這是用戶在 2024-5-14 4:00 為 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/word/ 保存的雙語快照頁面,由 沉浸式翻譯 提供雙語支持。了解如何保存?

SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS
社交網路分析:方法與應用

STANLEY WASSERMAN
斯坦利·沃瑟曼

2011

Abstract
抽象

The advantages of a Galois lattice for representing an affiliation network are the focus on subsets, and the complementary relationships between the actors and the events that are displayed in the diagram. The focus on subsets is especially appropriate for representing affiliation networks. In addition patterns in the relationships between
伽羅瓦格子表示隸屬網路的優點是關注子集,以及參與者與圖中顯示的事件之間的互補關係。對子集的關注特別適合表示隸屬關係網路。此外,模式在關係中

8.6 (j9Analysis of Actors and Events
8.6 (j9參與者和事件分析

Synopsis
概要

A Galois lattice is beneficial for representing affiliation networks due to its emphasis on subsets and the complementary relationships between actors and events displayed in the diagram.
伽羅瓦格子有利於表示隸屬網路,因為它強調子集以及圖中顯示的參與者和事件之間的互補關係。

The text discusses social groups, role structures, network analysis, statistical approaches, and methods for studying social networks.
本文討論了社會群體、角色結構、網路分析、統計方法和研究社交網路的方法。

It covers topics such as structural equivalence, centrality, and n-cliques in networks.
它涵蓋了網路中的結構等價性、中心性和 n 集團等主題。

The text also mentions the importance of replication in network analysis and the development of general propositions about social network structures.
本文還提到了複製在網路分析中的重要性以及關於社會網路結構的一般命題的發展。

Additionally, it touches on the use of graph theory in identifying important actors in social networks and provides examples of affiliation networks and their properties.
此外,它還涉及圖論在識別社交網路中重要參與者中的應用,並提供了隸屬網路及其屬性的示例。

The text discusses various applications of affiliation networks, methods for gathering social network data, and techniques for analyzing social networks.
本文討論隸屬關係網路的各種應用、收集社交網路數據的方法以及分析社交網路的技術。

It covers topics such as hypergraphs, data collection techniques, nodal degree, graph density, cohesive subgroups, two-mode networks, and role structures.
它涵蓋了超圖、數據收集技術、節點度、圖密度、內聚子組、雙模網路和角色結構等主題。

The text also mentions the use of graph theory in social network analysis and the evaluation of methods for positional analysis.
本文還提到了圖論在社會網路分析中的應用以及位置分析方法的評估。

Additionally, it touches on topics like transitivity in social networks, n-cliques, and n-clans.
此外,它還涉及社交網路、n 集團和 n 氏族中的傳遞性等主題。

The text discusses various concepts related to social network analysis, including cohesive subgroups, graph theory, and multirelational blockmodels.
本文討論了與社交網路分析相關的各種概念,包括內聚子群、圖論和多關係塊模型。

It also covers methods for analyzing social networks, such as structural equivalence, hubbell's approach, and the k-plex definition.
它還涵蓋了分析社交網路的方法,例如結構等價性、Hubbell 方法和 k-plex 定義。

The text emphasizes the importance of studying patterns of ties and relationships within social networks to understand social structures and interactions.
該文本強調了研究社交網路中的聯繫和關係模式以了解社會結構和互動的重要性。

The text discusses various concepts and methods related to social network analysis, including formal network role analysis, sampling methods, structural balance, matrix operations, centrality indices, cohesive subgroups, and balance in signed digraphs.
本文討論了與社會網路分析相關的各種概念和方法,包括形式網路角色分析、抽樣方法、結構平衡、矩陣運算、中心性指數、內聚子群和符號二元圖中的平衡。

It also covers the importance of actor attributes, Bayesian estimation, and the use of sociometric and graph theoretic notations.
它還涵蓋了參與者屬性、貝葉斯估計以及社會計量和圖論符號的使用的重要性。

The text emphasizes the mathematical definitions provided by social network analysis and the significance of network data in understanding social relationships.
本文強調了社會網路分析提供的數學定義以及網路數據在理解社會關係中的重要性。

The text discusses various concepts related to social network analysis, including equivalence, relations, graphs, and structural properties of actors and groups.
本文討論了與社會網路分析相關的各種概念,包括參與者和群體的等價性、關係、圖形和結構屬性。

It also covers the use of Bayesian ideas, maximum likelihood estimates, and matrix permutation analysis in network analysis.
它還涵蓋了貝葉斯思想、最大似然估計和矩陣排列分析在網路分析中的應用。

The text emphasizes the importance of structural variables in network data sets and explores methods for comparing ego algebras and measuring equivalence between actors in a network.
本文強調了結構變數在網路數據集中的重要性,並探討了比較自我代數和測量網路中參與者之間等價性的方法。

Additionally, it mentions the application of these methods to real-world problems and the concept of blockmodels in network analysis.
此外,它還提到了這些方法在實際問題中的應用以及網路分析中塊模型的概念。

It covers methods for analyzing social networks, such as composition of relations, regular equivalence, and measures of structural equivalence.
它涵蓋了分析社交網路的方法,例如關係的組成、規則等價和結構等價的度量。

The text also touches on the importance of network theory and measurement in understanding social structures.
本文還談到了網路理論和測量在理解社會結構中的重要性。

Additionally, it mentions the use of graph theory and formal definitions to translate theoretical concepts into formal measures for network analysis.
此外,它還提到了使用圖論和形式定義將理論概念轉化為網路分析的形式度量。

The text discusses various methods and concepts related to social network analysis, including the use of correlation matrices, multidimensional scaling, hierarchical clustering, network software, stochastic blockmodels, goodness-of-fit statistics, and clusterability in signed graphs.
本文討論了與社交網路分析相關的各種方法和概念,包括相關矩陣的使用、多維縮放、分層聚類、網路軟體、隨機塊模型、擬合優度統計和有符號圖中的聚類性。

It also covers topics such as affiliation networks, transitivity, graph theory, matrix operations, and random directed graph distributions.
它還涵蓋了隸屬網路、傳遞性、圖論、矩陣運算和隨機有向圖分佈等主題。

The text emphasizes the importance of understanding network properties and measures for social and behavioral science research.
本文強調了理解網路屬性和測量對社會和行為科學研究的重要性。

Key points
要點

Social Group and Subgroup 7.2 Subgroups Based on Complete Mutuality 7.2.1 Definition of a Clique 7.2.2 An Example 7.3.2 An Example 7.3.4 n-clans and n-clubs
社會群體和子群體 7.2 基於完全互惠的子群體 7.2.1 集團的定義 7.2.2 示例 7.3.2 示例 7.3.4 n氏族和n氏族

When multidimensional scaling is used to study network positions using measures of structural equivalence as input, the results show which subsets of actors are more, and which are less, structurally equivalent
當使用多維縮放來研究使用結構等價度量作為輸入的網路位置時,結果顯示哪些參與者子集在結構上等價更多,哪些參與者更少

We have described how to compare role structures
我們已經描述了如何比較角色結構

This usage is apparent in a statement such as, "a person takes on the role of leader in a group." A theoretical statement is provided by Homans (1967), who defines role as
這種用法在諸如「一個人在團隊中扮演領導者的角色」之類的陳述中很明顯。Homans(1967)提供了一個理論陳述,他將角色定義為

Goodenough (1969) makes the important distinctions between status, pOSition, and role. He argues that the fact that many authors have not carefully distinguished between status and position has led to unfortunate confusions
Goodenough(1969)對地位、pOSition和角色進行了重要的區分。他認為,許多作者沒有仔細區分地位和地位,這一事實導致了不幸的混淆

The difference between the G2 statistics for two hierarchically nested models is approximately asymptotically distributed as a X2 random variable. This difference can be compared to tabled values of X2 to establish whether the model with more parameters fits significantly better than the simpler model
兩個分層嵌套模型的 G2 統計量之間的差值近似地呈漸近分佈,作為 X2 隨機變數。可以將此差異與 X2 的表值進行比較,以確定具有更多參數的模型是否明顯優於更簡單的模型

By restrictive we mean that if one equivalence definition is more restrictive than another, any actors who are equivalent by the first definition are equivalent by the second definition, though actors who are equivalent by the second may not be equivalent by the first
我們所說的限制性是指,如果一個等價定義比另一個定義更具限制性,則任何與第一個定義等價的行為者在第二個定義下都是等價的,儘管在第二個定義上等價的行為者可能與第一個定義不等價

Summary
總結


15.8 Goodness-of-fit statistics for the fabricated network
15.8 預製網路的擬合優度統計

15.10 Parameter estimates for Krackhardt's high-tech managers 632. 15.11 The W-array for the second-graders using friendship and age (the first subset consists of the 7-year-old children, Eliot, Keith, and Sarah, and the second subset consists of the 8-year-old children, Allison, Drew, and Ross.).
15.10 克拉克哈特高科技管理人員的參數估計 632.15.11 使用友誼和年齡的二年級學生的 W 陣列(第一個子集由 7 歲的孩子 Eliot、Keith 和 Sarah 組成,第二個子集由 8 歲的孩子 Allison、Drew 和 Ross 組成)。

15.10 Parameter estimates for Krackhardt's high-tech managers 632.
15.10 克拉克哈特高科技管理人員的參數估計 632.

15.11 The W-array for the second-graders using friendship and age.
15.11 使用友誼和年齡的二年級學生的 W 陣列。

15.12 The W-arrays for Krackhardt's high-tech managers, using tenure, and age and tenure.
15.12 Krackhardt高科技經理的W陣列,使用任期、年齡和任期。

15.13 Parameters, models, and associated margins for models for attribute variables.
15.13 屬性變數模型的參數、模型和相關邊距。

15.14 Goodness-of-fit statistics for the fabricated network, using attribute variables.
15.14 使用屬性變數對預製網路進行擬合優度統計。

15.16 Goodness-of-fit statistics for Krackhardt's managers and the advice relation, with attribute variables.
15.16 Krackhardt經理的擬合優度統計和建議關係,以及屬性變數。

15.17 Goodness-of-fit statistics for Krackhardt's managers and the friendship relation, with attribute variables
15.17 Krackhardt經理和友誼關係的擬合優度統計,以及屬性變數


Dendrogram for complete link hierarchical clustering of correlation coefficients on the advice relation for
用於對建議關係的相關係數進行完整連結分層聚類的樹狀圖

9.9 Multidimensional scaling of correlation coefficients on the advice relation for Krackhardt's high-tech managers agers permuted according to positions from hierarchical clustering of correlations.
9.9 Krackhardt高科技經理人諮詢關係的相關係數的多維縮放,根據相關性分層聚類中的位置進行置換。

9.11 Density table for the advice relation from Krackhardt's high-tech managers, positions identified by hierarchical clustering of correlations.
9.11 Krackhardt高科技經理的建議關係密度表,通過相關性的分層聚類確定職位。

9.12 Image matrix for the advice relation from Krackhardt's high-tech managers, positions identified by hierarchical clustering of correlations.
9.12 來自Krackhardt高科技經理的建議關係的圖像矩陣,通過相關性的分層聚類確定的職位。

9.13 Reduced graph for the advice relation from Krackhardt's high-tech managers, positions identified by hierarchical clustering of correlations
9.13 Krackhardt高科技經理的建議關係簡化圖,通過相關性的分層聚類確定職位


12.11 Ego algebras for the example of two relations
12.11 以兩個關係為例的自我代數

12.12 Distances between ego algebras for a hypothetical example of two relations. 12.13 Distances between ego algebras computed on advice and friendship relations for Krackhardt's high-tech managers 500.
12.12 自我代數之間的距離,用於兩個關係的假設示例。12.13 根據建議和友誼關係計算的自我代數之間的距離 克拉克哈特的高科技經理 500.

12.12 Distances between ego algebras for a hypothetical example of two relations.
12.12 自我代數之間的距離,用於兩個關係的假設示例。

12.13 Distances between ego algebras computed on advice and friendship relations for Krackhardt's high-tech managers 500.
12.13 根據建議和友誼關係計算的自我代數之間的距離 克拉克哈特的高科技經理 500.

12.14 Hierarchical clustering of distances between ego algebras on the two relations for Krackhardt's high-tech managers
12.14 自我代數之間距離的層次聚類對克拉克哈特高科技經理的兩種關係的影響


Part I
第一部分

The notion of a social network and the methods of social network analysis have attracted considerable interest and curiosity from the social and behavioral science community in recent decades.
近幾十年來,社交網路的概念和社交網路分析方法引起了社會和行為科學界的極大興趣和好奇心。

Network analysis enters into the process or model development, specification, and testing in a number of ways: 10 express relationally defined theoretical concepts by providing formal definitions, measures and descriptions, to evaluate models and theories in which key concepts and propositions are expressed as relational processes or structural outcomes, or to provide statistical analyses of multirelational systems.
網路分析以多種方式進入過程或模型開發、規範和測試:10 通過提供正式的定義、度量和描述來表達關係定義的理論概念,以評估關鍵概念和命題表示為關係過程或結構結果的模型和理論,或提供多重關係系統的統計分析。

In this first, descriptive context, network analysis provides a vocabulary and set of formal definitions for expressing theoretical concepts and properties.
在第一個描述性上下文中,網路分析提供了用於表達理論概念和屬性的詞彙表和一組形式定義。

Usefulness of one or more attributes for predicting the level of another attribute, the social network perspective views characteristics of the social units as arising out of structural or Social Ne/wo/," Analysis in the Social and Behavioral Sciences relational processes 01' focuses on properties of the relational systems themselves.
社會網路視角認為社會單位的特徵源於結構或社會 Ne/wo/,“社會和行為科學關係過程分析 01' 側重於關係系統本身的屬性。

Bronfenbenner (1943) and Moreno and Jennings (1945) were the first to study such tendencies quantitatively
Bronfenbenner(1943)和Moreno和Jennings(1945)是第一個定量研究這種趨勢的人


Theoretical Motivations
理論動機

Theoretical notions have provided impetus for development of network methods. Here, the authors explore some of the theoretical concepts that have motivated the development of specific network analysis methods.
理論概念為網路方法的發展提供了動力。在這裡,作者探討了一些理論概念,這些概念推動了特定網路分析方法的發展。

Balanced relations were quite common in empirical work; theorists were quick to pose theories about why such things occurred so frequently
平衡關係在實證工作中很常見;理論家們很快就提出了關於為什麼這樣的事情如此頻繁發生的理論

This concept led to a very active thirty-year period of empirical, theoretical, and quantitative research on triples of individuals.
這個概念導致了對三倍個體的三十年非常活躍的實證、理論和定量研究。

Mathematicians had long been interested in graphs and distributions for graphs, and the more mathematical social network analysts were quick to pick up models and methods from the mathematicians
長期以來,數學家一直對圖和圖的分佈感興趣,而更懂數學的社交網路分析師很快就從數學家那裡學習了模型和方法

Graph theory provides both an appropriate representa~ tion of a social network and a set of concepts that can be used to study formal properties of social networks.
圖論既提供了社交網路的適當表示~,也提供了一組可用於研究社交網路的形式屬性的概念。

Empirical and theoretical work on balance theory and transitivity motivated a variety of mathematicians and statisticians to formulate mathematical models for behavior of triples of actors.
關於平衡理論和傳遞性的實證和理論工作促使各種數學家和統計學家為三重參與者的行為制定數學模型。

Such theories argue that units are not acting independently from one another, but rather influence each other
這些理論認為,單位不是彼此獨立行動,而是相互影響

Focusing on such structural variables opens up a different range of possibilities for, and constraints on, data analysis and model building.
關注這些結構變數為數據分析和模型構建開闢了不同的可能性和限制。

The historical examination of empirical, theoretical, and mathematical developments in network research should convince the reader that social
對網路研究的經驗、理論和數學發展的歷史考察應該讓讀者相信,社會


Fundamental Concepts in Network
網路的基本概念

Analysis network analysis is far more than an intuitively appealing vocabulary, metaphor, or set of images for discussing social, behavioral, political, or economic relationships.
分析 網路分析遠不止是用於討論社會、行為、政治或經濟關係的直觀吸引人的詞彙、隱喻或一組圖像。

Social network analysis provides a precise way to define important social concepts, a theoretical alternative to the assumption of independent social actors, and a framework for testing theories about structured social relationships.
社會網路分析提供了一種定義重要社會概念的精確方法,是獨立社會行為者假設的理論替代方案,也是測試結構化社會關係理論的框架。

The methods of network analysis provide explicit formal statements and measures of social structural properties that might otherwise be defined only in metaphorical terms.
網路分析方法提供了社會結構屬性的明確形式陳述和測量,否則這些屬性可能只能用隱喻術語來定義。

Such phrases as webs of relationships, closely knit networks of relations, social role, social position, group, clique, popularity, isolation, prestige, prominence, and so on are given mathematical definitions by social network analysis.
諸如關係網、緊密聯繫的關係網路、社會角色、社會地位、群體、集團、受歡迎程度、孤立、聲望、突出等短語通過社會網路分析給出了數學定義。

There are several key concepts at the heart of network analysis that are fundamental to the discussion of social networks
網路分析的核心有幾個關鍵概念,這些概念是討論社交網路的基礎

These concepts are: actor, relational tie, dyad, triad, subgroup, group, relation, and network.
這些概念是:參與者、關係關係、二元組、三元組、子組、組、關係和網路。

Many important social network methods and models focus on the triad; a subset of three actors and the tie(s) among them.
許多重要的社交網路方法和模型都集中在三元組上;三個參與者的子集以及他們之間的聯繫。

It is important to note that a relation refers to the collection of ties of a given kind measured on pairs of actors from a specified actor set.
需要注意的是,關係是指在特定參與者集中的成對的參與者上測量的給定類型關係的集合。

Having defined actor, group, and relation the authors can give a more explicit definition of social network.
在定義了行動者、群體和關係之後,作者可以對社交網路給出更明確的定義。


Distinctive
獨特

Features social network analysis requires a specialized vocabulary, and deals with conceptual entities and research problems that are quite difficult to pursue using a more traditional statistical and data analytic framework.
特徵 社交網路分析需要專門的詞彙,並處理概念實體和研究問題,而這些問題很難使用更傳統的統計和數據分析框架進行研究。

The authors turn to some of the distinctive features of network analysis
作者轉向網路分析的一些顯著特徵


Distinctive Features of Network Theory and Measurement
網路理論與測量的顯著特點

It is quite important to note the key features that distinguish network theory, and network measurement, from the more usual data analytic framework common in the social and behavioral sciences.
重要的是要注意將網路理論和網路測量與社會和行為科學中常見的更常見的數據分析框架區分開來的關鍵特徵。

Such features provide the necessary motivation for the topics discussed in this book.
這些特點為本書所討論的主題提供了必要的動力。

Many network analysis methods provide formal definitions and descriptions of structural properties of actors, subgroups of actors, or groups
許多網路分析方法提供了對參與者、參與者、參與者的子組或組的結構屬性的正式定義和描述

These methods translate core concepts in social and behavioral theories into formal definitions expressed in relational terms.
這些方法將社會和行為理論中的核心概念轉化為以關係術語表達的正式定義。

Social network data require measurements on ties among social units; attributes of the actors may be collected
社交網路數據需要測量社會單位之間的聯繫;可以收集參與者的屬性

Such data sets need social network methods for analysis.
此類數據集需要社交網路方法進行分析。

Part 11 presents graph theory, develops the vocabulary and concepts that are widely used in network analysis, and relies heavily on examples
第 11 部分介紹了圖論,發展了網路分析中廣泛使用的詞彙和概念,並大量依賴示例

It discusses simple actor and group properties.
它討論了簡單的參與者和組屬性。

The methods presented in these three parts of the book assume specific descriptive models for the structure of a network, and primarily present descriptive techniques for network analysis which translate theoretical concepts.into formal measures.
本書的這三個部分介紹的方法假設了網路結構的特定描述性模型,並主要提出了將理論概念轉化為形式度量的網路分析的描述性技術。


Introduction
介紹

Social network data consist of at least one structural variable measured on a set of actors.
社交網路數據由至少一個在一組參與者上測量的結構變數組成。

The substantive concerns and theories motivating a specific network study usually determine which variables to measure, and often which techniques are most appropriate for their measurement.
激發特定網路研究的實質性關注點和理論通常決定了要測量哪些變數,以及通常哪種技術最適合其測量。

If one is studying economic transactions between countries, one cannot rely on observational techniques; one would probably use archival records to obtain information on such transactions.
如果一個人正在研究國家之間的經濟交易,就不能依賴觀察技術;人們可能會使用檔案記錄來獲取有關此類交易的資訊。

Friendships among people are most likely studied using questionnaires or interviews, rather than using archival or historical records.
人與人之間的友誼最有可能通過問卷調查或訪談來研究,而不是使用檔案或歷史記錄。

The nature of the study determines whether the entire set of actors can be surveyed or whether a sample of the actors must be taken.
研究的性質決定了是否可以對整套行為者進行調查,或者是否必須對行為者進行抽樣調查。

The nature of the structural variables determines which analytic methods are appropriate for their study.
結構變數的性質決定了哪些分析方法適合於他們的研究。

It is crucial to understand the nature of these variables.
了解這些變數的性質至關重要。

The data collection techniques described here determine, to some degree, the characteristics of the relations
這裡描述的數據收集技術在某種程度上決定了關係的特徵


Structural and Composition Variables
結構和組成變數

There are two types of variables that can be included in a network data set: structural and composition.
網路數據集中可以包含兩種類型的變數:結構變數和組合變數。

Structural variables are measured on pairs of actors and are the cornerstone of social network data sets.
結構變數是在成對的參與者上測量的,是社交網路數據集的基石。

Structural variables can measure business transactions between corporations, friendships between people, or trade between nations.
結構變數可以衡量公司之間的商業交易、人與人之間的友誼或國家之間的貿易。

Actors comprising these pairs usually belong to a single set of actors.
組成這些對的 actor 通常屬於一組 actor。

Structural variables measured on a single set of actors give rise to one-mode networks.
在一組參與者上測量的結構變數產生了單模網路。

There are types of structural variables that are measured on two sets of entities.
有一些類型的結構變數是在兩組實體上測量的。

A two-mode network data set contains measurements on which actors from one of the sets have ties to actors in the other set.
雙模式網路數據集包含來自一個集合的參與者與另一個集合中的參與者有聯繫的度量。

The second mode in an affiliation network is a set of events to which the actors belong.
隸屬關係網路中的第二種模式是參與者所屬的一組事件。

In affiliation network data the two modes are the actors and the events.
在隸屬網路數據中,兩種模式是參與者和事件。

In such data, the events are defined not on pairs of actors, but on subsets of actors.
在此類數據中,事件不是在成對的參與者上定義的,而是在參與者的子集上定義的。


Boundary Specification and
邊界規範和

Sampling identify the population to be studied, and if sampling is necessary, worry about how to sample actors and relations.
抽樣確定要研究的總體,如果需要抽樣,請擔心如何對參與者和關係進行抽樣。

The second example comes from the study of community leaders by Laumann and Pappi (1973)
第二個例子來自Laumann和Pappi(1973)對社區領袖的研究

They asked community leaders to define the boundary by identifying the elite actors in the community of Altneustadt.
他們要求社區領導人通過確定Altneustadt社區的精英行為者來定義邊界。

Name all persons [who] are in general very influential in Altneustadt
說出所有在阿爾特諾伊施塔特非常有影響力的人

From these lists, each of which can be considered a sample of the relevant actors in the elite network, the actor set was enumerated.
從這些名單中,每個名單都可以被視為精英網路中相關參與者的樣本,列舉了參與者集。

Examples of social network studies using snowball sampling include: Johnson (1990) and Johnson, Boster, and Holbert (1989) on commercial fishermen; Moore (1979) and Alba and Moore (1978) on elite networks
使用滾雪球抽樣的社交網路研究的例子包括:Johnson(1990)和Johnson,Boster和Holbert(1989)關於商業漁民;Moore (1979) 和 Alba and Moore (1978) 在精英網路上

Most network studies focus on well-defined, completely enumerated sets, rather than on samples of actors from larger popuiations.
大多數網路研究都集中在定義明確、完全列舉的集合上,而不是來自較大人口的參與者樣本。

Methodology for the latter situation is considerably different from methods for the former.
后一種情況的方法與前一種情況的方法有很大不同。

One example is data arising from an ego-centered network design
一個例子是以自我為中心的網路設計產生的數據

Data on such networks are gathered using special sampling strategies that allow the researcher to focus on a specific set of respondents, and the ties that these respondents have to particular others.
這些網路上的數據是使用特殊的抽樣策略收集的,這些策略使研究人員能夠專注於一組特定的受訪者,以及這些受訪者與特定其他人的聯繫。

The authors turn to a discussion of one-mode, two-mode, and affiliational, and egocentric and special networks
作者轉而討論單模式、雙模式、從屬關係、自我中心和特殊網路


One-Mode Networks
單模網路

Suppose the network under study is one-mode, and involves measurements on just a single set of actors.
假設所研究的網路是單模的,並且只涉及對一組參與者的測量。

The relations measured on the single set of actors in a one-mode network are usually viewed as representing specific substantive connections, or "relational contents" (Knoke and Kuklinski 1982).
在單模式網路中,在一組參與者上測量的關係通常被視為代表特定的實質性聯繫或“關係內容”(Knoke and Kuklinski 1982)。

These connections, measured at the level of pairs of actors, can be of many types.
這些連接,在成對的參與者的水平上測量,可以有多種類型。

In addition to relational information, social network data sets can contain measurements on the characteristics of the actors.
除了關係資訊外,社交網路數據集還可以包含對參與者特徵的測量。

Such measurements of actor attribute variables constitute the composition of the social network.
這種對行為者屬性變數的測量構成了社交網路的組成。

Relations in a two-mode network measure ties between the actors in one set and actors in a second set.
雙模網路中的關係衡量一個集合中的參與者和第二個集合中的參與者之間的聯繫。

The type of two-mode social network, which the authors refer to as an affiliation network, arises when one set of actors is measured with respect to attendance at, or affiliation with, a set of events or activities.
雙模式社交網路的類型,作者稱之為從屬網路,當一組參與者被衡量為一組事件或活動的出席或從屬關係時,就會出現。

Social network data consist of one relations measured among a set of actors.
社交網路數據由一組參與者之間測量的一種關係組成。

The authors could record the dollar value of manufactured goods that are exported from One country to a second country, giving rise to a valued relation
作者可以記錄從一個國家出口到第二個國家的製成品的美元價值,從而產生價值關係


Collection
收集

There are a variety of ways in which social network data can be gathered. These techniques are: Questionnaires; Interviews; Observations; Archival records; Experiments; Other techniques, including ego-centered, small world, and diaries.
有多種方法可以收集社交網路數據。這些技術是:問卷調查;採訪;觀察;檔案記錄;實驗;其他技術,包括以自我為中心、小世界和日記。

An example of a complete rank order design is the study by Bernard, Killworth, and Sailer (1980)
完整排名順序設計的一個例子是 Bernard、Killworth 和 Sailer (1980) 的研究

They asked each of forty members of a social science research office to report the amount of communication with each other member of the office using the following procedure: ...
他們要求社會科學研究辦公室的四十名成員中的每一個人使用以下程式報告與辦公室其他成員的交流量:......

Observing interactions among actors is another way to collect network data
觀察參與者之間的交互是收集網路數據的另一種方法

This method has been widely used in field research to study relatively small groups of people who have faceto-face interactions (Roethlisberger and Dickson 1961; Kapferer 1969; Hammer, Polgar, and Salzinger 1969; Thurman 1980; Bernard and Killworth 1977; Killworth and Bernard 1976; Bernard, Killworth, and Sailer 1980, 1982; Freeman and Romney 1987; Freeman, Romney, and Freeman 1987; Freeman, Freeman, and Michaelson 1988, 1989).
這種方法已被廣泛用於實地研究,以研究具有面對面互動的相對較小的人群(Roethlisberger and Dickson 1961;Kapferer 1969 年;Hammer、Polgar 和 Salzinger 1969 年;瑟曼 1980;伯納德和基爾沃思 1977 年;Killworth 和 Bernard 1976;Bernard、Killworth 和 Sailer 1980、1982;弗里曼和羅姆尼 1987;弗里曼、羅姆尼和弗里曼 1987 年;Freeman、Freeman 和 Michaelson 1988、1989)。

Many network studies employ a variety of data collection methods for recording ties, in addition to gathering actor attribute information.
許多網路研究除了收集參與者屬性資訊外,還採用多種數據收集方法來記錄關係。

Another way to gather social network data is to ask each respondent to keep a continuous record of the other people with whom they interact.
收集社交網路數據的另一種方法是要求每個受訪者連續記錄與他們互動的其他人。

The data were gathered by Taba (1955), who focused on the differences and similarities between boy-boy and girl-girl choices, and "mixed gender" ties
這些數據是由Taba(1955)收集的,他專注於男孩和女孩女孩選擇之間的差異和相似之處,以及“混合性別”關係


Measurement Validity, Reliability, Accuracy, Error
測量有效性、可靠性、準確度、誤差

As Freeman and Romney (1987) note, "social structure refers to a relatively prolonged and stable pattern of interpersonal relations" (1987, pages 330-331)
正如Freeman和Romney(1987)所指出的,“社會結構是指一種相對長期和穩定的人際關係模式”(1987年,第330-331頁)

In their discussion of measurement error in sociometry, Holland and Leinhardt (1973) refer to this pattern as the true structure, in contrast to the observed structure contained in the measured network data, which might contain error.
Holland和Leinhardt(1973)在討論社會測量學中的測量誤差時,將這種模式稱為真實結構,與測量網路數據中包含的觀察到的結構形成鮮明對比,後者可能包含誤差。

Important concerns in social network measurement are the validity, reliability, and measurement error in these data.
社交網路測量中的重要問題是這些數據的有效性、可靠性和測量誤差。

Little work has been done on the issues of validity, reliability, and measurement error in social network data.
關於社交網路數據的有效性、可靠性和測量誤差問題,幾乎沒有做過任何工作。

They found that what people report about their interactions is related to the long-range social structure, rather than to particular instances
他們發現,人們報告的互動與長期社會結構有關,而不是與特定實例有關

Another issue related to the accuracy of network data occurs when the actors in the network are organizations but information on ties is collected from individuals as representatives of the organization.
當網路中的行為者是組織,但有關關係的資訊是從作為組織代表的個人那裡收集的時,就會發生與網路數據準確性有關的另一個問題。

The construct validity of social network measures can be studied by examining how these measures behave in a range of theoretical propositions (Mouton, Blake, and Fruchter 1955b; Burt, Marsden, and Rossi 1985).
社會網路測量的結構有效性可以通過檢查這些測量在一系列理論命題中的行為來研究(Mouton, Blake, and Fruchter 1955b;Burt、Marsden 和 Rossi 1985)。

Of particular importance in the discussion presented by Holland and Leinhardt is the error that arises in fixed choice data collection designs.
在Holland和Leinhardt提出的討論中,特別重要的是固定選擇數據收集設計中出現的錯誤。


Kraekhardt's High-teeh Managers
Kraekhardt的高端經理

This is a one-mode network, with three relations measured on a set of people
這是一個單模式網路,在一組人身上測量了三種關係

These data were gathered by Krackhardt (1987a) in a small manufacturing organization on the west coast of the U.S This organization had been in existence for ten years and produced high-tech machinery for other companies.
這些數據是由Krackhardt(1987a)在美國西海岸的一個小型製造組織中收集的,該組織已經存在了十年,併為其他公司生產高科技機械。

This is a one-mode network with two relations measured among a set of families
這是一個單模式網路,在一組族之間測量了兩個關係

These multirelational network data, compiled by Padgett, consist of the marriage and business ties among 16 families in 15th century Florence, Italy.
這些由帕吉特編製的多關係網路數據包括 15 世紀義大利佛羅倫薩 16 個家庭之間的婚姻和商業關係。

There are three actor attributes: net wealth in 1427; number of priors from 1282-1344; and number of business or marriage ties in the total network
有三個參與者屬性:1427年的凈財富;1282-1344 年的先驗數量;以及整個網路中的商業或婚姻關係數量

This is a one-mode network with two relations measured on a set of people.
這是一個單模式網路,在一組人身上測量了兩種關係。

These data come from a computer conference among researchers working in the emerging scientific specialty of social network research, organized by Freeman, and sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
這些數據來自由弗里曼組織並由美國國家科學基金會贊助的社交網路研究新興科學專業研究人員之間的計算機會議。

Social network data consist of measurements on a variety of relations for one or more sets of actors.
社交網路數據包括對一組或多組參與者的各種關係的測量。


OMultiple Relations
OMultiple 關係

Graph theoretic notation can be generalized to multirelatiorial networks, which could include both directional and nondirectional relations.
圖論符號可以推廣到多關係網路,其中可以包括方向關係和非方向關係。

Each of these relations can be represented as a graph or directed graph; each has associated with it a set of lines or arcs, specifying which lines are present in the graph for the relation (or, which pairs are "relating").
這些關係中的每一個都可以表示為圖或有向圖;每個都與它關聯了一組線或弧,指定關係圖中存在哪些線(或者,哪些線對是“相關的”)。

Each relation has a corresponding set of arcs, fi'" which contains Lr ordered pairs of actors as elements.
每個關係都有一組相應的弧線 fi'“,其中包含作為元素的 Lr 有序的參與者對。

The subscript r ranges from 1 to R, the total number of relations
下標 r 的範圍從 1 到 R,關係總數

Each of these R sets defines a directed graph on the nodes in .AI.
這些 R 集中的每一個都定義了 中節點上的有向圖。人工智慧。

For a non,directional relation, such as "lives near," measurements are made on unordered rather than ordered pairs.
對於非方向性關係,例如「生命附近」,測量是在無序而不是有序對上進行的。

The authors use (., .) to denote pairs of actors for whom a tie is present on a nondirectional relation, and use < .,.
作者使用 (., .) 來表示在非方向關係中存在平局的參與者對,並使用 < .,。

Since "lives near" is nondirected, there are no arrowheads on these lines
由於「附近生活」是無向的,因此這些行上沒有箭頭

Sociometric notation is general enough to handle valued relations
社會計量符號足夠通用,可以處理價值關係


Sociometric Notation
社會計量符號

Sociometry is the study of positive and negative affective relations, such as liking/disliking and friends/enemies, among a set of people.
社會測量學是研究一組人之間的積極和消極情感關係,例如喜歡/不喜歡和朋友/敵人。

A social network data set consisting of people and measured affective relations between people is often referred to as sociometric.
由人與人之間測量的情感關係組成的社交網路數據集通常被稱為社會計量學。

A sociomatrix for a dichotomous relation is exactly the adjacency matrix for the graph quantifying the ties between the actors for the relation in question
二分關係的社會矩陣正是圖的鄰接矩陣,用於量化相關關係的參與者之間的聯繫

This notation can be viewed as complementary to graph theoretic notation described .
這種符號可以看作是對所描述的圖論符號的補充。

Festinger (1949) applied matrix multiplication to sociomatrices and described how products of a sociomatrix can be used to find cliques or subgroups of similar actors
Festinger(1949)將矩陣乘法應用於社會矩陣,並描述了如何使用社會矩陣的乘積來尋找相似參與者的集團或子群體

Since such powers have simple graph theoretic interpretation-fsee-Chap~ ter 4's discussion of 2- and 3-step walks), this research helped begin the era of graph theoretic approaches to social network analysis.
由於這種冪具有簡單的圖論解釋-fsee-Chap~ ter 4 對 2 步和 3 步行走的討論),這項研究有助於開啟圖論方法用於社交網路分析的時代。

Define Xij as the value of the tie from the ith actor to the jth actor on the single relation.
將 Xij 定義為單個關係上從第 i 個 actor 到第 j 個 actor 的領帶值。

The authors place these measurements into a sociomatrix.
作者將這些測量結果放入社會矩陣中。

Since there are g actors, the matrix is of size g x g
由於有 g 參與者,因此矩陣的大小為 g x g

Sociometric notation uses such matrices to denote measurements on ties.
社會計量符號使用此類矩陣來表示領帶的測量值。


Friendship at Beginning of Year
年初的友誼

Sarah represented by the arc 11 there is an arc from Allison to Drew in the sociogram for the first relation, indicating that Allison chooses Drew as a friend at the beginning of the school year.
由弧線 11 表示的莎拉在第一個關係的社會圖中有一個從艾莉森到德魯的弧線,表明艾莉森在學年開始時選擇德魯作為朋友。

This arc is how this tie is denoted by graph theoretic notation
這個弧線就是用圖論符號表示這種關係的方式

Consider how this single tie is coded with sociometric notation.
考慮一下這個單一的領帶是如何用社會計量符號編碼的。

Consider the entry which quantifies Allison as a sender and Drew (n2) as a receiver on relation ,q(1
考慮將 Allison 量化為發送者,將 Drew (n2) 量化為關係的接收者,q(1

This entry is in the (1,2) cell of this sociomatrix, and contains a 1 indicating that xl21 the value of the tie from nl to n2 on relation f!ll.
此條目位於此社會矩陣的 (1,2) 單元格中,包含一個 1,表示 xl21 關係 f!ll 上從 nl 到 n2 的領帶值。

As the authors have mentioned, there are network data sets for which sociometric notation is more difficult to use - those which contain information on the attributes of the actors.
正如作者所提到的,有些網路數據集更難使用社會計量符號 - 那些包含有關參與者屬性的資訊的數據集。

The authors would record the tie implied by "child i chooses child j as a friend at the beginning of the school year" as iFj. In sociometric notation, iFj means that XijF = 1, and implies that there is a "I" in the cell at row i and column j of the sociomatrix for this relation.
作者將「孩子我在學年開始時選擇孩子j作為朋友」所暗示的領帶記錄為iFj。在社會計量符號中,iFj 表示 XijF = 1,並暗示此關係的社會矩陣第 i 行和第 j 列的單元格中有一個“I”。


OTwo Sets of
OTwo 集

Actors presents no problem for us, since the models that use algebraic notation are specific to dichotomous relations.
Actors 對我們來說沒有問題,因為使用代數符號的模型是特定於二分關係的。

If the relation is defined on a single set of actors, both actors in the pair can be senders and both can be receivers.
如果關係是在一組參與者上定義的,則對中的兩個參與者都可以是發送者,也可以是接收者。

The authors return to the collection of six secondgrade children, and consider a second set of actors, vii, consisting of h = 4 adults.
作者回到了六個二年級兒童的集合,並考慮了第二組演員,vii,由h = 4個成年人組成。

In homogeneous pairs the senders and receivers are from the same set, while in heterogeneous pairs actors are from different sets.
在同質對中,發送者和接收者來自同一集合,而在異質對中,參與者來自不同的集合。

Assuming the relation for the heterogeneous pairs is directional, the originating actor must belong to a different set than the receiving actor.
假設異構對的關係是定向的,則原始參與者必須屬於與接收參與者不同的集合。

Since there are two sets of actors, the authors get two kinds of heterogeneous pairs: Sender belongs to % and Receiver belongs to vii;.
由於有兩組 actor,作者得到了兩種異構對:Sender 屬於 %,Receiver 屬於 vii;。

If the relation is defined for actors from different sets, in general, its sociomatrix will not be square.
如果為來自不同集合的參與者定義關係,則通常其社會矩陣不會是正方形的。

This relation is defined for the heterogeneous pairs consisting of a child as the seI,lder and an adult as a receiver.
這種關係是為異質對定義的,這些異構對由一個子作為 seI,lder 和一個作為接收者的成人組成。


Putting It All Together children that are taught by each teacher
把每個老師教的孩子放在一起

Note how this array codes the information in the directional relation between two sets of actors.
請注意此陣列如何對兩組參與者之間的方向關係中的資訊進行編碼。

The authors will use the symbols "ni ~ n/, as shorthand notation for nj "chooses" nj on the single relation in question; that is, the arc from nj to nj is contained in the set 2, so that there is a tie present for the ordered pair < ni.
作者將使用符號「ni ~ n/」作為 nj 在所討論的單個關係上「選擇」nj 的簡寫符號;也就是說,從 NJ 到 NJ 的弧包含在集合 2 中,因此 Ni <有序對存在領帶。

Nodes and arcs are the basic building blocks for graph theoretic notation
節點和圓弧是圖論符號的基本構建塊

To relate these concepts to the elements of sociometric notation, the authors consider again the collection of all ordered pairs of actors in ..¥.
為了將這些概念與社會計量符號的元素聯繫起來,作者再次考慮了 .. 中所有有序的參與者對的集合。¥.

Sometimes this collection is denoted ..¥ x ..¥, a Cartesian product of sets.
有時這個集合表示為..¥ x ..¥,集合的笛卡爾乘積。

Freeman (1989) views the triple consisting of the algebraic structure S, the directed graph or sociogram '#d, and the adjacency matrix or sociomatrix X as a social network: g = < S, '#d, X>
Freeman(1989)認為由代數結構S、有向圖或社會圖'#d 以及鄰接矩陣或社會矩陣X組成的三元組是一個社交網络:g = < S, '#d, X>

This triple provides a nice abstract definition of the central concept of this book.
這三重奏為本書的中心概念提供了一個很好的抽象定義。

In the final section of this chapter the authors define and illustrate basic matrix operations that are used in social network analysis, and show how many of these matrix operations can be used to study the graph theoretic concepts discussed of this chapter
在本章的最後一節中,作者定義並說明了用於社會網路分析的基本矩陣運算,並展示了這些矩陣運算中有多少可用於研究本章討論的圖論概念


Why Grapbs?
為什麼選擇Grapbs?

Graph theory has been useful in social network analysis for many reasons. Among these reasons are the following (see Harary, Norman, and Cartwright 1965, page 3).
圖論在社交網路分析中很有用,原因有很多。這些原因如下(參見 Harary、Norman 和 Cartwright 1965,第 3 頁)。

The authors will illustrate the graph theoretic concepts discussed on small, simple social networks
作者將說明在小型、簡單的社交網路上討論的圖論概念

Most of these examples will consist of hypothetical data created to demonstrate specific properties of graphs.
這些範例中的大多數將包含為演示圖形的特定屬性而創建的假設數據。

A graph is a model for a social network with an undirected dichotomous relation; that is, a tie is either present or absent between each pair of actors
圖是具有無向二分關係的社交網路的模型;也就是說,每對演員之間存在或不存在領帶

Nondirectional relations include such things as co-membership in formal organizations or informal groups, some kinship relations such as "is married to," "is a blood relative of," proximity relations such as "lives near," and interactions such as "works with." In a graph, nodes represent actors and lines represent ties between actors.
非定向關係包括正式組織或非正式團體的共同成員身份,一些親屬關係,如“已婚”、“是血親”,親近關係,如“住在附近”,以及互動,如“一起工作”。在圖形中,節點表示參與者,線表示參與者之間的聯繫。

In a graph of a social network with a single nondirectional dichotomous relation, the nodes represent actors, and the lines represent the ties that exist between pairs of actors on the relation.
在具有單個非方向二分關係的社交網路圖中,節點表示參與者,線表示關係中成對參與者之間存在的聯繫。

A line lk = is included in the set of lines, 2, if there is a tie present between the two actors in the network who are represented by nodes nj and nj in the graph.
如果網路中由圖中的節點 nj 和 nj 表示的兩個參與者之間存在平局,則線 lk = 包含在線集 2 中。

The sets of nodes and lines are listed
列出了節點和線的集

The authors turn to an example to demonstrate nodal degree and graph density
作者舉了一個例子來證明節點度和圖密度


Example

Padgett's Florentine families network includes a set of sixteen Italian families in the early 15th century.
帕吉特的佛羅倫薩家庭網路包括 15 世紀初的 16 個義大利家庭。

The authors define and illustrate properties that are used to study the connectivity of graphs, to define the distance between pairs of nodes, and to identify nodes and lines that are critical for the connectivity of the graph
作者定義並說明了用於研究圖的連通性、定義節點對之間的距離以及識別對圖的連通性至關重要的節點和線的屬性

These properties are important in themselves, but are building blocks for later properties.
這些屬性本身很重要,但也是後續屬性的構建塊。

If the authors consider a network of communications among people in which lines in a graph represent channels for transmission of messages between people, if two actors are reachable, it is possible for a message to travel from one actor to the other by passing the message through intermediaries.
如果作者考慮人與人之間的通信網路,其中圖中的線表示人與人之間傳遞消息的管道,如果可以到達兩個參與者,則消息可以通過仲介傳遞消息從一個參與者傳播到另一個參與者。

The two components in this graph are the subgraphs generated by the subsets: let them consider the paths between a pair of nodes.
此圖中的兩個分量是由子集生成的子圖:讓它們考慮一對節點之間的路徑。

The authors use the ideas of reachability between pairs of nodes, the concept of a connected graph, and components in a disconnected graph to define nodes and lines that are critical for the connectivity of a graph.
作者使用節點對之間的可達性、連接圖的概念以及斷開連接圖中的元件來定義對圖的連通性至關重要的節點和線。

One can consider the extent of connectivity in a graph in terms of the number of nodes or the number of lines that must be removed in order to leave the graph disconnected.
人們可以根據節點數或必須刪除的線數來考慮圖中的連通性程度,以使圖斷開連接。

The authors will focus on the most important directed graph concepts including the nodal degrees, walks, paths, reachability, and connectivity
作者將重點介紹最重要的有向圖概念,包括節點度、步行、路徑、可達性和連通性


Nodal lndegree and Outdegree
淋巴結 lndegree 和 outdegree

The degree of a node is the number of nodes adjacent to it. In a digraph, a node can be either adjacent to, or adjacent from another node, depending on the "direction" of the arc.
節點的度數是與其相鄰的節點數。在二合圖中,一個節點可以與另一個節點相鄰,也可以與另一個節點相鄰,具體取決於圓弧的“方向”。

These two numbers are equal, since they are considering the same set of arcs, but from different "directions." The authors will denote the mean indegree as ch, and the mean outdegree as do.
這兩個數位是相等的,因為它們考慮的是同一組弧線,但來自不同的“方向”。作者將平均度數表示為ch,將平均度數表示為ch。

The indegrees and outdegrees of the nodes in a directed graph can be used to distinguish four different kinds of nodes based on the possible ways that arcs can be incident with the node.
有向圖中節點的內度和外度可用於根據弧入射到節點的可能方式來區分四種不同類型的節點。

The density of a directed graph is equal to the proportion of arcs present in the digraph.
有向圖的密度等於二元圖中存在的弧的比例。

It is calculated as the number of arcs, L, divided by the possible number of arcs.
它的計算方法是弧數 L 除以可能的弧數。

Let them illustrate nodal indegree and outdegree, and the density of a directed graph on the example of friendships among Krackhardt's hightech managers.
讓他們以 Krackhardt 的高科技經理之間的友誼為例來說明節點內度和外度,以及有向圖的密度。

Walks and related concepts in graphs can be defined for digraphs, but one must consider the direction of the arcs.
圖中的行走和相關概念可以為二圖定義,但必須考慮弧線的方向。

The length of a path is the number of arcs in it
路徑的長度是其中的弧數


Dir,ected Graphs
Dir,ected 圖表

Directed walk Directed path Semipath Cycle Semicyc)e ns "I n2 "3 "4 "2 "3 ns 114 "2 "3.
定向行走 定向路徑 半路徑 迴圈 Semicyc)e ns “I n2 ”3 “4 ”2 “3 ns 114 ”2 “3.

The authors will consider walks and paths in which the arc between previous and subsequent nodes in the sequence may go in either direction.
作者將考慮序列中前一個節點和後續節點之間的弧線可能沿任一方向移動的步道和路徑。

A semiwalk joining nodes nj and nj is a sequence of nodes and arcs in which successive pairs of nodes are incident with an arc from the first to the second, or by an arc from the second to the first.
連接節點 nj 和 nj 的半漫遊是節點和弧的序列,其中連續的節點對從第一個節點到第二個節點以弧入射,或從第二個節點到第一個節點以弧入射。

A semipath joining nodes nj and nj is a sequence of distinct nodes, where all successive pairs of nodes are connected by an arc from the first to the second, or by an arc from the second to the first for all successive .
連接節點 nj 和 nj 的半徑是不同節點的序列,其中所有連續的節點對都通過從第一個節點到第二個節點的弧連接,或者通過從第二個節點到第一個節點的弧連接所有連續節點。

A cycle in a directed graph is a closed directed walk of at least three nodes in which all nodes except the first and last are distinct.
有向圖中的迴圈是至少三個節點的閉合有向遊走,其中除第一個節點和最後一個節點外的所有節點都是不同的。

A semicycle in a directed graph is a closed directed semiwalk of at least three nodes in which all nodes except the first and last are distinct.
有向圖中的半圓是至少三個節點的閉合有向半遊走,其中除第一個節點和最後一個節點外的所有節點都是不同的。


Reachability and Connectivity in Digraphs
二合體中的可達性和連通性

Using the ideas of paths and semipaths, the authors can define reachability and connectivity of pairs of nodes, and the connectedness of a directed graph.
使用路徑和半路徑的思想,作者可以定義節點對的可達性和連通性,以及有向圖的連通性。

A pair of nodes, nj, nj, is: (i) Weakly connected if they are joined by a semipath (ii) Unilaterally connected if they are joined by a path from nj to nj, or a path from nj to nj (iii) Strongly connected if there is a path from nj to nj, and a path from nj to nj; the path from nj to nj may contain different nodes and arcs than the path from nj to nj (iv) Recursively connected if they are strongly connected, and the path from nj to nj uses the same nodes and arcs as the path from nj to nj, in reverse order
一對節點 nj, nj 是: (i) 如果它們由半路徑連接,則為弱連接 (ii) 如果它們由從 nj 到 nj 的路徑連接,或從 nj 到 nj 的路徑連接,則為單邊連接 (iii) 如果存在從 nj 到 nj 的路徑,以及從 nj 到 nj 的路徑,則為強連接;從 NJ 到 NJ 的路徑可能包含與從 NJ 到 NJ 的路徑不同的節點和弧 (iv) 如果它們強連接,則遞歸連接,並且從 NJ 到 NJ 的路徑使用與從 NJ 到 NJ 的路徑相同的節點和弧,順序相反

Notice that these forms of connectivity are increasingly strict, and that any strict form implies connectivity of any less strict form.
請注意,這些形式的連接越來越嚴格,任何嚴格的形式都意味著任何不太嚴格的形式的連接。

The diameter of a weakly or unilaterally connected directed graph is undefined
弱連接或單邊連接的有向圖的直徑是未定義的


OSpecia/ Kinds of Directed Graphs
OSpecia/ 有向圖的種類

The authors describe several kinds of digraphs with important properties. The authors begin by defining digraph complement and digraph converse.
作者描述了幾種具有重要性質的二合字。作者首先定義了二合補語和雙合字對立。

The arcs in the converse connect the same pairs of nodes as the arcs in the digraph, but all arcs are reversed in direction.
相反的弧線連接與二合圖中的弧線相同的節點對,但所有弧線的方向都是相反的。

In the digraph representing the relation of friendship the arc < nj, nj > means i "chooses" j as a friend.
在代表友誼關係的二元圖中,弧線< nj,nj > 表示我“選擇”j 作為朋友。

In the digraph representing the complement of the relation of friendship, the arc < ni, nj > means i "does not choose" j as a friend.
在代表友誼關係補語的二元圖中,弧< ni,nj >表示我“不選擇”j 作為朋友。

One other special type of a digraph is a tournament, which mathematically represents a set of actors competing in some event(s) and a relation indicating superior performances or "beats" in competition.
二元圖的另一種特殊類型是錦標賽,它在數學上表示一組參加某些賽事的演員,以及表示在比賽中表現出色或“節拍”的關係。

Such tournaments can be modeled as round robin designs (Kenny 1981; Kenny and LaVoie 1984; Wong 1982)
這樣的比賽可以建模為迴圈賽設計(Kenny 1981;Kenny 和 LaVoie 1984;Wong 1982)

These competitive records form a special type of digraph, because each pair of nodes is connected by exactly one arc.
這些競爭記錄形成了一種特殊類型的二元圖,因為每對節點都恰好由一條弧線連接。

Many relations are valued; that is, the ties indicate the strength or intensity of the tie between each pair of actors.
許多關係都受到重視;也就是說,領帶表示每對演員之間領帶的強度或強度。

The graph for a valued relation must convey more information by representing the strength of an arc or a line.
值關係的圖形必須通過表示弧或線的強度來傳達更多資訊。


Signed Graphs and Signed Directed Graphs
有符號圖和有符號有向圖

Relations are measured in which the ties can be interpreted as being either positive or negative in affect, evaluation, or meaning.
關係是衡量關係的,在這種關係中,關係可以被解釋為在影響、評估或意義上是積極的或消極的。

A signed graph is a graph whose lines carry the additional information of a valence: a positive or negative sign.
有符號圖是一種圖,其線條帶有價的附加資訊:正號或負號。

A complete signed graph is a signed graph in which all unordered pairs of nodes are included in the set of lines.
完整的有符號圖是一個有符號圖,其中所有無序的節點對都包含在線集中。

Since all lines are present in a complete signed graph, and all lines have a valence either "+" or "-", each unordered pair of nodes is assigned either "+" or "-".
由於所有線都存在於一個完整的有符號圖中,並且所有線都具有“+”或“-”的化合價,因此每個無序節點對都被分配為“+”或“-”。

In a complete signed graph, a triad may be in one of four possible states, depending on whether zero, one, two, or three positive lines are present among the three nodes.
在完整的有符號圖中,三元組可能處於四種可能的狀態之一,具體取決於三個節點之間是否存在零、一條、兩條或三條正線。

In a signed directed graph the most general cycles are usually referred to as semicycles.
在有符號有向圖中,最一般的迴圈通常稱為半週期。

Signed graphs and signed directed graphs generalize graphs and directed graphs by allowing the lines or arcs to have valences.
有符號圖和有向圖通過允許直線或圓弧具有價來概括圖和有向圖。

Examples of valued relations include the frequency of interaction among pairs of people, the dollar amount of trade between nations, or the rating of friendship between people in a group
有價值的關係的例子包括成對的人之間互動的頻率、國家之間的貿易金額或群體中人與人之間的友誼等級

Such relations cannot be fully represented using a graph or a directed graph, since lines or arcs in a graph or directed graph are only present or absent.
這種關係不能用圖或有向圖完全表示,因為圖或有向圖中的線或弧只存在或不存在。

In a valued directed graph, the arc from node nj to node nj is not the
在值有向圖中,從節點 nj 到節點 nj 的弧不是


Valued Graphs and Valued Directed
值圖和值定向圖

Graphs same as the arc from node nj to node nj
圖形與從節點 nj 到節點 nj 的弧相同

In a graph or digraph, nodal degree is equal to the number of lines incident with the node or the number of arcs incident to it or from it.
在圖形或二合圖中,節點度等於與節點入射的線數或入射到節點或從節點入射的弧數。

One way to generalize the notion of degree to valued graphs and digraphs is to average the values over all lines incident with a node, or all arcs incident to or from a node.
將度的概念推廣到值圖和二元圖的一種方法是對入射到節點的所有線或入射到節點或從節點入射的所有弧的值取平均值。

In order to define these concepts for valued graphs, the authors must consider the values attached to each of the lines in a path.
為了定義值圖的這些概念,作者必須考慮附加到路徑中每條線的值。

The authors define a path at level c as a path between a pair of nodes such that each and every line in the path has a value greater than or equal to c; that is, VI ~ c for all VI in the path (Doreian 1969, 1974).
作者將 c 級的路徑定義為一對節點之間的路徑,使得路徑中的每一行都具有大於或等於 c 的值;也就是說,路徑中所有VI的VI~c(Doreian 1969,1974)。

Directed graphs are used for representing directional relations and generalize graphs by considering the direction of the arcs between pairs of nodes.
有向圖用於表示方向關係,並通過考慮節點對之間的弧的方向來概括圖。

If more than one relation is measured on the same set of actors, the graph representing this network must allow each pair of nodes to be connected in more than one way.
如果在同一組參與者上測量了多個關係,則表示此網路的圖形必須允許每對節點以多種方式連接。

The entry in cell (i, j) of X records the strength of the tie from actor i to actor j
X 的儲存格 (i, j) 中的項目記錄了從演員 i 到演員 j 的領帶強度


OMatrices 101' Hypergraphs
OMatrices 101' 超圖

The matrix for a hypergraph, denoted by A, is a g by h matrix that records which points are contained within which edges.
超圖的矩陣(用 A 表示)是一個 g x h 矩陣,它記錄了哪些點包含在哪些邊內。

A sociomatrix for a network with a single set of actors and one relation has g rows and g columns, and is of size g x g.
具有一組參與者和一個關係的網路的社會矩陣具有 g 行和 g 列,大小為 g x g。

Each entry in a matrix is called a cell, and is denoted by its row index and column index.
矩陣中的每個條目稱為儲存格,由其行索引和列索引表示。

The sociomatrix for a digraph is not necessarily symmetric, since the arc < ni,nj > is not the same as the arc < ni,nj >, and the entry in cell Xij is not necessarily the same as the entry in ceIl Xji. The authors turn to some important matrix operations, including matrix permutation, the transpose of a matrix, matrix addition and subtraction, matrix multiplication, and Boolean matrix multiplication.
二合字的社會矩陣不一定是對稱的,因為ni,nj > <弧與ni,nj > <弧不同,並且單元格 Xij中的條目不一定與ceIl Xji中的條目相同。作者轉向一些重要的矩陣運算,包括矩陣排列、矩陣的轉置、矩陣加減法、矩陣乘法和布爾矩陣乘法。

In a sociomatrix, the order of the rows and columns indexing the actors in the network or the nodes in the graph is arbitrary, so long as the rows and columns are indexed in the same order.
在社會矩陣中,索引網路中的參與者或圖形中的節點的行和列的順序是任意的,只要行和列以相同的順序進行索引即可。

Sometimes the patterns of ties between actors is not clear until the authors permute both the rows and the columns of the matrix.
有時,在作者排列矩陣的行和列之前,參與者之間的聯繫模式並不清晰。

In the transpose of the sociomatrix, a 1 in cell (i,j) indicates that row actor i received a tie from column actor j.
在社會矩陣的轉置中,單元格 (i,j) 中的 1 表示行 actor i 從列 actor j 那裡獲得了平局。


In general, we define XP (X to the pth power) as the matrix product of X times itself, p times
通常,我們將 XP(X 的 p 次方)定義為 X 乘以本身的矩陣乘積,即 p 乘以

The authors will first describe how to use matrix multiplication to study walks and reachability in a graph and show how properties of matrices can be used to quantify nodal degree and graph density.
作者將首先描述如何使用矩陣乘法來研究圖中的遊走和可達性,並展示如何使用矩陣的屬性來量化節點度和圖密度。

Since every path is a walk, the authors can study reachability of pairs of nodes by considering the powers of the matrix X that count walks of a given length.
由於每條路徑都是步行,因此作者可以通過考慮計算給定長度的步行的矩陣 X 的冪來研究節點對的可達性。

Since any two nodes that are reachable are connected by a path of length g - 1 or less, non-zero entries in the matrix X[rl indicate pairs of nodes that are reachable.
由於可訪問的任意兩個節點都通過長度為 g - 1 或更小的路徑連接,因此矩陣 X[rl 中的非零條目表示可訪問的節點對。

The entry in cell (i,j) of X[Rl is equal to 1 if nodes ni and Hj are reachable, and equal to 0 otherwise
如果節點 ni 和 Hj 可訪問,則 X[Rl 的儲存格 (i,j) 中的條目等於 1,否則等於 0

The authors can calculate these values by looking at the elements of X[I:l, and noting which ones are non~zero.
作者可以通過查看 X[I:l 的元素並注意哪些元素是非~零來計算這些值。

The authors can consider directed walks of any length by studying powers of the matrix X.
作者可以通過研究矩陣 X 的冪來考慮任何長度的有向遊走。

The entries of the matrix XP give the total number of directed walks of length p beginning at row node ni and ending at column node nj.
矩陣 XP 的條目給出了長度為 p 的有向遊走總數,從行節點 ni 開始,到列節點 nj 結束。

(g - 1), the authors obtain a matrix, denoted by X£l:l, whose entries give the total number of directed walks from row node nj to column node nj> of any length less than or equal to g-1.
(g - 1),作者得到一個矩陣,用 X£l:l 表示,其條目給出了從行節點 nj 到列節點 nj 的有向遊走總數>長度小於或等於 g-1。

These representations are quite useful, as Katz (1947) first realized
正如Katz(1947)首先意識到的那樣,這些表示非常有用


4.10 Properties of Graphs, Relations, and Matrices
4.10 圖形、關係和矩陣的性質

The authors have noted three important properties of social networks: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
作者指出了社交網路的三個重要特性:自反性、對稱性和傳遞性。

The authors show how they can be studied by examining matrices, relations, and graphs.
作者展示了如何通過檢查矩陣、關係和圖形來研究它們。

In the discussion of graphs the authors have focused on simple graphs, which, by definition, exclude loops.
在對圖的討論中,作者將重點放在簡單的圖上,根據定義,這些圖不包括迴圈。

A simple graph is irreflexive, since no.
一個簡單的圖是不可反身的,因為沒有。

If all loops are present, the graph represents a reflexive relation.
如果所有迴圈都存在,則圖形表示自反關係。

In a sociomatrix loops are coded by the entries along the main diagonal of the matrix, Xii for all i.
在社會矩陣中,迴圈由沿矩陣主對角線的條目編碼,Xii 表示所有 i。

A relation is reflexive if, in the sociomatrix, Xij = 1 for all i.
如果在社會矩陣中,所有 i 的 Xij = 1,則關係是自反關係。

An irreflexive relation has entries on the main diagonal of the sociomatrix that are undefined.
非反身關係在社會矩陣的主對角線上具有未定義的條目。


4.11 Summary that is not reflexive (also not irreflexive) has some, but not all, values of
4.11 非反身(也不是非反身)的摘要具有一些(但不是全部)值

The sociomatrix for a symmetric relation is symmetric; Xij = Xji for all distinct i and j.
對稱關係的社會矩陣是對稱的;Xij = Xji 表示所有不同的 i 和 j。

Transitivity is a property that considers patterns of triples of actors in a network or triples of nodes in a graph.
傳遞性是一種屬性,它考慮網路中參與者的三元組或圖中節點的三元組的模式。

In order for the relation to be transitive, whenever x};l ;::: 1, xij must equal 1.
為了使關係是可傳遞的,只要 x};l ;::: 1,xij 必須等於 1。

Graph theory is a useful way to represent network data.
圖論是表示網路數據的有用方法。

Actors in a network are represented as nodes of a graph.
網路中的參與者表示為圖形的節點。

Nondirectional ties between actors are represented as lines between the nodes of a graph.
參與者之間的非方向性聯繫表示為圖形節點之間的線。

Directed ties between actors are represented as arcs between the nodes in a digraph.
參與者之間的有向聯繫表示為二圖中節點之間的弧。

Harary (1969) and Bondy and Murty (1976) are excellent mathematical introductions to graph theory, with coverage ranging from proofs of many of the statements the authors have made, to solutions to a variety of applied problems.
Harary(1969)和Bondy和Murty(1976)是圖論的優秀數學入門,涵蓋範圍從作者所做的許多陳述的證明到各種應用問題的解決方案。

The excellent text by Frank (1971) is more mathematically advanced and focuses on social networks.
弗蘭克(Frank,1971)的優秀著作在數學上更先進,專注於社交網路。

Roberts (1976, 1978) and Hage and Harary (1983) provide very readable, elementary introductions to graph theory, with many concepts illustrated on anthropological network data.
Roberts(1976,1978)和Hage和Harary(1983)對圖論進行了非常可讀的基本介紹,其中許多概念都說明瞭人類學網路數據。

A more mathematical discussion of tournaments can be found in Moon (1968). Berge (1989) discusses hypergraphs in detail
關於錦標賽的更多數學討論可以在Moon(1968)中找到。Berge(1989)詳細討論了超圖


Part III
第三部分

One of the primary uses of graph theory in social network analysis is the identification of the "most important" actors in a social network.
圖論在社交網路分析中的主要用途之一是識別社交網路中“最重要”的參與者。

Among the definitions that the authors will discuss are those based on degree, closeness, betweenness, iriformation, and the differential status or rank of the actors
作者將討論的定義包括那些基於程度、親密程度、中間性、虹膜形成以及演員的不同地位或等級的定義

These definitions yield actor indices which attempt to quantify the prominence of an individual actor embedded in a network.
這些定義產生了行為者指數,這些指數試圖量化嵌入網路中的單個行為者的突出程度。

Measures such as outdegree and indegree are quite likely to be different, and prestigious actors are usually those with large indegrees, or "choices" received
學位和學位等衡量標準很可能是不同的,而有聲望的演員通常是那些擁有大量學位或獲得“選擇”的人

Both centrality and prestige indices are examples of measures of the prominence or importance of the actors in a social network.
中心性和聲望指數都是衡量社會網路中參與者的突出性或重要性的例子。

Bavelas (1950), Flament (1963), Beauchamp (1965), and Sabidussi (1966) state that very centralized graphs are compact, in the sense that the distances between pairs of nodes are small
Bavelas (1950)、Flament (1963)、Beauchamp (1965) 和 Sabidussi (1966) 指出,非常集中的圖是緊湊的,從某種意義上說,節點對之間的距離很小

These authors proposed an index of actor centrality based on closeness, as the authors will discuss later .
這些作者提出了一個基於親密關係的演員中心性指數,作者將在後面討論。

The variance is .recommended as a group-level index of centrality by Snijders (1981a, 1981b), reflecting the view of H0ivik and Gleditsch (1975) that centralization is synonymous with the dispersion or heterogeneity of an actor index
Snijders(1981a,1981b)推薦將方差作為群體層面的中心性指數,反映了H0ivik和Gleditsch(1975)的觀點,即中心化是參與者指數的離散性或異質性的同義詞

This index attains its minimum value of 0 when all degrees are equal or when the graph is regular.
當所有度數相等或圖形正則時,該指數達到其最小值 0。

Brazil, Czechoslovakia, and Argentina are linked directly to other prestigious countries
巴西、捷克斯洛伐克和阿根廷與其他著名國家直接相連


Comparisons and Extensions
比較和擴展

Several authors have compared the performance of the many centrality and prestige indices discussed either on real or simulated data, or both
幾位作者比較了在真實數據或類比數據上討論的許多中心性和聲望指數的性能,或兩者兼而有之

Earlier researchers, such as Stogdill (1951), concentrated on different measures of actor degrees, focusing attention on only one centrality index.
早期的研究者,如Stogdill(1951),專注於不同的演員度測量,只關注一個中心性指數。

Freeman lists all thirty-four possible graphs with g = 5 nodes, and compares actor- and group-level degree, closeness, and betweenness centrality measures across the graphs.
Freeman 列出了 g = 5 節點的所有 34 個可能的圖,並比較了圖中的參與者和組級程度、接近度和仲介中心性度量。

The study of structural balance in a social network, consisting of a relation measured for a set of actors, requires that the ties have a sign or a valence.
對社會網路中結構平衡的研究,包括為一組參與者測量的關係,要求這些關係具有符號或效價。

A relation must be representable as a signed graph or digraph in order to be studied using ideas of balance: positive ties as well as negative ties must be possible.
關係必須可以表示為有符號圖或二元圖,以便使用平衡思想進行研究:正向關係和負向關係必須是可能的。

Sociologists and social psychologists have used the term "structural balance" to refer to groups of people and affective relations that substantively are "pleasing" or lack intrapersonal psychological "tension." The authors will formally define a triple of nodes, and the lines between them, as balanced if the cycle has a positive sign.
社會學家和社會心理學家使用「結構平衡」一詞來指代實質上「令人愉悅」或缺乏人內心理」張力“的人群和情感關係。作者將正式定義一個三元組節點,以及它們之間的線,如果週期有一個正號,則為平衡。

A balanced signed graph important generalization of this idea first mentioned by Heider: that balanced triples have actor partitions for which positive ties occur within and negative between.
平衡有符號圖是Heider首先提到的這個想法的重要概括:平衡三元組具有參與者分區,其中正連接發生,負連接之間發生。

The authors will return to clusterability as a generalization of structural balance later
作者稍後將回到聚類性,作為結構平衡的推廣


Signed Directional Relations
簽署方向關係

Suppose that the relation under investigation is directional, so that the relevant representation is a signed digraph.
假設所研究的關係是方向性的,因此相關表示是帶符號的二合體。

To generalize balance to such structures requires some care, since there are a number of ways to examine cycles in directed graphs.
將平衡推廣到這種結構需要一些小心,因為有許多方法可以檢查有向圖中的週期。

Consider the triple shown, which has one negative arc, and two positive arcs
考慮所示的三元組,它有一個負弧和兩個正弧

This digraph does not contain a cycle, since the arc from nl to n2 is oriented in the wrong direction.
這個二合圖不包含迴圈,因為從 nl 到 n2 的弧的方向是錯誤的。

Reversing the direction of this arc would give them a digraph with a cycle of length 3, nln3n2nJ, with a negative sign, and the digraph appears to be an unbalanced structure.
反轉這個弧線的方向會給它們一個週期長度為 3 的二合圖,nln3n2nJ,帶有負號,並且二合圖似乎是一個不平衡的結構。

To formally define balance in signed digraphs, the authors consider not paths and cycles, but semipaths and semicycles.
為了正式定義有符號二合字中的平衡,作者考慮的不是路徑和迴圈,而是半路徑和半迴圈。

With these definitions, the authors can state: Definition 6.2 A signed digraph is balanced if and only if all semicycles have positive signs.
根據這些定義,作者可以說明: 定義 6.2 當且僅當所有半週期都有正符號時,有符號二合符是平衡的。

In a balanced signed digraph, all semicycles must have an even number of negative signs attached to the arcs.
在平衡有符號二合符中,所有半環都必須有偶數個負符號附著在弧上。

The semicycle, n2nln3n2, has a sign "-", so this digraph is not balanced.
半週期 n2nln3n2 有一個符號“-”,所以這個二元圖是不平衡的。

The authors should note that there is a very comprehensive set theoretic approach to structural balance given by Flament (1963), similar to Freeman's (1989) representation for social network data discussed at the end of Chapter 3
作者應該注意到,Flament (1963) 給出了一個非常全面的結構平衡理論方法,類似於Freeman (1989) 在第3章末尾討論的社交網路數據表示


OChecking for Balance
平衡

A single unbalanced cycle or semicycle insures that the graph or digraph is not balanced.
單個不平衡迴圈或半迴圈確保圖形或二元圖不平衡。

It is natural to consider how many cycles or semicycles in a graph or digraph do not have positive signs.
很自然地要考慮圖或二合圖中有多少個週期或半周期沒有正號。

From this consideration, one can develop graph-level indices measuring the amount of unbalance in a structure.
從這個考慮出發,人們可以開發圖形級指數來衡量結構中的不平衡量。

Cycles have a maximum length of g, so the authors need not raise the sociomatrix to any power greater than g
迴圈的最大長度為 g,因此作者不需要將社會矩陣提高到任何大於 g 的冪

The authors note that the numbers on the diagonals of the power sociomatrices for balanced graphs are the sums of the signs of closed walks, with lengths equal to the powers of the respective matrices.
作者指出,平衡圖的冪社會矩陣對角線上的數位是閉合行走符號的總和,長度等於各個矩陣的冪。

To quantify how "unbalanced" an unbalanced graph or digraph is, one first must count the number of cycles or the number of semicycles that have negative Signs.
要量化不平衡圖或二元圖的“不平衡”程度,首先必須計算具有負號的週期數或半週期數。

An index such as this is usually referred to as a cycle index for balance.
這樣的指數通常被稱為平衡周期指數。

References to its use in practice and theory abound - Taylor (1970), who presents both a text for readers on balance and social interaction, and critically reviews the literature, cites nearly 200 papers and books. Hage and Harary (1983), in their chapter on signed graphs, and Hage and Harary (1991) cite many anthropological studies of balance in networks. Davis (1963, 1967, 1968b) takes a variety of very important studies and formulates a large number of propositions
關於它在實踐和理論中的使用比比皆是——泰勒(Taylor,1970)為讀者提供了關於平衡和社會互動的文本,並批判性地回顧了文獻,引用了近200篇論文和書籍。Hage和Harary(1983)在他們關於符號圖的章節中,以及Hage和Harary(1991)引用了許多關於網路平衡的人類學研究。Davis(1963,1967,1968b)進行了各種非常重要的研究,並提出了大量的命題


Clusterability about social structure from the writings of these theorists
從這些理論家的著作中關於社會結構的聚類性

The studies are Durkheim (1947), Stouffer Suchman, DeVinney, Star, and Williams (1949), Merton and Kitt (1950), Homans (1950, 1961), Festinger (1954, 1957), Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee (1954), Lazarsfeld and Merton (1954), Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955), Lipset, Trow, and Coleman (1956), Bott (1957), Coleman (1957), Fiedler (1958), and Davis (1959).
這些研究是塗爾干(1947),Stouffer Suchman,DeVinney,Star和Williams(1949),Merton和Kitt(1950),Homans(1950,1961),Festinger(1954,1957),Berelson,Lazarsfeld和McPhee (1954),Lazarsfeld 和 Merton(1954),Katz 和 Lazarsfeld(1955),Lipset,Trow 和 Coleman(1956),Bott(1957),Coleman(1957),Fiedler(1958)和Davis(1959)。

Structural balance, as noted by Granovetter (1979) need not apply to the behavior of actors outside of small group settings
正如Granovetter(1979)所指出的,結構平衡不一定適用於小團體環境之外的參與者的行為

Some ties, especially those that makecycles have negative signs, may be reinforced by a wide variety of institutional, economic, and political constraints.
一些關係,特別是那些具有負面信號的聯繫,可能會因各種制度、經濟和政治限制而得到加強。

The most important aspect of structural balance is that the nodes in a balanced graph can be partitioned into two subsets or clusters
結構平衡最重要的方面是平衡圖中的節點可以劃分為兩個子集或集群

This fact follows directly from the original theorem for balance involving the signs of cycles, and allows one to consider clusters of actors among whom all ties are possible.
這一事實直接來自涉及週期符號的原始平衡定理,並允許人們考慮所有聯繫都可能的參與者集群。

It allowed researchers, in the 1950's and 1960's, to consider ways to generalize structural balance, so that actors could possibly be partitioned into more than two subsets.
它允許研究人員在1950年代和1960年代考慮推廣結構平衡的方法,以便參與者可以被劃分為兩個以上的子集。

Harary (1954) proved that balanced signed graphs have partitions of nodes into two clusters or subsets such that only positive lines join nodes in the same cluster and only negative lines join nodes in different clusters.
Harary(1954)證明,平衡有符號圖將節點劃分為兩個簇或子集,使得只有正線連接同一簇中的節點,只有負線連接不同簇中的節點。

These two theorems give the conditions under which a signed graph has a clustering; that is, under what conditions on the
這兩個定理給出了有符號圖具有聚類的條件;也就是說,在什麼條件下


Clllsterability cycles of a graph will the ,graph be clusterable?
圖的可聚性循環 ,圖是否可聚類?

The second theorem is more specific than the first, since it is appropriate only for complete signed graphs, where all nodes are adjacent.
第二個定理比第一個定理更具體,因為它只適用於所有節點相鄰的完整有符號圖。

It is important since it shows that for complete signed graphs, one need only look at cycles of length 3 to determine clusterability.
這很重要,因為它表明,對於完整的有符號圖,只需要查看長度為 3 的週期即可確定聚類性。

None of these cycles contains exactly one line with a sign of "-", so, by the theorem, the graph is clusterable.
這些迴圈中沒有一個只包含一條帶有符號“-”的線,因此,根據定理,該圖是可聚類的。

If there is a triple of actors in a cycle containing three negative lines, these three actors can be partitioned into three different clusters.
如果一個包含三條負線的迴圈中存在三重參與者,則這三個參與者可以劃分為三個不同的集群。

The following theorem extends clusterability to complete signed graphs; its last condition is very important
以下定理將聚類性擴展到完整的有符號圖;它的最後一個條件非常重要

It comes directly from Davis (1967).
它直接來自Davis(1967)。

Davis' clustering theorems, coupled with Flament's (1963) finding that the properties of triples were sufficient to assess the balance of a complete signed graph, led to nearly two decades of research on statistical and deterministic models for triples.
Davis的聚類定理,加上Flament(1963)發現三元組的性質足以評估完整有符號圖的平衡性,導致了近二十年對三元組的統計和確定性模型的研究。

Through these theorems, the properties of the triples of nodes in a graph tell them whether theoretically important structural properties are present.
通過這些定理,圖中節點三元組的性質告訴它們是否存在理論上重要的結構性質。

The clusters of actors appeared to be ranked, or hierarchical in nature, with the actors "on the bottom" choosing those "at the top"
這些行為者群體似乎是按等級劃分的,或者說是等級分明的,“在底層”的在“在底層”在底層的


ORanked Clusterability
ORanked 可聚類性

Davis and Leinhardt (1968) presented a concept of ranked clusters, for complete signed directed graphs.
Davis 和 Leinhardt (1968) 提出了一個排序聚類的概念,用於完整的有符號有向圖。

Ranked c1l1sterability, in which the positive arcs emanating to or from the nodes in [+-j dyads are postulated to "point" in the same direction, states that the triples numbered 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of Figure 6.6 should not occur in practice.
排序 c1l1sterability,其中 [+-j 二元組中向或從節點發出的正弧被假定為“指向”同一方向,指出圖 6.6 中編號為 2、10、11、12、13、14、15 和 16 的三元組在實踐中不應出現。

These "miserable" eight (Davis 1979) depart from both clusterability and ranked cIusterability.
這“悲慘的”八個(Davis 1979)偏離了可聚類性和排名cIusterability。

As Davis (1979) notes, there was strong empirical evidence for 6/8th's of a theorem
正如Davis(1979)所指出的,有很強的經驗證據證明一個定理的6/8

These two triples are quite common in positive affect relations which are in an "early" development stage; that is, assuming that the relation under study will change over time, these triples contain dyads which might evolve into triples which are not prohibited.
這兩個三元組在處於「早期」發展階段的積極影響關係中很常見;也就是說,假設所研究的關係會隨著時間的推移而改變,這些三元組包含二元組,這些二元組可能會演變成不被禁止的三元組。

This ranked clusterability model was quite elegant, but little used.
這種排序的可聚類性模型非常優雅,但很少使用。

To turn ranked cIusterability for complete signed digraphs into an equivalent idea for digraphs
將完整有符號二合字的排序 cIusterability 轉化為二合字的等價思想


Transitivity without signs is quite simple
沒有符號的傳遞性非常簡單

The authors take the idea of ranked clusters for complete signed digraphs, and do not consider arcs with negative signs.
作者將排序簇的思想用於完整的有符號二合符,並且不考慮帶有負號的弧。

The assumption is that the relation under study is the "positive" part of the signed relation - for example, the authors study only "like," "not like," and "dislike." Figure 6.7 shows the triples of Figure 6.6, without the negative arcs.
假設所研究的關係是有符號關係的“積極”部分——例如,作者只研究“喜歡”、“不喜歡”和“不喜歡”。圖 6.7 顯示了圖 6.6 的三元組,沒有負弧。

Holland and Leinhardt showed that ranked c1usterability is a special case of a more general set of theorems which naturally blend balance, clusterability, and ranked c1usterability.
Holland 和 Leinhardt 表明,排序 c1usterability 是一組更一般的定理的特例,這些定理自然地融合了平衡性、聚類性和排序 c1usterability。

Their partially ordered clusterability leads naturally to a consideration of the concept of transitivity.
它們的部分有序聚類性自然導致了對傳遞性概念的考慮。

One can obtain balanced, clusterable, and ranked c1usterable graphs by making various assumptions about reciprocity and asymmetry of choices.
通過對選擇的互惠性和不對稱性做出各種假設,可以獲得平衡的、可聚類的和可排序的 c1usterable 圖。

During the past two decades, evidence has accumulated that transitivity is a compelling force in the organization of social groups.
在過去的二十年中,越來越多的證據表明,傳遞性是社會群體組織中的一股令人信服的力量。


Transitivity
傳遞

The authors turn the attention to a triple of actors, i, j, and k, and the ties between them. The authors state: Definition 6.4 The triad involving actors i. j. and k is transitive if whenever i --+ j and j --+ k i --+ k.
作者將注意力轉向了三重演員,i、j 和 k,以及它們之間的聯繫。作者指出: 定義 6.4 涉及行為者 i. j. 和 k 的三元組是及物的,如果每當 i --+ j 和 j --+ k i --+ k。

The number of transitive and/or intransitive triples within a particular type of triad is very important when quantitatively and statistically assessing the amount of transitivity in a digraph.
在定量和統計地評估二元圖中的傳遞性量時,特定類型的三元組中傳遞和/或不傳遞三元組的數量非常重要。

The authors note in conclusion that while this small set of graph theorists, sociologists, social psychologists, and statisticians were working on mathematical models of balance, clusterability, and transitivity, other methodologists were busy studying about cliques and cohesive subgroups.
作者在結論中指出,當這一小群圖理論家、社會學家、社會心理學家和統計學家正在研究平衡、聚類性和傳遞性的數學模型時,其他方法學家正忙於研究集團和有凝聚力的子群體。

This area of research is described .
描述了這一研究領域。

The the authors discuss methods for finding cohesive sub~oups of actors within a social network.
作者討論了在社交網路中尋找有凝聚力的子~角色的方法。


Social Group and Subgroup
社會群體和子群體

Many authors have discussed the role of social cohesion in social explanations and theories (Burt 1984; Collins 1988; Erickson 1988; Friedkin 1984).
許多作者討論了社會凝聚力在社會解釋和理論中的作用(Burt 1984;柯林斯 1988;埃裡克森 1988;Friedkin 1984)。

Many network researchers who have developed or reviewed methods for cohesive subgroups in social networks have noted that these methods attempt to formalize the notion of social group (Seidman and Foster 1978a, 1978b; Alba and Moore 1978; Mokken 1979; Burt 1980; Freeman 1984, 1992a; Sailer and Gaulin 1984)
許多開發或審查了社交網路中凝聚性子群體方法的網路研究人員注意到,這些方法試圖將社會群體的概念形式化(Seidman and Foster 1978a, 1978b;Alba 和 Moore 1978;莫肯 1979;伯特 1980;弗里曼 1984, 1992a;Sailer 和 Gaulin 1984)

According to these authors, the concept of social group can be studied by looking at properties of subsets of actors within a network.
根據這些作者的說法,社會群體的概念可以通過觀察網路中參與者子集的屬性來研究。

The authors' discussion is divided into sections, each of which takes up methods that are primarily motivated by one of these ideas
作者的討論分為幾個部分,每個部分都採用主要受這些想法之一啟發的方法

In contrast to these ideas that focus on ties between pairs of actors in one-mode networks, some cohesive subgroup ideas are concerned with the linkages that are established among individuals by virtue of their common membership in collectivities.
與這些側重於單一模式網路中成對行為者之間聯繫的思想相反,一些有凝聚力的子群體思想關注的是個人之間由於集體中的共同成員身份而建立的聯繫。


Subgroups Based on Complete
基於完成的子組

Mutuality length of a path is the number of lines in it. A shortest path between two nodes is called a geodesic, and the (geodesic) distance between two nodes, denoted by dU, j), is the length of a shortest path between them.
路徑的互數長度是其中的行數。兩個節點之間的最短路徑稱為測地線,兩個節點之間的(測地線)距離(用 dU、j 表示)是它們之間最短路徑的長度。

Luce and Perry and Festinger proposed that a clique for a relation of positive affect is a subset of people among whom all choices are mutual, and no other people can be added to the subset who have mutual choices with all members of the subset
Luce、Perry 和 Festinger 提出,積極影響關係的集團是所有選擇都是相互的人群的子集,並且不能將與該子集的所有成員有共同選擇的其他人添加到子集中

This definition of a clique is appropriate for a directional dichotomous relation.
集團的這種定義適用於方向性二分關係。

The authors will use the example of the relations of marriage and business among Padgett's Florentine families to illustrate cohesive subgroups throughout this chapter.
作者將以帕吉特的佛羅倫薩家庭之間的婚姻和商業關係為例,來說明本章中具有凝聚力的亞群體。

Recall that both of these relations are dichotomous and nondirectionaL The authors used the network analysis programs GRADAP 2.0.
回想一下,這兩種關係都是二分和非方向性的aL作者使用了網路分析程式GRADAP 2.0。

Two different structural properties have been used to relax the clique notion: first, Luce (1950), and later Alba (1973) and Mokken (1979), have used properties of reachability, path distance, and diameter to extend the clique definition; second, Seidman and Foster (1978a) and Seidman (1981b, 1983b) used nodal degree to propose alternative cohesive subgroup ideas.
使用了兩種不同的結構屬性來放鬆集團概念:首先,Luce(1950),後來Alba(1973)和Mokken(1979)使用可達性,路徑距離和直徑的屬性來擴展集團定義;其次,Seidman和Foster(1978a)和Seidman(1981b,1983b)使用節點度提出了替代的內聚子群思想。


Subgroups Based on Reachability and Diameter
基於可達性和直徑的子組

Reachability is the motivation for the first cohesive subgroup ideas that extend the notion of a clique.
可達性是第一個有凝聚力的子群體思想的動機,這些思想擴展了集團的概念。

These alternative subgroup ideas are useful if the researcher hypothesizes that important social processes occur through intermediaries.
如果研究人員假設重要的社會過程是通過中介發生的,那麼這些替代子群體的想法是有用的。

Recall that the geodesic distance between two nodes, denoted by dei, j), is the length of a shortest path between them.
回想一下,兩個節點之間的測地線距離(用 dei, j) 表示)是它們之間最短路徑的長度。

Cohesive subgroups based on reachability require that the geodesic distances among members of a subgroup be small.
基於可達性的內聚子組要求子組成員之間的測地線距離很小。

The authors can specify some cutoff value, n, as the maximum length of geodesics connecting pairs of actors within the cohesive subgroup.
作者可以指定一些截止值 n,作為連接內聚子群內參與者對的測地線的最大長度。

Restricting geodesic distance among subgroup members is the basis for the definition of an n-clique (Alba 1973; Luce 1950).
限制子組成員之間的測地線距離是定義 n 集團的基礎(Alba 1973;盧斯 1950 年)。

An n-clique is a maximal subgraph in which the largest geodesic distance between any two nodes is no greater than n.
n 群是一個最大子圖,其中任意兩個節點之間的最大測地線距離不大於 n。

2-cliques are subgraphs in which all members need not be adjacent, but all members are reachable through at most one intermediary.
2-cliques 是子圖,其中所有成員不需要相鄰,但最多可以通過一個仲介訪問所有成員。

In this graph, there are two 2-cliques: {1,2,3,4,5} and {2,3,4,5,6}.
在此圖中,有兩個 2 集團:{1,2,3,4,5} 和 {2,3,4,5,6}。

2-c1iques: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} and {2, 3,4, 5,6} 2-cIan: {2,3,4,5,6} 2-c1ubs: {1,2,3,4}, {1,2,3,5}, and {2,3,4,5,6}
2-c1iques: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} 和 {2, 3,4, 5,6} 2-cIan: {2,3,4,5,6} 2-c1ubs: {1,2,3,4}, {1,2,3,5} 和 {2,3,4,5,6}


An Example
一個例子

Let them return to the example of marriage and business relations among Padgett's Florentine families to illustrate n-cliques.
讓他們回到帕吉特的佛羅倫薩家庭之間的婚姻和商業關係的例子來說明n-cliques。

There are thirteen 2-cliques in the marriage relation: Acciaiuoli Albizzi BarbadoriMedici Ridolfi Salviati Tornabuoni;.
婚姻關係中有 13 個 2 派系:Acciaiuoli Albizzi BarbadoriMedici Ridolfi Salviati Tornabuoni;。

. Albizzi Ginori Guadagni Medici; Albizzi Guadagni Medici Ridolfi Tornabuoni;.
.阿爾比齊·吉諾里·瓜達尼·美第奇;阿爾比齊·瓜達尼·美第奇·里多爾菲·托爾納波尼;

Guadagni Medici Ridolfi Strozzi Tornabuoni; Medici Pazzi Salviati.
收入醫生:里多爾菲·斯特羅齊·托爾納波尼;美第奇·帕齊·薩爾維亞蒂。

There are four 2-cliques on the business relation: Barbadori Bischeri Castellani Lamberteschi Peruzzi;.
業務關係有四個 2 集團:Barbadori Bischeri Castellani Lamberteschi Peruzzi;。

. Barbadori Ginori Medici Pazzi Salviati Tornabuoni;.
.巴巴多里、吉諾里、美第奇、帕齊、薩爾維亞蒂、龍捲風;

. Bischeri Castellani Guadagni Lamberteschi Peruzzi Notice that the 2-cliques are both larger and more numerous than the cliques found for both the marriage and business relations.
.比舍里·卡斯特拉尼 瓜達尼·蘭貝特斯基·佩魯齊 請注意,2 個集團比婚姻和商業關係的集團更大、更多。

Since the definition of an n-clique is less restrictive than the definition of a clique, when n is greater than 1 it is likely that a network will contain more n-cliques than cliques.
由於 n 集團的定義比集團的定義限制性更小,因此當 n 大於 1 時,網路可能包含的 n 集團多於集團。

It is likely that the n-cliques will be larger than the cliques
n-集團可能會比集團大


Considerations
考慮

There are several important properties of n-cliques, some of which limit the usefulness of this cohesive subgroup definition.
n 小集團有幾個重要屬性,其中一些限制了這個有凝聚力的子群定義的有用性。

Since n-cliques are defined for geodesic paths that can include any nodes in the graph, two problems might arise: first, an n-clique, as a subgraph, may have a diameter greater than n, and second, an n-clique might be disconnected.
由於 n 社區是為可以包含圖中任何節點的測地線路徑定義的,因此可能會出現兩個問題:首先,作為子圖的 n 社區可能具有大於 n 的直徑,其次,n 個社區可能會斷開連接。

Mokken (1979) has described two logical ways to do this
Mokken(1979)描述了兩種合乎邏輯的方法

The first, which he calls an n-clan, starts with the n-cliques that are identified in a network and excludes those n-cliques that have a diameter greater than n.
第一種,他稱之為 n 氏族,從網路中識別的 n 氏族開始,排除直徑大於 n 的 n 氏族。

This example is taken from Alba (1973) and Mokken (1979), and illustrates the difference between n-cliques, nclans, and n-clubs
這個例子取自 Alba (1973) 和 Mokken (1979),說明瞭 n-cliques、nclans 和 n-clubs 之間的區別

For this graph, taking n = 2 results in the following sets: 2-cliques: {1,2,3,4,5} and {2,3,4,5,6}; 2-clan: {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}; 2-clubs: {1, 2, 3,4}, {1, 2, 3, 5}, and {2, 3,4, 5, 6}.
對於此圖,取 n = 2 會得到以下集合:2 個集團:{1,2,3,4,5} 和 {2,3,4,5,6};2 族:{2、3、4、5、6};2 桿:{1、2、3,4}、{1、2、3、5} 和 {2、3、4、5、6}。

Five of the 2-cliques have diameter greater than 2, so they are excluded from the list of 2-clans
2 個集團中有 5 個的直徑大於 2,因此它們被排除在 2 集團名單之外

This leaves eight 2-c1ans: Acciaiuoli Albizzi Barbadori Medici Ridolfi Salviati Tornabuoni;.
這剩下八個 2-c1ans:Acciaiuoli Albizzi Barbadori Medici Ridolfi Salviati Tornabuoni;。

The diameter of the 2-clique {Barbadori, Medici, Ridolfi, Strozzi, Tornabuoni} is greater than 2, since the geodesic between Strozzi and Barbadori includes Castellani.
2 集團 {巴巴多里、美第奇、里多爾菲、斯特羅齊、龍捲風} 的直徑大於 2,因為斯特羅齊和巴巴多里之間的測地線包括卡斯特拉尼。

An n-c1ique may be seen as too loose a definition of cohesive subgroup, and restrictions requiring geodesic paths to remain
n-c1ique 可能被視為對內聚子群的定義過於寬鬆,並且需要保留測地線路徑的限制


Subgroups Based on Nodal
基於節點的子組

Degree within the subgroup can be applied by requiring the subgraph to have a given maximum diameter. n-c1ubs and n-c1ans are two possible definitions that have the desired restrictions.
可以通過要求子圖具有給定的最大直徑來應用子組內的度數。N-C1UBS 和 N-C1ANS 是具有所需限制的兩個可能定義。

In studying network processes such as information diffusion that "flow" through intermediaries, cohesive subgroups based on indirect connections of relatively short paths provide a reasonable approach.
在研究網路過程(例如通過仲介“流動”的信息擴散)時,基於相對較短路徑的間接連接的內聚子群提供了一種合理的方法。

Hubbell's approach relies on measures of influence based on a weighting of adjacencies and paths of influence, and a partitioning of actors based on the degree to which subgroup members mutually influence each other.
Hubbell 的方法依賴於基於鄰接和影響路徑權重的影響力衡量,以及基於子群體成員相互影響程度的參與者劃分。

Since the number of actors adjacent to a given actor is quantified by the degree of the node in a graph, these subgroup methods focus on nodal degree.
由於與給定參與者相鄰的參與者的參與者的數量由圖中節點的度數量化,因此這些子組方法側重於節點度。

One measures robustness by considering "the degree to which the structure is vulnerable to the removal of any given individual" (Seidman and Foster 1978, page 142).
人們通過考慮“結構在多大程度上容易受到任何給定個體的移除”來衡量魯棒性(Seidman and Foster 1978,第 142 頁)。

The possible lack of robustness of n-cliques was one consideration that led to the proposal of an alternative subgroup definition
n-集團可能缺乏穩健性是導致提出替代亞組定義的一個考慮因素

This alternative definition, the k-plex, builds on the notion that cohesive subgroups should contain sets of actors among whom there are relatively numerous adjacencies (Seidman 1978; Seidman and Foster 1978).
這種替代定義,即 k-plex,建立在這樣一種概念之上,即有凝聚力的子群應該包含一組參與者,其中有相對多的相鄰關係(Seidman 1978;Seidman 和 Foster 1978)。

Borgatti, Everett, and Shirey (1990) have extended the notion of an LS set
Borgatti, Everett, and Shirey (1990) 擴展了 LS 集合的概念

Their approach, which they call a lambda set, is motivated by the idea that a cohesive subset should be relatively robust in terms of its connectivity.
他們的方法,他們稱之為lambda集,其動機是,一個有凝聚力的子集在其連通性方面應該是相對穩健的。

Several researchers have proposed measures for the extent to which ties are concentrated within a subgroup, rather than between subgroups
一些研究人員提出了衡量關係集中在一個亞組內而不是亞組之間的程度的措施


Measures of Subgroup
亞組的措施

The authors discuss extensions of cohesive subgroups to relations that are valued or directional
作者討論了將有凝聚力的子群擴展到有價值的或方向性的關係

These extensiOIlN allow the cohesive subgroup ideas discussed to be applied to a much wider range of social network data.
這些擴展OIlN允許所討論的有凝聚力的子組思想應用於更廣泛的社交網路數據。

Recall that the definition of a clique originally proposed by Festinger (1949) and Luce and Perry (1949) focused on directional affective relations and required that all ties between all pairs of clique members be reciprocated.
回想一下,最初由Festinger(1949)和Luce和Perry(1949)提出的集團定義側重於定向情感關係,並要求所有集團成員之間的所有聯繫都是相互的。

A more flexible way to extend cohesive subgroup ideas to directional relations uses definitions of semipaths and connectivity for directed graphs.
將內聚子群思想擴展到方向關係的一種更靈活的方法使用有向圖的半路徑和連通性的定義。

In a valued relation the authors can study cohesive subgroups that vary in the strength of ties among members.
在價值關係中,作者可以研究成員之間聯繫強度不同的有凝聚力的子群體。

An n-clique at level c requires that geodesics between subgroup members contain lines that have values that are all c or greater.
級別 c 的 n 組要求子組成員之間的測地線包含值均為 c 或更大的線。

One way to study cohesive subgroups in valued relations is to define one or more derived dichotomous relations based on the strength of the ties in the original valued relation (Doreian 1969).
研究價值關係中內聚子群的一種方法是根據原始價值關係中關係的強度定義一個或多個派生的二分關係(Doreian 1969)。

Every derived dichotomous relation defines a graph that can be analyzed using methods for finding cohesive subgroups, described above.
每個派生的二分關係都定義了一個圖,可以使用上面描述的查找內聚子群的方法進行分析。

The numbers of actors in the subgroups and the degree to which these subgroups overlap can be used to describe the structure of the network as a whole
子組中參與者的數量以及這些子組的重疊程度可用於描述整個網路的結構


7.10 Other Approaches
7.10 其他方法

All of the cohesive subgroup ideas discussed define specific graph theoretic properties that should be satisfied in order to identify a subset of actors as a cohesive subgroup.
所討論的所有內聚子群思想都定義了特定的圖論屬性,這些屬性應該滿足這些屬性,以便將參與者的子集識別為一個內聚的子群。

For all of these approaches, the analytic problem is to examine a set of social network data to see whether any subsets of actors meet the specified subgroup definition.
對於所有這些方法,分析問題是檢查一組社交網路數據,以查看是否有任何參與者子集滿足指定的子組定義。

The result is the possible assignment of actors to one or more cohesive subgroups.
其結果是可能將參與者分配到一個或多個有凝聚力的子組。

More exploratory, approach to cohesion in social networks seeks to represent the group structure in a network as a whole.
更具探索性的是,社交網路中的凝聚力方法試圖將整個網路中的群體結構表示為一個整體。

Collections of actors among whom there are relatively strong ties can become more visible by displaying functions or rearrangements of the graphs or sociomatrices.
通過顯示函數或圖形或社會矩陣的重新排列,可以更明顯地顯示具有相對緊密聯繫的參與者的集合。


7.10.1 Matrix Permutation Approaches
7.10.1 矩陣排列方法

The earliest contributions to cohesive subgroup analysis of social networks were concerned with systematic ways for ordering rows and columns of a sociomatrix to reveal the subgroup structure of a network (Forsyth and Katz 1946; Katz 1947).
對社交網路的內聚子群分析的最早貢獻是關於對社會矩陣的行和列進行排序以揭示網路的子群結構的系統方法(Forsyth and Katz 1946;Katz 1947年)。

If the value of equation (7.5) is small, the ordering of rows and columns in the sociomatrix places actors among whom there are relatively strong ties close to each other, as is desired.
如果等式 (7.5) 的值很小,則社會矩陣中行和列的順序會根據需要放置彼此之間有相對強聯繫的參與者。

Beum and Brundage (1950), Coleman and MacRae (1960), and Arabie, Hubert, and Schleutermann (1990) suggest strategies for reordering rows and columns of the sociomatrix so that i and j corresponding to large values of xij are moved closer together
Beum 和 Brundage (1950)、Coleman 和 MacRae (1960) 以及 Arabie、Hubert 和 Schleutermann (1990) 提出了對社會矩陣的行和列進行重新排序的策略,以便對應於 xij 的大值的 i 和 j 靠得更近

This problem of sociomatrix permutation to optimize a given quantity is an instance of the more general analysis problem of combinatorial optimization.
這種用於優化給定量的社會矩陣排列問題是組合優化的更一般分析問題的一個實例。

The result of a matrix permutation analysis is a reordering of the rows and columns of the sociomatrix so that actors that are close in the sociomatrix tend to have relatively strong ties.
矩陣排列分析的結果是對社會矩陣的行和列進行重新排序,以便社會矩陣中接近的參與者往往具有相對較強的聯繫。

To study cohesive subsets of actors in a network the input to multidimensional scaling should be some measure of pairwise proximity among actors, such as the geodesic distance between each pair of actors.
為了研究網路中參與者的內聚子集,多維縮放的輸入應該是參與者之間成對接近的某種度量,例如每對參與者之間的測地線距離。

Factor analysis can be used to study cohesive subgroups in an exploratory way, the most influential and important cohesive subgroup ideas are those that express specific formal properties of cohesive subgroups and locate such subgroups that might exist within a network data set
因數分析可用於以探索性的方式研究內聚子群,最有影響力和最重要的內聚子群思想是那些表達內聚子群的特定形式屬性並定位網路數據集中可能存在的此類子群的思想


7.11 Summary
7.11 總結

The authors have presented methods for studying cohesive subgroups in social networks, for dichotomous nondirectional relations, directional relations, and valued relations.
作者提出了研究社交網路中內聚子群的方法,包括二分非方向關係、方向關係和價值關係。

These methods are motivated by theoretically important properties of cohesive subgroups, and present alternative ways of quantifying the idea of social group using social networks.
這些方法受到內聚子群體理論上重要特性的激勵,並提出了使用社交網路量化社會群體概念的替代方法。

The authors presented methods for assessing the cohesiveness of subgroups.
作者介紹了評估亞組凝聚力的方法。

The authors discuss methods for analyzing a special kind of twomode social network that represents the affiliation of a set of actors with a set of social occasions.
作者討論了分析一種特殊的雙模式社交網路的方法,該社交網路代表了一組參與者與一組社交場合的隸屬關係。

The authors will refer to these data as affiliation network data, or measurements on an affiliation variable.
作者將這些數據稱為隸屬關係網路數據,或對隸屬關係變數的測量。

This kind of two-mode network has been called a membership network (Breiger 1974, 1990a) or hypernetwork (McPherson 1982), and the affiliation relation has been referred to as an involvement relation (Freeman and White 1993)
這種雙模網路被稱為隸屬網路(Breiger 1974,1990a)或超網路(McPherson 1982),隸屬關係被稱為參與關係(Freeman and White 1993)


Affiliation Networks
聯盟網路

Affiliation networks differ in several important ways from the types of social networks the authors have discussed so far.
隸屬關係網路在幾個重要方面與作者迄今為止討論的社交網路類型不同。

Affiliation networks are two-mode networks, consisting of a set of actors and a set of events.
隸屬網路是雙模式網路,由一組參與者和一組事件組成。

Affiliation networks describe collections of actors rather than ties between pairs of actors.
隸屬關係網路描述的是參與者的集合,而不是成對參與者之間的聯繫。

Both of these features of affiliation networks make their analysis and interpretation somewhat distinct from the analysis and interpretation of one-mode networks, and lead them to the special set of methods discussed .
隸屬網路的這兩個特徵使它們的分析和解釋與單模網路的分析和解釋有些不同,並將它們引向所討論的一組特殊方法。

. Affiliation networks consist of subsets of actors, rather than pairs of actors;.
.隸屬關係網路由參與者的子集組成,而不是成對的參與者;

Affiliation networks allow one to study the dual perspectives of the actors and the events.
隸屬關係網路允許人們研究行為者和事件的雙重視角。

Many of the methods the authors discuss are concerned with representing affiliation networks using graph theoretic and related ideas, rather than with analyzing these networks.
作者討論的許多方法都涉及使用圖論和相關思想來表示隸屬網路,而不是分析這些網路。

The authors discuss how affiliation networks establish linkages among the entities in each of the modes.
作者討論隸屬關係網路如何在每種模式的實體之間建立聯繫。

The authors examine what the affiliation network implies about the association between the actors and the events, and present two approaches for analyzing the two modes simultaneously
作者研究隸屬關係網路對行為者與事件之間關聯的含義,並提出了兩種同時分析這兩種模式的方法


Background
背景

The authors review some of the more influential theoretical and substantive contributions to the study of affiliation networks.
作者回顧了對隸屬關係網路研究的一些較有影響力的理論和實質性貢獻。

The following list is a small sample: membership on a corporate board of directors (Allen 1982; Bearden and Mintz 1987; Burt 1978/79b; Fennema and Schijf 1978/79; Levine 1972; Mariolis 1975; Mintz and Schwartz 1981a, 1981b; Mizruchi 1984; Mokken and Stokman 1978/79; Sonquist and Koenig 1975), records of the club memberships of a set of community decision makers or elites (Domhoff 1975; Galaskiewicz 1985), memberships in voluntary organizations (McPherson 1982), records of the academic institutions with which researchers have been affiliated (Freeman 1980b), ceremonial events attended by members of a village (Foster and Seidman 1984), committees on which university faculty sit (Atkin 1974, 1976), social events people attend (Breiger 1974; Davis, Gardner, and Gardner 1941; Homans 1950), high school clubs (Bonacich 1978), observations of collections of individuals' interactions (Bernard, KiUworth, and Sailer 1980, 1982; Freeman and Romney 1987; Freeman, Romney, and Freeman 1987; Freeman, Freeman, and Michaelson 1988), trade partners of major oil exporting nations (Breiger 1990b), the overlap of subspecialties within an academic discipline (Cappell and Guterbock 1992; Ennis 1992), and the fate of Chinese political figures (Schweizer 1990)
以下清單是一個小樣本:公司董事會成員(Allen 1982;Bearden 和 Mintz 1987;伯特 1978/79b;Fennema 和 Schijf 1978/79;萊文 1972;馬里奧利斯 1975;Mintz 和 Schwartz 1981a, 1981b;Mizruchi 1984 年;Mokken 和 Stokman 1978/79;Sonquist 和 Koenig 1975),一組社區決策者或精英的俱樂部成員記錄(Domhoff 1975;Galaskiewicz 1985)、志願組織的成員資格(McPherson 1982)、研究人員所屬的學術機構的記錄(Freeman 1980b)、村民參加的儀式活動(Foster and Seidman 1984)、大學教師參加的委員會(Atkin 1974、1976)、人們參加的社會活動(Breiger 1974;大衛斯、加德納和加德納 1941 年;Homans 1950)、高中俱樂部(Bonacich 1978)、對個人互動集合的觀察(Bernard、KiUworth 和 Sailer 1980、1982;弗里曼和羅姆尼 1987;弗里曼、羅姆尼和弗里曼 1987 年;Freeman, Freeman, and Michaelson 1988)、主要石油出口國的貿易夥伴(Breiger 1990b)、學科內亞專業的重疊(Cappell and Guterbock 1992;Ennis 1992)和中國政治人物的命運(Schweizer 1990)

Given this wide range of applications, it is useful to note three primary rationales for studying affiliation networks.
鑒於如此廣泛的應用,有必要注意研究隸屬關係網路的三個主要理由。

McPherson (1982) has used hypergraphs to examine participation in voluntary organizations, and has discussed issues of sampling and estimation. Berge (1973, 1989) presents a mathematical discussion of graphs and hypergraphs
McPherson(1982)使用超圖來檢查志願組織的參與情況,並討論了抽樣和估計問題。Berge(1973,1989)提出了對圖和超圖的數學討論


OSimplices and Simplicial Complexes
OSimplices 和 Simplicial 複合體

Simplices and simplicial complexes provide yet another way to represent affiliation networks using ideas from algebraic topology.
單純複合和單純複數提供了另一種使用代數拓撲思想來表示隸屬網路的方法。

This approach draws heavily on the work by Atkin (1972, 1974), and exploits a more geometric, or topological, interpretation of the relationship between the actors and the events.
這種方法在很大程度上借鑒了阿特金(1972,1974)的工作,並利用了對參與者和事件之間關係的更幾何或拓撲的解釋。

A simplicial complex is useful for studying the overlaps among the subsets and the connectivity of the network, and can be used to define the dimensionality of the network in a precise mathematical way.
簡單複數可用於研究子集之間的重疊和網路的連通性,並可用於以精確的數學方式定義網路的維數。

Simplicial complexes can be used to study the internal structure of the onemode networks implied by the affiliation network by examining the degree of connectivity of entities in one mode, based on connections defined by the second mode.
單純複合體可用於研究隸屬網路所隱含的單模網路的內部結構,方法是基於第二模態定義的連接,檢查一種模態中實體的連通性程度。

The two-mode sociomatrix, the bipartite graph, and the hypergraph are alternative representations of an affiliation network.
雙模社會矩陣、二分圖和超圖是隸屬網路的替代表示。

The sociomatrix is an efficient way to present the information and is most useful for data analytic purposes.
社會矩陣是呈現資訊的有效方式,對於數據分析目的最有用。

Representing the affiliation network as a bipartite graph highlights the connectivity in the network, and makes the indirect chains of connection more apparent.
將隸屬關係網路表示為二分圖可突出顯示網路中的連通性,並使間接連接鏈更加明顯。

Since there is no loss or gain of information in one or another
由於一個或另一個沒有信息丟失或獲得


One-mode
單模式

Networks representation, the researcher's goals should guide selection of the best representation.
網路表示,研究人員的目標應指導選擇最佳表示。

As an example of an affiliation network, the authors will use the data collected by Galaskiewicz on chief executive officers (CEOs) and their memberships in civic clubs and corporate boards.
作為隸屬關係網路的一個例子,作者將使用Galaskiewicz收集的有關首席執行官(CEO)及其在公民俱樂部和公司董事會中的成員資格的數據。

The relationship between the sociomatrix for the comembership relation, Xx, whose entries indicate the number of events jointly attended by each actor, and the affiliation matrix, A, that indicates which events each actor is affiliated with, can be expressed concisely in matrix notation.
共隸關係的社會矩陣 XX 與隸屬矩陣 A 之間的關係可以用矩陣符號簡潔地表示,前者的條目表示每個參與者共同參加的事件的數量,後者表示每個參與者所屬的事件。

The matrix X.k" records the co-membership relation for actors
矩陣 X.k“ 記錄了參與者的共同成員關係

It is a symmetric, valued sociomatrix, indicating the number of events jointly attended by each pair of actors.
它是一個對稱的、有價值的社會矩陣,表示每對參與者共同參加的事件數量。

Each value of x{f is the product of the corresponding columns in A: The authors can define an h x h sociomatrix, X..II = {xt,}, that records the number of actors each pair of events has in common.
x{f 的每個值都是 A 中相應列的乘積: 作者可以定義一個 h x h 社會矩陣 X.。II = {xt,},記錄每對事件共有的參與者數量。

The matrix X..II is a one-mode, symmetric, valued sociomatrix indicating the number of actors that each pair of events shares.
矩陣 X..II 是一個單模、對稱、有價值的社會矩陣,表示每對事件共享的參與者數量。

The authors illustrate the actor co-membership matrix, Xx, and the event overlap matrix, X..II, using both the hypothetical example of six children and three birthday parties and Galaskiewicz's data on CEOs and their membership in clubs and corporate boards.
作者說明了參與者共隸矩陣 Xx 和事件重疊矩陣 X。II,使用六個孩子和三個生日派對的假設例子,以及Galaskiewicz關於首席執行官及其在俱樂部和公司董事會中的成員資格的數據。

The authors discuss properties of affiliation networks, including properties of the one-mode networks of actors and of events, and of the two-mode affiliation network
作者討論了從屬網路的性質,包括參與者和事件的單模式網路以及雙模式隸屬網路的性質


Properties of Affiliation Networks
隸屬關係網路的屬性

The authors define and describe several properties of affiliation networks and show how these properties can be calculated from the affiliation matrix, A, or from the one-mode sociomatrices, XA' and X..H. The authors first consider properties of individual actors or events and discuss properties of networks of actors and/or of events
作者定義並描述了隸屬關係網路的幾個屬性,並展示了如何從隸屬關係矩陣 A 或單模社會矩陣 XA' 和 X 計算這些屬性。H.作者首先考慮了單個參與者或事件的屬性,並討論了參與者和/或事件網路的屬性


Properties 0/ Actors and Events
屬性 0/ Actor 和事件

Some simple properties of actors and events can be calculated directly from the affiliation matrix or from the one-mode sociomatrices.
參與者和事件的一些簡單屬性可以直接從隸屬矩陣或單模社會矩陣中計算出來。

On average each club has a membership of 6.533 CEOs from this sample
平均而言,每個俱樂部有 6.533 名來自此樣本的 CEO 會員

These measures of the rates of participation for actors or the size of events are appropriate for describing affiliation networks when the authors assume that all actors and events of interest are included in the data set.
當作者假設所有感興趣的參與者和事件都包含在數據集中時,這些對參與者的參與者或事件規模的測量適合於描述隸屬關係網路。

Let them consider the density of ties in the one-mode networks of actor co-memberships and event overlaps.
讓他們考慮一下參與者共同成員和事件重疊的單模式網路中的聯繫密度。

The value of d(.¥) for the co-membership relation can be interpreted as the mean number of events to which pairs of actors belong.
共同成員關係的 d(.¥) 值可以解釋為成對參與者所屬的事件的平均數。

The value of drAt) for the overlap relation can be interpreted as the mean number of actors who belong to each pair of events.
重疊關係的DrAt值可以解釋為屬於每對事件的參與者的平均數。

The authors will use Galaskiewicz's data on CEOs and their memberships in clubs and boards to illustrate the density of ties among actors and among events
作者將使用Galaskiewicz關於首席執行官及其在俱樂部和董事會中的成員資格的數據來說明參與者之間和活動之間的聯繫密度

The authors will use both the valued and dichotomous relations of actor co-memberships and event overlaps.
作者將同時使用演員共同成員和事件重疊的價值關係和二分關係。

The density of this valued relation is Ll(.K) = 1.412
此值關係的密度為 Ll(.K) = 1.412

This means that on average, pairs of CEOs share memberships in 1.412 clubs.
這意味著平均而言,一對CEO在1.412個俱樂部中共用會員資格。

A useful way to study reachability in an affiliation network is to consider the bipartite graph, with both actors and events represented as nodes.
研究隸屬網路中可達性的一個有用方法是考慮二分圖,參與者和事件都表示為節點。


Properties afAffiliation Networks
屬性afAffiliation Networks

4, 14, 15, 17, 20, 14, 15, 20, 23, I, 13, 19 7,14,20 14, 15, 25 14, 17,26 15, 16, 23.
4、14、15、17、20、14、15、20、23、I、13、19、7、14、20、14、15、25、14、17、26、15、16、23。

The authors have used cliques to study the co-membership and overlap relations, one could use other cohesive subgroup ideas, such as n· cliques or k-plexes for valued graphs, to study these relations.
作者使用集團來研究共隸關係和重疊關係,可以使用其他有凝聚力的子集團思想,例如n·取值圖的 cliques 或 k-plexes,以研究這些關係。

Recall that the value of a path in a valued graph as the smallest value of any line included in the path
回想一下,值圖中路徑的值是路徑中包含的任何行的最小值

The authors can use this idea to study cohesive subgroups based on levels of reachability either among actors in the co-membership relation or among events in the overlap relation.
作者可以使用這個想法來研究基於共同成員關係中參與者之間或重疊關係中事件之間的可達性水準的內聚子群。

The authors focus on the one-mode valued relation of co-membership for actors or the one-mode valued relation of overlap for events.
作者重點研究了行為者共同成員的單模價值關係或事件重疊的單模價值關係。

One can use the definitions for the value of a path to define connectedness for pairs of actors in the valued graph.
可以使用路徑值的定義來定義值圖中成對的參與者的連通性。

But using the idea of simplicial complexes, Doreian defines a set of actors connected at level q as a subset such that all pairs of actors in the path were co-members of at least q + 1 events.
但是,使用簡單複合體的概念,Doreian將在水準q上連接的一組參與者定義為一個子集,使得路徑中的所有參與者對都是至少q + 1事件的共同成員。

ComputationalIy, finding pairs of actors who are q-connected is equivalent to finding paths of level q in the valued graph (Doreian 1969).
在計算中,找到 q 連接的 actor 對等價於在值圖中查找 q 級的路徑 (Doreian 1969)。

A q-analysis consists of finding subsets of actors all of whom are connected at level q
q 分析包括查找參與者的子集,所有這些參與者都在 q 水平上連接


Taking Account 0/ Subgroup Size
考慮 0/ 子組大小

An important issue to consider when analyzing the one-mode networks that are derived from an affiliation network is that both the co-membership relation for actors and the overlap relation for events are valued relations based on frequency counts.
在分析從隸屬網路派生的單模網路時要考慮的一個重要問題是,參與者的共隸關係和事件的重疊關係都是基於頻率計數的值關係。

These four children form a maximal complete subgraph in the co-membership relation.
這四個子項在共同成員關係中構成了一個最大完整的子圖。

If the authors return to the affiliation matrix, A, the authors see that Allison and Eliot attended Party 3, Allison and Sarah attended Party 1, and Eliot and Sarah attended Party 2, and Ross was at all parties, Allison, Eliot, Ross, and Sarah were never all four present at any party
如果作者回到隸屬關係矩陣 A,作者會看到 Allison 和 Eliot 參加了第 3 次聚會,Allison 和 Sarah 參加了第 1 次聚會,Eliot 和 Sarah 參加了第 2 次聚會,Ross 參加了所有聚會,Allison、Eliot、Ross 和 Sarah 從未參加過任何聚會

In his application of hypergraphs to social networks, Seidman (1981a) uses the term "pseudo-event" to refer to a subset of actors that form a "clique" in the one-mode comembership relation but are not together in any event in the affiliation network.
Seidman(1981a)在將超圖應用於社交網路時,使用術語“偽事件”來指代在單一模式共成員關係中形成“集團”但在隸屬關係中無論如何都不在一起的參與者子集。

The authors can represent the colIection of subsets of events defined by the actors' memberships, along with the null set, the universal set, and the relation s; as a lattice.
作者可以表示由參與者的成員身份定義的事件子集的集合,以及零集、通用集和關係 s;作為格子。

The advantages of a Galois lattice for representing an affiliation network are the focus on subsets, and the complementary relationships between the actors and the events that are displayed in the diagram.
伽羅瓦格子表示隸屬網路的優點是關注子集,以及參與者與圖中顯示的事件之間的互補關係。

Let them reiterate some of the important features of affiliation networks that make them distinctive from the one-mode networks that the authors have discussed prior to this chapter, and briefly review some of the
讓他們重申隸屬關係網路的一些重要特徵,這些特徵使它們與作者在本章之前討論的單模式網路不同,並簡要回顧一些


Summary important issues to consider when analyzing affiliation networks
總結 分析隸屬關係網路時要考慮的重要問題

Affiliation networks are two-mode networks that focus on the affiliation of a set of actors with a set of events.
隸屬關係網路是雙模式網路,側重於一組參與者與一組事件的隸屬關係。

Since each event consists of a subset of actors, and each actor is affiliated with a subset of events, affiliation network data cannot be studied completely by looking at pairs of actors and/or pairs of events.
由於每個事件都由參與者的子集組成,並且每個參與者都隸屬於事件的子集,因此無法通過查看參與者對和/或事件對來完全研究隸屬網路數據。

Affiliation networks are two-mode networks, and the most comprehensive analyses would study both actors and events simultaneously, it is possible to study the one-mode networks, of actors or of events.
隸屬網路是雙模網路,最全面的分析將同時研究行為者和事件,可以研究行為者或事件的單模式網路。

Since affiliation networks are defined on subsets of actors and events there is loss of information and potential for misinterpretation when studying only the one-mode networks.
由於隸屬網路是在參與者和事件的子集上定義的,因此在僅研究單模網路時,存在資訊丟失和誤解的可能性。

For the most part the analyses that the authors have described assume that one has a complete affiliation network.
在大多數情況下,作者所描述的分析假設一個人有一個完整的隸屬關係網路。

That all actors and all events constituting the network are included.
構成網路的所有參與者和所有事件都包括在內。

If, on the other hand, the actors in % are a sample of actors from a larger popUlation, or if the events in .It are a sample from a larger popUlation of events, one must consider issues of sampling and estimation of the relevant network quantities.
另一方面,如果 % 中的 actor 是來自較大 popUlation 的 actor 樣本,或者如果 .它是從更大的事件群中抽取的樣本,必須考慮相關網路數量的抽樣和估計問題。

McPherson (1982) discusses how to estimate key network affiliation measures
McPherson(1982)討論了如何估計關鍵的網路隸屬關係測量


Part IV
第四部分

Many methods for the description of network structural properties are concerned with the dual notions of social position and social role.
許多描述網路結構特性的方法都涉及社會地位和社會角色的雙重概念。

In social network terms these translate into procedures for analyzing actors' structural similarities and patterns of relations in multirelational networks
在社會網路術語中,這些轉化為分析多重關係網路中行為者的結構相似性和關係模式的程式

These methods, which have been referred to as positional, role, or relational approaches, are the topic of Part IV.
這些方法被稱為位置方法、角色方法或關係方法,是第四部分的主題。

These methods are mathematically and formally diverse, they share a common goal of representing patterns in complex social network data in simplified form to reveal subsets of actors who are embedded in networks of relations and to describe the associations among relations in multirelational networks.
這些方法在數學上和形式上都是多樣化的,它們有一個共同的目標,即以簡化的形式表示複雜社交網路數據中的模式,以揭示嵌入關係網路中的參與者子集,並描述多關係網路中關係之間的關聯。

In Chapters and the authors take up more advanced approaches to the notions of role and position and explore alternative formal definitions of these concepts
在章節中,作者對角色和地位的概念採取了更高級的方法,並探索了這些概念的替代形式定義

These chapters are concerned with the algebraic analysis of role systems using relational algebras (Chapter 11) and more general definitions of equivalence (Chapter 12).
這些章節涉及使用關係代數(第 11 章)和更一般的等價定義(第 12 章)對角色系統進行代數分析。

The use of formal role and positional analysis to study social networks with a wider variety of relations started in the 1970's, with the publication of Lorrain and White's (1971) paper on structural equivalence.
1970年代,隨著Lorrain和White(1971)關於結構等價的論文的發表,開始使用正式角色和位置分析來研究具有更廣泛關係的社會網路。

I and j are structurally equivalent if i ~ k if and only
I 和 j 在結構上是等價的,如果 i ~ k 當且僅


Definition of Structural
結構的定義

For two actors to be structurally equivalent in a multirelational network, they must have identical ties to and from all other actors, on all relations.
要使兩個參與者在多關係網路中結構上等效,它們必須在所有關係上與所有其他參與者具有相同的聯繫。

Consider the valued relation of acquaintanceship in Freeman's EIES network
考慮弗里曼的EIES網路中熟人關係的價值

This quantity is measured as each person's reported friendship with each other member of the group on a five-point scale: 1) "unknown," 2) "person the author has heard of," 3) "person the author has met," 4) "friend," or 5) "close personal friend." In the strictest sense, two actors are structurally equivalent if they name and are named by exactly the same close personal friends, exactly the same friends, had met and been met by exactly the same others, and so on.
這個數量是以每個人報告的與小組其他成員的友誼來衡量的,分為五分制:1)“未知”,2)“作者聽說過的人”,3)“作者見過的人”,4)“朋友”,或5)“親密的私人朋友”。從最嚴格的意義上講,如果兩個演員的名字和名字完全一樣,由完全相同的私人朋友命名,完全相同的朋友,遇到和被完全相同的其他人認識,等等,那麼他們在結構上是等價的。

When a relation is reflexive (i ---+ i for all i) and self-ties are considered substantively meaningful, diagonal entries in the sociomatrix should be included in calculation of structural equivalence.
當關係是自反的(i ---+ i 表示所有 i)並且自聯繫被認為具有實質意義時,社會矩陣中的對角線條目應包含在結構等價的計算中。

The authors present a list of the steps that are required for a complete positional analysis
作者列出了完整位置分析所需的步驟


Simplification of Multirelational Networks
多關係網路的簡化

If all actors within each subset are structurally equivalent, when the rows and columns of the original sociomatrix are permuted so that actors who are assigned to the same equivalence class occupy rows and columns that are adjacent, the submatrices corresponding to the ties between and within positions are filled with either all O's or all l's.
如果每個子集中的所有參與者在結構上都是等價的,那麼當原始社會矩陣的行和列被置換,以便分配給同一等價類的參與者佔據相鄰的行和列時,對應於位置之間和位置內的聯繫的子矩陣將填充所有 O 或所有 l。

This is the definition of a graph homomorphism, which is important in the discussions of blockmodels and relational algebras
這是圖同態的定義,這在塊模型和關係代數的討論中很重要

This rule for constructing a reduced graph includes both a rule for assigning actors to positions and a rule for assigning ties between positions based on the presence or absence of ties between actors.
此用於構建簡化圖的規則既包括將參與者分配給位置的規則,也包括根據參與者之間是否存在聯繫來分配位置之間聯繫的規則。

This example illustrates some of the results of positional analysis methods: a partition of the actors into discrete subsets and a simplified description of the original social network data presenting the ties between positions rather than among individual actors.
這個例子說明瞭位置分析方法的一些結果:將參與者劃分為離散的子集,並簡化了原始社交網路數據的描述,呈現了位置之間的聯繫,而不是單個參與者之間的聯繫。

Structurally equivalent actors have identical entries in their corresponding rows and columns of the sociomatrix.
結構等效的參與者在社會矩陣的相應行和列中具有相同的條目。

Notice that no pairs of actors are structurally equivalent, since none of the off-diagonal distances is equal to O
請注意,沒有一對參與者在結構上是等價的,因為沒有一個對角線距離等於 O


Correlation as a Measure of Structural Equivalence
相關性作為結構等效性的度量

A second widely used measure of structural equivalence is the correlation coefficient.
第二個廣泛使用的結構等價度量是相關係數。

The authors denote the mean of the values in row i of the sociomatrix as Xi., and denote the mean of the values in column i as x.j, where the calculation excludes diagonal elements.
作者將社會矩陣第 i 行中值的平均值表示為 習,並將第 i 列中值的平均值表示為 x.j,其中計算不包括對角線元素。

Where all the sums are over k, and i =1= k, j =1= k
其中所有總和都超過 k,並且 i =1= k,j =1= k

These correlations are arranged in a g x g correlation matrix, which the authors denote by Cl. The (i,j)th element of Cl is the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, rij, between the ith row and column and the jth row and column of the sociomatrix.
這些相關性排列在 g x g 相關矩陣中,作者用 Cl 表示。Cl 的 (i,j) 元素是 Pearson 乘積矩相關係數 rij,位於社會矩陣的第 i 行和列與第 j 行和列之間。

Diagonal elements of the sociomatrix are excluded from calculation of the correlation.
社會矩陣的對角線元素被排除在相關性的計算之外。

If two actors are structurally equivalent, the correlation between their respective rows and columns of the sociomatrix will be equal to +1.
如果兩個參與者在結構上是等價的,則它們各自的社會矩陣的行和列之間的相關性將等於 +1。

Since the columns of the original matrix become the rows in its transpose, including the transposes in the calculation allows them to compare ties both to and from the actors.
由於原始矩陣的列成為其轉置中的行,因此在計算中包括轉置允許它們比較與參與者的聯繫和與參與者的聯繫。

This is the same conclusion that the authors reached using Euclidean distance as a measure of structural equivalence
這與作者使用歐幾里得距離作為結構等價度量得出的結論相同


Some Considerations in Measuring Structural Equivalence
測量結構等效性時的一些考慮因素

The authors turn to some considerations in the measurement of structural equivalence. The authors' comments focus on selecting a good measure for a given relation and a comparison of the two measures (Euclidean distance, and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient).
作者轉向了結構等價性測量中的一些考慮因素。作者的評論側重於為給定關係選擇一個好的度量,並比較兩個度量(歐幾里得距離和皮爾遜積矩相關係數)。

This method was first used for analyzing social networks by H.
這種方法最初被H用於分析社交網路。

One way to display the results of a series of partitions from CONCOR is to construct a tree-diagram or a dendrogram indicating the degree of structural equivalence among the positions and identifying their members.
顯示 CONCOR 一系列分區結果的一種方法是構建樹形圖或樹狀圖,指示位置之間的結構等效程度並識別其成員。

Extensions, Generalizing CONCOR to multirelational networks and to valued relations is straightforward once the authors realize that the primary matrix that CONCOR analyzes is the correlation matrix, Cl, containing the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients as measures of similarity among pairs of actors, After the first step of computing Cl the procedure of iterating correlations is identical regardless of the types of relations that were included in the calculation of Cl. Some Comments.
擴展,將 CONCOR 推廣到多關係網路和價值關係是很簡單的,一旦作者意識到 CONCOR 分析的主要矩陣是相關矩陣 Cl,其中包含 Pearson 乘積矩相關係數作為參與者對之間相似性的度量,在計算 Cl 的第一步之後,反覆運算相關性的過程是相同的,無論 Cl 的計算中包含何種關係類型。評論。

Another way to study the figure is to compare the proximity of actors in the multidimensional scaling figure with the partition that resulted from CONCOR or from hierarchical clustering of either the Pearson product-moment correlations or of the Euclidean distances
研究該圖的另一種方法是將多維縮放圖中參與者的鄰近性與 CONCOR 或 Pearson 積矩相關性或歐幾里得距離的分層聚類產生的分區進行比較

Recall that these three methods gave the same partition at the level of two positions.
回想一下,這三種方法在兩個位置的級別上給出了相同的分區。


Three arcs, 2 reflexive
三弧,2反身

The advice image is transitive at the level of the positions.
建議圖像在職位級別是可傳遞的。

The pattern for friendship is not as clear.
友誼的模式並不那麼清晰。

Interpreting blockmodels with multiple relations can be tedious.
解釋具有多個關係的塊模型可能很乏味。

One possible way to interpret multirelational blockmodels is to study pairs of image matrices to see whether they exhibit common kinds of multirelational patterns, such as mUltiplexity or exchange.
解釋多重關係塊模型的一種可能方法是研究圖像矩陣對,看看它們是否表現出常見類型的多重關係模式,例如mUltiplexity或交換。

Multiplexity of relations is the tendency for two or more relations to occur together.
關係的多重性是兩個或多個關係同時發生的趨勢。

"is a friend of" and "spends time with" are two relations that might tend to occur together if people are free to choose the people they spend time with.
“是朋友”和“花時間在一起”是兩種關係,如果人們可以自由選擇與他們共度時光的人,它們可能會同時發生。

Multiplexity in a blockmodel would be apparent if two or more image matrices were identical.
如果兩個或多個圖像矩陣相同,則塊模型中的多重性將很明顯。

Exchange occurs when one relation "flows" one way, and the second relation "flows" back.
當一個關係以一種方式「流動」 而第二個關係「流回」 時,就會發生交換。

"pays money to" and "delivers goods to" are two relations that form an exchange in an economic transaction.
“向”和“向”是經濟交易中形成交換的兩種關係。


Transitivity [li~!]m[!!~n
傳遞性 [li~!]m[!!~n

The researcher should be able to lIse the several approaches described to arrive at a consistent and theoretically meaningful statement about the positions in a network, the characteristics of actors in the positions, and how the positions are related to each other.
研究人員應該能夠理解所描述的幾種方法,以得出關於網路中位置、位置中參與者的特徵以及位置如何相互關聯的一致且理論上有意義的陳述。

White (1963) draws the analogy between a formal organization and certain kinship structures, and lays the groundwork for a program of research on formal role analysis
White(1963)將正式組織與某些親屬結構進行了類比,併為正式角色分析的研究計劃奠定了基礎

He notes "Primary roles can be cumulated into chains defining compound roles", pointing toward a focus on associations among relations.
他指出,“主要角色可以累積成定義複合角色的鏈條”,並指出了對關係之間關聯的關注。

Formalizing the ideas of interrelatedness, interlocking, or bundles of relations is one goal of formal network role analysis
將相互關聯性、互鎖性或關係束的概念形式化是正式網路角色分析的目標之一

These methods are different from methods for network positions that focus on properties of subsets of actors.
這些方法不同於關注參與者子集屬性的網路位置方法。

Network methods for social roles focus on relations and on the associations among these relations, rather than on network properties of actors or subsets of actors.
社會角色的網路方法側重於關係和這些關係之間的關聯,而不是行為者或行為者子集的網路屬性。

The the authors present formal network definitions for the notion of social role and show how this concept applies to the different levels of analysis of networks.
作者提出了社會角色概念的正式網路定義,並展示了這一概念如何應用於不同層次的網路分析。

In order to present methods and models for multiple relations, it is useful to employ algebraic notation rather than the sociometric and graph theoretic notations.
為了呈現多重關係的方法和模型,使用代數符號而不是社會計量和圖論符號是有用的。

The authors describe some properties of the operation of composition of relations
作者描述了關係組合操作的一些特性


11.2.2 Properties of Composition and Compound Relations
11.2.2 組成的性質和複合關係

There are several important things to note about the operation of composition of relations.
關於關係組合的運作,有幾件重要的事情需要注意。

Examples of compound relations of long strings that might be socially meaningful include relations such as "a friend of a friend of a friend," or "a boss of a friend of a friend," or "mother's mother's mother." Each string of relations that forms a compound relation is referred to as a word, and the length of a word is the number of primitive relations in it.
可能具有社會意義的長字串複合關係的例子包括諸如「朋友的朋友的朋友」或「朋友的朋友的老闆」或「母親的母親的母親」等關係。形成複合關係的每個關係串都稱為一個詞,一個詞的長度是其中原始關係的數量。

These long compound relations are computed through a series of operations of composition of two relations, for example, (U 0 U) 0 U, or through a series of Boolean matrix products.
這些長複合關係是通過兩個關係的組合的一系列運算來計算的,例如,(U 0 U) 0 U,或者通過一系列布爾矩陣乘積。

The first collection contains all words that could be constructed from a given set of primitive relations, regardless of whether the words give rise to equivalent images.
第一個集合包含所有可以從一組給定的原始關係構造的單詞,而不管這些單詞是否產生等效的圖像。


11.3.1 Multiplication Tables and Relational Structures
11.3.1 乘法表和關係結構

One way to display the result of composition of relations for a given network is in a multiplication table.
顯示給定網路關係組合結果的一種方法是在乘法表中。

Composition graph table for a hypothetical network the relation "oversees the work of" in a three-level corporate hierarchy, or as the relation "is the parent of" in a three-generation family tree.
假設網路的組成圖表,該關係在三級公司層次結構中“監督”其工作,或作為三代家譜中“是其父級”的關係。

In this example there are Rs = 5 distinct images: the primitive relations Hand L, and three additional distinct compound relations H L, H H, and 0.
在此示例中,有 Rs = 5 個不同的圖像:原始關係 Hand L,以及另外三個不同的複合關係 H L、H H 和 0。

This compound relation could be interpreted as "parent of a parent" or "boss of a boss." The entry in the second row and second column of the body of the table shows the compollnd relation LL
這種複合關係可以解釋為「父母的父母」或「老闆的老闆」。表正文的第二行和第二列中的條目顯示了 compollnd 關係 LL

Notice that this is equivalent to the relation L. and so adds no new image to the table, or new entry to 1/.
請注意,這等價於關係 L.,因此不會向表中添加新圖像,也不會向 1/ 添加新條目。

The information in the multiplication table describes the set of equivalences among the relations; that is, the results of composition tell them which primitive or compound relations produce identical images.
乘法表中的資訊描述了關係之間的等價集;也就是說,構圖的結果告訴他們哪些原始關係或複合關係產生相同的圖像。


A F AF FA FF
FA FF 的 A F

Let them look at the role structure generated by the image matrices for the relations of advice and friendship for Krackhardt's high-tech managers.
讓他們看看圖像矩陣為克拉克哈特的高科技經理提供建議和友誼關係所產生的角色結構。

This multiplication table was adapted from an analysis using UC/NET IV (Borgatti, Everett, and Freeman 1991).
該乘法表改編自使用UC/NET IV(Borgatti, Everett, and Freeman 1991) 的分析。

These equivalence classes are given, along with some of the words that generate the same image
給出了這些等價類,以及一些生成相同圖像的單詞

This set of equations expresses the fact that the role structure describes a partition of the set of all possible words that could be constructed from the primitive relations.
這組方程表達了這樣一個事實,即角色結構描述了可以從原始關係構造的所有可能單詞的集合的分區。

This shows that there are two subsets of images that operate when they are the first element in a compound relation.
這表明,當圖像是複合關係中的第一個元素時,有兩個圖像子集可以運行。

The second strategy is based on simplifying the multiplication table that expresses the composition of relations
第二種策略基於簡化表示關係組成的乘法表


11.4.1 Simplification by Comparing Images
11.4.1 通過比較圖像進行簡化

One goal of simplification and reduction of a multiplication table is to add further equations among pairs or collections of images to reduce the total number of distinct elements in the table.
簡化和減少乘法表的一個目標是在圖像對或圖像集合之間添加進一步的方程,以減少表中不同元素的總數。

For the example of advice and friendship, if the authors focus on similarities among columns in the table, the authors are led to a different simplification than if the authors focus on rows
以建議和友誼為例,如果作者關注表中各列之間的相似性,則作者會被引導到與作者關注行不同的簡化

This second set of equations, which is a homomorphic reduction, is: The authors present the permuted and partitioned multiplication table in Fig-.
第二組方程是同態約簡,是: 作者在圖-中給出了置換和分區的乘法表。

Pattison (1993) has developed a complementary approach to homomorphic reduction of relational algebras that preserves the property of inclusions among images in the network
Pattison(1993)開發了一種互補方法,用於關係代數的同態約簡,該方法保留了網路中圖像之間的包含屬性

Both of these approaches have the goal of representing the essential features that are shared between role structures.
這兩種方法的目標都是表示角色結構之間共用的基本特徵。

Consider imposing the equations among images that hold for Krackhardfs high-tech managers on the role table for the Bank Wiring room
考慮將 Krackhardfs 高科技經理的形象強加於銀行佈線室的角色表上

The authors will denote these new classes by Q{NT, Q~NT, ...
作者將用 Q{NT, Q~NT, ...

Examining this figure, the authors see that within each submatrix, the labels for images are all in the same equivalence class, and this simplification preserves the operation of composition
通過檢查該圖,作者發現在每個子矩陣中,圖像的標籤都處於相同的等價類中,並且這種簡化保留了構圖的操作

This reduction of the role structure for the Bank Wiring room is a homomorphic reduction.
組布線室角色結構的這種簡化是同態簡化。

If the authors consider the equations among compound relations that are expressed in the set of equivalence classes of images for the joint homomorphic reduction of these two role structures, the authors see that there are five kinds of compound relations operating in these groups.
如果作者考慮在圖像的等價類集合中表示的複合關係之間的方程,用於這兩個角色結構的聯合同態還原,作者會發現在這些組中有五種複合關係在起作用。

Let them consider some issues that arise in defining regular equivalence for nondirectional relations
讓他們考慮在定義非方向關係的正則等價時出現的一些問題


12.4.2 Regular Equivalence for Nondirectional Relations
12.4.2 非方向關係的正則等價

As many authors have noted, in a graph in which there are no isolates, the maximal regular equivalence consists of a single equivalence class containing all nodes (Faust 1985; Doreian 1987, 1988b; Borgatti 1988).
正如許多作者所指出的,在沒有分離物的圖中,最大正則等價由包含所有節點的單個等價類組成(Faust 1985;Doreian 1987, 1988b;Borgatti 1988)。

For a nondirectional relation with no isolates, all actors in the single maximal regular equivalence class are adjacent to some other actor, who is in the equivalence class.
對於沒有隔離的非方向關係,單個最大正則等價類中的所有參與者都與等價類中的其他參與者相鄰。

A partition consisting of a single equivalence class is trivial, and probably uninteresting.
由單個等價類組成的分區是微不足道的,而且可能無趣。

A nondirectional relation may contain other regular equivalence partitions.
非方向關係可以包含其他正則等價分區。

The maximal regular equivalence partition for this graph is {1, 2,3, 4}.
此圖的最大正則等價分區為 {1, 2,3, 4}。

One useful approach for studying regular equivalence in graphs is the graph theoretic concept of neighborhood (Everett, Boyd, and Borgatti 1990).
研究圖中正則等價的一種有用方法是鄰域的圖論概念(Everett, Boyd, and Borgatti 1990)。

Since the neighborhood of a node consists of all nodes adjacent to that node, nodes that are regularly equivalent must have the same equivalence classes of nodes in their neighborhoods across all relations.
由於節點的鄰域由與該節點相鄰的所有節點組成,因此,在所有關係中,常規等效節點的鄰域中必須具有相同的等價節點類。

In order to be regularly equivalent, actors must be adjacent to the same kinds of other actors
為了在規則上等價,參與者必須與相同類型的其他參與者相鄰

This approach to defining regular equivalence is especially useful for studying regular equivalence in nondirectional relations.
這種定義正則等價的方法對於研究非方向關係中的正則等價特別有用。

Before the authors discuss measures of regular equivalence, let them consider how to represent regular equivalence partitions using a regular equivalence blockmodel
在作者討論正則等價的度量之前,讓他們考慮一下如何使用正則等價塊模型來表示正則等價分區


12.4.3 Regular Equivalence Blockmodels
12.4.3 正則等價塊模型

Recall that a blockmodel consists of a mapping of actors into equivalence classes according to the particular equivalence definition, and for each pair of positions, a statement of whether or not there is a tie present from one position to another position.
回想一下,塊模型由根據特定的等價定義將參與者映射到等價類中組成,並且對於每對位置,都包含從一個位置到另一個位置是否存在平局的陳述。

Let them consider two definitions of equivalence that focus on the types of ties in which each actor is involved
讓他們考慮兩個等價的定義,這兩個定義側重於每個行為者所參與的聯繫類型

These two approaches, Winship and Mandel's local role equivalence and Breiger and Pattison's ego algebras, consider associations among relations from the perspectives of individual actors
這兩種方法,Winship和Mandel的局部角色等價以及Breiger和Pattison的自我代數,從個體行為者的角度考慮了關係之間的關聯

The authors will consider the associations among relations from the perspectives of individual actors
作者將從個體行為者的角度考慮關係之間的關聯

To describe these approaches it will be useful to return to Merton's (1957) ideas of role relation and role set, which the authors discussed at the beginning of this chapter.
為了描述這些方法,回到Merton(1957)的角色關係和角色集思想將是有用的,作者在本章開頭討論了這一點。

For this example the authors will consider the set of all distinct primitive and compound relations.
在這個例子中,作者將考慮所有不同的原始關係和複合關係的集合。

In the two sections the authors present two different definitions and measures of equivalence for individual roles
在這兩節中,作者提出了兩種不同的定義和個別角色的等效性衡量標準

These two methods, local role equivalence (Winship and Mandel 1983, and Mandel 1983) and ego algebras (Breiger and Pattison 1986) focus on sets of primitive and compound relations, but they differ in terms of which relations are included in the set, how individual roles are defined, and how similarity of individual roles is calculated.
這兩種方法,局部角色等價(Winship and Mandel 1983,Mandel 1983)和自我代數(Breiger和Pattison 1986)側重於原始關係和複合關係的集合,但它們在集合中包含哪些關係,如何定義單個角色以及如何計算單個角色的相似性方面有所不同。

Notice that actors 2 and 3 have identical equations among relations and identical right multiplication tables, as do actors 4, 5, and 6
請注意,參與者 2 和 3 在關係之間具有相同的方程和相同的右乘法表,參與者 4、5 和 6 也是如此


H r-H1 2-1L
Two actors have identical ego algebras, and are ego-algebraically equivalent (EA), if the equivalences among relations and the composition of relations are the same from each actor's perspective.
兩個參與者具有相同的自我代數,並且從每個參與者的角度來看,如果關係之間的等價和關係的組成相同,則它們是自我代數等價的 (EA)。

Actors i and j are equivalent, i ~ j, if Y j , the partition of Y for actor i, is identical to !/j, the partition of [/ for actor j, and their right multiplication tables are identical.
Actor i 和 j 是等價的,i ~ j,如果 Y j 是 actor i 的 Y 分區,則與 Actor j 的 [/ 的分區 !/j 相同,它們的右乘法表相同。

The authors turn to measuring the similarity of ego algebras
作者轉向測量自我代數的相似性


11.7.3 Measming Ego Algebra Similarity
11.7.3 測量自我代數相似性

To measure the similarity of ego algebras the authors use the same approach that the authors used to compare the role algebras for two groups.
為了測量自我代數的相似性,作者使用了與作者用來比較兩組角色代數相同的方法。

Breiger and Pattison (1986) compare ego algebras by the joint right homomorphism of two ego algebras.
Breiger和Pattison(1986)通過兩個自我代數的聯合右同態來比較自我代數。

The authors will denote the joint right homomorphic reduction of the ego algebras for actors i and j by !lfJ-IT.
作者將用 !lfJ-IT 表示參與者 i 和 j 的自我代數的聯合右同態約簡。

The joint right homomorphic reduction is a coarser partition of the set f/, since it equates relations that are identical from the perspective of either individual actor.
聯合右同態約簡是集合 f/ 的較粗略的劃分,因為它等價從任何一個個體參與者的角度來看相同的關係。

A measure of the degree of equivalence of two ego algebras is a measure of how much "coarser" the partition described by their joint right homomorphic reduction is, compared to the partitions of the two ego algebras.
兩個自我代數的等價程度的度量是衡量它們的聯合右同態約簡所描述的分區與兩個自我代數的分區相比有多“粗糙”。

The authors can measure the distance between two ego algebras by slimming the distance each is from their joint right homomorphic reduction.
作者可以通過縮小兩個自我代數與它們的關節右同態約簡的距離來測量兩個自我代數之間的距離。

In both examples the authors used the routine JNTHOM in the program ROLE (Breiger 1986).
在這兩個例子中,作者在程式ROLE(Breiger,1986)中使用了例程JNTHOM。

As Wc noted above, for this example there are three subsets of actors who arc ego-algebraically equivalent (EA)
如上所述,在這個例子中,有三個參與者的子集,它們在自我代數等價 (EA) 上是弧形的

These subsets are: consider the relations of advice and friendship for Krackhardl's high-tech managers.
這些子集是:考慮 Krackhardl 高科技經理的建議和友誼關係。

There are fewer examples of applications of these methods to substantive problems
將這些方法應用於實質性問題的例子較少


Part V
第五部分

The first question that an analyst must answer is: "What is the stochastic nature of the random variables?" In other words: "What distribution do the author's random variables follow?" These distributions allow a researcher to test hypotheses about various properties of a directed graph under study, such as the number of mutual dyads.
分析師必須回答的第一個問題是:「隨機變數的隨機性質是什麼?換句話說:「作者的隨機變數遵循什麼分佈?這些分佈允許研究人員測試有關所研究的有向圖的各種屬性的假設,例如相互二元組的數量。

These properties will be described at length .
這些屬性將詳細描述。

A statistical dyadic analysis is only possible if the authors allow the counts of the dyad census to be random variables; that is, if the authors consider the sociomatrix under study to represent a random directed graph.
只有當作者允許二元普查的計數是隨機變數時,才有可能進行統計二元分析;也就是說,如果作者認為所研究的社會矩陣代表隨機有向圖。

Katz and Powell (1955) proposed an index, which the authors will label PKP, to measure the tendency for actors in a group to reciprocate choices more frequently than would occur by chance
Katz和Powell(1955)提出了一個指數,作者將其命名為PKP,以衡量群體中行為者比偶然發生更頻繁地回報選擇的傾向

Such an index refines the examination of the counts in the dyad census, since the index can be used to compare groups and relations with unequal numbers of actors.
這種指數細化了對二元人口普查中計數的檢查,因為該指數可用於比較具有不等數量行為者的群體和關係。

The simplest conditional uniform random digraph distribution conditions on the graph property
圖屬性上最簡單的條件均勻隨機二圖分佈條件


Such a distribution is useful when studying the randomness of choices made by each individual actor
在研究每個參與者所做選擇的隨機性時,這種分佈是有用的

One could assume that the sociomatrix was distributed as a uniform random matrix, conditional on the outdegrees and number of mutuals
人們可以假設社會矩陣分佈為一個均勻的隨機矩陣,條件是相互的出度和數量

This allows all statistical inferences to be made only among those sociomatrices with the same outdegrees and M value as observed in the data set.
這允許所有統計推斷僅在那些與數據集中觀察到的具有相同度數和 M 值的社會矩陣中進行。

Each of these random digraphs is likely under the uniform distribution, conditional on a fixed set of indegrees
這些隨機二分法中的每一個都可能處於均勻分佈之下,以一組固定的內度為條件

This number is the size of the sample space of digraphs under this distribution.
這個數位是這個分佈下二合體的樣本空間的大小。

The distribution discussed in these paragraphs is one of the most frequently used random directed graph distributions in social network analysis
這些段落中討論的分佈是社交網路分析中最常用的隨機有向圖分佈之一

It is a uniform distribution which conditions on the numbers of mutual, asymmetric, and null dyads in the digraph - that is, the dyad census itself.
它是一種均勻分佈,它以二元圖中互對、不對稱和零二元對稱的數量為條件,即二元普查本身。

It is quite useful in social network analysis, when working with a specific set of graph properties to fix or condition on all "lower-level" graph properties
在社交網路分析中,當使用一組特定的圖形屬性來修復或調節所有“較低級別”的圖形屬性時,它非常有用

This is exactly the approach that the authors take, where the UIMAN distribution will be used extensively when studying triads - that is, the authors fix the dyad census to study triadic frequencies.
這正是作者所採用的方法,在研究三元組時,UIMAN分佈將被廣泛使用——也就是說,作者將二元組普查固定為研究三元組頻率。

Such hypotheses are usually tested by examining not the entire triad census and its expectation, but linear combinations of it, which the authors discuss
這種假設通常不是通過檢查整個三合會人口普查及其期望來檢驗的,而是通過檢查作者討論的線性組合來檢驗的


14.3.4 Mean and Variance of Linear Combinations of a Triad Census
14.3.4 三元組普查線性組合的均值和方差

As the authors have mentioned and demonstrated, linear combinations of the triad census, defined as Lu tu Tu where the lu are the coefficients of the.
正如作者所提及和證明的,三元組人口普查的線性組合,定義為 Lu tu Tu,其中 lu 是 的係數。

The first step in the testing process is to consider how these hypotheses can be "operationalized" in terms of triads; that is, what predictions these theories make about the various triadic configurations that occur in a data set.
測試過程的第一步是考慮如何根據三元組「操作化」這些假設;也就是說,這些理論對數據集中出現的各種三元配置做出了哪些預測。

By "chance," the authors mean the expected numbers of these configurations that would arise as given by a random directed graph distribution, assuming that the hypothesis is true
作者所說的“偶然”是指這些配置的預期數量,這些配置由隨機有向圖分佈給出,假設假設為真

Note that this comparison strategy is identical to the standard approach to significance testing in statistics: let the data give the empirical frequencies or value of the relevant statistic, and compare the empirical value(s) with the value(s) to be expected based on some null model.
請注意,這種比較策略與統計學中顯著性檢驗的標準方法相同:讓數據給出相關統計量的經驗頻率或值,並將經驗值與基於某些零模型的預期值進行比較。

Under one of the random directed graph distributions, the authors can calculate the expected value and covariance matrix of T, and the expected number for this configuration (equation (14.22) and its variance (equation (14.23))
在其中一個隨機有向圖分佈下,作者可以計算 T 的期望值和協方差矩陣,以及該配置的期望數(方程 (14.22) 及其方差(方程 (14.23))

This expected number is l'PT, and the standard error is -/1'''£Ti, where PT, the mean triad census vector, is given by the components of equation (14.19).
這個預期數位是 l'PT,標準誤差是 -/1'''£Ti,其中 PT,平均三元組普查向量,由方程 (14.19) 的分量給出。

The configurations associated with the theory yield a set of weighting vectors, to be applied to the counts of the triad census, since the triad types contain the various predicted configurations.
與該理論相關的配置產生一組加權向量,用於三元組人口普查的計數,因為三元組類型包含各種預測配置。

A complete social network analysis begins by using methods from Parts Ill, IV, and V of this book
完整的社交網路分析從使用本書第 Ill、IV 和 V 部分的方法開始


Part VI
第六部分

Statistical Analysis of Single Relational Networks by Dawn Iacobucci. The authors turn the attention to stochastic models for social network data.
Dawn Iacobucci 對單一關係網路的統計分析。作者將注意力轉向社交網路數據的隨機模型。

Parameters that quantify the "structural effects" present in a network, such as reciprocity and tendencies toward differential indegrees, can be estimated simultaneously; for example, the authors can model actor expansiveness while controlling for differential actor popularity.
可以同時估計量化網路中存在的「結構效應」的參數,例如互惠性和差異度的趨勢;例如,作者可以對演員的擴張性進行建模,同時控制不同的演員受歡迎程度。

The authors begin this chapter by presenting models for a network with measurements on a single, directional relation for one set of actors.
作者在本章的開頭介紹了一個網路模型,該模型對一組參與者的單個方向關係進行了測量。

The model the authors present for a single relation includes parameters to measure the probabilistic tendencies of all of these substantive effects: expansiveness, popularity, and reciprocity.
作者為單一關係提出的模型包括用於衡量所有這些實質性影響的概率趨勢的參數:擴展性、受歡迎程度和互惠性。

The authors estimate these parameters using log linear modeling techniques.
作者使用對數線性建模技術估計這些參數。

Referring to network data, if the authors include P's in the model, and if actor 1 is chosen by four of the eight actors, fitted probabilities that nl is chosen must sum to (4/8) = 0.50
參考網路數據,如果作者在模型中包括 P,並且 8 個參與者中的 4 個選擇了參與者 1,則選擇 nl 的擬合概率之和必須為 (4/8) = 0.50

This equating is the critical computation that will produce maximum likelihood estimates of cell expected values, and parameters.
這種等價是關鍵計算,它將產生單元格期望值和參數的最大似然估計值。

The authors' models for single relational network data Can be fit by following the theory discussed above; one focuses on the model parameters, and their sufficient statistics, which are margins of the Y-array.
作者的單關係網路數據模型可以通過遵循上述理論進行擬合;一個關注模型參數及其充分的統計數據,即 Y 陣列的邊緣。

More manageable sizes (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 if the authors use one attribute variable or 4 x 4 x 2 x 2 if the authors use two attribute variables) than their corresponding y-arrays (21 x 21 x 2 x 2 for both of the relations)
比其相應的 y 陣列(兩個關係均為 21 x 21 x 2 x 2)更易於管理的大小(如果作者使用一個屬性變數,則為 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2,如果作者使用兩個屬性變數,則為 4 x 4 x 2 x 2)


15.2.3 The Basic Model with Auribute Variables
15.2.3 具有 Auribute 變數的基本模型

The model the authors fit to this new contingency table (the W-array defined in equation (15.8)) is a special case of the basic model (15.3), subject to the constraints placed on the parameters, which arise through the use of the actor attribute variables and the assumption of stochastic equivalence.
作者擬合到這個新的列聯表的模型(等式(15.8)中定義的W陣列)是基本模型(15.3)的一個特例,受制於對參數的約束,這些約束是通過使用參與者屬性變數和隨機等價假設產生的。

This version of model (15.3) follows: 10gP(Yijk/ = 1) =.
此版本的模型 (15.3) 如下:10gP(Yijk/ = 1) =。

If the authors aggregate the actors into four age and tenure subsets (S = 4), and model the resulting W-array, the authors estimate only (4 - 1)(2 - 1) = 3 a's and 3 p's, 1, and 1 fJ, for a total of just 8 parameters
如果作者將參與者聚合為四個年齡和任期子集 (S = 4),並對生成的 W 陣列進行建模,則作者僅估計 (4 - 1)(2 - 1) = 3 個 a 和 3 個 p、1 和 1 fJ,總共只有 8 個參數

This simplification is due to the stochastic equivalence assumption.
這種簡化是由於隨機等價假設。

The adjustment that is needed takes the parameter estimates for a model with attribute variables (which are based on S(S -1)/2 pairs of subsets), and calculates fitted values for all g(g - 1)/2 pairs of actors, compares these fitted values to the relational data contained in the original sociomatrix.
所需的調整採用具有屬性變數的模型的參數估計值(基於 S(S -1)/2 對子集),並計算所有 g(g - 1)/2 對參與者的擬合值,將這些擬合值與原始社會矩陣中包含的關係數據進行比較。


Not small 1 Not small
不小 1 不小

The younger and older actors have different numbers of friends
年輕和年長的演員有不同數量的朋友

Their friendship expansiveness differs, as can be seen from the parameter estimates from model (15.9), fit to the friendship relation, using just age as the actor attribute variable.
從模型(15.9)的參數估計值可以看出,他們的友誼擴展性是不同的,擬合到友誼關係,僅使用年齡作為演員屬性變數。

The models that the authors have presented allow researchers to study patterns of ties for a single relational variable among individual actors, or among subsets.
作者提出的模型允許研究人員研究單個參與者之間或子集之間單個關係變數的聯繫模式。

Models postulated for such data focus on the relations alone, without consideration of who sent or received the ties, or of any attributes of these actors
為此類數據假設的模型僅關注關係,而不考慮誰發送或接收了關係,或這些參與者的任何屬性

These models assume that all expansiveness parameters are constant across all actors or all subsets of actors.
這些模型假定所有參與者或所有參與者子集的所有擴展性參數都是恆定的。

When considering whether to go from the W- to the V-array, the authors are further assuming all subsets, or all actors, are homogeneous with respect to the dyadic interactions on the relational variable under study.
在考慮是否從 W 陣列轉到 V 陣列時,作者進一步假設所有子集或所有參與者在所研究的關係變數上的二元相互作用方面都是同質的。

No parameters appear in the model that depend on the actors, i or j, or the subsets, s(i) or s(j), because the authors have aggregated over all these possibilities, and formed a table that cross-classifies only the levels of the relational variables.
模型中沒有出現依賴於參與者 i 或 j 或子集 s(i) 或 s(j) 的參數,因為作者已經聚合了所有這些可能性,並形成了一個僅對關係變數級別進行交叉分類的表。


15.4 ONondirectionai Relations
15.4 ONondirectionai 關係

Y-array, designed to reflect the dyadic states that are possible with a nondirectional relation: Yijk.
Y 陣列,旨在反映非方向關係中可能的二元狀態:Yijk。

To study whether the families differ with respect to business or marriage, the authors fit the special case of the basic model without the ')The author parameters.
為了研究家庭在商業或婚姻方面是否不同,作者擬合了基本模型的特殊情況,沒有“)作者參數。

Comparing the basic model to the model without these actor-level parameters, the authors found that the ')The author effects are large for both marital ties (LlG2 = 108.13 - 87.97 = 20.16).
將基本模型與沒有這些行為者水平參數的模型進行比較,作者發現,對於兩種婚姻關係來說,“)作者效應都很大(LlG2 = 108.13 - 87.97 = 20.16)。

The authors can conclude that the families are different with respect to the volume and patterns of their marital and business ties to others.
作者可以得出結論,這些家庭在與他人的婚姻和商業聯繫的數量和模式方面是不同的。

Five families have no business ties with the others, and have -00 parameter estimates.
五個家庭與其他家庭沒有業務聯繫,參數估計值為 -00。

The authors modeled these relations using wealth as an attribute of each actor.
作者使用財富作為每個參與者的屬性來類比這些關係。

For the analyses of the w's, the )'i's for marriage are not large (LlG2 = 1.21 with Lldf = 1) but they are for business (LlG2 = 7.59 again with Lldf = 1)
對於w的分析,婚姻的)'i並不大(LlG2 = 1.21,Lldf = 1),但它們是商業的(LlG2 = 7.59,Lldf = 1)

These results suggest that wealth· is quite important in distinguishing families who have business ties, but not for marital arrangements.
這些結果表明,財富·對於區分有商業關係的家庭非常重要,但對於婚姻安排則不然。

Wealthy families enter into business relationships at different rates than less wealthy families, but wealth is not an important influence on marital ties.
富裕家庭與不富裕家庭建立商業關係的速度不同,但財富對婚姻關係的影響並不大。

These include Bayesian estimation of PI parameters as described in Wong (1987), and the pseudo-likelihood estimation described in Strauss and Ikeda (1988) designed for the Markov random graphs of Frank and Strauss (1986)
其中包括Wong(1987)描述的PI參數的貝葉斯估計,以及Strauss和Ikeda(1988)為Frank和Strauss(1986)的瑪律可夫隨機圖設計的偽似然估計


15.5 Q9Recent Generalizations of Pi
15.5 Q9圓周率的最新概括

The Bayesian ideas offered by Wong (1987) allow a priori information about the
Wong (1987) 提供的貝葉斯思想允許關於

Prior information might change or even improve parameter estimates in other network data sets
先前的資訊可能會改變甚至改進其他網路數據集中的參數估計

Another development to note is the work reported in Strauss and Ikeda (1990).
另一個值得注意的發展是施特勞斯和池田(1990)報告的工作。

Strauss and Ikeda compared the performance of standard maximum likelihood estimates to their maximum pseudo-likelihood (MP) estimates both in a simulation study, and by analyzing the "like" relation measured on the monks in the monastery studied by Sampson (1967)
Strauss 和 Ikeda 在類比研究中比較了標準最大似然估計值與最大偽似然 (MP) 估計值的性能,並通過分析 Sampson (1967) 研究的寺院僧侶的“相似”關係

In the simulations, they looked at the performance of the estimates in five replicated networks containing fifteen, twenty, or thirty actors.
在類比中,他們研究了包含15個、20個或30個參與者的五個複製網路中的估計性能。

15.6 ®Single Relations and Two Sets of Actors various log-linear models
15.6 ® 單關係和兩組參與者各種對數線性模型

In this new situation, the authors create not a fourdimensional array, but a three-dimensional contingency table of size gxhxC, defined as follows: 1 if the ordered pair < ni, mj > takes on the value Xij = k o otherwise.
在這種新情況下,作者創建的不是四維數位列,而是大小為 gxhxC 的三維列聯表,定義如下:1 如果有序對< ni,則 mj > 取值 Xij = k o,否則。

Aggregating over all actors gives a very simple one-dimensional V-array: j describing only the relational data, not distinguishing among the sending or receiving actors
聚合所有參與者會得到一個非常簡單的一維 V 陣列:j 僅描述關係數據,不區分發送或接收參與者

Models fit to this array would contain only A and () parameters.
擬合到此陣列的模型將僅包含 A 和 () 參數。

To fit models to a y-array, use the following program file: TITLE 'MY ANALYSIS'
要將模型擬合到 y 陣列,請使用以下程式檔: 標題“我的分析”


BY L K BY L
To fit models to a w-array, use these commands: TITLE 'MY WANALYSIS'. The commands "TITLE," "FILE HANDLE," and "DATA LIST" initiate SPSSx and read in the data file.
要將模型擬合到 w 陣列,請使用以下命令:TITLE 'MY WANALYSIS'。命令「TITLE」、“FILE HANDLE”和“DATA LIST”啟動 SPSSx 並讀取數據檔。

The standard mathematical representation of a positional analysis frequently uses blockmodels to describe and study the equivalence classes determined by a set of measured relations.
位置分析的標準數學表示經常使用塊模型來描述和研究由一組測量關係確定的等價類。

It is not proper to use relational data to find a blockmode representation, and test this same representation on that data set.) If statistical tests are desired in a network analysis, the authors recommend the use of statistical methods from the beginning of the analysis
使用關係數據查找塊模式表示,並在該數據集上測試相同的表示形式是不合適的。如果在網路分析中需要統計檢驗,作者建議從分析開始就使用統計方法

Such methods, as described can be used to find partitions of actors, and lead to proper statistical tests and measures of goodness-of-fit.
如上所述,這些方法可用於查找參與者的分區,並導致適當的統計檢驗和擬合優度的測量。

As described can be used to find partitions of actors, and lead to proper statistical tests and measures of goodness-of-fit
如上所述,可用於查找參與者的分區,並導致適當的統計檢驗和擬合優度的測量

Another approach centers on the evaluation of a particular positional analysis technique using standard data sets.
另一種方法是使用標準數據集評估特定位置分析技術。

The second approach, as mentioned, is based on statistical theory for social network data
如前所述,第二種方法基於社交網路數據的統計理論

This idea uses a statistical or stochastic blockmodel to represent mathematically the equivalence classes defined on the actors.
這個想法使用統計或隨機塊模型在數學上表示在參與者上定義的等價類。

The authors note that one can generate a permutation distribution for this index by considering all possible permutations of the actors to positions, and calculating R2 for each permutation
作者指出,通過考慮參與者對位置的所有可能排列,並計算每個排列的R2,可以為該指數生成排列分佈

This leads to a valid, nonparametric statistical test for the goodness of an observed fit.
這導致了對觀察到的擬合優度的有效非參數統計檢驗。

There is no parametric statistical theory for this index
該指數沒有參數統計理論


16.1.2 Structurally Based Blockmodels and Permutation Tests
16.1.2 基於結構的塊模型和排列測試

It should not be surprising to find that ties predicted by a blockmodel are extremely similar to the observed ties.
發現塊模型預測的領帶與觀察到的領帶極為相似也就不足為奇了。

The authors turn to a discussion of goodness-of-fit indices which are based on specific, parametric statistical models
作者轉而討論基於特定參數統計模型的擬合優度指數

This is a rather different approach to assessing the fit of a network data set to a particular partition of actors to positions.
這是一種完全不同的方法,用於評估網路數據集與特定參與者位置分區的擬合度。

This statistical approach, based on the statistical models described, has associated with it a natural goodness-of-fit index that follows directly from the models under consideration.
這種統計方法基於所描述的統計模型,與它相關的是直接來自所考慮的模型的自然擬合優度指數。

Attribute variables can greatly reduce the number of parameters in a model through the modeling of a W-, rather than a V-array
屬性變數可以通過對 W 陣列而不是 V 陣列進行建模來大大減少模型中的參數數量

These stochastic blockmodels will be discussed for valued and muItirelational data sets, and will be illustrated by using the countries trade network.
這些隨機塊模型將針對價值數據集和多關係數據集進行討論,並將使用國家貿易網路進行說明。

These posterior partitions are more difficult to find and evaluate statistically, but are highly desirable because of their similarity to relational analysis, which is based on posterior partitions
這些後部分區更難在統計上找到和評估,但由於它們與基於後部分區的關係分析相似,因此非常可取

These a posteriori stochastic blockmodels are very similar to the positional analyses of Chapters 9 and 10, since they use the relational data to obtain the positions; this "data dredging" does not allow for proper, significance tests of the fit of actors to the derived positions.
這些後驗隨機塊模型與第 9 章和第 10 章的位置分析非常相似,因為它們使用關係數據來獲取位置;這種「數據疏通」不允許對參與者與派生位置的擬合度進行適當的、顯著性測試。

Of primary interest to them are the likelihood-ratio statistics, which, as the authors discuss shortly, can be used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of a stochastic blockmodel
他們最感興趣的是似然比統計,正如作者稍後討論的那樣,它可以用來評估隨機塊模型的擬合優度


16.2.4 Goodness-oJ-Fit Indices for Stochastic Blockmodels
16.2.4 隨機塊模型的優度-oJ-擬合指數

As discussed earlier there is a large literature on indices designed to measure how well a blockmodel fits a given network data set
如前所述,有大量關於索引的文獻,旨在衡量塊模型與給定網路數據集的擬合程度

Most of these measures are lacking because they are not based on statistical models, and they do not have convenient and well-known distributions.
這些度量大多是缺乏的,因為它們不是基於統計模型的,而且它們沒有方便和眾所周知的分佈。

One solution to this problem, discussed by Wasserman and Anderson (1987), begins with the assumption that one has a stochastic blockmodel, consisting of a p(x) and a mapping of actors to B positions.
Wasserman 和 Anderson (1987) 討論過這個問題的一個解決方案,首先假設有一個隨機塊模型,由 p(x) 和參與者到 B 位置的映射組成。

If one desires to compare two stochastic blockmodels with differing number of positions (and one of the p(x)'s is not a special case of the other), one can compare G2,s normalized by their degrees of freedom: G21dj
如果想要比較兩個位置數不同的隨機塊模型(其中一個 p(x) 不是另一個的特例),則可以比較按其自由度歸一化的 G2,s:G21dj

This normalization is commonly used in categorical data analysis, and its evaluation is equivalent to that of a statistic divided by its mean.
這種歸一化通常用於分類數據分析,其評估等價於統計量除以其均值。


16.3.1 Statistical Analysis of Multiple Relational Networks
16.3.1 多關係網路的統計分析

There is a wide variety of models for network data consisting of measurements on two or more relations.
網路數據有各種各樣的模型,包括對兩個或多個關係的測量。

Most of the models can be fit using standard categorical data analysis techniques, especially those found in the computer package GLIM (Baker and Nelder 1978; Payne 1985; and the appendix to Wasserman and Iacobucci 1986)
大多數模型都可以使用標準的分類數據分析技術進行擬合,尤其是那些在計算機軟體包GLIM中發現的模型(Baker and Nelder 1978;佩恩 1985;以及 Wasserman 和 Iacobucci 1986 的附錄)

These techniques are identical to those illustrated in the last chapter on simpler network data sets involving just one relation.
這些技術與上一章中介紹的那些技術相同,這些技術僅涉及一個關係的簡單網路數據集。

The first extension of these dyadic interaction models to mUltiple relations came in Fienberg and Wasserman (1980) and Fienberg, Meyer, and Wasserman (1981)
這些二元交互模型首次擴展到 mUltiple 關係是在 Fienberg 和 Wasserman (1980) 以及 Fienberg, Meyer 和 Wasserman (1981) 中

Their models extend Holland and Leinhardt's PI by focusing on the associations among the relations rather than on the similarities and differences among individual actor attributes.
他們的模型擴展了Holland和Leinhardt的PI,關注關係之間的關聯,而不是單個參與者屬性之間的異同。

Fienberg, Meyer, and Wasserman (1985) presented models that could include both actor and subset parameters, as we]] as interactions that measure the interrelatedness of the different relations.
Fienberg, Meyer, and Wasserman (1985) 提出了可以同時包含參與者和子集參數的模型,因為我們]] 作為測量不同關係相互關聯性的交互作用。

Novel applications of these models can be found in Wasserman (1987), Iacobucci and Wasserman (1987, 1988), and Wasserman and Iacobucci (1988, 1989).
這些模型的新應用可以在Wasserman(1987),Iacobucci和Wasserman(1987,1988)以及Wasserman和Iacobucci(1988,1989)中找到。

Research on the diffusion of innovations among the actors in a small, closed set has frequently utilized stochastic models to study how such innovations percolate through network structures. Rogers (1979) gives a thorough overview of such models and studies. Rapoport (1953) and Coleman, Katz, and Menzel (1957) have made important contributions to such modeling, and the authors refer the interested reader to reviews of this research in Kemeny and Snell (1962), Bartholomew (1967), and Coleman (1964)
關於創新在小型封閉集合中參與者之間的擴散的研究經常使用隨機模型來研究這種創新如何滲透到網路結構中。Rogers(1979)對此類模型和研究進行了全面概述。Rapoport (1953) 和 Coleman, Katz, and Menzel (1957) 對這種建模做出了重要貢獻,作者向感興趣的讀者推薦了 Kemeny 和 Snell (1962)、Bartholomew (1967) 和 Coleman (1964) 對這項研究的評論


Epilogue
結語

The authors conclude this book by speculating a bit about the future of social network methodology.
作者在本書的最後對社交網路方法論的未來進行了一些推測。

The equivalences and inclusions among a set of relations measured on a specific network is one of the most important issues in multirelational studies, and a statistical approach to this problem should be quite welcome
在特定網路上測量的一組關係之間的等價性和包含性是多關係研究中最重要的問題之一,對這個問題的統計方法應該非常受歡迎

Such statistical approaches should be developed, and should become an integral part of any social network analysis.
這種統計方法應該得到發展,並應成為任何社會網路分析的一個組成部分。

Social network methods have been developed to study one-mode networks with a single, usually dichotomous and nondirectional relation
已經開發了社交網路方法來研究具有單一,通常是二分和非方向關係的單模式網路

Methods designed for these limited data can be generalized to directional, valued, or multirelational networks, and less frequently to two-mode networks.
為這些有限數據設計的方法可以推廣到定向網路、價值網路或多關係網路,而較少推廣到雙模式網路。

An active area of current research in social network methodology is development of methods for measuring and analyzing properties of local or ego-centered networks.
目前社會網路方法論研究的一個活躍領域是開發測量和分析局部或以自我為中心的網路屬性的方法。

One area of network analysis that needs more work is development of general propositions about the structure of social networks based on replication across a large number of networks.
網路分析的一個需要更多工作的領域是開發關於基於大量網路複製的社交網路結構的一般命題。

17.6 Computer Technology corporating replication across a number of independent networks include Bernard, KiIlworth and Sailer's research on informant accuracy and Freeman's work of appropriate models of the notion of social group (Freeman 1992a)
17.6 計算機技術在許多獨立網路中包括Bernard、KiIlworth和Sailer對線人準確性的研究,以及Freeman對社會群體概念的適當模型的工作(Freeman 1992a)

These studies test general propositions about networks using the network as the unit of analysis.
這些研究使用網路作為分析單位來測試有關網路的一般命題。

One .should be able to display actor attributes and nodal or subgroup properties along with the graph
一個 .應該能夠顯示參與者屬性和節點或子組屬性以及圖形


17.7 Networks and Standard Social and Behavioral Science
17.7 網路與標準社會和行為科學

One area where a great deal of work remains is integrating network concepts and measures into more general social and behavioral science research.
一個仍有大量工作的領域是將網路概念和措施整合到更一般的社會和行為科學研究中。

Network is a catch phrase in many disciplines the precise use of network measures has not fully diffused to these areas.
網路在許多學科中都是一個流行語,網路測量的精確使用尚未完全擴散到這些領域。

In part the usual institutional and intellectual barriers between disciplines inhibit diffusion.
在某種程度上,學科之間通常的制度和知識障礙抑制了傳播。

Theperception of the technical sophistication required to use network ideas may dissuade potential users.
對使用網路創意所需的技術複雜性的看法可能會勸阻潛在使用者。

The authors expect the greater availability of network analysis software, and greater ease of interface with standard statistical analysis software will make network ideas more exportable to the wider community.
作者預計,網路分析軟體的可用性更高,與標準統計分析軟體的介面更加容易,將使網路思想更容易輸出到更廣泛的社區。

Jf and when greater consensus develops among network researchers about key network properties and measures, it should be easier to communicate appropriate use of network methods to nonnetwork specialists.
當網路研究人員對關鍵的網路屬性和措施達成更大的共識時,應該更容易將網路方法的適當使用傳達給非網路專家。

The authors hope that this book will help in this regard.
作者希望這本書能在這方面有所説明。

The authors are excited about the future prospects for social network methods, and look forward to incorporating these advances into the second edition of this book
作者對社交網路方法的未來前景感到興奮,並期待將這些進展納入本書的第二版


A.I GRADAP GRADAP
Graph Definition and Analysis Package (Sprenger and Stokman 1989) was developed through collaboration of researchers from the Universities of Amsterdam, Groningen, Nijmegen, and Twente (Sprenger and Stokman 1989).
圖定義和分析包(Sprenger and Stokman 1989)是由阿姆斯特丹大學、格羅寧根大學、奈梅亨大學和特溫特大學的研究人員合作開發的(Sprenger and Stokman 1989)。

GRADAP explicitly analyzes network data represented as graphs, and includes a wide· range of cohesive subgroup and centrality methods, and models for the distribution of in- and outdegrees.
GRADAP顯式分析以圖形表示的網路數據,並包括一個廣泛的·內聚亞群和中心性方法的範圍,以及內度和外度分佈的模型。

GRADAP runs on any DOS machine and is available from: 736 Computer Programs icc ProGAMMA Kraneweg 8 9718 JP Groningen THE NETHERLANDS.
GRADAP 可在任何 DOS 機器上運行,可從以下位置獲得:736 Computer Programs icc ProGAMMA Kraneweg 8 9718 JP Groningen THE NETHERLANDS。

KrackPlot runs on any DOS machine and is distributed by: Stephen Borgatti Analytic Technologies.
KrackPlot可在任何DOS計算機上運行,並由以下開發商分發:Stephen Borgatti Analytic Technologies。

NEGOPY and FATCAT NEGOPY Network Analysis Program (Richards 1989a) analyzes sub¥OllP}~ f3:nd individual roles in communication networks.
NEGOPY 和 FATCAT NEGOPY 網络分析程式 (Richards 1989a) 分析了通信網路中的 sub¥OllP}~ f3:nd 個體角色。

FATCAT (Richards 1989b) allows one to analyze actor attributes along with network data.
FATCAT (Richards 1989b) 允許人們分析參與者屬性以及網路數據。

Many early versions of NEGOPY were available for mainframe computers, the current version is available for the DOS machines.
許多早期版本的NEGOPY可用於大型計算機,當前版本可用於DOS計算機。

SNAPS runs on DOS machines equipped with math coprocessors and is distributed by: APTECH Systems Inc. 26250 196th Place S.E. Kent, WA 98042 USA.
SNAPS 在配備數學協處理器的 DOS 機器上運行,由以下機構分發:APTECH Systems Inc. 26250 196th Place SE Kent, WA 98042 USA。

STRUCTURE (Burt 1989, 1991) contains programs for structural equivalence, cohesive subgroups, centrality, and models of contagion and autonomy.
STRUCTURE(Burt 1989,1991)包含結構等價性,內聚性子群,中心性以及傳染和自主模型的程式。

The basic edition of STRUCTURE runs on DOS machines.
STRUCTURE的基本版在DOS機器上運行。

For information about STRUCTURE contact: Ronald Burt Department of Sociology University of Chicago Chicago, IL 60637 USA
有關STRUCTURE的資訊,請聯繫:Ronald Burt 芝加哥大學社會學系 Chicago, IL 60637 USA


UC/NET
UC/NET網路

UC/NET (Borgatti, Everett, and Freeman 1991) contains network analysis programs for centrality, cohesive subgroup, and position and role methods, along with a basic Pi model and programs for multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering.
UC/NET (Borgatti, Everett, and Freeman 1991) 包含用於中心性、內聚子群、位置和角色方法的網路分析程式,以及用於多維縮放和分層聚類的基本 Pi 模型和程式。


Countries Trade Data
國家貿易數據

The five relations measured for the countries trade network are trade of basic manufactured goods from the row country to the column country (Table B.12); food and live animals (Table B.13); crude materials, excluding food (Table B.14); minerals, fuels, and other petroleum products (Table B.15); and exchange of diplomats (Table B.16).
衡量國家貿易網路的五種關係是:從行國到列國的基本製成品貿易(表B.12);食用和活體動物(表B.13);原材料,不包括食品(表B.14);礦物、燃料和其他石油產品(表B.15);以及外交官的互派(表B.16)。

Social Networks in Urban Situations, pages 51-76.
《城市環境中的社會網路》,第51-76頁。

Intercorporate Relations: The Structural AnalysiS of Business, pages.
公司間關係:商業結構分析,頁面。

Social Semigroups: A Unified Theory of Scaling and England: Cambridge University Press.
社會半群:統一的尺度理論和英格蘭:劍橋大學出版社。

Explorations in Structural Analysis: Dual and Multiple Networks of Social Structure.
結構分析探索:社會結構的雙重和多重網路。

An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling.
一種對關係數據進行聚類的演算法,適用於社交網路分析和多維縮放比較。

Corporate society: A time series analysis of network structure.
企業社會:網路結構的時間序列分析。

Towards a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perceptions, and Action.
邁向行動的結構理論:社會結構、感知和行動的網路模型。

In Burt, R.S., and Minor, M.J., Applied Network Analysis, pages 158-174.
在 Burt, R.S. 和 Minor, M.J. 中,應用網路分析,第 158-174 頁。

Research Program in Structural Analysis, Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University.
哥倫比亞大學社會科學中心結構分析研究專案。

Columbia University Workshop on Survey Network Data
哥倫比亞大學調查網路數據研討會


Findings
發現

By restrictive the authors mean that if one equivalence definition is more restrictive than another, any actors who are equivalent by the first definition are equivalent by the second definition, though actors who are equivalent by the second may not be equivalent by the first '" 2(20)2(23) - 1022 + 880 8876 PKP = 102(20)2 _ 1022 + 880 = 31276 = 0.2838, a fairly low mutuality index.
作者所說的限制性是指,如果一個等價定義比另一個等價定義更具限制性,則任何與第一個定義等價的參與者在第二個定義上都是等價的,儘管在第二個定義中等價的參與者可能與第一個定義不等價 '“ 2(20)2(23) - 1022 + 880 8876 PKP = 102(20)2 _ 1022 + 880 = 31276 = 0.2838, 一個相當低的互惠指數。

This value is surprisingly large, given that only slightly more than 10 percent of the dyads are mutuals.
這個值大得驚人,因為只有略多於10%的二元組是互惠的。

The difference between the G2 statistics for two hierarchically nested models is approximately asymptotically distributed as a X2 random variable.
兩個分層嵌套模型的 G2 統計量之間的差值近似地呈漸近分佈,作為 X2 隨機變數。

This difference can be compared to tabled values of X2 to establish whether the model with more parameters fits significantly better than the simpler model.
可以將此差異與 X2 的表值進行比較,以確定具有更多參數的模型是否明顯優於更簡單的模型。


Introduction
介紹

A graph theoretic blocking procedure for social networks.
社交網路的圖論阻塞過程。

A Comparative Evaluation of Methods for Positional Analysis of Social Networks.
社交網路位置分析方法的比較評估。

Comparison of methods for positional analysis: Structural and general equivalences.
位置分析方法的比較:結構和一般等價。

Applications of Graph Theory to Group Structure.
圖論在群結構中的應用.

A strategy for the dissection and analysis of social structures.
社會結構剖析和分析的策略。

SNAPS (Social Network Analysis Procedures) for GAUSS.
高斯的 SNAPS(社交網路分析程式)。

In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S., Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 304-325.
在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.中,社會結構:網路方法,第304-325頁。

A graph theoretic approach to the analysis of alliance structure and local grouping in Highland New Guinea.
分析新幾內亞高地聯盟結構和地方分組的圖論方法。

Graph theory as a structural model in cultural anthropology.
圖論作為文化人類學中的結構模型。

The effects of individual and structural characteristics on intransitivity in social networks.
個體和結構特徵對社交網路中不可傳遞性的影響。

Transitivity in structural models of small groups.
小群結構模型中的傳遞性。

The statistical analysis of local structure in social networks.
社交網路中局部結構的統計分析。

Notes on the statistical analysis of social network data.
關於社交網路數據統計分析的說明。

In Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S., Perspectives on Social Network Research,.
在Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S., Perspectives on Social Network Research,.

In Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S., Perspectives on Social Network Research,. pages
在Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S., Perspectives on Social Network Research,.頁面


63-83. New York
63-83. 紐約

In Marsden, P.V., and Lin, N., Social Structure and Network Analysis, pages 147-158.
在Marsden,P.V.和Lin,N.,社會結構和網路分析,第147-158頁。

In Boissevain, J., and Mitchell, lC., Network AnalysiS: Studies in Human Interaction, pages 83-110.
在 Boissevain, J. 和 Mitchell, lC. 中,網路分析:人類交互研究,第 83-110 頁。

Informant accuracy in social network data Ill: A comparison of triadic structure in behavioral and cognitive data.
社交網路數據中的線人準確性 Ill:行為和認知數據中三元結構的比較。

In Mizruchi, M.S., and Schwartz, M., Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business, pages 85-108.
在Mizruchi,M.S.和Schwartz,M.,公司間關係:商業結構分析,第85-108頁。

In Freeman, L.e., White, D.R., and Romney, A.K., Research Methods in Social Nelwork Analysis, pages 489-530.
在Freeman, L.e., White, D.R., and Romney, A.K., Research Methods in Social Nelwork Analysis, 第489-530頁。

Algorithms and network analysis: A test of some analytical procedures on Kapferer's tailor shop materiaL In Freeman, L.e., White, D.R, and Romney, A.K., Research Methods in Social Network AnalysiS, pages 391-365.
演算法和網路分析:對 Kapferer 裁縫店材料的一些分析程序的測試 在 Freeman, L.e., White, D.R, and Romney, A.K., Research Methods in Social Network AnalysiS, pages 391-365.

In Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S., Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 301-318.
在Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.,社交網路研究的觀點,第301-318頁。

A study on sociometric group structure: An application of a stochastic theory of social interaction.
社會計量群體結構研究:社會互動隨機理論的應用。

In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S.D., Social, Structures: A Network Approach, pages.
在 Wellman, B. 和 Berkowitz, S.D., Social, Structures: A Network Approach, pages.

In Freeman, L.C., White, D.R., and Romney, AK., Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, pages 429-488.
在Freeman, L.C., White, D.R., and Romney, AK., Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, 第429-488頁。

Introduction
介紹

Social network data consist of at least one structural variable measured on a set of actors. The substantive concerns and theories motivating a specific network study usually determine which variables to measure, and often which techniques are most appropriate for their measurement. For example, if one is studying economic transactions between countries, one cannot (easily) rely on observational techniques; one would probably use archival records to obtain information on such transactions. On the other hand, friendships among people are most likely studied using questionnaires or interviews, rather than using archival or historical records. In addition, the nature of the study determines whether the entire set of actors can be surveyed or whether a sample of the actors must be taken.
社交網路數據由至少一個在一組參與者上測量的結構變數組成。激發特定網路研究的實質性關注點和理論通常決定了要測量哪些變數,以及通常哪種技術最適合其測量。例如,如果一個人正在研究國家之間的經濟交易,他就不能(輕易地)依賴觀察技術;人們可能會使用檔案記錄來獲取有關此類交易的資訊。另一方面,人與人之間的友誼很可能是通過問卷調查或訪談來研究的,而不是使用檔案或歷史記錄。此外,研究的性質決定了是否可以對整套行為者進行調查,或者是否必須對行為者進行抽樣調查。

The nature of the structural variables also determines which analytic methods are appropriate for their study. Thus, it is crucial to understand the nature of these variables. The data collection techniques described here determine, to some degree, the characteristics of the relations.
結構變數的性質也決定了哪些分析方法適合他們的研究。因此,了解這些變數的性質至關重要。這裡描述的數據收集技術在某種程度上決定了關係的特徵。

In this section we discuss the theoretical background for social groups, briefly outline some ways to conceptualize cohesive subgroups, and review key notation and graph theoretic concepts that are used to study cohesive subgroups.
在本節中,我們討論了社會群體的理論背景,簡要概述了一些概念化內聚子群體的方法,並回顧了用於研究內聚子群體的關鍵符號和圖理論概念。

In this section we review some of the more influential theoretical and substantive contributions to the study of affiliation networks. We will also note some of the different motivations for studying affiliation networks and introduce the basic concepts that we will use in discussing affiliation networks.
在本節中,我們回顧了對隸屬關係網路研究的一些更有影響力的理論和實質性貢獻。我們還將注意到研究隸屬關係網路的一些不同動機,並介紹我們將在討論隸屬關係網路時使用的基本概念。

The importance of studying affiliation networks is grounded in the theoretical importance of individuals' memberships in collectivities. Such research has a long history in the social sciences, especially in sociology.
研究隸屬關係網路的重要性是建立在個人在集體中的成員身份的理論重要性之上的。這種研究在社會科學中有著悠久的歷史,尤其是在社會學中。

Simmel (1950, 1955) is widely acknowledged as being among the first social theorists to discuss the theoretical implications of individuals' affiliations with collectivities (which he called social circles). In quite simplified form, his argument is that multiple group affiliations (for example with family, voluntary organizations, occupational groups) are fundamental in defining the social identity of individuals. He argued that the individual- "is determined sociologically in the sense that the groups 'intersect' in his person by virtue of his affiliation with them" (page 150).
Simmel(1950,1955)被廣泛認為是最早討論個人與集體(他稱之為社會圈)的理論含義的社會理論家之一。以相當簡化的形式,他的論點是,多重群體隸屬關係(例如與家庭、志願組織、職業團體)是定義個人社會身份的基礎。他認為,個人“在社會學上是確定的,因為這些群體由於他與群體的隸屬關係而在他身上'相交'”(第150頁)。

Many social scientists have developed and expanded on Simmel's insights (Breiger 1974, 1990b, 1991; Foster and Seidman 1982, 1984; Kadushin 1966; McPherson 1982; McPherson and Smith-Lovin 1982).
許多社會科學家發展和擴展了西美爾的見解(Breiger 1974, 1990b, 1991;福斯特和塞德曼 1982 年、1984 年;Kadushin 1966 年;麥克弗森 1982;McPherson 和 Smith-Lovin 1982)。

Kadushin (1966) clarified the notion of a social circle as an important kind of social entity, one without a formal membership list, rules, or leadership. He also outlined the differences between social circles and other kinds of social groups. In his work, the social circle is seen as an unobservable entity that must be inferred from behavioral similarities among collections of individuals. One of Kadushin's important insights is that social circles provide conditions for development of interpersonal connections.
Kadushin(1966)澄清了社交圈的概念,認為社交圈是一種重要的社會實體,沒有正式的成員名單、規則或領導。他還概述了社交圈與其他類型的社會群體之間的差異。在他的作品中,社交圈被視為一個不可觀察的實體,必須從個體集合之間的行為相似性中推斷出來。Kadushin的重要見解之一是,社交圈為人際關係的發展提供了條件。

Affiliation networks are especially useful for studying urban social structures. As Foster and Seidman (1984) observe:
隸屬關係網路對於研究城市社會結構特別有用。正如Foster和Seidman(1984)所觀察到的:

... due to their size and complexity, urban social structures are never described either by social scientists or urban residents exclusively in terms of dyadic relationships. Accordingly, most anthropologists have recognized that an important component of urban structure arises from collections of overlapping subsets such as voluntary associations, ethnic groups, action sets, and quasi-groups.... (page 177)
...由於城市社會結構的規模和複雜性,無論是社會科學家還是城市居民,都從未完全用二元關係來描述城市社會結構。因此,大多數人類學家已經認識到,城市結構的一個重要組成部分來自重疊子集的集合,例如自願協會、族群、行動集和準群體。(第 177 頁)

To be used in social network analysis, the social occasions which define events in affiliation networks must be collections of individuals whose membership is known, rather than inferred (as in Kadushin's models of social circles). We assume, as did Breiger (1974), that usage of the term "group" is restrictive in that I consider only those groups for which membership lists are available - through published sources, reconstruction from field observation or interviews, or by any other means. (1974, page 181)
為了用於社會網路分析,在從屬網路中定義事件的社會場合必須是個人的集合,其成員身份是已知的,而不是推斷的(如Kadushin的社交圈模型)。我們假設,正如Breiger(1974)一樣,“群體”一詞的使用是有限制的,因為我只考慮那些成員名單可用的群體 - 通過公開的來源,實地觀察或訪談的重建,或任何其他方式。(1974年,第181頁)

Common to all of these views is the idea that actors are brought together through their joint participation in social events. Joint participation in events not only provides the opportunity for actors to interact, but also increases the probability that direct pairwise ties (such as acquaintanceship) will develop between actors. For example, belonging to the same club (voluntary organization, boards of directors, political party, labor union, committee, and so on) provides the opportunity for people to meet and interact, and thus constitutes a link between individuals. Similarly, when a person (or a number of people) participate in more than one event, a linkage is established between the two events. Overlap in group membership allows for the flow of information between groups, and perhaps coordination of the groups' actions. For example, 294 Affiliations an~ Overlapping Subgroups the interlock among corporate boards through sharing members might facilitate coordination among companies (Sonquist and Koenig 1975). The fact that events can be described as collections of actors affiliated with them and actors can be described as collections of events with which they are affiliated is a distinctive feature of affiliation networks.
所有這些觀點的共同點是,行動者通過共同參與社會活動而聚集在一起。共同參與活動不僅為演員提供了互動的機會,而且還增加了演員之間直接配對關係(如熟人關係)的可能性。例如,屬於同一個俱樂部(志願組織、董事會、政黨、工會、委員會等)為人們提供了見面和互動的機會,從而構成了個人之間的聯繫。同樣,當一個人(或多人)參加一個以上的事件時,兩個事件之間就會建立聯繫。組成員身份的重疊允許組之間的資訊流動,並可能協調組的行動。例如,294 隸屬關係 an~ 重疊的子組 公司董事會之間通過共享成員的互鎖可能促進公司之間的協調 (Sonquist and Koenig 1975)。事件可以被描述為與其有關聯的行為者的集合,而行為者可以被描述為與它們有關聯的事件的集合,這一事實是隸屬網路的一個顯著特徵。

Because affiliation networks are different from the social networks we have discussed so far in this book, we will need to introduce some new concepts, vocabulary, and notation. Most importantly, since affiliation networks are two-mode networks, we need to be clear about both of the modes. As usual, we have a set of actors, % = {nt. n2,"" ng}, as the first of the two-modes. In affiliation networks we also have a second mode, the events, which we denote by ./It = {ml' m2, ... , mh}'
由於隸屬關係網路與我們在本書中討論的社交網路不同,因此我們需要引入一些新的概念、詞彙和符號。最重要的是,由於隸屬網路是雙模網路,我們需要明確這兩種模式。像往常一樣,我們有一組 actor , % = {nt. n2,“” ng},作為兩種模式中的第一種。在隸屬網路中,我們還有第二種模式,即事件,我們用 ./It = {ml' m2, ... , mh}' 表示

The events in an affiliation network can be a wide range of specific kinds of social occasions; for example, social clubs in a community, treaty organizations for countries, boards of directors of major corporations, university committees, and so on. When there is no ambiguity in meaning we will use the terms "club," "board of directors," "party," "committee," and so on to describe specific kinds of events. We do not require that an event necessarily consist of face-to-face interactions among actors at a particular physical location at a particular point in time. For example, we could record memberships in national organizations where people do not have face-to-face meetings that include all members. We do require that we have a list of the actors affiliated with each of the events.
隸屬關係網路中的事件可以是各種特定類型的社交場合;例如,社區中的社交俱樂部、國家的條約組織、大公司的董事會、大學委員會等。當含義沒有歧義時,我們將使用術語“俱樂部”、“董事會”、“派對”、“委員會”等來描述特定類型的事件。我們並不要求一個事件必須由行為者在特定時間點的特定物理位置進行的面對面互動組成。例如,我們可以記錄國家組織的成員資格,在這些組織中,人們沒有包括所有成員的面對面會議。我們確實要求我們有一個與每個事件有關聯的行為者名單。

In the most general sense, we will say that an actor is affiliated with an event, if, in substantive terms, the actor belongs to the club, attended the meeting, sits on the board or directors, is on the committee, went to the party, and so on. When there is no ambiguity, we might also say that the actor belongs to, Was at, or is a member of an event, depending on the particular application.
在最一般的意義上,我們會說演員隸屬於一個事件,如果從實質上講,演員屬於俱樂部,參加會議,坐在董事會或董事中,是委員會成員,去參加聚會,等等。當沒有歧義時,我們也可以說參與者屬於某個事件、曾經在某個事件中或是一個事件的成員,具體取決於特定的應用程式。

As we have noted, affiliation networks consist of information about subsets of actors who participate in the same social activities. Since activities usually contain several actors, rather than simply pairs of actors, an affiliation network contains information on collections of actors that are larger than pairs. Thus, affiliation networks cannot be analyzed thoroughly by looking at pairs or dyads of actors or events.
正如我們所指出的,隸屬關係網路由有關參與相同社會活動的行為者子集的信息組成。由於活動通常包含多個參與者,而不僅僅是成對的參與者,因此隸屬關係網路包含大於成對的參與者集合的資訊。因此,無法通過觀察成對或成對的參與者或事件來徹底分析從屬網路。

Another important property of affiliation networks is the duality in the relationship between the actors and the events. In emphasizing this property, Breiger (1990a, 1990b, 1991) refers to such networks as dual networks. In the more general literature, the term "duality" is used in various, often imprecise, ways to refer to the complementary relationship between two kinds of entities. However, the duality in affiliation networks refers specifically to the alternative, and equally important, perspectives by which actors are linked to one another by their affiliation with events, and at the same time events are linked by the actors who are their members. Therefore, there are two complementary ways to view an affiliation network: either as actors linked by events, or as events linked by actors. A formal statement of the duality of the relationship between actors and events was given in the classic paper by Breiger (1974). We present this formal statement of the duality below.
隸屬關係網路的另一個重要特性是行為者與事件之間關係的二元性。在強調這一特性時,Breiger(1990a,1990b,1991)將這種網路稱為雙網路。在更一般的文獻中,“二元性”一詞以各種方式使用,通常不精確,以指代兩種實體之間的互補關係。然而,從屬關係網路的二元性特指另一種同樣重要的視角,即行為者通過與事件的隸屬關係相互聯繫,同時事件由作為其成員的行為者聯繫在一起。因此,有兩種互補的方式來查看從屬關係網路:要麼作為由事件連結的參與者,要麼作為由參與者連結的事件。Breiger(1974)的經典論文中正式闡述了行為者和事件之間關係的二元性。我們在下面提出這個二元性的正式聲明。

Analytically, the duality of an affiliation network means that we can study the ties between the actors or the ties between the events, or both. For example, in one-mode analysis focusing on ties between actors, two actors have a pairwise tie if they both are affiliated with the same event. Focusing on events, two events have a pairwise tie if one or more actors is affiliated with both events. When we focus on ties between actors, we will refer to the relation between actors as one of co-membership, or co-attendance. When we focus on ties between events, we will refer to the relation between events as overlapping or interlocking events. On some occasions both forms of one-mode relations are referred to as co-occurrence relations (MacEvoy and Freeman n.d.).
從分析上講,隸屬關係網路的二元性意味著我們可以研究參與者之間的聯繫或事件之間的聯繫,或兩者兼而有之。例如,在關注參與者之間關係的單模式分析中,如果兩個參與者都隸屬於同一事件,則他們具有成對的關聯。以事件為重點,如果一個或多個參與者隸屬於兩個事件,則兩個事件具有成對的平局。當我們關注行動者之間的聯繫時,我們將行動者之間的關係稱為共同成員或共同出席的關係之一。當我們關注事件之間的聯繫時,我們將事件之間的關係稱為重疊或環環相扣的事件。在某些情況下,兩種形式的單模關係被稱為共現關係(MacEvoy 和 Freeman n.d.)。

These one-mode ties, either between actors or between events, are derived from the affiliation data and can be studied using methods for analyzing one-mode networks. However, it is often more interesting to analyze both modes simultaneously by studying the relationship between the actors and the events with which they are affiliated. Such two-mode analyses study the actors, the events, and the relationship between them at the same time. We will discuss both one-mode and two-mode analyses in this chapter.
這些單模聯繫,無論是在參與者之間還是在事件之間,都是從隸屬關係數據中得出的,可以使用分析單模式網路的方法進行研究。然而,通過研究參與者與其所屬事件之間的關係,同時分析這兩種模式通常更有趣。這種雙模式分析同時研究了參與者、事件以及它們之間的關係。在本章中,我們將討論單模和雙模分析。

In summary, affiliation networks are relational in three ways: first, they show how the actors and events are related to each other; second, the events create ties among actors; and third, the actors create ties among events.
總之,隸屬關係網路在三個方面是關係的:首先,它們顯示了參與者和事件之間的關係;第二,這些事件在行動者之間建立了聯繫;第三,行動者在事件之間建立聯繫。

Numerous research applications have employed affiliation networks, either explicitly or implicitly. The following list is a small sample: membership on a corporate board of directors (Allen 1982; Bearden and Mintz 1987; Burt 1978/79b; Fennema and Schijf 1978/79; Levine 1972; Mariolis 1975; Mintz and Schwartz 1981a, 1981b; Mizruchi 1984; Mokken and Stokman 1978/79; Sonquist and Koenig 1975), records of the club memberships of a set of community decision makers or elites (Domhoff 1975; Galaskiewicz 1985), memberships in voluntary organizations (McPherson 1982), records of the academic institutions with which researchers have been affiliated (Freeman 1980b), ceremonial events attended by members of a village (Foster and Seidman 1984), committees on which university faculty sit (Atkin 1974, 1976), social events people attend (Breiger 1974; Davis, Gardner, and Gardner 1941; Homans 1950), high school clubs (Bonacich 1978), observations of collections of individuals' interactions (Bernard, KiUworth, and Sailer 1980, 1982; Freeman and Romney 1987; Freeman, Romney, and Freeman 1987; Freeman, Freeman, and Michaelson 1988), trade partners of major oil exporting nations (Breiger 1990b), the overlap of subspecialties within an academic discipline (Cappell and Guterbock 1992; Ennis 1992), and the fate of Chinese political figures (Schweizer 1990).
許多研究應用程式都明確或隱含地使用了隸屬關係網路。以下清單是一個小樣本:公司董事會成員(Allen 1982;Bearden 和 Mintz 1987;伯特 1978/79b;Fennema 和 Schijf 1978/79;萊文 1972;馬里奧利斯 1975;Mintz 和 Schwartz 1981a, 1981b;Mizruchi 1984 年;Mokken 和 Stokman 1978/79;Sonquist 和 Koenig 1975),一組社區決策者或精英的俱樂部成員記錄(Domhoff 1975;Galaskiewicz 1985)、志願組織的成員資格(McPherson 1982)、研究人員所屬的學術機構的記錄(Freeman 1980b)、村民參加的儀式活動(Foster and Seidman 1984)、大學教師參加的委員會(Atkin 1974、1976)、人們參加的社會活動(Breiger 1974;大衛斯、加德納和加德納 1941 年;Homans 1950)、高中俱樂部(Bonacich 1978)、對個人互動集合的觀察(Bernard、KiUworth 和 Sailer 1980、1982;弗里曼和羅姆尼 1987;弗里曼、羅姆尼和弗里曼 1987 年;Freeman, Freeman, and Michaelson 1988)、主要石油出口國的貿易夥伴(Breiger 1990b)、學科內亞專業的重疊(Cappell and Guterbock 1992;Ennis 1992)和中國政治人物的命運(Schweizer 1990)。

Given this wide range of applications, it is useful to note three primary rationales for studying affiliation networks. First, some authors argue that individuals' affiliations with events provide direct linkages between the actors and/or between the events. Second, other authors argu,e that contact among individuals who participate in the same social events provides conditions under which pairwise ties among individuals become more likely. Third, one can view the interaction between actors and events as a social system that is important to study as a whole. Let us examine each of these perspectives in more detail, and describe what each perspective implies for the analysis of affiliation network data.
鑒於如此廣泛的應用,有必要注意研究隸屬關係網路的三個主要理由。首先,一些作者認為,個人與事件的聯繫提供了行為者之間和/或事件之間的直接聯繫。其次,其他作者認為,參與相同社會事件的個體之間的接觸為個體之間更有可能建立成對關係提供了條件。第三,人們可以將行動者與事件之間的相互作用視為一個社會系統,對整體研究很重要。讓我們更詳細地研究這些觀點中的每一個,並描述每個觀點對附屬網路數據分析的意義。

The first, and perhaps most common, motivation for studying affiliation networks is that the affiliations of actors with events constitute a direct linkage, either between the actors through memberships in events, or between the events through common members. Examples of this perspective include studies of interlocking directorates (cited above), Foster and Seidman's study of Thai households and ceremonies, and observations of interactions between people in small face-to-face communities. Studies of this sort often focus on the frequency of interactions between people compiled from observations or records of peoples' social interactions.
研究從屬關係網路的第一個,也許是最常見的動機是,行為者與事件的隸屬關係構成了一種直接聯繫,要麼通過事件的成員身份在行為者之間,要麼通過共同成員在事件之間建立聯繫。這種觀點的例子包括對環環相扣的理事會的研究(如上所述),福斯特和塞德曼對泰國家庭和儀式的研究,以及對小型面對面社區中人與人之間互動的觀察。這類研究通常側重於人與人之間互動的頻率,這些頻率是從對人們社會互動的觀察或記錄中彙編而成的。

Second, some researchers have treated affiliations as providing conditions that facilitate the formation of pairwise ties between actors. In his discussion of the diffusion of innovations, Kadushin notes that "inllL.ence patterns flow along the lines of social circles" (page 789). Thus, the affiliation of individuals with social groups provides the opportunity for interpersonal influence. Similarly, in his discussion of voluntary organizations, McPherson (1982) states that one can "view the members of face-to-face organizations as groups with heightened probability of contact" (page 226). Common group membership increases the probability of establishing pairwise ties, such as becoming acquainted or becoming friends.
其次,一些研究人員將從屬關係視為促進行為者之間形成成對關係的條件。在討論創新的傳播時,Kadushin指出,“inllL.ence模式沿著社會圈子的路線流動”(第789頁)。因此,個人與社會群體的聯繫為人際影響提供了機會。同樣,McPherson(1982)在討論志願組織時指出,人們可以“將面對面組織的成員視為接觸概率更高的群體”(第226頁)。共同的群體成員身份增加了建立成對關係的可能性,例如結識或成為朋友。

Feld (1981) is one of the key contributors to this perspective. He argues that it is important to examine the larger social context or social environment within which networks of ties arise, and the ways in which this environment influences patterns in network structures (such as transitivity, balance, or clustering). His idea is based on the organization of activities around foci.
Feld(1981)是這一觀點的主要貢獻者之一。他認為,重要的是要研究關係網路產生的更大的社會背景或社會環境,以及這種環境如何影響網路結構中的模式(如傳遞性、平衡性或聚類)。他的想法是基於圍繞焦點的活動組織。

A focus is defined as a social, psychological, legal, or physical entity around which joint activities are organized (e.g., work places, voluntary organizations, hangouts, families, etc.). (page 1016)
焦點被定義為圍繞其組織聯合活動的社會、心理、法律或物理實體(例如,工作場所、志願組織、聚會場所、家庭等)。(第 1016 頁)

Foci are important for understanding the emergence of dyadic ties, because, according to Feld, "individuals whose activities are organized around the same focus will tend to become interpersonally tied and form a cluster" (1981 :1016). Thus, not only are pairwise ties more likely between people who share a focus, but these ties are likely to form specific kinds of network patterns, such as clusters.
焦點對於理解二元關係的出現很重要,因為根據費爾德的說法,「圍繞同一焦點組織活動的個人往往會變得人際聯繫並形成一個集群」(1981:1016)。因此,不僅在有共同關注點的人之間更有可能形成成對的聯繫,而且這些聯繫很可能形成特定類型的網路模式,例如集群。

In formalizing the insights of this perspective, Freeman (1980b) has borrowed concepts and terminology from algebraic topology (Atkin 1972, 1974) to express these ideas. In his analysis of the development of friendship among a set of social science researchers, Freeman argues that having been located in the same institution (university department) at the same time, or having attended conferences together, provided the opportunity for becoming acquainted and forming friendships. Atkin (1972, 1974) uses the term "backcloth" to refer to the structure of ties among the events and "traffic" to refer to the pairwise ties or acquaintanceships that take place on the backcloth.
在形式化這一觀點的見解時,Freeman(1980b)借用了代數拓撲學(Atkin 1972,1974)的概念和術語來表達這些想法。在分析一組社會科學研究人員之間的友誼發展時,弗里曼認為,同時位於同一機構(大學系)或一起參加會議,提供了結識和建立友誼的機會。阿特金(1972,1974)使用術語「背布」來指代事件之間的聯繫結構,並使用「交通」來指代發生在背布上的成對關係或熟人關係。

The third reason for studying affiliation networks is to model the relationships between actors and events as a whole system. Thus, one would study the structure and properties of the social system composed of actors' affiliations with events, and events' membership, as a whole.
研究從屬網路的第三個原因是將參與者和事件之間的關係作為一個整體系統進行建模。因此,人們將研究由行動者與事件的隸屬關係以及事件作為一個整體的成員組成的社會系統的結構和屬性。

However, there are very few methods for studying actors and events simultaneously.
然而,同時研究演員和事件的方法很少。

Each of these three rationales implies a slightly different approach to data analysis and modeling. The first motivation would lead one to study either the one-mode network of ties between pairs of actors implied by their affiliations with events, or the one-mode network of ties between pairs of events implied by the actors they have in common. The second motivation implies that the researcher has measured both an affiliation network and a one-mode relation of pairwise ties either between actors or between events, and that these pairwise ties would be more likely to occur along lines defined by the affiliations. The third motivation would analyze both modes simultaneously and focus on the ties between them.
這三個基本原理中的每一個都意味著數據分析和建模方法略有不同。第一種動機將導致人們研究成對行為者之間由他們與事件的關係所暗示的單一模式聯繫網路,或者研究他們共同的行為者所隱含的成對事件之間的單一模式聯繫網路。第二個動機意味著研究人員已經測量了從屬網路和行為者之間或事件之間成對關係的單模式關係,並且這些成對關係更有可能沿著隸屬關係定義的路線發生。第三個動機將同時分析兩種模式,並關注它們之間的聯繫。

In the next section we describe several ways to present affiliation networks using graph theoretic and other representations.
在下一節中,我們將介紹使用圖論和其他表示來呈現隸屬網路的幾種方法。

In this section we discuss several ways to represent affiliation networks. We start by defining a matrix that records the affiliations of a set of actors with a set of events. We then describe graph theoretic representations of affiliation networks, including a bipartite graph and a hypergraph. As we will see, all of these representations of affiliation networks contain the same information.
在本節中,我們將討論表示隸屬關係網路的幾種方法。我們首先定義一個矩陣,該矩陣記錄了一組參與者與一組事件的隸屬關係。然後,我們描述了隸屬網路的圖論表示,包括二分圖和超圖。正如我們將看到的,隸屬關係網路的所有這些表示都包含相同的資訊。

The most straightforward presentation of an affiliation network is the matrix that records the affiliation of each actor with each event. This matrix, which we will call an affiliation matrix, A = {aij}, codes, for each actor, the events with which the actor is affiliated. Equivalently, it records, for each event, the actors affiliated with it. The matrix, A, is a two-mode sociomatrix in which rows index actors and columns index events. Since there are g actors and h events, A is a g x h matrix. There is entry of 1 in the (i, j)th cell if row actor i is affiliated with column event j, and an entry of 0 if row actor i is not affiliated with column event j. From the perspective of the events, there is an entry of 1 if the column event includes the row actor, and an entry of 0 if the column event does not include the row actor. Formally, Event Party 1 Party 2 Party 3
隸屬關係網路最直接的表示方式是記錄每個參與者與每個事件的隸屬關係的矩陣。這個矩陣,我們稱之為隸屬矩陣,A = {aij},為每個參與者編碼與參與者所屬的事件。同樣,它記錄了每個事件的參與者。矩陣 A 是一個雙模態社會矩陣,其中行索引參與者,列索引事件。由於有 g actor 和 h 事件,因此 A 是一個 g x h 矩陣。如果行參與者 i 隸屬於列事件 j,則在第 (i, j) 儲存格中有一個條目 1,如果行參與者 i 不隸屬於列事件 j,則條目為 0。從事件的角度來看,如果列事件包含行參與者,則條目為 1,如果列事件不包括行參與者,則條目為 0。正式地,活動方 1 方 方 2 方 方 3

Each row of A describes an actor's affiliation with the events. Similarly, each column of A describes the membership of an event.
A 的每一行都描述了參與者與事件的關係。同樣,A 的每一列都描述了事件的成員身份。

Figure 8.1 gives the affiliation matrix for a hypothetical example of six second-grade children (the example introduced in Chapter 2) and their attendance at three birthday parties. In this example the actors are the children, and the events are the birthday parties. In Figure 8.1, a 1 indicates that the row child attended the column birthday party. Looking at the first row of Figure 8.1, we see that AIlison attended Parties 1 and 3 and did not attend Party 2. Similarly, looking at column 2, we see that Drew, Eliot, Ross, and Sarah attended Party 2, and that Allison and Keith did not attend that party.
圖 8.1 給出了 6 個二年級兒童(第 2 章介紹的範例)的假設示例以及他們參加三個生日派對的隸屬關係矩陣。在此示例中,演員是孩子,事件是生日派對。在圖 8.1 中,1 表示行子項參加了列生日派對。從圖8.1的第一行可以看出,艾利森參加了第1方和第3方,沒有參加第2方。同樣,查看第 2 列,我們看到 Drew、Eliot、Ross 和 Sarah 參加了第 2 派對,而 Allison 和 Keith 沒有參加該派對。

Several properties of A are important to note. Since the 1's in a row code the events with which an actor is affiliated, the row marginal totals of A, {aj+}, are equal to the number of events with which each actor is affiliated. If a row marginal total is equal to 0, it means that the actor did not attend any of the events, and if a row marginal total is equal to h, the total number of events, it means that the actor attended all of the events. Similarly, the column marginal totals, {a+i}, are equal to the ° number of actors who are affiliated with each event. A column marginal total equal to means that the event had no actors affiliated with it, and a column marginal total equal to g means that all actors are affiliated with that event.
A 的幾個屬性是需要注意的。由於行中的 1 編碼了 actor 所屬的事件,因此 A {aj+} 的行邊際總數等於每個 actor 所屬的事件數。如果行邊際總數等於 0,則表示參與者未參加任何事件,如果行邊際總數等於 h,即事件總數,則表示參與者參加了所有事件。同樣,列邊際總計 {a+i} 等於與每個事件有關聯的參與者的 ° 數。列邊際總計等於 表示該事件沒有參與者與之關聯,列邊際總計等於 g 表示所有參與者都隸屬於該事件。

An affiliation network can also be represented by a bipartite graph. A bipartite graph is a graph in which the nodes can be partitioned into two subsets, and all lines are between pairs of nodes belonging to different subsets. An affiliation network can be represented by a bipartite graph by representing both actors and events as nodes, and assigning actors to one subset of nodes and events to the other subset. Thus, each mode of the network constitutes a separate node set in the bipartite graph. Since there are g actors and h events, there are g + h nodes in the bipartite graph. The lines in the bipartite graph represent the relation "is affiliated with" (from the perspective of actors) or "has as a member" (from the perspective of events). Since actors are affiliated with events, and events have actors as members, all lines in the bipartite graph are between nodes representing actors and nodes representing events.
隸屬關係網路也可以用二分圖表示。二分圖是一種圖,其中節點可以劃分為兩個子集,並且所有線都位於屬於不同子集的節點對之間。隸屬關係網路可以通過二分圖表示,方法是將參與者和事件都表示為節點,並將參與者分配給節點的一個子集,將事件分配給另一個子集。因此,網路的每個模式都構成了二分圖中設置的單獨節點。由於有 g actor 和 h 事件,因此二分圖中有 g + h 節點。二分圖中的線表示「隸屬於」(從參與者的角度來看)或「作為成員」(從事件的角度來看)的關係。由於 actor 隸屬於事件,並且事件有 actor 作為成員,因此二分圖中的所有線都位於表示 actor 的節點和表示事件的節點之間。

Figure 8.2 presents the bipartite graph for the hypothetical example of six children and three birthday parties (from Figure 8.1). Notice that, as required_. all lines are between actors and events.
圖 8.2 顯示了假設的 6 個孩子和 3 個生日派對的二分圖(來自圖 8.1)。請注意,如required_。所有臺詞都在演員和事件之間。

The bipartite graph can also be represented as a sociomatrix. The sociomatrix for the bipartite graph has g + h rows and g + h columns.
二分圖也可以表示為社會矩陣。二分圖的社會矩陣有 g + h 行和 g + h 列。

There is an entry of 1 in the (i,j)th cell if the row actor "is affiliated with" the column event, or if the row event "has as a member" the column actor. Letting the first g rows and columns index actors, and the last h rows and columns index events, this sociomatrix has the general form: The upper left g x g submatrix and the lower right h x h submatrix are filled with a's, indicating no "affiliation" ties among the g actors (the first g rOws and columns) or among the h events (the last h rows and columns). The upper right submatrix is the g x h affiliation matrix, A, indicating "is affiliated with" ties from row actors to column events. The lower left h x g submatrix is the transpose of A, denoted by A', indicating whether or not each row event includes the column actor.
如果行執行元件“隸屬於”列事件,或者行事件“具有”列執行元件,則第 (i,j) 單元格中的條目為 1。讓前 g 行和列索引參與者,讓最後 h 行和列索引事件,這個社會矩陣具有一般形式:左上角的 g x g 子矩陣和右下角的 h x h 子矩陣填充了 a,表示 g 參與者(第一個 g rOws 和列)或 h 事件(最後 h 行和列)之間沒有“隸屬關係”聯繫。右上方的子矩陣是 g x h 隸屬關係矩陣 A,表示從行參與者到列事件的“隸屬關係”。左下角的 h x g 子矩陣是 A 的轉置,用 A' 表示,表示每個行事件是否包含列 actor。

Figure 8.3 gives the sociomatrix for the bipartite graph of the affiliation network of six children and three birthday parties (from Figure 8.2). Since there are g = 6 children and h = 3 parties, this sociomatrix has 6 + 3 = 9 rows and 9 columns. A bipartite graph highlights some important aspects of an affiliation network. As is usual in a graph, the degree of a node is the number of nodes adjacent to it. In the bipartite graph, since lines are between actors and events, the degree of a node representing an actor is equal to the number of events with which the actor is affiliated. Similarly, the degree
圖 8.3 給出了 6 個孩子和 3 個生日派對的隸屬關係網路的二分圖的社會矩陣(來自圖 8.2)。由於有 g = 6 個子項和 h = 3 個政黨,因此此社會矩陣具有 6 + 3 = 9 行和 9 列。二分圖突出顯示了隸屬關係網路的一些重要方面。與圖形中通常一樣,節點的度數是與其相鄰的節點數。在二分圖中,由於線位於 actor 和事件之間,因此表示 actor 的節點的度數等於參與者所屬的事件數。同樣,度數

Bipartite graphs have been used to represent affiliation networks by Wilson (1982), and have been generalized to tripartite graphs by Fararo and Doreian (1984). We will return to the bipartite graph below when we discuss reachability and connectedness in affiliation networks.
Wilson (1982) 使用二分圖來表示隸屬網路,並被 Fararo 和 Doreian (1984) 推廣為三方圖。當我們討論隸屬關係網路中的可達性和連通性時,我們將回到下面的二分圖。

Affiliation networks can also be described as collections of subsets of entities. The duality of affiliation networks is apparent in this approach in that each event describes the subset of actors who are affiliated with it, and each actor describes the subset of events to which it belongs. Viewing an affiliation network this way is fundamental to the hypergraph approach. Hypergraphs were defined in general in Chapter 4. A more extensive discussion of hypergraphs can be found in Berge (1973, 1989). In this section we show how hypergraphs can be used to represent affiliation networks.
隸屬關係網路也可以描述為實體子集的集合。在這種方法中,隸屬關係網路的二元性是顯而易見的,因為每個事件都描述了與其有關聯的參與者的子集,每個參與者描述了它所屬的事件的子集。以這種方式查看隸屬關係網路是超圖方法的基礎。第4章對超圖進行了一般定義。關於超圖的更廣泛討論可以在Berge(1973,1989)中找到。在本節中,我們將展示如何使用超圖來表示隸屬關係網路。

Both actors and events can be viewed as subsets of entities. We begin with each event in an affiliation network defining a subset of the actors from JIf. Since there are h events, there are h subsets of actors defined by the events. Similarly, each actor can be described as the subset of events from .A with which it is affiliated. Since there are g actors, there are g subsets of events defined by the actors.
參與者和事件都可以被視為實體的子集。我們從隸屬關係網路中的每個事件開始,定義 JIf 中參與者的子集。由於存在 h 個事件,因此有 h 個由事件定義的參與者子集。類似地,每個參與者都可以描述為 的事件子集。與其隸屬的 A。由於有 g 個 actor,因此有 g 個由 actor 定義的事件子集。

Recall that a hypergraph consists of a set of objects, called points, and a collection of subsets of objects, called edges. In a hypergraph each point belongs to at least one edge (subset) and no edge (subset) is empty. In studying an affiliation network it seems natural to start by letting the point set be the set of actors, JIf, and the edge set be the set of events, .A. The hypergraph consisting of actors as the points and the events as the edges will be denoted by .?If = (JIf,04). In order for a set of affiliation network data to meet the hypergraph definition, each actor must be affiliated with at least one event, and each event must include at least one actor.
回想一下,超圖由一組物件(稱為點)和一組物件子集(稱為邊)組成。在超圖中,每個點至少屬於一條邊(子集),沒有一條邊(子集)是空的。在研究從屬網路時,似乎很自然地首先讓點集是參與者的集合 JIf,邊緣集是事件集 .A。由參與者作為點和事件作為邊緣組成的超圖將用 .?如果 = (JIf,04)。為了使一組隸屬網路數據滿足超圖定義,每個參與者必須至少隸屬於一個事件,並且每個事件必須至少包含一個參與者。

An important aspect of the hypergraph representation is that the data can be described equally well by the dual hypergraph, denoted by :tt*, by reversing the roles of the points and the edges. The dual hypergraph for an affiliation network would be .?If* = (.A, JIf). In the dual hypergraph for an affiliation network the events are represented as points and the actors are represented as edges.
超圖表示的一個重要方面是,通過反轉點和邊的角色,可以通過雙超圖(用 :tt* 表示)同樣很好地描述數據。隸屬網路的雙超圖是 .?如果* = (.A,JIf)。在隸屬網路的雙超圖中,事件表示為點,參與者表示為邊。

To describe subsets defined either by actors or by events, we will introduce some notation to indicate when an event or an actor is viewed as a subset, and when an event or an actor is viewed as an element of a subset. We will use capital letters to denote subsets. Thus, when we view event j as a subset of actors we will denote it by M j , where Mj S;;; JIf. Similarly, when we view actor i as the subset of events with which it is affiliated we will denote it by Ni, where Ni S;;; .A.
為了描述由參與者或事件定義的子集,我們將引入一些符號來指示何時將事件或參與者視為子集,以及何時將事件或參與者視為子集的元素。我們將使用大寫字母來表示子集。因此,當我們將事件 j 視為參與者的子集時,我們將用 M j 表示它,其中 Mj S;;;JIf。類似地,當我們將參與者 i 視為與其相關的事件的子集時,我們將用 Ni 表示它,其中 Ni S;;;。一個。

or in terms of the subsets of events with which each actor is affiliated
或者就每個參與者所屬的事件子集而言

{ml,m3} {m2} {m2,m3} {m3} {mh m2,m3} {mh m2}.
{毫升,m3}{m2}{米2,米3}{m3}{鉦M2,M3}{mh m2}。

These subsets can also be displayed visually by representing the entities in the point set as points in space, and representing the edges as "circles" surrounding the points they include. For example, in Figure 8.4a we give the hypergraph, ;;t( = (.;If, .4), with the six children as points, and indicate the subsets of children defined by the guest lists of the parties as circles including their members. Figure 8.4b shows the dual hypergraph,
還可以通過將點集中的實體表示為空間中的點,並將邊表示為圍繞它們所包含的點的“圓”來直觀地顯示這些子集。例如,在圖 8.4a 中,我們給出了超圖 ;;t( = (.;如果,.4),以六個子項為點,並表示由各方的來賓清單定義為圓圈(包括其成員)的子集。圖 8.4b 顯示了雙超圖,

;;t(* = (.4, .;If), obtained by reversing the roles of the children and the parties. In the dual hypergraph the parties are the points and the children define circles that contain the parties they attended.
;;t(* = (.4, .;如果),通過顛倒兒童和當事人的角色獲得。在雙超圖中,派對是點,孩子們定義包含他們參加的派對的圓圈。

In either the hypergraph or the dual hypergraph we say that points are incident with edges. Thus, for affiliation networks, actors are incident with the events they attend, and events are incident with the actors they include. Returning to the affiliation matrix, A, we see that all of the information for the hypergraph is contained in this matrix. If actors are viewed as points, and events are viewed as the edges, then A describes which points (actors) are incident with which edges (events). For this reason, the affiliation matrix A has been called an incidence matrix for the hypergraph (Seidman 1981a). The transpose of A, denoted by A', presents the incidence matrix for the dual hypergraph, and shows which points (representing events) are incident with which edges (representing actors).
在超圖或雙超圖中,我們說點與邊入射。因此,對於隸屬關係網路,參與者與他們參加的事件有關,而事件與他們所包含的參與者有關。回到隸屬矩陣 A,我們看到超圖的所有資訊都包含在該矩陣中。如果將 actor 視為點,將事件視為邊緣,則 A 描述哪些點(actor)與哪些邊(事件)一起入射。出於這個原因,隸屬矩陣 A 被稱為超圖的入射矩陣 (Seidman 1981a)。A 的轉置(用 A' 表示)表示為對偶超圖的入射矩陣,並顯示哪些點(表示事件)與哪些邊(表示參與者)入射。

One of the shortcomings of a hypergraph for representing an affiliation network is that both the hypergraph and the dual hypergraph are required to show simultaneously relationships among actors and events (Freeman and White 1993).
用於表示隸屬網路的超圖的缺點之一是,超圖和雙超圖都需要同時顯示參與者和事件之間的關係(Freeman and White 1993)。

Hypergraphs have been used by Seidman and Foster to study the social structure described by Thai households' attendance at ceremonial events (Foster and Seidman 1984) and to describe urban structures (Foster and S~idman 1982). McPherson (1982) has used hypergraphs to examine participation in voluntary organizations, and has discussed issues of sampling and estimation. Berge (1973, 1989) presents a mathematical discussion of graphs and hypergraphs.
Seidman 和 Foster 使用超圖來研究泰國家庭參加儀式活動所描述的社會結構(Foster and Seidman 1984)和描述城市結構(Foster and S~idman 1982)。McPherson(1982)使用超圖來檢查志願組織的參與情況,並討論了抽樣和估計問題。Berge(1973,1989)提出了圖和超圖的數學討論。

Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Caldeira, G.A. (1988). Legal precedent: Structures of communication between state supreme courts. Social Networks. 10, 29-55.
佐治亞州卡爾代拉(1988 年)。法律先例:州最高法院之間的溝通結構。社交網路。10, 29-55.

Review. 21,489-493.
回顧。21,489-493.

M.R., and Porter, L.w. (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
M.R.和Porter,L.w.(編輯),心理學年度評論。加利福尼亞州帕洛阿爾托:年度審查。

Heider's theory. Psychological Review. 63, 277-292.
海德的理論。心理評論。63, 277-292.

Elemente der Mathematik. 23, 85-89.
數學元素。23, 85-89.

Dixon, WJ. (ed.) (l983). BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley: University of California Press.
迪克森,WJ。(編者注)(l983).BMDP統計軟體。伯克利:加州大學出版社。

Insurgent Sociologist. 5, 173-184. Donninger, C. (1986). The distribution of centrality in social networks. Social
叛亂社會學家。5, 173-184.唐寧格,C.(1986 年)。社交網路中中心性的分佈。社會的

Networks. 8, 191-203. Doreian, P. (1969). A note on the detection of cliques in valued graphs.
網路。8, 191-203.Doreian,P.(1969 年)。關於在值圖中檢測集團的說明。

Sociometry. 32, 237-242. Doreian, P. (1974). On the connectivity of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 3, 245-258. Doreian, P. (1979a). On the evolution of group and network structure. Social
社會測量學。32, 237-242.Doreian,P.(1974 年)。關於社交網路的連通性。數學社會學雜誌。3, 245-258.Doreian,P.(1979a)。關於群體和網路結構的演變。社會的

Networks. 2, 235-252. Doreian, P. (1979b). Structural control models of group structure. In Holland, P.W., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research. New York: Academic Press. Doreian, P. (1980). On the evolution of group and network structure. Social Networks. 2, 235-252. Doreian, P. (1981). Estimating linear models with spatially distributed data. In Leinhardt, S. (00.), Sociological Methodology 1981, pages 359-388. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Doreian, P. (1986). Measuring relative strength in small groups and bounded networks. Social Psychological Quarterly. 49, 247-259.
網路。2, 235-252.Doreian,P.(1979b)。群體結構的結構控制模型。在Holland,P.W.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),社會網路研究的觀點。紐約:學術出版社。 Doreian,P.(1980 年)。關於群體和網路結構的演變。社交網路。2, 235-252.Doreian,P.(1981 年)。使用空間分佈數據估計線性模型。在Leinhardt,S.(00.),社會學方法論1981年,第359-388頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Doreian,P.(1986 年)。測量小組和有界網路的相對強度。社會心理學季刊。49, 247-259.

29, 190-194. Everett, M.G. (1982). A graph theoretic blocking procedure for social networks.
29, 190-194.埃弗雷特,MG(1982 年)。社交網路的圖論阻塞過程。

Social Networks. 4, 147-167. Everett, M.G. (1985). Role similarity and complexity in social networks. Social
社交網路。4, 147-167.埃弗雷特,MG(1985 年)。社交網路中的角色相似性和複雜性。社會的

Networks. 7, 353-359. Everett, M.G., and Borgatti, S.P. (1988). Calculating role similarities: An algorithm that helps determine the orbits of a graph. Social Networks. 10, 77-91. Everett, M.G., and Borgatti, S.P. (1990). A testing example for positional analysis techniques. Social Networks. 12,253-260. Everett, M.G., Boyd, I.P., and Borgatti, S.P. (1990). Ego-centered and local roles: A graph theoretic approach. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 15, 163-172. Fararo, T.I. (1973). Mathematical SOciology. New York: Wiley lnterscience. Fararo, T.I. (1981). Biased networks and social structure theorems. Part I: Social Networks. 3, 137-159. Fararo, T.I. (1983). Biased networks and the strength of weak ties. Social Networks. 5, 1-11. Fararo, T.J., and Doreian, P. (1984). Tripartite structural analysis: Generalizing the Breiger-Wilson formalism. Social Networks. 6,141-176. Fararo, T.J., and Skvoretz, J. (1984). Biased networks and social structure theorems. Part 11. Social Networks. 6, 223-258. Fararo, T.J., and Skvoretz, 1. (1987). Unification research programs: Integrating two structural theories. American Journal of Sociology. 92, 1183-1209. Fararo, T.J., and Sunshine, M.H. (1964). A Study of a Biased Friendship Net. Syracuse, NY: Youth Development Center. Faucheux, C, and Moscovici, S. (1960). Etudes sur la creativite des groups taches, structures des communications, et reussite. Bulletin du C.E.R.P. 9, 11-22. Faust, K. (1985). A Comparative Evaluation of Methods for Positional Analysis of Social Networks. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine. Faust, K. (1988). Comparison of methods for positional analysis: Structural and general equivalences. Social Networks. 10,313-341. Faust, K., and Romney, AK. (1985a). Does STRUCTURE find structure?: A critique of Burt's use of distance as a measure of structural equivalence. Social Networks. 7,77-103. Faust, K., and Romney, AK. (1985b). The effect of skewed distributions OD matrix permutation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistica( Psychology. 38, 152-160. Faust, K., and Romney, AK. (1986). Comment on 'A cautionary note.' Social Networks. 8,213.
網路。7, 353-359.Everett,MG和Borgatti,SP(1988)。計算角色相似性:一種有助於確定圖形軌道的演算法。社交網路。10, 77-91.Everett,MG和Borgatti,SP(1990)。位置分析技術的測試範例。社交網路。12,253-260. Everett, MG, Boyd, I.P., 和 Borgatti, S.P. (1990).以自我為中心和局部角色:一種圖論方法。數學社會學雜誌。15, 163-172.法拉羅,TI(1973 年)。數學社會學。紐約:Wiley lnterscience。法拉羅,TI(1981 年)。有偏見的網路和社會結構定理。第一部分:社交網路。3, 137-159.法拉羅,TI(1983 年)。有偏見的網路和弱關係的強度。社交網路。5, 1-11.Fararo,TJ和Doreian,P.(1984)。三方結構分析:推廣Breiger-Wilson形式主義。社交網路。6,141-176. Fararo, T.J. 和 Skvoretz, J. (1984)。有偏見的網路和社會結構定理。第 11 部分。社交網路。6, 223-258.Fararo, T.J. 和 Skvoretz, 1.(1987). 統一研究計劃:整合兩種結構理論.美國社會學雜誌。92, 1183-1209.Fararo,TJ和Sunshine,MH(1964)。對有偏見的友誼網的研究。紐約州錫拉丘茲:青年發展中心。Faucheux,C和Moscovici,S.(1960)。Etudes sur la creativite des groups taches, structures des communications, et reussite.C.E.R.P. 公報 9, 11-22.浮士德,K.(1985 年)。社交網路位置分析方法的比較評估。未發表的博士論文。加州大學歐文分校社會科學學院。浮士德,K.(1988 年)。位置分析方法的比較:結構和一般等價。社交網路。10,313-341.浮士德,K.和羅姆尼,AK。(1985年a)。 結構找到結構嗎?:對伯特使用距離作為結構等價度量的批評。社交網路。7,77-103. 浮士德,K.和羅姆尼,AK。(1985b). 偏態分佈的影響 OD 矩陣排列檢驗.英國數理與統計雜誌(心理學38,152-160。浮士德,K.和羅姆尼,AK。(1986). 評論“警告說明”。社交網路。8,213.

Bibliographie zum Projeckt Analyse Sozialer Netwerke. WuppertaI, West Germany: Gesamthochschule Wuppertale. Feld, S.L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology. 86, 1015-1035. Feld, S.L., and Elmore, R. (1982a). Patterns of sociometric choices: Transitivity reconsidered. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45, 77-85. Feld, S.L., and EImore, R. (1982b). Processes underlying patterns of sociometric choice: Response to Hallinan. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45,9(}-92. Fennema, M., and Schijf, H. (1978/79). Analysing interlocking directorates: Theory and methods. Social Networks. 1,297-332. Fershtman, M. (1985). Transitivity and the path census in sociometry. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 11, 159-189. Festinger, L. (1949). The analysis of sociograms using matrix algebra. Human Relations. 2, 153-158. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 7,117-140. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co. Fiedler, F.E. (1958). Attitudes and Group Effectiveness. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Bibliographie zum Projeckt Analyse Sozialer Netwerke.伍珀泰,西德:Gesamthochschule Wuppertale。費爾德,SL(1981 年)。社會關係的重點組織。美國社會學雜誌。86, 1015-1035.Feld, SL 和 Elmore, R. (1982a)。社會計量選擇的模式:重新考慮傳遞性。社會心理學季刊。45, 77-85.Feld, S.L. 和 EImore, R. (1982b)。社會測量選擇模式的基本過程:對哈裡南的反應。社會心理學季刊。45,9(}-92.Fennema,M.和Schijf,H.(1978/79)。分析聯鎖理事會:理論和方法。社交網路。1,297-332. Fershtman,M.(1985 年)。社會計量學中的傳遞性和路徑普查。數學社會學雜誌, 11, 159-189.費斯廷格,L.(1949 年)。使用矩陣代數分析社會圖。人際關係。2, 153-158.費斯廷格,L.(1954 年)。社會比較過程理論。人際關係。7,117-140. 費斯廷格,L.(1957 年)。認知失調理論。伊利諾伊州埃文斯頓:Row,Peterson&Co.Fiedler,FE(1958)。態度和團隊效能。厄巴納:伊利諾伊大學出版社。

City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Flament, C. (1963). Applications of Graph Theory to Group Structure. Englewood
城市。芝加哥:芝加哥大學出版社。 Flament,C.(1963 年)。圖論在群結構中的應用.恩格爾伍德

Princeton University Press. Forsyth, E., and Katz, L. (1946). A matrix approach to the analysis of sociometric data: Preliminary report. Sociometry. 9, 340-347. Foster, B.L. (1978/79). Formal network studies and the anthropological perspective. Social Networks. 1,241-255. Foster, B.L., and Seidman, S.B. (1982). Urban structures derived from collections of overlapping subsets. Urban Anthropology. 11,177-192. Foster, B.L., and Seidman, S.B. (1983). A strategy for the dissection and analysis of social structures. Journal of Social and Biological Structures. 6, 49-64. Foster, B.L., and Seidman, S.B. (1984). Overlap structure of ceremonial events in two Thai villages. Thai Journal of Development Administration. 24, 143-157. Fox, J. (1982). Selective aspects of measuring resemblance for taxonomy. In social groups: A test of the Sailer-Gaulin models. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology. 1,229-238. Freeman, L.C., Roeder, D., and Mulholland, R.R. (1980). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social Networks. 2, 119-141. Freeman, L.e., and Romney, A.K (1987). Words, deeds and social structure: A preliminary study of the reliability of informants. Human Organization. 46, 330-334. Freeman, L.e., Romney, A.K., and Freeman, S.e. (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist. 89, 310-325. Freeman, L.C, and Thompson, CR. (1989). Estimating acquaintanceship volume. In Kochen, M. (ed.), The Small World, pages 147-158. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Freeman, L.C, and White, D.R. (1993). Using Galois lattices to represent network data. In Marsden, PV. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1993, pages 127-146. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. Freeman, L.C, White, D.R., and Romney, A.K. (eds.) (1989). Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press. Freeman, S.C., and Freeman, L.C (1979). The networkers network: A study of the impact of a new communications medium on sociometric structure. Social Science Research Reports No 46. Irvine, CA: University of California. Frey, S.L. (1989). Network Analysis as Applied to a Group of AIDS Patients Linked by Sexual Contact. Unpublished Undergraduate Honors Thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana. Friedell, M.F. (1967). Organizations as semilattices. American Sociological Review. 32, 46-54. Friedkin, N.E. (1981). The development of structure in random networks: An analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure. Social Networks. 3,41-52. Friedkin, N.E. (1984). Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods and Research. 12, 235-261. Friedkin, N.E. (1986). A formal theory of social power. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12, 103-126. Friedkin, N.E. (1989). SNAPS (Social Network Analysis Procedures) for GAUSS. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara. Friedkin, N.E. (1990). A Guttman scale for the strength of an interpersonal tie. Social Networks. 12,217-238. Friedkin, N.E. (1991). Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology. 96, 1478-1504. Friedkin, N.E., and Cook, KS. (1990). Peer group influence. Sociological Methods & Research. 19, 122-143. Friedkin, N.E., and Johnsen, E.e. (1990). Social influence and opinions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 15, 193-206. Friedmann, H. (1988). Form and substance in the analysis of the world economy. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 304-325. New York: Cambridge University Press. Fulkerson, D.R. (1960). Zero-one matrices with zero trace. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 10,831-836. Gabriel, KR. (1982). Biplot. In Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L., and Reed, CB. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Volume 1, pages 263-271. New York: John WiJey and Sons.
普林斯頓大學出版社。 Forsyth,E.和Katz,L.(1946)。分析社會計量數據的矩陣方法:初步報告。社會測量學。9, 340-347.福斯特,BL(1978/79)。正式的網路研究和人類學視角。社交網路。1,241-255. Foster, B.L. 和 Seidman, S.B. (1982)。從重疊子集的集合派生的城市結構。城市人類學。11,177-192. 福斯特,BL 和 Seidman,SB(1983 年)。社會結構剖析和分析的策略。社會和生物結構雜誌。6, 49-64.福斯特,BL和塞德曼,SB(1984)。兩個泰國村莊的儀式活動重疊結構。泰國發展管理雜誌。24, 143-157.福克斯,J.(1982 年)。測量分類相似性的選擇性方面。在社會群體中:對Sailer-Gaulin模型的測試。定量人類學雜誌。1,229-238. Freeman, L.C., Roeder, D., and Mulholland, R.R. (1980).社交網路的中心性:II.實驗結果。社交網路。2, 119-141.Freeman,L.E.和Romney,AK(1987)。言行與社會結構:線人可靠性的初步研究。人類組織。46, 330-334.Freeman, L.E., Romney, A.K., and Freeman, S.E. (1987)。認知結構和線人準確性。美國人類學家。89, 310-325.Freeman, L.C. 和 Thompson, CR. (1989)。估計熟人數量。在Kochen,M.(編輯),《小世界》,第147-158頁。新澤西州諾伍德:Ablex。Freeman, L.C. 和 White, DR (1993)。使用伽羅瓦格子表示網路數據。在馬斯登,PV。(編),《社會學方法論》,1993年,第127-146頁。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:Basil Blackwell。Freeman, L.C, White, D.R., and Romney, A.K. (eds.) (1989)。社會網路分析的研究方法。 佛吉尼亞州費爾法克斯:喬治梅森大學出版社。 弗里曼,南卡羅來納州和弗里曼,L.C.(1979 年)。網路人網路:研究一種新的通信媒介對社會計量結構的影響。社會科學研究報告第46號。加利福尼亞州爾灣:加州大學。弗雷,SL(1989 年)。應用於一組通過性接觸聯繫在一起的愛滋病患者的網路分析。未發表的本科榮譽論文。伊利諾伊大學厄巴納分校心理學系。弗里德爾,MF(1967 年)。組織作為半格子。美國社會學評論。32, 46-54.弗里德金,NE(1981 年)。隨機網路結構的發展:網路密度增加對結構五種度量的影響分析.社交網路。3,41-52.弗裡德金,NE(1984)。社會同質性的結構凝聚力和等價性解釋。社會學方法與研究。12, 235-261.弗里德金,NE(1986 年)。一種正式的社會權力理論。數學社會學雜誌。12, 103-126.弗里德金,NE(1989 年)。高斯的 SNAPS(社交網路分析程式)。未發表的手稿,加州大學聖塔芭芭拉分校。弗里德金,NE(1990 年)。衡量人際關係強度的古特曼量表。社交網路。12,217-238.弗里德金,N.E.(1991年)。中心性度量的理論基礎。美國社會學雜誌。96, 1478-1504.弗里德金,N.E.和庫克,堪薩斯州。(1990). 同伴群體影響.社會學方法與研究。19, 122-143.Friedkin,NE和Johnsen,EE(1990)。社會影響和意見。數學社會學雜誌。15, 193-206.弗裡德曼,H.(1988 年)。世界經濟分析的形式和實質。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第304-325頁。 紐約:劍橋大學出版社。 富爾克森,DR(1960 年)。跡線為零的零一矩陣。太平洋數學雜誌。10,831-836.加布里埃爾,KR.(1982年)。雙圖。在 Kotz, S.、Johnson, N.L. 和 Reed, CB。(編輯),統計科學百科全書,第 1 卷,第 263-271 頁。紐約:John WiJey and Sons。

Arbor, MI: Mathesis. Haberman, S.1. (1978). The Analysis of Qualitative Data. Volume 1. New York: Academic Press. Haberman, S.l. (1979). The Analysis of Qualitative Data. Volume 2. New York: Academic Press. Haberman, S.l. (1981). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt, 'An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs'. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 76, 60-62. Hage, P. (1973). A graph theoretic approach to the analysis of alliance structure and local grouping in Highland New Guinea. Anthropological Forum. 3, 280-294. Hage, P. (1976a). Structural balance and clustering in Bushmen kinship relations. Behavioral Science. 21, 36-37. Hage, P. (1976b). The atom of kinship as a directed graph. Man (n.s.). 11, 558-568. Hage, P. (1979). Graph theory as a structural model in cultural anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 8, 115-136. Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1983). Structural Models in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1991). Exchange in Oceania: A Graph Theoretic Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hakimi, S.L. (1965). Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Operations Research. 12, 450-459. Hall, A., and Wellman, B. (1985). Social networks and social support. In Cohen, S., and Syme, S.L. (eds.), Social Support and Health. New York: Academic Press. Hallinan, M.T. (1972). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt. American Journal of Sociology. 77, 1201-1205. HaIlinan, M.T. (1974a). The Structure of Positive Sentiment. New York: Elsevier. Hallinan, M.T. (1974b). A structural model of sentiment relations. American Journal of Sociology. 80, 364-378. Hallinan, M.T. (1978). The process of friendship formation. Social Networks. 1, 193-210. Hallinan, M.T. (1982). Cognitive balance and differential popularity in social networks. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45, 86-90. Hallinan, M.T., and Hutchins, E.E. (1980). Structural effects on dyadic change. Social Forces. 59, 229-245. Hallinan, M.T., and Kubitschek, W.N. (1988). The effects of individual and structural characteristics on intransitivity in social networks. Social Psychology Quarterly. 51, 81-92. Hallinan, M.T., and Kubitschek, W.N. (1990). Sex and race effects on the response to intransitive sentiment relations. Social Psychology Quarterly. 53, 252-263. Hallinan, M.T., and McFarland, D.D. (1975). Higher order stability conditions in mathematical models of sociometric or cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 4, 131-148. Hallinan, M.T., and Smith, S.S. (1985). The effects of classroom racial composition on students' interracial friendliness. Social Psychological Quarterly. 48,3-16. Hallinan, M.T., and Williams, R.A. (1987). The stability of students' interracial friendships. American Sociological Review. 52, 653-664.
密歇根州亞伯:Mathesis。哈伯曼,S.1。(1978). 定性數據分析.第 1 卷。紐約:學術出版社。 Haberman, S.l. (1979)。定性數據分析。第 2 卷。紐約:學術出版社。 哈伯曼,SL(1981 年)。評論 Holland 和 Leinhardt,“有向圖的概率分布指數族”。美國統計協會雜誌。76, 60-62.哈格,P.(1973 年)。分析新幾內亞高地聯盟結構和地方分組的圖論方法。人類學論壇。3, 280-294.Hage,P.(1976a)。布須曼人親屬關係中的結構平衡和聚類。行為科學。21, 36-37.Hage,P.(1976b)。作為有向圖的親屬關係原子。男人 (n.s.)。11, 558-568.哈格,P.(1979 年)。圖論作為文化人類學中的結構模型。人類學年度評論。8, 115-136.Hage,P.和Harary,F.(1983)。人類學中的結構模型。劍橋:劍橋大學出版社。 Hage,P.和Harary,F.(1991)。大洋洲的交流:圖論分析。牛津:克拉倫登出版社。 Hakimi, SL (1965)。交換中心的最佳位置以及圖形的絕對中心和中位數。運籌學。12, 450-459.Hall,A.和Wellman,B.(1985)。社交網路和社會支援。在 Cohen, S. 和 Syme, S.L.(編輯)中,社會支援與健康。紐約:學術出版社。 哈裡南,M.T.(1972 年)。評論霍蘭德和萊因哈特。美國社會學雜誌。77, 1201-1205.HaIlinan, M.T. (1974a)。積極情緒的結構。紐約:愛思唯爾。哈裡南,M.T.(1974b)。情感關係的結構模型。美國社會學雜誌。80, 364-378.哈裡南,MT(1978 年)。友誼形成的過程。社交網路。1, 193-210.哈裡南,MT(1982 年)。 社交網路中的認知平衡和差異流行度。社會心理學季刊。45, 86-90.Hallinan,M.T.和Hutchins,EE(1980)。對二元變化的結構效應。社會力量。59, 229-245.Hallinan,M.T.和Kubitschek,W.N.(1988)。個體和結構特徵對社交網路中不可傳遞性的影響。社會心理學季刊。51, 81-92.Hallinan,M.T.和Kubitschek,W.N.(1990)。性別和種族對不及物情感關係反應的影響。社會心理學季刊。53, 252-263.Hallinan,M.T.和McFarland,D.D.(1975)。社會計量學或認知結構的數學模型中的高階穩定性條件。數學社會學雜誌。4, 131-148.Hallinan,M.T.和Smith,SS(1985)。課堂種族構成對學生跨種族友好度的影響。社會心理學季刊。48,3-16. Hallinan, M.T. 和 Williams, R.A. (1987)。學生跨種族友誼的穩定性。美國社會學評論。52, 653-664.

Tables, Trends, and Shapes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
表格、趨勢和形狀。紐約:約翰·威利父子。

H0ivik, T., and Gleditsch, N.P. (1975). Structural parameters of graphs: A theoretical investigation. In Blalock, H.M., et al (eds.), Quantitative Sociology, pages 203-223. New York: Academic Press.
H0ivik,T.和Gleditsch,N.P.(1975)。圖形的結構參數:理論研究.在Blalock,H.M.等人(編輯),定量社會學,第203-223頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Holland, PW., Laskey, K.B., and Leinhardt, S. (1983). Stochastic blockmodels: Some first steps. Social Networks. 5, 109-137.
Holland,PW.,Laskey,KB和Leinhardt,S.(1983)。隨機塊模型:一些第一步。社交網路。5, 109-137.

Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S. (1970). A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology. 70,492-513.
Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.(1970)。一種檢測社會計量數據結構的方法。美國社會學雜誌。70,492-513.

Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies. 2, 107-124.
Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.(1971)。小群結構模型中的傳遞性。比較小組研究。2, 107-124.

Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (1972). Some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. American Journal of Sociology. 72, 1205-1209.
Holland,PW和Leinhardt,S.(1972)。關於積極人際情感傳遞性的一些證據。美國社會學雜誌。72, 1205-1209.

Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (1973). The structural implications of measurement error in sociometry. Journal of Mathematical SOCiology. 3, 85-111.
Holland,PW和Leinhardt,S.(1973)。社會測量學中測量誤差的結構意義。數學SOCiology雜誌。3, 85-111.

Holland, P.W., and Leinhardt, S. (1975). The statistical analysis of local structure in social networks. In Heise, D.R. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1976, pages 1-45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holland,PW和Leinhardt,S.(1975)。社交網路中局部結構的統計分析。Heise, D.R. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1976, pages 1-45.三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S. (1976). Conditions for eliminating intransitivities in binary digraphs. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 4, 314-318.
Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.(1976)。消除二進位二元圖中不傳遞性的條件。數學社會學雜誌。4, 314-318.

Holland, PW" and Leinhardt, S. (1977a). Notes on the statistical analysis of social network data. Unpublished manuscript.
Holland, PW“和 Leinhardt, S. (1977a)。關於社交網路數據統計分析的說明。未發表的手稿。

Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (1977b). A dynamic model for social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 5, 5-20.
Holland, P.w. 和 Leinhardt, S. (1977b)。社交網路的動態模型。數學社會學雜誌。5, 5-20.

Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (1977c). Social structure as a network process. Zeitschriji fUr Soziologie. 6, 386-402.
Holland, P.w. 和 Leinhardt, S. (1977c)。社會結構作為一個網路過程。Zeitschriji fUr Soziologie.6, 386-402.

Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (1978). An omnibus test for social structure using triads. Sociological Methods and Research. 7, 227-256.
Holland,PW和Leinhardt,S.(1978)。使用三元組對社會結構進行綜合測試。社會學方法與研究。7, 227-256.

Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (1979). Structural sociometry. In Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research,. pages
Holland,PW和Leinhardt,S.(1979)。結構社會測量學。在Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),社會網路研究的觀點,。頁面

The goal of this research is to identify hubs, those actors adjacent to many peripheral actors, and bridges, those adjacent to few central or prestigious actors
本研究的目的是確定樞紐,即與許多週邊參與者相鄰的參與者,以及橋樑,即與少數中心或有聲望的參與者相鄰的橋樑

Methods
方法

I*J I*K J*L J*K I*L K*L

I*J J*K I*L K*L

I*J I*K J*L K*L

R*S R*K S*L S*K R*L K*L

R*S S*K R*L K*L /DES1GN R*S R*K S*L

R*S R*K S*L S*K R*L LOGL1NEAR R S (1,2) K L (0,1) /DES1GN RSKLR BY S R BY K S BY L R BY L K BY L S BY K The commands "TITLE," "FILE HANDLE," and "DATA LIST" initiate SPSSx and read in the data file. "HILOGLINEAR" generates hierarchical log-linear models and the fitting procedures. It is a fast procedure, both for typing in compact model statements, and in terms of computational running time. However, it does not give estimated u-terms. "LOGLINEAR" is a slower and more cumbersome procedure, but it will calculate estimated u-terms for small networks. BMDP Commands. To fit models to a y-array (contained in a data file, like that needed for SPSSx):
R*S R*K S*L S*K R*L LOGL1NEAR R S (1,2) K L (0,1) /DES1GN RSKLR BY S R BY K S BY L R BY L K BY L S BY K “TITLE”、“FILE HANDLE” 和 “DATA LIST” 命令啟動 SPSSx 並讀取數據檔。“HILOGLINEAR”生成分層對數線性模型和擬合過程。這是一個快速的過程,無論是鍵入緊湊的模型語句,還是在計算運行時間方面。但是,它沒有給出估計的 u 項。“LOGLINEAR”是一個更慢、更繁瑣的過程,但它會計算小型網络的估計 u 項。BMDP 命令。要將模型擬合到 y 陣列(包含在數據檔中,就像 SPSSx 所需的那樣):

New York: John Wiley and Sons. Silvey, S.D. (1981). Optimal Design. London: Chapman-Hall. Sim, F.M., and Schwartz, M.R. (1979). Does CONCOR find positions?
紐約:約翰·威利父子。西爾維,S.D.(1981 年)。優化設計。倫敦:查普曼大廳。Sim,FM和Schwartz,MR(1979)。CONCOR能找到職位嗎?

Discussion
討論

XVll Part V: Dyadic and Triadic Methods 13.1 An Overview 13.2 An Example and Some Definitions 13.3.1 The Dyad Census 13.3.2 The Example and Its Dyad Census 13.3.3 An Index for Mutuality 13.3.4 ®A Second Index for Mutuality 13.3.5 OSubgraph Analysis, in General 13.4.1 The Uniform Distribution - A Review 13.4.2 Simple Distributions on Digraphs
XVll 第五部分:二元法和三元法 13.1 概述 13.2 示例和一些定義 13.3.1 二元普查 13.3.2 示例及其二元普查 13.3.3 互惠指數 13.3.4 ® 互惠性的第二個指數 13.3.5 OSubgraph分析,一般 13.4.1 均勻分佈 - 綜述 13.4.2 二元圖上的簡單分佈

Conclusion
結論

We conclude this chapter by pulling together all three notations into a single, more general framework. To begin, we note that the collection of actors, the relational information on pairs of actors, and possible attributes of the actors constitute a collection of data that can be referred to as a social relational system. Such a system is a conceptualization of the actors, pairs, relations, and attributes found in a social network.
在本章的最後,我們將所有三個符號組合成一個更通用的框架。首先,我們注意到,參與者的集合、參與者對的關係資訊以及參與者的可能屬性構成了一個可以稱為社會關係系統的數據集合。這樣的系統是社交網路中發現的參與者、配對、關係和屬性的概念化。

In summary, the sociomatrix records for each pair of nodes whether the nodes are adjacent or not. The next matrix we describe records which nodes are incident with which lines.
總之,社會矩陣記錄了每對節點是否相鄰。我們描述的下一個矩陣記錄了哪些節點與哪些行一起入射。

In summary, affiliation networks are relational in three ways: first, they show how the actors and events are related to each other; second, the events create ties among actors; and third, the actors create ties among events.
總之,隸屬關係網路在三個方面是關係的:首先,它們顯示了參與者和事件之間的關係;第二,這些事件在行動者之間建立了聯繫;第三,行動者在事件之間建立聯繫。

In conclusion, let us reiterate some of the important features of affiliation networks that make them distinctive from the one-mode networks that we have discussed prior to this chapter, and briefly review some of the
最後,讓我們重申隸屬關係網路的一些重要特徵,這些特徵使它們有別於我們在本章之前討論過的單模式網路,並簡要回顧一下其中的一些

In summary, measures of structural equivalence are used to assess how close pairs of actors are to perfect structural equivalence. Further, these measures may be used to study structural equivalence for all of the kinds of relations we have discussed: single or multiple relations, dichotomous or valued relations, and directional or nondirectional relations.
總之,結構等價的度量用於評估成對的參與者與完美結構等價的接近程度。此外,這些措施可用於研究我們討論的所有類型的關係的結構等價性:單個或多個關係,二分或價值關係,以及方向性或非方向性關係。

In conclusion, let us consider some general issues in positional analysis, especially positional analysis based on structural equivalence. Although
總之,讓我們考慮位置分析中的一些一般問題,特別是基於結構等價的位置分析。雖然

In summary, the role structures for advice and friendship for Krackhardfs high-tech managers and for helping and friendship for the Bank Wiring room are quite similar, Substantively, we see that the relations of providing work-related aid and being friends operate similarly in these two work groups. If we consider the equations among compound relations that are expressed in the set of equivalence classes of images for the joint homomorphic reduction of these two role structures, we see that there are five kinds of compound relations operating in these groups. The first class of images includes all images (words) that contain only sequences of A's (advice); the second class includes only the primitive relation F (friendship); the third class includes images that begin with A and end with F; the fourth class includes images that both begin with F and end with A; and the fifth class includes images that both begin and end with F.
總之,Krackhardfs 高科技經理的建議和友誼以及銀行接線室的幫助和友誼的角色結構非常相似,實質上,我們看到提供與工作相關的幫助和成為朋友的關係在這兩個工作組中運作相似。如果我們考慮在圖像的等價類集合中表示的複合關係之間的方程,用於這兩個角色結構的聯合同態還原,我們可以看到在這些組中有五種複合關係在起作用。第一類圖像包括僅包含 A(建議)序列的所有圖像(單詞);第二類僅包括原始關係F(友誼);第三類包括以 A 開頭並以 F 結尾的圖像;第四類包括以 F 開頭並以 A 結尾的圖像;第五類包括以 F 開頭和結尾的圖像。

To summarize this stage in the test statistic construction process, we form a weighting vector for each of the configurations that are predicted to occur more or less frequently than chance if the hypothesis in question is true. For Mazur's similarity/attraction theory, there are twelve configurations, and seven weighting vectors (since ten of the configurations are "paired up" into five equivalent configurations). All seven vectors are given in Table 14.5. The first four (concerned with agreements among friends or close friends) should occur more frequently than expected, if the substantive hypothesis about similarity and attraction is true for this network, while the remaining three (concerned with disagreements) should occur less frequently. If a particular triad type has a zero for a specific vector, then it does not contain the configuration(s} that represent the theory.
為了總結檢驗統計構造過程中的這一階段,我們為每個配置形成了一個加權向量,如果所討論的假設為真,則預測這些配置的發生頻率高於或低於偶然性。對於 Mazur 的相似性/吸引力理論,有 12 個配置和 7 個加權向量(因為其中 10 個配置被“配對”成 5 個等效配置)。表14.5中給出了所有七個向量。如果關於相似性和吸引力的實質性假設對這個網路是正確的,那麼前四個(與朋友或親密朋友之間的協定有關)應該比預期的更頻繁地出現,而其餘三個(與分歧有關)應該不那麼頻繁地發生。如果特定三元組類型對特定向量的零,則它不包含表示理論的配置。

To summarize this chapter and this part of the book, we want to mention some ways to extend the models presented here to other types of network data. Perhaps the most important of these extensions are those that allow one to analyze multiple relational networks and networks that are measured over time. We very briefly discuss these extensions here.
為了總結本章和本書的這一部分,我們想提及一些將此處介紹的模型擴展到其他類型的網路數據的方法。也許這些擴展中最重要的擴展是那些允許分析多個關係網路和隨時間測量的網路的擴展。我們在這裡非常簡要地討論這些擴展。

We conclude this book by speculating a bit about the future of social network methodology. The following comments include observations about gaps in current network methods and "hot" trends that we think are likely to continue. We also include some wishful thinking about the directions in which we would like to see network methodology develop.
在本書的最後,我們通過對社交網路方法論的未來進行一些推測。以下評論包括對當前網路方法差距的觀察以及我們認為可能會持續下去的「熱門」趨勢。我們還對網路方法論的發展方向進行了一些一廂情願的想法。

In conclusion, we are excited about the future prospects for social network methods, and look forward to incorporating these advances into the second edition of this book.
總之,我們對社交網路方法的未來前景感到興奮,並期待將這些進展納入本書的第二版。

We conclude this chapter by pulling together all three notations into a single, more general framework. To begin, we note that the collection of actors, the relational information on pairs of actors, and possible attributes of the actors constitute a collection of data that can be referred to as a social relational system. Such a system is a conceptualization of the actors, pairs, relations, and attributes found in a social network.
在本章的最後,我們將所有三個符號組合成一個更通用的框架。首先,我們注意到,參與者的集合、參與者對的關係資訊以及參與者的可能屬性構成了一個可以稱為社會關係系統的數據集合。這樣的系統是社交網路中發現的參與者、配對、關係和屬性的概念化。

In summary, the sociomatrix records for each pair of nodes whether the nodes are adjacent or not. The next matrix we describe records which nodes are incident with which lines.
總之,社會矩陣記錄了每對節點是否相鄰。我們描述的下一個矩陣記錄了哪些節點與哪些行一起入射。

In summary, affiliation networks are relational in three ways: first, they show how the actors and events are related to each other; second, the events create ties among actors; and third, the actors create ties among events.
總之,隸屬關係網路在三個方面是關係的:首先,它們顯示了參與者和事件之間的關係;第二,這些事件在行動者之間建立了聯繫;第三,行動者在事件之間建立聯繫。

In conclusion, let us reiterate some of the important features of affiliation networks that make them distinctive from the one-mode networks that we have discussed prior to this chapter, and briefly review some of the
最後,讓我們重申隸屬關係網路的一些重要特徵,這些特徵使它們有別於我們在本章之前討論過的單模式網路,並簡要回顧一下其中的一些

In summary, measures of structural equivalence are used to assess how close pairs of actors are to perfect structural equivalence. Further, these measures may be used to study structural equivalence for all of the kinds of relations we have discussed: single or multiple relations, dichotomous or valued relations, and directional or nondirectional relations.
總之,結構等價的度量用於評估成對的參與者與完美結構等價的接近程度。此外,這些措施可用於研究我們討論的所有類型的關係的結構等價性:單個或多個關係,二分或價值關係,以及方向性或非方向性關係。

In conclusion, let us consider some general issues in positional analysis, especially positional analysis based on structural equivalence. Although
總之,讓我們考慮位置分析中的一些一般問題,特別是基於結構等價的位置分析。雖然

In summary, the role structures for advice and friendship for Krackhardfs high-tech managers and for helping and friendship for the Bank Wiring room are quite similar, Substantively, we see that the relations of providing work-related aid and being friends operate similarly in these two work groups. If we consider the equations among compound relations that are expressed in the set of equivalence classes of images for the joint homomorphic reduction of these two role structures, we see that there are five kinds of compound relations operating in these groups. The first class of images includes all images (words) that contain only sequences of A's (advice); the second class includes only the primitive relation F (friendship); the third class includes images that begin with A and end with F; the fourth class includes images that both begin with F and end with A; and the fifth class includes images that both begin and end with F.
總之,Krackhardfs 高科技經理的建議和友誼以及銀行接線室的幫助和友誼的角色結構非常相似,實質上,我們看到提供與工作相關的幫助和成為朋友的關係在這兩個工作組中運作相似。如果我們考慮在圖像的等價類集合中表示的複合關係之間的方程,用於這兩個角色結構的聯合同態還原,我們可以看到在這些組中有五種複合關係在起作用。第一類圖像包括僅包含 A(建議)序列的所有圖像(單詞);第二類僅包括原始關係F(友誼);第三類包括以 A 開頭並以 F 結尾的圖像;第四類包括以 F 開頭並以 A 結尾的圖像;第五類包括以 F 開頭和結尾的圖像。

To summarize this stage in the test statistic construction process, we form a weighting vector for each of the configurations that are predicted to occur more or less frequently than chance if the hypothesis in question is true. For Mazur's similarity/attraction theory, there are twelve configurations, and seven weighting vectors (since ten of the configurations are "paired up" into five equivalent configurations). All seven vectors are given in Table 14.5. The first four (concerned with agreements among friends or close friends) should occur more frequently than expected, if the substantive hypothesis about similarity and attraction is true for this network, while the remaining three (concerned with disagreements) should occur less frequently. If a particular triad type has a zero for a specific vector, then it does not contain the configuration(s} that represent the theory.
為了總結檢驗統計構造過程中的這一階段,我們為每個配置形成了一個加權向量,如果所討論的假設為真,則預測這些配置的發生頻率高於或低於偶然性。對於 Mazur 的相似性/吸引力理論,有 12 個配置和 7 個加權向量(因為其中 10 個配置被“配對”成 5 個等效配置)。表14.5中給出了所有七個向量。如果關於相似性和吸引力的實質性假設對這個網路是正確的,那麼前四個(與朋友或親密朋友之間的協定有關)應該比預期的更頻繁地出現,而其餘三個(與分歧有關)應該不那麼頻繁地發生。如果特定三元組類型對特定向量的零,則它不包含表示理論的配置。

To summarize this chapter and this part of the book, we want to mention some ways to extend the models presented here to other types of network data. Perhaps the most important of these extensions are those that allow one to analyze multiple relational networks and networks that are measured over time. We very briefly discuss these extensions here.
為了總結本章和本書的這一部分,我們想提及一些將此處介紹的模型擴展到其他類型的網路數據的方法。也許這些擴展中最重要的擴展是那些允許分析多個關係網路和隨時間測量的網路的擴展。我們在這裡非常簡要地討論這些擴展。

We conclude this book by speculating a bit about the future of social network methodology. The following comments include observations about gaps in current network methods and "hot" trends that we think are likely to continue. We also include some wishful thinking about the directions in which we would like to see network methodology develop.
在本書的最後,我們通過對社交網路方法論的未來進行一些推測。以下評論包括對當前網路方法差距的觀察以及我們認為可能會持續下去的「熱門」趨勢。我們還對網路方法論的發展方向進行了一些一廂情願的想法。

In conclusion, we are excited about the future prospects for social network methods, and look forward to incorporating these advances into the second edition of this book.
總之,我們對社交網路方法的未來前景感到興奮,並期待將這些進展納入本書的第二版。

Xii = 1. In terms of a directed graph, some, but not all, < ni, nj > arcs are present.
xii = 1。就有向圖而言,存在一些(但不是全部)< ni、nj > 弧。

A relation is symmetric if, whenever i "chooses" j, then j also "chooses" i; thus, iRj if and only if jRi. A nondirectional relation (represented by a graph) is always symmetric. In a directed graph symmetry implies that whenever the arc lk =< nj, nj > is in the set of lines .P, the arc lm =< nj, nj > is also in .P. In other words, dyads are either null or mutual. The sociomatrix for a symmetric relation is symmetric; Xij = Xji for all distinct i and j. If the matrix X is symmetric, then it is identical to its transpose, X'; xij = X;j for all i and j.
如果每當 i 「選擇」j 時,j 也「選擇」i 時,關係是對稱的;因此,iRj 當且僅當 jRi.非方向關係(由圖形表示)始終是對稱的。在有向圖中,對稱性意味著每當弧 lk =< nj 時,nj > 都在線集中。P,弧 lm =< nj,nj > 也在 .P 中。換句話說,二元組要麼是空的,要麼是互的。對稱關係的社會矩陣是對稱的;Xij = Xji 表示所有不同的 i 和 j。如果矩陣 X 是對稱的,則它與它的轉置 X' 相同;xij = X;j 對於所有 i 和 j。

Transitivity is a property that considers patterns of triples of actors in a network or triples of nodes in a graph. A relation is transitive if every time that iRj and jRk, then iRk. If the relation is "is a friend of," then the relation is transitive if whenever i "chooses" j as a friend and j "chooses" k as a friend, then i "chooses" k as a friend.
傳遞性是一種屬性,它考慮網路中參與者的三元組或圖中節點的三元組的模式。如果每次 iRj 和 jRk,則關係是可傳遞的,則 iRk。如果關係是“是朋友”,那麼關係是可傳遞的,如果每當我“選擇”j作為朋友,j“選擇”k作為朋友時,我就會“選擇”k作為朋友。

Transitivity can be studied by considering powers of a sociomatrix.
傳遞性可以通過考慮社會矩陣的冪來研究。

Recall that X[21 = XX codes the number of walks of length 2 between each pair of nodes in a graph; thus, an entry x}J1 ;::: 1 if there is a walk ni -+ nk -+ nj for at least one node nk. Thus, in order for the relation to be transitive, whenever x};l ;::: 1, then xij must equal 1.
回想一下,X[21 = XX 對圖中每對節點之間的長度為 2 的遊走數進行編碼;因此,如果至少有一個節點 nk 存在遊走 ni -+ nk -+ nj,則為條目 x}J1 ;::: 1。因此,為了使關係是可傳遞的,只要 x};l ;::: 1,則 xij 必須等於 1。

One can check for transitivity of a relation by comparing the square of a sociomatrix with the sociomatrix. Thus, a transitive relation is noteworthy in that ties present in X are a subset of the ties present in X2.
可以通過比較社會矩陣和社會矩陣的平方來檢查關係的傳遞性。因此,傳遞關係是值得注意的,因為 X 中存在的紐帶是 X2 中存在的紐帶的子集。

Graph theory is a useful way to represent network data. Actors in a network are represented as nodes of a graph. Nondirectional ties between actors are represented as lines between the nodes of a graph. Directed ties between actors are represented as arcs between the nodes in a digraph.
圖論是表示網路數據的有用方法。網路中的參與者表示為圖形的節點。參與者之間的非方向性聯繫表示為圖形節點之間的線。參與者之間的有向聯繫表示為二圖中節點之間的弧。

The valences of ties are represented by a "+" or "-" sign in a signed graph or digraph. The strength associated with each line or arc in a valued graph or digraph is assigned a value. Many of the concepts of graph theory have been used as the foundation of many theoretical concepts in social network analysis.
關係的化合價在有符號圖或二合圖中用“+”或“-”符號表示。為與值圖或二元圖中的每條線或弧關聯的強度分配一個值。圖論的許多概念已被用作社交網路分析中許多理論概念的基礎。

There are many, many references on graph theory. We recommend the following texts. Harary (1969) and Bondy and Murty (1976) are excellent mathematical introductions to graph theory, with coverage ranging from proofs of many of the statements we have made, to solutions to a variety of applied problems. The excellent text by Frank (1971) is more mathematically advanced and focuses on social networks. Similarly, the classic text by Harary, Norman, and Cartwright (1965) is also focused on directed graphs, and is quite accessible to beginners. Roberts (1976, 1978) and Hage and Harary (1983) provide very readable, elementary introductions to graph theory, with many concepts illustrated on anthropological network data. In their introduction to network analysis, Knoke and Kuklinski (1982) also describe some elementary ideas in graph theory. Ford and Fulkerson (1962), Lawler (1976), Tutte (1971), and others give mathematical treatments of special, advanced topics in graph theory, such as theories of matroids and optimization of network configurations. The topic of tournaments is treated in the context of paired comparisons by David (1988). A more mathematical discussion of tournaments can be found in Moon (1968). Berge (1989) discusses hypergraphs in detail.
關於圖論有很多很多的參考資料。我們推薦以下文本。Harary(1969)和Bondy和Murty(1976)是圖論的優秀數學介紹,涵蓋範圍從我們所做的許多陳述的證明到各種應用問題的解決方案。弗蘭克(Frank,1971)的優秀著作在數學上更先進,專注於社交網路。同樣,Harary、Norman 和 Cartwright (1965) 的經典著作也側重於有向圖,初學者很容易理解。Roberts(1976,1978)和Hage和Harary(1983)對圖論進行了非常可讀的基本介紹,其中許多概念都說明瞭人類學網路數據。在網路分析的介紹中,Knoke和Kuklinski(1982)也描述了圖論中的一些基本思想。Ford 和 Fulkerson (1962)、Lawler (1976)、Tutte (1971) 等人對圖論中特殊的高級主題進行了數學處理,例如矩陣理論和網路配置優化。David(1988)在配對比較的背景下處理了錦標賽的主題。關於錦標賽的更多數學討論可以在Moon(1968)中找到。Berge(1989)詳細討論了超圖。

In this chapter we have presented methods for studying cohesive subgroups in social networks, for dichotomous nondirectional relations, directional relations, and valued relations. These methods are motivated by theoretically important properties of cohesive subgroups, and present alternative ways of quantifying the idea of social group using social networks. We also presented methods for assessing the cohesiveness of subgroups.
在本章中,我們介紹了研究社交網路中內聚子群的方法,包括二分非方向關係、方向關係和價值關係。這些方法受到內聚子群體理論上重要特性的激勵,並提出了使用社交網路量化社會群體概念的替代方法。我們還介紹了評估亞組凝聚力的方法。

In this chapter we discuss methods for analyzing a special kind of twomode social network that represents the affiliation of a set of actors with a set of social occasions (or events). We will refer to these data as affiliation network data, or measurements on an affiliation variable. This kind of two-mode network has also been called a membership network (Breiger 1974, 1990a) or hypernetwork (McPherson 1982), and the affiliation relation has also been referred to as an involvement relation (Freeman and White 1993).
在本章中,我們討論了分析一種特殊的雙模式社交網路的方法,該社交網路代表了一組參與者與一組社交場合(或事件)的隸屬關係。我們將這些數據稱為隸屬關係網路數據,或對隸屬關係變數的測量。這種雙模網路也被稱為隸屬網路(Breiger 1974,1990a)或超網路(McPherson 1982),隸屬關係也被稱為參與關係(Freeman and White 1993)。

First, affiliation networks are two-mode networks that focus on the affiliation of a set of actors with a set of events. Since each event consists of a subset of actors, and each actor is affiliated with a subset of events, affiliation network data cannot be studied completely by looking at pairs of actors and/or pairs of events. Next, there is an important duