這是用戶在 2024-12-30 14:55 為 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/pdf-pro/65e88f86-a9de-4dca-870a-8a48a15ef2db 保存的雙語快照頁面,由 沉浸式翻譯 提供雙語支持。了解如何保存?
Clottey, T. and Grawe, S. (2014), “Non-response bias assessment in logistics survey research: use fewer tests?”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 412-426, doi: 10.1108/jijpdlm-10-2012-0314.
Clottey, T. and Grawe, S. (2014), "Non-response bias assessment in logistics survey research: use fewer tests?", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp.

Das, K. and Lashkari, R.S. (2015), “Risk readiness and resiliency planning for a supply chain”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 6752-6771, doi: 10.1080/ 00207543.2015.1057624.
Das, K. and Lashkari, R.S. (2015), "Risk readiness and resiliency planning for a supply chain", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp.
Daugherty, P.J., Richey, R.G., Roath, A.S., Min, S., Chen, H., Arndt, A.D. and Genchev, S.E. (2006), “Is collaboration paying off for firms?”, Business Horizons, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 61-70, doi: 10.1016/j. bushor.2005.06.002.
Daugherty, P.J., Richey, R.G., Roath, A.S., Min, S., Chen, H., Arndt, A.D. and Genchev, S.E. (2006), "Is collaboration paying off for firms?", Business Horizons, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp.

Davis, D.F., Davis-Sramek, B., Golicic, S.L. and McCarthy-Byrne, T.M. (2019), “Constrained choice in supply chain relationships: the effects of regulatory institutions”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 1101-1123, doi: 10.1108/ijlm-01-2019-0030.
Davis, D.F., Davis-Sramek, B., Golicic, S.L. and McCarthy-Byrne, T.M. (2019), "Constrained choice in supply chain relationships: the effects of regulatory institutions", International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 1101-1123, doi: 10.1108/ijlm-01-2019-0030。

Desai, P.S., Koenigsberg, O. and Purohit, D. (2010), “Forward buying by retailers”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 90-102, doi: 10.1509/jmkr.47.1.90.
Desai, P.S., Koenigsberg, O. and Purohit, D. (2010),「零售商的前向購買」,《行銷研究期刊》,第 47 卷第 1 期,第 90-102 頁,doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.1.90。

Dohale, V., Verma, P., Gunasekaran, A. and Ambilkar, P. (2023), “COVID-19 and supply chain risk mitigation: a case study from India”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 417-442, doi: 10.1108/ijlm-04-2021-0197.
Dohale, V., Verma, P., Gunasekaran, A. and Ambilkar, P. (2023), "COVID-19 and supply chain risk mitigation: a case study from India", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp.

Donnelly, R. and Farina, M.P. (2021), “How do state policies shape experiences of household income shocks and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic?”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 269, 113557, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113557.
Donnelly, R. and Farina, M.P. (2021),「在 COVID-19 大流行期間,國家政策如何塑造家庭收入衝擊與心理健康的經驗? 」,《社會科學與醫學》,第 269 卷,113557,doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113557。

Dovbischuk, I. (2022), “Innovation-oriented dynamic capabilities of logistics service providers, dynamic resilience and firm performance during the COVID-19 pandemic”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 499-519, doi: 10.1108/ijlm-01-2021-0059.
Dovbischuk, I. (2022),《COVID-19 大流行期間物流服務供應商的創新導向動態能力、動態復原力和公司績效》,《國際物流管理期刊》,第 33 卷第 2 期,第 499-519 頁,doi: 10.1108/ijlm-01-2021-0059。

Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. (1998), “The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 660-679, doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.1255632.
Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. (1998), "The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage", The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp.

El Baz, J. and Ruel, S. (2021), “Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 233, 107972, doi: 10.1016/j.jipe.2020.107972.
El Baz, J. and Ruel, S. (2021), "Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains' resilience and robustness?COVID-19 爆發時代的實證調查證據」,《國際生產經濟學期刊》,第 233 卷,107972,doi:10.1016/j.jipe.2020.107972。

Fawcett, S.E., Magnan, G.M. and McCarter, M.W. (2008), “A three stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 93-112, doi: 10.1002/ j.2158-1592.2008.tb00070.x.
Fawcett, S.E., Magnan, G.M. and McCarter, M.W. (2008), "A three stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp.
Firouz, M., Keskin, B.B. and Melouk, S.H. (2017), “An integrated supplier selection and inventory problem with multi-sourcing and lateral transshipments”, Omega, Vol. 70, pp. 77-93, doi: 10. 1016/j.omega.2016.09.003.
Firouz, M., Keskin, B.B. and Melouk, S.H. (2017), "An integrated supplier selection and inventory problem with multi-sourcing and lateral transshipments", Omega, Vol. 70, pp.

Gakpo, M.D.Y. (2021), “Operational risk management systems implementation in Ghanaian banks: the critical success factors”, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, Vol. 55, pp. 59-70.
Gakpo,M.D.Y.(2021年),「加纳银行实施操作风险管理系统:关键成功因素」,《国际科学杂志》:基礎與應用研究》,第 55 卷,第 59-70 頁。

Gunessee, S. and Subramanian, N. (2020), “Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in supply chains lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 40 Nos 7/8, pp. 1201-1223, doi: 10.1108/ijopm-07-2019-0530.
Gunessee, S. and Subramanian, N. (2020),「Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in supply chains lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters」,International Journal of Operations and Production Management,Vol. 40 Nos 7/8,pp. 1201-1223,doi: 10.1108/ijopm-07-2019-0530。

Gupta, S., Nguyen, T., Raman, S., Lee, B., Lozano-Rojas, F., Bento, A., Simon, K. and Wing, C. (2021), “Tracking public and private responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: evidence from state and local government actions”, American Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 361-404, doi: 10.1086/716197.
Gupta,S.、Nguyen,T.、Raman,S.、Lee,B.、Lozano-Rojas,F.、Bento,A.、Simon,K. 和 Wing,C. (2021),「追蹤 COVID-19 流行病的公共和私人反應:來自州和地方政府行動的證據」,《美國健康經濟學期刊》,第 7 卷第 4 期,第 361-404 頁,doi:10.1086/716197。

Handfield, R.B., Graham, G. and Burns, L. (2020), “Corona virus, tariffs, trade wars and supply chain evolutionary design”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 40 No. 10, pp. 1649-1660, doi: 10.1108/ijopm-03-2020-0171.
Handfield, R.B., Graham, G. and Burns, L. (2020), "Corona virus, tariffs, trade wars and supply chain evolutionary design", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 40 No. 10, pp.
Hilletofth, P., Eriksson, D., Tate, W. and Kinkel, S. (2019), “Right-shoring: making resilient offshoring and reshoring decisions”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, 100540, doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100540.
Hilletofth, P., Eriksson, D., Tate, W. and Kinkel, S. (2019), "Right-shoring: Making resilient offshoring and reshoring decisions", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, 100540, doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100540.

Hinton, P.R., McMurray, I. and Brownlow, C. (2014), SPSS Explained, 2nd ed., Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, Milton Park, Oxfordshire.
Hohenstein, N.O. (2022), “Supply chain risk management in the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies and empirical lessons for improving global logistics service providers’ performance”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 1336-1365, doi: 10.1108/ijlm-02-2021-0109.
Hohenstein, N.O. (2022),「COVID-19大流行病中的供應鏈風險管理:提高全球物流服務供應商績效的策略和經驗教訓」,《國際物流管理雜誌》,第33卷第4期,第1336-1365頁,doi: 10.1108/ijlm-02-2021-0109。

Hossain, M.R., Akhter, F. and Sultana, M.M. (2022), “SMEs in COVID-19 crisis and combating strategies: a systematic literature review (SLR) and A case from emerging economy”, Operations Research Perspectives, Vol. 9, 100222, doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2022.100222.
Hossain, M.R., Akhter, F. and Sultana, M.M. (2022), "SMEs in COVID-19 crisis and combating strategies: a systematic literature review (SLR) and A case from emerging economy", Operations Research Perspectives, Vol. 9, 100222, doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2022.100222.

Ivanov, D. (2020), “Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: a simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 136, pp. 1-14, doi: 10. 1016/j.tre.2020.101922.
Ivanov, D. (2020), "Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: a simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case", Transportation Research Part E. Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 136, pp:136, pp. 1-14, doi: 10. 1016/j.tre.2020.101922.

Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A. (2021), “OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: managerial insights and research implications”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 232, 107921, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107921.
Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A. (2021),「在 COVID-19 大流行期間應對供應鏈漣漪效應的 OR 方法:管理洞察力與研究意義」,《國際生產經濟學期刊》,第 232 卷,107921,doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107921。

Jahani, H., Abbasi, B., Alavifard, F. and Talluri, S. (2018), “Supply chain network redesign with demand and price uncertainty”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 205, pp. 287-312, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.022.
Jahani, H., Abbasi, B., Alavifard, F. and Talluri, S. (2018),「具有需求和價格不確定性的供應鏈網路再設計」,《國際生產經濟學期刊》,第 205 卷,第 287-312 頁,doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.022。

Jones, J.M. (2022), “America’s 5 most average states”, Objective Lists, available at: https:// objectivelists.com/2022/12/26/the-most-average-states-in-the-usa/
Jones, J.M. (2022),「美國最平均的 5 個州」,Objective Lists,網址:https:// objectivelists.com/2022/12/26/the-most-average-state-in-the-USA/。

Khan, O., Huth, M., Zsidisin, G.A. and Henke, M. (2022), “Supply chain resilience: Re-conceptualizing supply chain risk management in a post-pandemic world”, in Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, Springer, New York, NY, Vol. 21.
Khan, O., Huth, M., Zsidisin, G.A. and Henke, M. (2022),"Supply chain resilience:Re-conceptualizing supply chain risk management in a post-pandemic world", in Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, Springer, New York, NY, Vol. 21.

Khan, S.A.R., Piprani, A.Z. and Yu, Z. (2023), “Supply chain analytics and post-pandemic performance: mediating role of triple-A supply chain strategies”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 1330-1354, doi: 10.1108/ijoem-11-2021-1744.
Khan, S.A.R., Piprani, A.Z. and Yu, Z. (2023),「Supply chain analytics and post-pandemic performance: mediating role of triple-A supply chain strategies」,International Journal of Emerging Markets,Vol. 18 No. 6,pp. 1330-1354,doi: 10.1108/ijoem-11-2021-1744。

Krajewski, P. (2021), Public Support Incurred in Connection with the Pandemic - Comparison of Poland with the Largest EU Economies, Office of Analysis, Documentation and Correspondence, Chancellery of the Senate, Warsaw.
Krajewski, P. (2021),《與大流行病有關的公共支援 - 波蘭與歐盟最大經濟體的比較》,分析、文件和通信辦公室,參議院辦公室,華沙。

Kumar, M.S., Raut, R.D., Narwane, V.S. and Narkhede, B.E. (2020), “Applications of industry 4.0 to overcome the COVID-19 operational challenges”, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 1283-1289, doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.010.
Kumar, M.S., Raut, R.D., Narwane, V.S. and Narkhede, B.E. (2020),「應用工業 4.0 克服 COVID-19 的營運挑戰」,《糖尿病與代謝綜合症》:14 No. 5, pp. 1283-1289, doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.010.

Kumar, P., Singh, R.K. and Shahgholian, A. (2022), “Learnings from COVID-19 for managing humanitarian supply chains: systematic literature review and future research directions”, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 319 No. 1, pp. 1-37, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04753-w.
Kumar, P., Singh, R.K. and Shahgholian, A. (2022), "Learnings from COVID-19 for managing humanitarian supply chains: systematic literature review and future research directions", Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 319 No. 1, pp.

Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997), “Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect”, Management Science, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 546-558.
Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997), "Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect", Management Science, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp.

Leite, H., Lindsay, C. and Kumar, M. (2020), “COVID-19 outbreak: implications on healthcare operations”, The TQM Journal, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 247-256, doi: 10.1108/tqm-05-2020-0111.
Leite, H., Lindsay, C. and Kumar, M. (2020),「COVID-19 爆發:對醫療保健營運的影響」,《品質管理期刊》,第 33 卷第 1 期,第 247-256 頁,doi: 10.1108/tqm-05-2020-0111。

Lorié, J. and Ciobica, I. (2021), “COVID-19 government support reinforces zombification”, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 345-354.
Lorié, J. and Ciobica, I. (2021),「COVID-19 政府支援強化殭屍化」,《金融機構風險管理期刊》,第 14 卷第 4 期,第 345-354 頁。

Min, S., Roath, A.S., Daugherty, P.J., Genchev, S.E., Chen, H., Arndt, A.D. and Richey, G.R. (2005), “Supply chain collaboration: what’s happening?”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 237-256, doi: 10.1108/09574090510634539.
Min, S., Roath, A.S., Daugherty, P.J., Genchev, S.E., Chen, H., Arndt, A.D. and Richey, G.R. (2005), "Supply chain collaboration: what's happening?", International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp.

Moharana, H.S., Murty, J.S., Senapati, S.K. and Khuntia, K. (2012), “Coordination, collaboration and integration for supply chain management”, International Journal of Interscience Management Review, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 46-50.
Moharana, H.S., Murty, J.S., Senapati, S.K. and Khuntia, K. (2012), "Coordination, collaboration and integration for supply chain management", International Journal of Interscience Management Review, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp.
Moktadir, M.A., Paul, S.K., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Ali, S.M. and Sultana, R. (2023), “Strategic drivers to overcome the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for ensuring resilience in supply chains”, Operations Management Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 466-488, doi: 10.1007/s12063-022-00301-8.
Moktadir,M.A.、Paul,S.K.、Kumar,A.、Luthra,S.、Ali,S.M. 和 Sultana,R. (2023),「克服 COVID-19 大流行影響的戰略驅動力:對確保供應鏈復原能力的影響」,《運營管理研究》,第 16 卷第 1 期,第 466-488 頁,doi:10.1007/s12063-022-00301-8。

Naz, F., Kumar, A., Majumdar, A. and Agrawal, R. (2022), “Is artificial intelligence an enabler of supply chain resiliency post-COVID-19? An exploratory state-of-the-art review for future research”, Operations Management Research, Vol. 15 Nos 1-2, pp. 378-398, doi: 10.1007/s12063-021-00208-w.
Naz, F., Kumar, A., Majumdar, A. and Agrawal, R. (2022), "Is artificial intelligence an enabler of supply chain resiliency post-COVID-19?15 Nos 1-2, pp. 378-398, doi: 10.1007/s12063-021-00208-w。

Norrman, A. and Jansson, U. (2004), “Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 434-456, doi: 10.1108/09600030410545463.
Norrman, A. and Jansson, U. (2004), "Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp.

Ozdemir, D., Sharma, M., Dhir, A. and Daim, T. (2022), “Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Technology in Society, Vol. 68, 101847, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101847.
Ozdemir, D., Sharma, M., Dhir, A. and Daim, T. (2022),「COVID-19 大流行期間的供應鏈復原能力」,《社會科技》,第 68 卷,101847,doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101847。

Paul, S.K., Chowdhury, P., Moktadir, M.A. and Lau, K.H. (2021), “Supply chain recovery challenges in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 136, pp. 316-329, doi: 10. 1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.056.
Paul, S.K., Chowdhury, P., Moktadir, M.A. and Lau, K.H. (2021),「COVID-19大流行之後的供應鏈恢復挑戰」,《商業研究期刊》,第136卷,第316-329頁,doi: 10. 1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.056。

Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B. and Ragatz, G.L. (2005), “Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 23 Nos 3-4, pp. 371-388, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009.
Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B. and Ragatz, G.L. (2005), "Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design", Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 23 Nos 3-4, pp.

Pettit, TJ.J, Fiksel, J. and Croxton, K.L. (2010), “Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 1-21, doi: 10.1002/j. 2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x.
Pettit, TJ.J, Fiksel, J. and Croxton, K.L. (2010), "Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x.

Pettit, TJ., Croxton, K.L. and Fiksel, J. (2019), “The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 56-65, doi: 10.1111/jbl.12202.
Pettit, TJ., Croxton, K.L. and Fiksel, J. (2019), "The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 56-65, doi: 10.1111/jbl.12202。

Power, D.J., Heavin, C., McDermott, J. and Daly, M. (2018), “Defining business analytics: an empirical approach”,Journal of Business Analytics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 40-53, doi: 10.1080/2573234x.2018.1507605.
Power, D.J., Heavin, C., McDermott, J. and Daly, M. (2018), "Defining Business Analytics: an empirical approach",Journal of Business Analytics, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp.

Raj, A., Mukherjee, A.A., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L. and Srivastava, S.K. (2022), “Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 142, pp. 1125-1139, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.037.
Raj, A., Mukherjee, A.A., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L. and Srivastava, S.K. (2022), "Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 142, pp. 1125-1139, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.037.

Richards, TJ. and Rickard, B. (2020), “COVID-19 impact on fruit and vegetable markets”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 189-194, doi: 10.1111/cjag.12231.
Richards, TJ. and Rickard, B. (2020),「COVID-19 對蔬果市場的影響」,《加拿大農業經濟學期刊》/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie,第 68 卷第 2 期,第 189-194 頁,doi: 10.1111/cjag.12231。

Ruel, S. and El Baz, J. (2023), “Disaster readiness’ influence on the impact of supply chain resilience and robustness on firms’ financial performance: a COVID-19 empirical investigation”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 61 No. 8, pp. 2594-2612, doi: 10.1080/ 00207543.2021.1962559.
Ruel, S. and El Baz, J. (2023), "Disaster readiness' influence on the impact of supply chain resilience and robustness on firms' financial performance: a COVID-19 empirical investigation", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 61 No. 8, pp. 2594-2612, doi: 10.1080/ 00207543.2021.1962559.
Salama, M.R. and McGarvey, R.G. (2023), “Resilient supply chain to a global pandemic”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 61 No. 8, pp. 2563-2593.
Salama, M.R. and McGarvey, R.G. (2023), "Resilient supply chain to a global pandemic", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 61 No. 8, pp.

Saleheen, F. and Habib, M.M. (2023), “Supply chain resilience during disruption: a study on supply chain performance measurement”, International Supply Chain Technology Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 1-14, doi: 10.20545/isctj.v09.i02.02.
Saleheen, F. and Habib, M.M. (2023),「中斷期間的供應鏈恢復力:關於供應鏈績效測量的研究」,《國際供應鏈技術期刊》,第 9 卷第 2 期,第 1-14 頁,doi: 10.20545/isctj.v09.i02.02。

Schoenherr, T., Ellram, L.M. and Tate, W.L. (2015), “A note on the use of survey research firms to enable empirical data collection”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 288-300, doi: 10. 1111/jbl.12092.
Schoenherr, T., Ellram, L.M. and Tate, W.L. (2015), "A note on the use of survey research firms to enable empirical data collection", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp.

Seuring, S., Brandenburg, M., Sauer, P.C., Schünemann, D.S., Warasthe, R., Aman, S., Qian, C., Petljak, K., Neutzling, D.M., Land, A. and Khalid, R.U. (2022), “Comparing regions globally: impacts of COVID-19 on supply chains-a Delphi study”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 42 No. 8, pp. 1077-1108, doi: 10.1108/ijopm-10-2021-0675.
Seuring,S.,Brandenburg,M.,Sauer,P.C.,Schünemann,D.S.,Warasthe,R.,Aman,S.,Qian,C.,Petljak,K.,Neutzling,D.M、Land, A. and Khalid, R.U. (2022),「全球區域比較:COVID-19 對供應鏈的影響 - Delphi 研究」,《國際作業與生產管理雜誌》,第 42 卷第 8 期,第 1077-1108 頁,doi: 10.1108/ijopm-10-2021-0675。

Sharma, R., Shishodia, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A. and Belhadi, A. (2020a), “Agriculture supply chain risks and COVID-19: mitigation strategies and implications for the practitioners”,
Sharma, R.、Shishodia, A.、Kamble, S.、Gunasekaran, A.和Belhadi, A.(2020a),「农业供应链风险和COVID-19:缓解战略和对从业人员的影响」、

Supply chain strategies  供應鏈策略

24

International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 20, pp. 1-27, doi: 10.1080/ 13675567.2020.1830049.
International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications,Vol. 20,pp. 1-27,doi: 10.1080/ 13675567.2020.1830049。
Sharma, A., Adhikary, A. and Borah, S.B. (2020b), “Covid-19’ s impact on supply chain decisions: strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 117, pp. 443-449, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.035.
Sharma, A., Adhikary, A. and Borah, S.B. (2020b),「Covid-19 對供應鏈決策的影響:使用 Twitter 資料的納斯達克 100 家公司的策略洞察」,《商業研究期刊》,第 117 期,第 443-449 頁,doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.035。

Shen, Z.M. and Sun, Y. (2023), “Strengthening supply chain resilience during COVID-19: a case study of JD.com”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 359-383, doi: 10.1002/joom.1161.
Shen, Z.M. and Sun, Y. (2023), "Strengthening supply chain resilience during COVID-19: a case study of JD.com", Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp.

Shi, D. (2004), “A review of enterprise supply chain risk management”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 219-244, doi: 10.1007/s11518-006-0162-2.
Shi, D. (2004),「企業供應鏈風險管理回顧」,《系統科學與系統工程期刊》,第 13 卷第 2 期,第 219-244 頁,doi:10.1007/s11518-006-0162-2。

Simchi-Levi, D., Simchi-Levi, E. and Watson, M. (2004), “Tactical planning for reinventing the supply chain”, The Practice of Supply Chain Management: Where Theory and Application Converge. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, Boston, MA, Vol. 62.
Simchi-Levi, D., Simchi-Levi, E. and Watson, M. (2004), "Tactical planning for reinventing the supply chain", The Practice of Supply Chain Management:理論與應用的結合。International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, Boston, MA, Vol. 62.

Spieske, A. and Birkel, H. (2021), “Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: a systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 158, 107452, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452.
Spieske, A. and Birkel, H. (2021),「透過工業 4.0 改善供應鏈彈性:COVID-19 大流行印象下的系統文獻回顧」,《計算機與工業工程》,第 158 卷,107452,doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452。

Sreedevi, R. and Saranga, H. (2017), “Uncertainty and supply chain risk: the moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 193, pp. 332-342, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.024.
Sreedevi, R. and Saranga, H. (2017), "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: the moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 193, pp. 332-342, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.024.

Srinivasan, M.M., Stank, T.P., Dornier, P.P. and Petersen, K.J. (2014), Global Supply Chains: Evaluating Regions on an EPIC Framework - Economy, Politics, Infrastructure, and Competence, McGrawHill Education, New York.
Srinivasan, M.M., Stank, T.P., Dornier, P.P. and Petersen, K.J. (2014), Global Supply Chains:Evaluating Regions on an EPIC Framework - Economy, Politics, Infrastructure, and Competence, McGrawHill Education, New York。

Stevens, G.C. (1989), “Integrating the supply chain”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp. 3-8, doi: 10.1108/eum0000000000329.
Stevens, G.C. (1989), "Integrating the supply chain", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp.

Stevens, J. (1992), Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Su, X. and Zhang, F. (2008), “Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance”, Management Science, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 1759-1773, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0886.
Su, X. and Zhang, F. (2008),「戰略客戶行為、承諾與供應鏈績效」,《管理科學》,第 54 卷第 10 期,第 1759-1773 頁,doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0886。

Taleb, N.N. and Blyth, M. (2011), “The black swan of Cairo: how suppressing volatility makes the world less predictable and more dangerous”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90 No. 3, pp. 33-39.
Taleb, N.N. and Blyth, M. (2011), "The black swan of Cairo: how suppressing volatility makes the world less predictable and more dangerous", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90 No.

Togar, M.S. and Sridharan, R. (2002), “The collaborative supply chain”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 15-30, doi: 10.1108/09574090210806333.
Togar, M.S. and Sridharan, R. (2002), "The collaborative supply chain", International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp.

Tukamuhabwa, B.R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J. and Zorzini, M. (2015), “Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53 No. 18, pp. 5592-5623, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934.
Tukamuhabwa, B.R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J. and Zorzini, M. (2015), "Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53 No. 18, pp. 5592-5623, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934.

van Hoek, R. (2020), “Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain - closing the gap between research findings and industry practice”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 341-355, doi: 10.1108/ijopm-03-2020-0165.
van Hoek, R. (2020), "Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain - closing the gap between research findings and industry practice", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp.

van Hoek, R. (2021), “Larger, counter-intuitive and lasting-The PSM role in responding to the COVID19 pandemic, exploring opportunities for theoretical and actionable advances”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, 100688, doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100688.
van Hoek, R. (2021), "Larger, counter-intuitive and lasting-The PSM role in responding to the COVID19 pandemic, exploring opportunities for theoretical and actionable advances", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, 100688, doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100688.

van Hoek, R. and Dobrzykowski, D. (2021), “Towards more balanced sourcing strategies-are supply chain risks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic driving reshoring considerations?”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 689-701, doi: 10.1108/scm-09-2020-0498.
van Hoek, R. and Dobrzykowski, D. (2021), "Towards more balanced sourcing strategies-are supply chain risks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic driving reshoring considerations?", Supply Chain Management:26 No. 6, pp. 689-701, doi: 10.1108/scm-09-2020-0498.

Villena, V.H., Choi, T.Y. and Revilla, E. (2021), “Mitigating mechanisms for the dark side of collaborative buyer-supplier relationships: a mixed-method Study”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 86-116, doi: 10.1111/jscm.12239.
Villena, V.H., Choi, T.Y. and Revilla, E. (2021), "Mitigating mechanisms for the dark side of collaborative buyer-supplier relationships: a mixed-method Study", Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp.

Wagner, S.M. and Kemmerling, R. (2010), “Handling nonresponse in logistics research”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 357-381, doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00156.x.
Wagner, S.M. and Kemmerling, R. (2010),「物流研究中的非回應處理」,《商業物流期刊》,第 31 卷第 2 期,第 357-381 頁,doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00156.x。
Wagner, S.M., Bode, C. and Koziol, P. (2009), “Supplier default dependencies: empirical evidence from the automotive industry”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 199 No. 1, pp. 150-161, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.012.
Wagner, S.M., Bode, C. and Koziol, P. (2009), "Supplier default dependencies: empirical evidence from the automotive industry", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 199 No. 1, pp. 150-161, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.012.

Watson, G.F. IV, Worm, S., Palmatier, R.W. and Ganesan, S. (2015), “The evolution of marketing channels: trends and research directions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 4, pp. 546-568, doi: 10. 1016/j.jretai.2015.04.002.
Watson, G.F. IV, Worm, S., Palmatier, R.W. and Ganesan, S. (2015), "The evolution of marketing channels: trends and research directions", Journal of Retailing, Vol. 91 No. 4, pp.

Weinberg, T. (2021), “After relying on local officials to combat COVID, Parson signs limit on health orders”, Missouri Independent, available at: https://missouriindependent.com/2021/06/15/after-relying-on-local-officials-to-combat-COVID-parson-signs-limit-on-health-orders/
Weinberg, T. (2021),「在依賴當地官員對抗 COVID 之後,Parson 簽署限制衛生令」,密蘇里獨立報,網址:https://missouriindependent.com/2021/06/15/after-relying-on-local-officials-to-combat-COVID-parson-signs-limit-on-health-orders/

Yan, T. and Dooley, K. (2014), “Buyer-supplier collaboration quality in new product development projects”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 59-83, doi: 10.1111/jscm.12032.
Yan, T. and Dooley, K. (2014), "Buyer-supplier collaboration quality in new product development projects", Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp.

Yang, S.A., Birge, J.R. and Parker, R.P. (2015), “The supply chain effects of bankruptcy”, Management Science, Vol. 61 No. 10, pp. 2320-2338, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2079.
Yang, S.A., Birge, J.R. and Parker, R.P. (2015),「破產的供應鏈影響」,《管理科學》,第 61 卷第 10 期,第 2320-2338 頁,doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2079。

Yao, Y. and Fabbe-Costes, N. (2018), “Can you measure resilience if you are unable to define it? The analysis of Supply Network Resilience (SNRES)”, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 255-265, doi: 10.1080/16258312.2018.1540248.
Yao, Y. and Fabbe-Costes, N. (2018),"如果無法定義恢復力,你能衡量它嗎?供應網路復原力 (SNRES) 分析」,《供應鏈論壇》:An International Journal》,第 19 卷第 4 期,第 255-265 頁,doi: 10.1080/16258312.2018.1540248。

Yoon, J., Talluri, S., Yildiz, H. and Ho, W. (2018), “Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: a holistic approach”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56 No. 10, pp. 3636-3661, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1403056.
Yoon, J., Talluri, S., Yildiz, H. and Ho, W. (2018), "Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: a holistic approach", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56 No. 10, pp.

Zhao, G., Vazquez-Noguerol, M., Liu, S. and Prado-Prado, J.C. (2023), “Agri-food supply chain resilience strategies for preparing, responding, recovering, and adapting in relation to unexpected crisis: a cross-country comparative analysis from the COVID-19 pandemic”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 45 No. 1, doi: 10.1111/jbl.12361.
Zhao, G., Vazquez-Noguerol, M., Liu, S. and Prado-Prado, J.C. (2023), "Agri-food supply chain resilience strategies for preparing, responding, recovering, and adapting in relation to unexpected crisis: a cross-country comparative analysis from the COVID-19 pandemic", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 45 No. 1, doi: 10.1111/jbl.12361.

Zhu, Q., Qu, Y., Geng, Y. and Fujita, T. (2017), “A comparison of regulatory awareness and green supply chain management practices among Chinese and Japanese manufacturers”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 18-30, doi: 10.1002/bse.1888.
Zhu, Q., Qu, Y., Geng, Y. and Fujita, T. (2017), "A comparison of regulatory awareness and green supply chain management practices among Chinese and Japanese manufacturers", Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp.

Zsidisin, G.A. and Hendrick, T.E. (1998), “Purchasing’s involvement in environmental issues: a multi-country perspective”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 98 No. 7, pp. 313-320, doi: 10.1108/02635579810241773.
Zsidisin, G.A. and Hendrick, T.E. (1998), "Purchasing's involvement in environmental issues: a multi-country perspective", Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 98 No. 7, pp.

Zsidisin, G.A., Wagner, S.M., Melnyk, S.A., Ragatz, G.L. and Burns, L.A. (2008), “Supply risk perceptions and practices: an exploratory comparison of German and U.S. Supply management professionals”, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 401-419, doi: 10.1504/ijtpm.2008.020166.
Zsidisin, G.A., Wagner, S.M., Melnyk, S.A., Ragatz, G.L. and Burns, L.A. (2008), "Supply risk perceptions and practices: an exploratory comparison of German and U.S. Supply management professionals", International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp.

Further reading  進一步閱讀

Myers, J.L. and Well, A.D. (2003), Research Design and Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S. and Kumar, A. (2022), “Developing a framework for enhancing survivability of sustainable supply chains during and post-COVID-19 pandemic”, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 25 Nos 4-5, pp. 433-453, doi: 10.1080/ 13675567.2020.1810213.
Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S. and Kumar, A. (2022), "Developing a framework for enhancing survivability of sustainable supply chains during and post-COVID-19 pandemic", International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 25 Nos 4-5, pp.
Wieland, A. and Wallenburg, C.M. (2013), “The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 300-320, doi: 10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2012-0243.
Wieland, A. and Wallenburg, C.M. (2013), "The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp.
Table A1.  表 A1.
Description of supply chain strategies
供應鏈策略說明

Appendix 1  附錄 1

Strategy  策略 Definition  定義 References  參考資料
Increase the supplier base
增加供應商基礎
The number of suppliers from which a firm purchases is increased
公司採購的供應商數量增加
Yoon et al. (2018), Ali et al. (2023), Salama and McGarvey (2023)
Yoon 等人(2018 年)、Ali 等人(2023 年)、Salama 和 McGarvey(2023 年)
Nearshore or regionalize the SC
近岸或區域化 SC
The firm uses closer locations or domestic suppliers to undertake SC activities, which may include local sourcing and distribution with manufacturing sites and supply networks located near the customer
公司利用較近的地點或國內供應商進行 SC 活動,其中可能包括利用位於客戶附近的製造場所和供應網路進行當地採購和配送。
Chopra and Sodhi (2014), Hilletofth et al. (2019), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021)
Chopra 和 Sodhi (2014)、Hilletofth 等人 (2019)、van Hoek 和 Dobrzykowski (2021)
Reduce the number of products/services offered
減少提供的產品/服務數量
The number of SKUs or products/ services competing in the same market is reduced
減少在同一市場競爭的 SKU 或產品/服務數量
Simchi-Levi et al. (2004)
Simchi-Levi 等人(2004 年)
Increase the number of products/services offered
增加所提供產品/服務的數量
New products/service offerings are introduced
推出新產品/服務
Sreedevi and Saranga (2017)
Sreedevi 和 Saranga (2017)
Increase collaboration within the firm
加強公司內部合作
Members of the firm work together across boundaries and increase the extent of information shared, benefits shared and joint decisions made to meet customer needs better
公司成員跨領域合作,增加資訊分享、利益共享和共同決策的程度,以更好地滿足客戶需求
Min et al. (2005), Fawcett et al. (2008), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023)
Min 等人 (2005), Fawcett 等人 (2008), Ozdemir 等人 (2022), Shen 和 Sun (2023)
Increase collaboration with key suppliers
加強與主要供應商的合作
The buyer and supplier work together and increase the extent of information shared, resources shared, and joint decisions made to meet customer needs better
買方和供應商共同努力,提高資訊共享、資源共享和共同決策的程度,以更好地滿足客戶需求
Yan and Dooley (2014), Sharma et al. (2020a, b), van Hoek (2020), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023)
Yan 和 Dooley (2014)、Sharma 等人 (2020a、b)、van Hoek (2020)、Ozdemir 等人 (2022)、Shen 和 Sun (2023)
Increase collaboration with key customers
加強與主要客戶的合作
The extent of information shared, joint decisions made, and synchronization of operations with key customers is increased
增加與主要客戶分享資訊、共同決策及同步運作的程度
Bowman (2004), Daugherty et al. (2006), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023)
Bowman (2004)、Daugherty 等人 (2006)、Ozdemir 等人 (2022)、Shen 和 Sun (2023)
Develop new commercial channels
開發新的商業通路
The configuration of the intermediate organizations that make goods and services available to consumers is modified
向消費者提供商品和服務的中間組織的配置有所改變
Watson et al. (2015), Salama and McGarvey (2023)
Watson 等人(2015 年)、Salama 和 McGarvey(2023 年)
Develop alternative markets for products
開發產品的替代市場
New markets, based on product availability, service level, lead time and sales support, are served
根據產品可用性、服務水準、交貨時間及銷售支援,服務新市場
Stevens (1989), Watson et al. (2015), Salama and McGarvey (2023)
Stevens (1989)、Watson 等人 (2015)、Salama 和 McGarvey (2023)
Modify contractual terms with suppliers
修改與供應商的合約條款
Terms of trade with suppliers are modified to incentivize actions to achieve optimal SC performance
修改與供應商的貿易條款,以獎勵達到最佳 SC 績效的行動
Cachon (2003), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021)
Cachon (2003)、van Hoek 和 Dobrzykowski (2021)
Modify contractual terms with customers
修改與客戶的合約條款
Terms of trade with the customer, such as price-commitments and quantitycommitments, are modified
修改與客戶的交易條款,例如價格承諾和數量承諾
Su and Zhang (2008), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021)
Su 和 Zhang (2008)、van Hoek 和 Dobrzykowski (2021)
Redesign the warehousing and transportation network
重新設計倉儲與運輸網路
Existing and alternative facilities and infrastructure are evaluated and redesigned to best satisfy customer demand
評估現有及替代設施與基礎結構,並重新設計,以最佳方式滿足客戶需求
Jahani et al. (2018)
Jahani 等人(2018 年)
Strategy Definition References Increase the supplier base The number of suppliers from which a firm purchases is increased Yoon et al. (2018), Ali et al. (2023), Salama and McGarvey (2023) Nearshore or regionalize the SC The firm uses closer locations or domestic suppliers to undertake SC activities, which may include local sourcing and distribution with manufacturing sites and supply networks located near the customer Chopra and Sodhi (2014), Hilletofth et al. (2019), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021) Reduce the number of products/services offered The number of SKUs or products/ services competing in the same market is reduced Simchi-Levi et al. (2004) Increase the number of products/services offered New products/service offerings are introduced Sreedevi and Saranga (2017) Increase collaboration within the firm Members of the firm work together across boundaries and increase the extent of information shared, benefits shared and joint decisions made to meet customer needs better Min et al. (2005), Fawcett et al. (2008), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023) Increase collaboration with key suppliers The buyer and supplier work together and increase the extent of information shared, resources shared, and joint decisions made to meet customer needs better Yan and Dooley (2014), Sharma et al. (2020a, b), van Hoek (2020), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023) Increase collaboration with key customers The extent of information shared, joint decisions made, and synchronization of operations with key customers is increased Bowman (2004), Daugherty et al. (2006), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023) Develop new commercial channels The configuration of the intermediate organizations that make goods and services available to consumers is modified Watson et al. (2015), Salama and McGarvey (2023) Develop alternative markets for products New markets, based on product availability, service level, lead time and sales support, are served Stevens (1989), Watson et al. (2015), Salama and McGarvey (2023) Modify contractual terms with suppliers Terms of trade with suppliers are modified to incentivize actions to achieve optimal SC performance Cachon (2003), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021) Modify contractual terms with customers Terms of trade with the customer, such as price-commitments and quantitycommitments, are modified Su and Zhang (2008), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021) Redesign the warehousing and transportation network Existing and alternative facilities and infrastructure are evaluated and redesigned to best satisfy customer demand Jahani et al. (2018)| Strategy | Definition | References | | :---: | :---: | :---: | | Increase the supplier base | The number of suppliers from which a firm purchases is increased | Yoon et al. (2018), Ali et al. (2023), Salama and McGarvey (2023) | | Nearshore or regionalize the SC | The firm uses closer locations or domestic suppliers to undertake SC activities, which may include local sourcing and distribution with manufacturing sites and supply networks located near the customer | Chopra and Sodhi (2014), Hilletofth et al. (2019), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021) | | Reduce the number of products/services offered | The number of SKUs or products/ services competing in the same market is reduced | Simchi-Levi et al. (2004) | | Increase the number of products/services offered | New products/service offerings are introduced | Sreedevi and Saranga (2017) | | Increase collaboration within the firm | Members of the firm work together across boundaries and increase the extent of information shared, benefits shared and joint decisions made to meet customer needs better | Min et al. (2005), Fawcett et al. (2008), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023) | | Increase collaboration with key suppliers | The buyer and supplier work together and increase the extent of information shared, resources shared, and joint decisions made to meet customer needs better | Yan and Dooley (2014), Sharma et al. (2020a, b), van Hoek (2020), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023) | | Increase collaboration with key customers | The extent of information shared, joint decisions made, and synchronization of operations with key customers is increased | Bowman (2004), Daugherty et al. (2006), Ozdemir et al. (2022), Shen and Sun (2023) | | Develop new commercial channels | The configuration of the intermediate organizations that make goods and services available to consumers is modified | Watson et al. (2015), Salama and McGarvey (2023) | | Develop alternative markets for products | New markets, based on product availability, service level, lead time and sales support, are served | Stevens (1989), Watson et al. (2015), Salama and McGarvey (2023) | | Modify contractual terms with suppliers | Terms of trade with suppliers are modified to incentivize actions to achieve optimal SC performance | Cachon (2003), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021) | | Modify contractual terms with customers | Terms of trade with the customer, such as price-commitments and quantitycommitments, are modified | Su and Zhang (2008), van Hoek and Dobrzykowski (2021) | | Redesign the warehousing and transportation network | Existing and alternative facilities and infrastructure are evaluated and redesigned to best satisfy customer demand | Jahani et al. (2018) |
Strategy  策略 Definition  定義 References  參考資料

提高業務分析的利用率
Increase the utilization of
business analytics
Increase the utilization of business analytics| Increase the utilization of | | :--- | | business analytics |

使用定性、定量和統計計算工具和方法來分析資料、獲得洞察力、提供資訊和支援決策是
The use of qualitative, quantitative and
statistical computational tools and
methods to analyse data, gain insights,
inform and support decision-making is
The use of qualitative, quantitative and statistical computational tools and methods to analyse data, gain insights, inform and support decision-making is| The use of qualitative, quantitative and | | :--- | | statistical computational tools and | | methods to analyse data, gain insights, | | inform and support decision-making is |
Power et al. (2018), Bag et al. (2023)
Power 等人(2018 年)、Bag 等人(2023 年)
increased  增加
Strategy Definition References "Increase the utilization of business analytics" "The use of qualitative, quantitative and statistical computational tools and methods to analyse data, gain insights, inform and support decision-making is" Power et al. (2018), Bag et al. (2023) increased | Strategy | Definition | References | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Increase the utilization of <br> business analytics | The use of qualitative, quantitative and <br> statistical computational tools and <br> methods to analyse data, gain insights, <br> inform and support decision-making is | Power et al. (2018), Bag et al. (2023) | | increased | | |

Supply chain  供應鏈

strategies  策略
Source(s): Authors’ own work
資料來源:作者自己的工作

Appendix 2  附錄 2

Country  國家

美國 北美洲中西部
USA
Midwest of North
America
USA Midwest of North America| USA | | :---: | | Midwest of North | | America |
  法國 西歐
France
Western
Europe
France Western Europe| France | | :---: | | Western | | Europe |

波蘭 中歐和東歐
Poland
Central and Eastern
Europe
Poland Central and Eastern Europe| Poland | | :---: | | Central and Eastern | | Europe |
EPIC Economy  經濟 3.03 3.10 3.00
dimensions  尺寸 Politics  政治 3.10 2.55 2.70
Infrastructure  基礎建設 3.78 3.50 2.85
Competence  能力 3.67 3.02 2.87
Overall grade  總成績 3.39 3.09 2.87
Country "USA Midwest of North America" "France Western Europe" "Poland Central and Eastern Europe" EPIC Economy 3.03 3.10 3.00 dimensions Politics 3.10 2.55 2.70 Infrastructure 3.78 3.50 2.85 Competence 3.67 3.02 2.87 Overall grade 3.39 3.09 2.87| Country | | USA <br> Midwest of North <br> America | France <br> Western <br> Europe | Poland <br> Central and Eastern <br> Europe | | :--- | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | | EPIC | Economy | 3.03 | 3.10 | 3.00 | | dimensions | Politics | 3.10 | 2.55 | 2.70 | | | Infrastructure | 3.78 | 3.50 | 2.85 | | | Competence | 3.67 | 3.02 | 2.87 | | | Overall grade | 3.39 | 3.09 | 2.87 |
Note(s): The assessments utilizing the EPIC framework range from 1 (lowest score) to 4 (highest score) Source(s): Own elaboration based on Amling et al. (2020)
註釋:利用 EPIC 框架進行的評估範圍從 1(最低分)到 4(最高分):根據 Amling 等人 (2020) 自行闡述
Table A2.  表 A2.
Comparison of USA (St. Louis), France and Poland based on EPIC approach
根據 EPIC 方法比較美國(聖路易)、法國和波蘭的情況
28 USA France  法國 Poland  波蘭
Industry  產業
Information technology  資訊技術 2.0% 0.0% 4.6%
Health care and social assistance
健康照護與社會援助
3.9% 6.1% 0.0%
Manufacturing  製造業 27.5% 51.2% 0.0%
Mining, and oil and gas extraction
採礦及油氣開採
2.0% 2.4% 0.0%
Professional, and technical services
專業及技術服務
2.0% 0.0% 4.6%
Public administration  公共行政 2.0% 1.2% 0.0%
Retail trade  零售業 5.9% 8.5% 31.8%
Transportation and warehousing
運輸與倉儲
33.3% 3.7% 13.6%
Utilities  公用事業 2.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Wholesale trade  批發貿易 7.8% 7.3% 9.1%
Construction  建築 0.0% 3.7% 9.1%
Finance and insurance  金融與保險 0.0% 0.0% 4.6%
Real estate, rental and leasing
不動產、租賃
0.0% 0.0% 4.6%
Art, entertainment and recreation
藝術、娛樂與休閒
0.0% 0.0% 4.6%
Other  其他 11.8% 15.9% 13.6%
Small-medium enterprise  中小型企業
Yes   34.8% 23.8% 54.5%
No  沒有 65.2% 76.3% 45.5%
Position  職位
Entry-level management  入門級管理 13.7% 7.3% 40.9%
Middle management  中層管理人員 25.5% 19.5% 13.6%
Senior management  高級管理層 60.8% 73.2% 45.5%
Years of experience  多年經驗
0-5 13.7% 8.5% 50.0%
Table A3.  表 A3. 6-10 19.6% 12.2% 18.2%
Sample characteristics  樣品特性 11 20 11 20 11-2011-20 27.5% 36.6% 22.7%
in the USA (St. Louis),
在美國(聖路易)、
21 or more  21 或以上 39.2% 42.7% 9.1%
France and Poland  法國和波蘭 Source(s): Authors' own work
資料來源:作者自己的工作
28 USA France Poland Industry Information technology 2.0% 0.0% 4.6% Health care and social assistance 3.9% 6.1% 0.0% Manufacturing 27.5% 51.2% 0.0% Mining, and oil and gas extraction 2.0% 2.4% 0.0% Professional, and technical services 2.0% 0.0% 4.6% Public administration 2.0% 1.2% 0.0% Retail trade 5.9% 8.5% 31.8% Transportation and warehousing 33.3% 3.7% 13.6% Utilities 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% Wholesale trade 7.8% 7.3% 9.1% Construction 0.0% 3.7% 9.1% Finance and insurance 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% Real estate, rental and leasing 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% Art, entertainment and recreation 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% Other 11.8% 15.9% 13.6% Small-medium enterprise Yes 34.8% 23.8% 54.5% No 65.2% 76.3% 45.5% Position Entry-level management 13.7% 7.3% 40.9% Middle management 25.5% 19.5% 13.6% Senior management 60.8% 73.2% 45.5% Years of experience 0-5 13.7% 8.5% 50.0% Table A3. 6-10 19.6% 12.2% 18.2% Sample characteristics 11-20 27.5% 36.6% 22.7% in the USA (St. Louis), 21 or more 39.2% 42.7% 9.1% France and Poland Source(s): Authors' own work | 28 | | USA | France | Poland | | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | | | Industry | | | | | | Information technology | 2.0% | 0.0% | 4.6% | | | Health care and social assistance | 3.9% | 6.1% | 0.0% | | | Manufacturing | 27.5% | 51.2% | 0.0% | | | Mining, and oil and gas extraction | 2.0% | 2.4% | 0.0% | | | Professional, and technical services | 2.0% | 0.0% | 4.6% | | | Public administration | 2.0% | 1.2% | 0.0% | | | Retail trade | 5.9% | 8.5% | 31.8% | | | Transportation and warehousing | 33.3% | 3.7% | 13.6% | | | Utilities | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | | | Wholesale trade | 7.8% | 7.3% | 9.1% | | | Construction | 0.0% | 3.7% | 9.1% | | | Finance and insurance | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.6% | | | Real estate, rental and leasing | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.6% | | | Art, entertainment and recreation | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.6% | | | Other | 11.8% | 15.9% | 13.6% | | | Small-medium enterprise | | | | | | Yes | 34.8% | 23.8% | 54.5% | | | No | 65.2% | 76.3% | 45.5% | | | Position | | | | | | Entry-level management | 13.7% | 7.3% | 40.9% | | | Middle management | 25.5% | 19.5% | 13.6% | | | Senior management | 60.8% | 73.2% | 45.5% | | | Years of experience | | | | | | 0-5 | 13.7% | 8.5% | 50.0% | | Table A3. | 6-10 | 19.6% | 12.2% | 18.2% | | Sample characteristics | $11-20$ | 27.5% | 36.6% | 22.7% | | in the USA (St. Louis), | 21 or more | 39.2% | 42.7% | 9.1% | | France and Poland | Source(s): Authors' own work | | | |
Appendix 4  附錄 4
Table A4.  表 A4.
Table A5.  表 A5.
Strategies  策略 N USA Mean  USA   Mean  {:[" USA "],[" Mean "]:}\begin{aligned} & \text { USA } \\ & \text { Mean } \end{aligned} STD N France Mean  法國平均值 STD N Poland Mean  波蘭 平均值 STD N Overall Mean  總平均值 STD F ANOVA
Sig Post hoc  後設
Increase collaboration with key suppliers
加強與主要供應商的合作
56 3.50 1.08 103 3.18 1.05 33 3.03 1.19 192 3.25 1.09 2.370 0.096
Increase collaboration within the firm
加強公司內部合作
55 3.20 1.13 104 3.17 1.24 34 3.21 1.34 193 3.19 1.22 0.010 0.986
Increase collaboration with key customers
加強與主要客戶的合作
56 3.34 1.21 98 2.80 1.21 34 3.41 1.05 188 3.07 1.21 5.500 0.005 U S & P O L > F R U S & P O L > F R US&POL > FRU S \& P O L>F R
Develop/improve a risk management program
發展/改善風險管理計畫
53 2.72 1.25 102 2.58 1.32 32 3.00 1.30 187 2.69 1.30 1.310 0.272
Increase the utilization of business analytics
提高業務分析的利用率
58 2.95 1.26 101 2.36 1.39 32 2.94 1.34 191 2.63 1.37 4.550 0.012 U S > F R U S > F R US > FRU S>F R
Increase supplier base  增加供應商基礎 55 2.84 0.86 104 2.36 0.94 31 2.65 1.17 190 2.54 0.98 4.720 0.010 U S > F R U S > F R US > FRU S>F R
Engage in forward buying
參與遠期採購
55 3.02 1.39 95 2.37 1.31 21 1.57 0.93 171 2.48 1.37 10.180 0.000 U S > F R > P O L U S > F R > P O L US > FR > POLU S>F R>P O L
Redesign warehousing/ transportation network
重新設計倉儲/運輸網路
55 2.62 1.31 104 2.13 1.23 26 2.62 1.53 185 2.35 1.31 3.140 0.046 U S > F R U S > F R US > FRU S>F R
Modify contractual terms with suppliers
修改與供應商的合約條款
51 2.49 1.17 100 2.22 1.11 30 2.33 1.12 181 2.31 1.13 0.970 0.380
Modify contractual terms with customers
修改與客戶的合約條款
48 2.50 1.24 97 2.14 1.14 32 2.44 1.13 177 2.29 1.17 1.800 0.169
Develop new commercial channels
開發新的商業通路
57 2.14 1.17 101 2.05 1.37 31 2.81 1.47 189 2.20 1.35 3.910 0.022 P O L > F R P O L > F R POL > FRP O L>F R
Nearshore/regionalize SC
近岸/區域化 SC
53 2.17 0.96 103 1.99 1.12 29 2.59 1.24 185 2.14 1.11 3.400 0.036 POL > F R > F R > FR>F R
Develop alternative markets for products
開發產品的替代市場
56 1.88 1.11 101 1.83 1.12 30 2.53 1.17 187 1.96 1.15 4.700 0.010 P O L > U S & F R P O L > U S & F R POL > US&FRP O L>U S \& F R
Increase number of products/ services offered
增加所提供產品/服務的數量
56 1.89 1.07 104 1.62 0.99 31 2.55 1.41 191 1.85 1.14 8.800 0.000 P O L > U S & F R P O L > U S & F R POL > US&FRP O L>U S \& F R
Reduce number of products/ services offered
減少提供的產品/服務數量
56 2.02 1.18 104 1.47 0.88 32 1.69 0.90 192 1.67 1.00 5.670 0.004 U S > F R U S > F R US > FRU S>F R
Note(s): Question: What strate listed below Scale: (1) not implemented at all; Source(s): Authors' own work
備註(s):問題:下面列出了哪些策略 標度:(1) 完全沒有實施; 資料來源:作者自己的工作
Note(s): Question: What strategies did your firm implement in response to COVID-19? Please indicate the extent of implementation of the supply chain strate listed below
備註(s):問題:貴公司針對 COVID-19 實施了哪些策略?請說明下列供應鏈策略的實施程度
  謀求
respon
somewh
respon somewh| respon | | :--- | | somewh |
se to CC at imple  se to  CC  at imple  {:[" se to "CC],[" at imple "]:}\begin{aligned} & \text { se to } \mathrm{CC} \\ & \text { at imple } \end{aligned}

9?請 d; (4) 至
9? Please
d; (4) to
9? Please d; (4) to| 9? Please | | :--- | | d; (4) to |
  大籼稻
indica
large
indica large| indica | | :--- | | large |
  (二)......
xtent of
impleme
xtent of impleme| xtent of | | :--- | | impleme |
  不完整;
inpleme
ted;
inpleme ted;| inpleme | | :--- | | ted; |

在此,我們建議您在使用本軟體之前,請先閱讀本軟體的使用手冊。
tation of
to a very
tation of to a very| tation of | | :--- | | to a very |
  
he sup
large
he sup large| he sup | | :--- | | large |

實施連鎖策略
y chain strategies
tent implemented
y chain strategies tent implemented| y chain strategies | | :--- | | tent implemented |
Strategies N " USA Mean " STD N France Mean STD N Poland Mean STD N Overall Mean STD F ANOVA Sig Post hoc Increase collaboration with key suppliers 56 3.50 1.08 103 3.18 1.05 33 3.03 1.19 192 3.25 1.09 2.370 0.096 Increase collaboration within the firm 55 3.20 1.13 104 3.17 1.24 34 3.21 1.34 193 3.19 1.22 0.010 0.986 Increase collaboration with key customers 56 3.34 1.21 98 2.80 1.21 34 3.41 1.05 188 3.07 1.21 5.500 0.005 US&POL > FR Develop/improve a risk management program 53 2.72 1.25 102 2.58 1.32 32 3.00 1.30 187 2.69 1.30 1.310 0.272 Increase the utilization of business analytics 58 2.95 1.26 101 2.36 1.39 32 2.94 1.34 191 2.63 1.37 4.550 0.012 US > FR Increase supplier base 55 2.84 0.86 104 2.36 0.94 31 2.65 1.17 190 2.54 0.98 4.720 0.010 US > FR Engage in forward buying 55 3.02 1.39 95 2.37 1.31 21 1.57 0.93 171 2.48 1.37 10.180 0.000 US > FR > POL Redesign warehousing/ transportation network 55 2.62 1.31 104 2.13 1.23 26 2.62 1.53 185 2.35 1.31 3.140 0.046 US > FR Modify contractual terms with suppliers 51 2.49 1.17 100 2.22 1.11 30 2.33 1.12 181 2.31 1.13 0.970 0.380 Modify contractual terms with customers 48 2.50 1.24 97 2.14 1.14 32 2.44 1.13 177 2.29 1.17 1.800 0.169 Develop new commercial channels 57 2.14 1.17 101 2.05 1.37 31 2.81 1.47 189 2.20 1.35 3.910 0.022 POL > FR Nearshore/regionalize SC 53 2.17 0.96 103 1.99 1.12 29 2.59 1.24 185 2.14 1.11 3.400 0.036 POL > FR Develop alternative markets for products 56 1.88 1.11 101 1.83 1.12 30 2.53 1.17 187 1.96 1.15 4.700 0.010 POL > US&FR Increase number of products/ services offered 56 1.89 1.07 104 1.62 0.99 31 2.55 1.41 191 1.85 1.14 8.800 0.000 POL > US&FR Reduce number of products/ services offered 56 2.02 1.18 104 1.47 0.88 32 1.69 0.90 192 1.67 1.00 5.670 0.004 US > FR Note(s): Question: What strate listed below Scale: (1) not implemented at all; Source(s): Authors' own work Note(s): Question: What strategies did your firm implement in response to COVID-19? Please indicate the extent of implementation of the supply chain strate listed below "respon somewh" " se to CC at imple " "9? Please d; (4) to" "indica large" "xtent of impleme" "inpleme ted;" "tation of to a very" "he sup large" "y chain strategies tent implemented"| Strategies | N | $\begin{aligned} & \text { USA } \\ & \text { Mean } \end{aligned}$ | STD | N | France Mean | STD | N | Poland Mean | STD | N | Overall Mean | STD | F | ANOVA | | | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sig | Post hoc | | Increase collaboration with key suppliers | 56 | 3.50 | 1.08 | 103 | 3.18 | 1.05 | 33 | 3.03 | 1.19 | 192 | 3.25 | 1.09 | 2.370 | 0.096 | | | Increase collaboration within the firm | 55 | 3.20 | 1.13 | 104 | 3.17 | 1.24 | 34 | 3.21 | 1.34 | 193 | 3.19 | 1.22 | 0.010 | 0.986 | | | Increase collaboration with key customers | 56 | 3.34 | 1.21 | 98 | 2.80 | 1.21 | 34 | 3.41 | 1.05 | 188 | 3.07 | 1.21 | 5.500 | 0.005 | $U S \& P O L>F R$ | | Develop/improve a risk management program | 53 | 2.72 | 1.25 | 102 | 2.58 | 1.32 | 32 | 3.00 | 1.30 | 187 | 2.69 | 1.30 | 1.310 | 0.272 | | | Increase the utilization of business analytics | 58 | 2.95 | 1.26 | 101 | 2.36 | 1.39 | 32 | 2.94 | 1.34 | 191 | 2.63 | 1.37 | 4.550 | 0.012 | $U S>F R$ | | Increase supplier base | 55 | 2.84 | 0.86 | 104 | 2.36 | 0.94 | 31 | 2.65 | 1.17 | 190 | 2.54 | 0.98 | 4.720 | 0.010 | $U S>F R$ | | Engage in forward buying | 55 | 3.02 | 1.39 | 95 | 2.37 | 1.31 | 21 | 1.57 | 0.93 | 171 | 2.48 | 1.37 | 10.180 | 0.000 | $U S>F R>P O L$ | | Redesign warehousing/ transportation network | 55 | 2.62 | 1.31 | 104 | 2.13 | 1.23 | 26 | 2.62 | 1.53 | 185 | 2.35 | 1.31 | 3.140 | 0.046 | $U S>F R$ | | Modify contractual terms with suppliers | 51 | 2.49 | 1.17 | 100 | 2.22 | 1.11 | 30 | 2.33 | 1.12 | 181 | 2.31 | 1.13 | 0.970 | 0.380 | | | Modify contractual terms with customers | 48 | 2.50 | 1.24 | 97 | 2.14 | 1.14 | 32 | 2.44 | 1.13 | 177 | 2.29 | 1.17 | 1.800 | 0.169 | | | Develop new commercial channels | 57 | 2.14 | 1.17 | 101 | 2.05 | 1.37 | 31 | 2.81 | 1.47 | 189 | 2.20 | 1.35 | 3.910 | 0.022 | $P O L>F R$ | | Nearshore/regionalize SC | 53 | 2.17 | 0.96 | 103 | 1.99 | 1.12 | 29 | 2.59 | 1.24 | 185 | 2.14 | 1.11 | 3.400 | 0.036 | POL $>F R$ | | Develop alternative markets for products | 56 | 1.88 | 1.11 | 101 | 1.83 | 1.12 | 30 | 2.53 | 1.17 | 187 | 1.96 | 1.15 | 4.700 | 0.010 | $P O L>U S \& F R$ | | Increase number of products/ services offered | 56 | 1.89 | 1.07 | 104 | 1.62 | 0.99 | 31 | 2.55 | 1.41 | 191 | 1.85 | 1.14 | 8.800 | 0.000 | $P O L>U S \& F R$ | | Reduce number of products/ services offered | 56 | 2.02 | 1.18 | 104 | 1.47 | 0.88 | 32 | 1.69 | 0.90 | 192 | 1.67 | 1.00 | 5.670 | 0.004 | $U S>F R$ | | Note(s): Question: What strate listed below Scale: (1) not implemented at all; Source(s): Authors' own work | Note(s): Question: What strategies did your firm implement in response to COVID-19? Please indicate the extent of implementation of the supply chain strate listed below | | | | respon <br> somewh | $\begin{aligned} & \text { se to } \mathrm{CC} \\ & \text { at imple } \end{aligned}$ | | 9? Please <br> d; (4) to | indica <br> large | | xtent of <br> impleme | inpleme <br> ted; | tation of <br> to a very | he sup <br> large | y chain strategies <br> tent implemented |
Strategies  策略 USA France  法國 Poland  波蘭 Overall  整體 ANOVA
N Mean  平均值 STD N Mean  平均值 STD N Mean  平均值 STD N Mean  平均值 STD F Sig Post hoc  後設
Redesign warehousing/ transportation network
重新設計倉儲/運輸網路
25 3.28 1.308 35 2.57 1.313 12 3.67 1.073 72 3.00 1.332 4.216 0.019 P O L > F R P O L > F R POL > FRP O L>F R
Increase supplier base  增加供應商基礎 36 3.22 0.959 42 2.95 1.011 16 2.19 1.682 94 2.93 1.175 4.651 0.012 U S > P O L U S > P O L US > POLU S>P O L
Nearshore/regionalize SC
近岸/區域化 SC
20 3.45 1.276 27 2.70 1.589 14 1.79 1.672 61 2.74 1.611 4.988 0.010 U S > P O L U S > P O L US > POLU S>P O L
Modify contractual terms with suppliers
修改與供應商的合約條款
25 3.00 0.913 38 2.45 1.389 10 2.50 1.716 73 2.64 1.306 1.438 0.244
Modify contractual terms with customers
修改與客戶的合約條款
24 2.75 1.189 35 2.43 1.668 13 2.08 1.754 72 2.47 1.538 0.831 0.440
Develop/improve a risk management program
發展/改善風險管理計畫
30 2.60 1.070 51 2.31 1.257 20 2.35 1.496 101 2.41 1.250 0.515 0.599
Increase the utilization of business analytics
提高業務分析的利用率
39 2.62 1.206 38 2.21 1.189 20 2.35 1.599 97 2.40 1.288 0.970 0.383
Reduce number of products/ services offered
減少提供的產品/服務數量
17 2.65 1.656 13 2.08 1.553 5 2.20 2.168 35 2.37 1.664 0.448 0.643
Engage in forward buying
參與遠期採購
35 2.54 1.172 39 2.23 1.111 2 2.00 2.828 76 2.37 1.176 0.746 0.478
Develop alternative markets for products
開發產品的替代市場
16 2.44 1.315 27 1.85 1.703 15 2.53 1.685 58 2.19 1.605 1.138 0.328
Develop new commercial channels
開發新的商業通路
22 2.05 1.618 31 2.06 1.209 16 2.50 1.461 69 2.16 1.400 0.611 0.546
Increase number of products/ services offered
增加所提供產品/服務的數量
14 2.43 1.222 19 2.11 1.197 14 1.79 1.672 47 2.11 1.355 0.780 0.465
Increase collaboration with key suppliers
加強與主要供應商的合作
47 2.32 1.163 77 1.99 1.153 22 2.00 1.380 146 2.10 1.194 1.217 0.299
Increase collaboration within the firm
加強公司內部合作
41 2.37 1.113 74 1.84 1.034 22 2.00 1.272 137 2.02 1.115 3.055 0.050 U S > F R U S > F R US > FRU S>F R
Increase collaboration with key customers
加強與主要客戶的合作
42 2.19 1.131 57 2.02 1.329 26 1.65 1.522 125 2.00 1.314 1.357 0.261
Note(s): Question: Please indicate the difficulty of implementing the supply chain strategies listed below Scale: (1) not difficult; (2) slightly difficult; (3) somewhat difficult; (4) very difficult; (5) extremely difficult Source(s): Authors' own work
備註(s):問題:請指出實施下列供應鏈策略的難度 標度:(1) 不難;(2) 略難;(3) 稍難;(4) 非常難;(5) 極難 資料來源: 作者自己的工作:作者自己的工作
Strategies USA France Poland Overall ANOVA N Mean STD N Mean STD N Mean STD N Mean STD F Sig Post hoc Redesign warehousing/ transportation network 25 3.28 1.308 35 2.57 1.313 12 3.67 1.073 72 3.00 1.332 4.216 0.019 POL > FR Increase supplier base 36 3.22 0.959 42 2.95 1.011 16 2.19 1.682 94 2.93 1.175 4.651 0.012 US > POL Nearshore/regionalize SC 20 3.45 1.276 27 2.70 1.589 14 1.79 1.672 61 2.74 1.611 4.988 0.010 US > POL Modify contractual terms with suppliers 25 3.00 0.913 38 2.45 1.389 10 2.50 1.716 73 2.64 1.306 1.438 0.244 Modify contractual terms with customers 24 2.75 1.189 35 2.43 1.668 13 2.08 1.754 72 2.47 1.538 0.831 0.440 Develop/improve a risk management program 30 2.60 1.070 51 2.31 1.257 20 2.35 1.496 101 2.41 1.250 0.515 0.599 Increase the utilization of business analytics 39 2.62 1.206 38 2.21 1.189 20 2.35 1.599 97 2.40 1.288 0.970 0.383 Reduce number of products/ services offered 17 2.65 1.656 13 2.08 1.553 5 2.20 2.168 35 2.37 1.664 0.448 0.643 Engage in forward buying 35 2.54 1.172 39 2.23 1.111 2 2.00 2.828 76 2.37 1.176 0.746 0.478 Develop alternative markets for products 16 2.44 1.315 27 1.85 1.703 15 2.53 1.685 58 2.19 1.605 1.138 0.328 Develop new commercial channels 22 2.05 1.618 31 2.06 1.209 16 2.50 1.461 69 2.16 1.400 0.611 0.546 Increase number of products/ services offered 14 2.43 1.222 19 2.11 1.197 14 1.79 1.672 47 2.11 1.355 0.780 0.465 Increase collaboration with key suppliers 47 2.32 1.163 77 1.99 1.153 22 2.00 1.380 146 2.10 1.194 1.217 0.299 Increase collaboration within the firm 41 2.37 1.113 74 1.84 1.034 22 2.00 1.272 137 2.02 1.115 3.055 0.050 US > FR Increase collaboration with key customers 42 2.19 1.131 57 2.02 1.329 26 1.65 1.522 125 2.00 1.314 1.357 0.261 Note(s): Question: Please indicate the difficulty of implementing the supply chain strategies listed below Scale: (1) not difficult; (2) slightly difficult; (3) somewhat difficult; (4) very difficult; (5) extremely difficult Source(s): Authors' own work | Strategies | USA | | | France | | | Poland | | | Overall | | | ANOVA | | | | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | | | N | Mean | STD | N | Mean | STD | N | Mean | STD | N | Mean | STD | F | Sig | Post hoc | | Redesign warehousing/ transportation network | 25 | 3.28 | 1.308 | 35 | 2.57 | 1.313 | 12 | 3.67 | 1.073 | 72 | 3.00 | 1.332 | 4.216 | 0.019 | $P O L>F R$ | | Increase supplier base | 36 | 3.22 | 0.959 | 42 | 2.95 | 1.011 | 16 | 2.19 | 1.682 | 94 | 2.93 | 1.175 | 4.651 | 0.012 | $U S>P O L$ | | Nearshore/regionalize SC | 20 | 3.45 | 1.276 | 27 | 2.70 | 1.589 | 14 | 1.79 | 1.672 | 61 | 2.74 | 1.611 | 4.988 | 0.010 | $U S>P O L$ | | Modify contractual terms with suppliers | 25 | 3.00 | 0.913 | 38 | 2.45 | 1.389 | 10 | 2.50 | 1.716 | 73 | 2.64 | 1.306 | 1.438 | 0.244 | | | Modify contractual terms with customers | 24 | 2.75 | 1.189 | 35 | 2.43 | 1.668 | 13 | 2.08 | 1.754 | 72 | 2.47 | 1.538 | 0.831 | 0.440 | | | Develop/improve a risk management program | 30 | 2.60 | 1.070 | 51 | 2.31 | 1.257 | 20 | 2.35 | 1.496 | 101 | 2.41 | 1.250 | 0.515 | 0.599 | | | Increase the utilization of business analytics | 39 | 2.62 | 1.206 | 38 | 2.21 | 1.189 | 20 | 2.35 | 1.599 | 97 | 2.40 | 1.288 | 0.970 | 0.383 | | | Reduce number of products/ services offered | 17 | 2.65 | 1.656 | 13 | 2.08 | 1.553 | 5 | 2.20 | 2.168 | 35 | 2.37 | 1.664 | 0.448 | 0.643 | | | Engage in forward buying | 35 | 2.54 | 1.172 | 39 | 2.23 | 1.111 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.828 | 76 | 2.37 | 1.176 | 0.746 | 0.478 | | | Develop alternative markets for products | 16 | 2.44 | 1.315 | 27 | 1.85 | 1.703 | 15 | 2.53 | 1.685 | 58 | 2.19 | 1.605 | 1.138 | 0.328 | | | Develop new commercial channels | 22 | 2.05 | 1.618 | 31 | 2.06 | 1.209 | 16 | 2.50 | 1.461 | 69 | 2.16 | 1.400 | 0.611 | 0.546 | | | Increase number of products/ services offered | 14 | 2.43 | 1.222 | 19 | 2.11 | 1.197 | 14 | 1.79 | 1.672 | 47 | 2.11 | 1.355 | 0.780 | 0.465 | | | Increase collaboration with key suppliers | 47 | 2.32 | 1.163 | 77 | 1.99 | 1.153 | 22 | 2.00 | 1.380 | 146 | 2.10 | 1.194 | 1.217 | 0.299 | | | Increase collaboration within the firm | 41 | 2.37 | 1.113 | 74 | 1.84 | 1.034 | 22 | 2.00 | 1.272 | 137 | 2.02 | 1.115 | 3.055 | 0.050 | $U S>F R$ | | Increase collaboration with key customers | 42 | 2.19 | 1.131 | 57 | 2.02 | 1.329 | 26 | 1.65 | 1.522 | 125 | 2.00 | 1.314 | 1.357 | 0.261 | | | Note(s): Question: Please indicate the difficulty of implementing the supply chain strategies listed below Scale: (1) not difficult; (2) slightly difficult; (3) somewhat difficult; (4) very difficult; (5) extremely difficult Source(s): Authors' own work | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Table A6. Disaggregated difficulty of supply chain strategy implementation
表 A6.供應鏈戰略實施的分類難度

32

Table A7.  表 A7.
Disaggregated perceived supply chain strategy effectiveness
分類感知的供應鏈策略成效

Appendix 7  附錄 7

Strategies  策略 USA France  法國 Poland  波蘭 Overall  整體 ANOVA
N Mean  平均值 STD N Mean  平均值 STD N Mean  平均值 STD N Mean  平均值 STD F Sig Post hoc  後設
Increase collaboration within the firm
加強公司內部合作
41 3.51 1.306 74 2.73 1.754 22 2.45 2.041 137 2.92 1.72 3.845 0.024 U S > F R & P O L U S > F R & P O L {:[US > FR&],[POL]:}\begin{aligned} & U S>F R \& \\ & P O L \end{aligned}
Redesign warehousing/ transportation network
重新設計倉儲/運輸網路
25 3.2 1.443 35 2.37 1.629 12 3.5 1.314 72 2.85 1.571 3.5 0.036
Develop new commercial channels
開發新的商業通路
22 2.86 1.726 31 2.71 1.697 16 2.94 1.731 69 2.81 1.691 0.108 0.898
Engage in forward buying
參與遠期採購
35 2.91 1.483 39 2.69 1.688 2 1.5 2.121 76 2.76 1.599 0.815 0.447
Increase collaboration with key suppliers
加強與主要供應商的合作
47 3.15 1.414 77 2.68 1.689 22 2.18 1.967 146 2.75 1.672 2.751 0.067
Increase the utilization of business analytics
提高業務分析的利用率
39 3 1.573 38 2.74 1.519 20 2.2 1.963 97 2.73 1.649 1.575 0.212
Increase supplier base  增加供應商基礎 36 3.08 1.105 42 2.5 1.55 16 2.06 1.731 94 2.65 1.464 3.232 0.044
Reduce number of products/ services offered
減少提供的產品/服務數量
17 3.18 1.425 13 2.23 2.166 5 1.4 1.342 35 2.57 1.803 2.433 0.104
Develop/improve a risk management program
發展/改善風險管理計畫
30 3 1.313 51 2.51 1.605 20 1.95 2.012 101 2.54 1.64 2.559 0.083
Modify contractual terms with suppliers
修改與供應商的合約條款
25 3 1.291 38 2.29 1.487 10 2.3 1.703 73 2.53 1.473 1.952 0.15
Increase collaboration with key customers
加強與主要客戶的合作
42 2.86 1.646 57 2.37 1.779 26 2 2.02 125 2.46 1.803 1.969 0.144
Modify contractual terms with customers
修改與客戶的合約條款
24 3.13 1.329 35 2.23 1.457 13 1.85 1.725 72 2.46 1.528 4.04 0.022 U S > P O L U S > P O L US > POLU S>P O L
Nearshore/regionalize SC
近岸/區域化 SC
20 2.7 1.302 27 2.26 1.831 14 2.29 1.816 61 2.41 1.657 0.449 0.64
Increase number of products/ services offered
增加所提供產品/服務的數量
14 2.5 1.506 19 1.89 1.853 14 1.79 1.968 47 2.04 1.781 0.663 0.52
Develop alternative markets for products
開發產品的替代市場
16 2.44 1.711 27 1.67 1.687 15 1.87 1.807 58 1.93 1.726 1.017 0.368
Note(s): Question: Please indicate the effectiveness of implementing the supply chain strategies listed below Scale: (1) not effective; (2) slightly effective; (3) somewhat effective; (4) very effective; (5) extremely effective Source(s): Authors' own work
備註(s):問題:請指出下列供應鏈策略的實施成效 量表:(1) 無效;(2) 略有成效;(3) 稍有成效;(4) 非常有成效;(5) 極有成效 資料來源: 作者自己的工作:作者自己的工作
Strategies USA France Poland Overall ANOVA N Mean STD N Mean STD N Mean STD N Mean STD F Sig Post hoc Increase collaboration within the firm 41 3.51 1.306 74 2.73 1.754 22 2.45 2.041 137 2.92 1.72 3.845 0.024 "US > FR& POL" Redesign warehousing/ transportation network 25 3.2 1.443 35 2.37 1.629 12 3.5 1.314 72 2.85 1.571 3.5 0.036 Develop new commercial channels 22 2.86 1.726 31 2.71 1.697 16 2.94 1.731 69 2.81 1.691 0.108 0.898 Engage in forward buying 35 2.91 1.483 39 2.69 1.688 2 1.5 2.121 76 2.76 1.599 0.815 0.447 Increase collaboration with key suppliers 47 3.15 1.414 77 2.68 1.689 22 2.18 1.967 146 2.75 1.672 2.751 0.067 Increase the utilization of business analytics 39 3 1.573 38 2.74 1.519 20 2.2 1.963 97 2.73 1.649 1.575 0.212 Increase supplier base 36 3.08 1.105 42 2.5 1.55 16 2.06 1.731 94 2.65 1.464 3.232 0.044 Reduce number of products/ services offered 17 3.18 1.425 13 2.23 2.166 5 1.4 1.342 35 2.57 1.803 2.433 0.104 Develop/improve a risk management program 30 3 1.313 51 2.51 1.605 20 1.95 2.012 101 2.54 1.64 2.559 0.083 Modify contractual terms with suppliers 25 3 1.291 38 2.29 1.487 10 2.3 1.703 73 2.53 1.473 1.952 0.15 Increase collaboration with key customers 42 2.86 1.646 57 2.37 1.779 26 2 2.02 125 2.46 1.803 1.969 0.144 Modify contractual terms with customers 24 3.13 1.329 35 2.23 1.457 13 1.85 1.725 72 2.46 1.528 4.04 0.022 US > POL Nearshore/regionalize SC 20 2.7 1.302 27 2.26 1.831 14 2.29 1.816 61 2.41 1.657 0.449 0.64 Increase number of products/ services offered 14 2.5 1.506 19 1.89 1.853 14 1.79 1.968 47 2.04 1.781 0.663 0.52 Develop alternative markets for products 16 2.44 1.711 27 1.67 1.687 15 1.87 1.807 58 1.93 1.726 1.017 0.368 Note(s): Question: Please indicate the effectiveness of implementing the supply chain strategies listed below Scale: (1) not effective; (2) slightly effective; (3) somewhat effective; (4) very effective; (5) extremely effective Source(s): Authors' own work | Strategies | USA | | | France | | | Poland | | | Overall | | | ANOVA | | | | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | | | N | Mean | STD | N | Mean | STD | N | Mean | STD | N | Mean | STD | F | Sig | Post hoc | | Increase collaboration within the firm | 41 | 3.51 | 1.306 | 74 | 2.73 | 1.754 | 22 | 2.45 | 2.041 | 137 | 2.92 | 1.72 | 3.845 | 0.024 | $\begin{aligned} & U S>F R \& \\ & P O L \end{aligned}$ | | Redesign warehousing/ transportation network | 25 | 3.2 | 1.443 | 35 | 2.37 | 1.629 | 12 | 3.5 | 1.314 | 72 | 2.85 | 1.571 | 3.5 | 0.036 | | | Develop new commercial channels | 22 | 2.86 | 1.726 | 31 | 2.71 | 1.697 | 16 | 2.94 | 1.731 | 69 | 2.81 | 1.691 | 0.108 | 0.898 | | | Engage in forward buying | 35 | 2.91 | 1.483 | 39 | 2.69 | 1.688 | 2 | 1.5 | 2.121 | 76 | 2.76 | 1.599 | 0.815 | 0.447 | | | Increase collaboration with key suppliers | 47 | 3.15 | 1.414 | 77 | 2.68 | 1.689 | 22 | 2.18 | 1.967 | 146 | 2.75 | 1.672 | 2.751 | 0.067 | | | Increase the utilization of business analytics | 39 | 3 | 1.573 | 38 | 2.74 | 1.519 | 20 | 2.2 | 1.963 | 97 | 2.73 | 1.649 | 1.575 | 0.212 | | | Increase supplier base | 36 | 3.08 | 1.105 | 42 | 2.5 | 1.55 | 16 | 2.06 | 1.731 | 94 | 2.65 | 1.464 | 3.232 | 0.044 | | | Reduce number of products/ services offered | 17 | 3.18 | 1.425 | 13 | 2.23 | 2.166 | 5 | 1.4 | 1.342 | 35 | 2.57 | 1.803 | 2.433 | 0.104 | | | Develop/improve a risk management program | 30 | 3 | 1.313 | 51 | 2.51 | 1.605 | 20 | 1.95 | 2.012 | 101 | 2.54 | 1.64 | 2.559 | 0.083 | | | Modify contractual terms with suppliers | 25 | 3 | 1.291 | 38 | 2.29 | 1.487 | 10 | 2.3 | 1.703 | 73 | 2.53 | 1.473 | 1.952 | 0.15 | | | Increase collaboration with key customers | 42 | 2.86 | 1.646 | 57 | 2.37 | 1.779 | 26 | 2 | 2.02 | 125 | 2.46 | 1.803 | 1.969 | 0.144 | | | Modify contractual terms with customers | 24 | 3.13 | 1.329 | 35 | 2.23 | 1.457 | 13 | 1.85 | 1.725 | 72 | 2.46 | 1.528 | 4.04 | 0.022 | $U S>P O L$ | | Nearshore/regionalize SC | 20 | 2.7 | 1.302 | 27 | 2.26 | 1.831 | 14 | 2.29 | 1.816 | 61 | 2.41 | 1.657 | 0.449 | 0.64 | | | Increase number of products/ services offered | 14 | 2.5 | 1.506 | 19 | 1.89 | 1.853 | 14 | 1.79 | 1.968 | 47 | 2.04 | 1.781 | 0.663 | 0.52 | | | Develop alternative markets for products | 16 | 2.44 | 1.711 | 27 | 1.67 | 1.687 | 15 | 1.87 | 1.807 | 58 | 1.93 | 1.726 | 1.017 | 0.368 | | | Note(s): Question: Please indicate the effectiveness of implementing the supply chain strategies listed below Scale: (1) not effective; (2) slightly effective; (3) somewhat effective; (4) very effective; (5) extremely effective Source(s): Authors' own work | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |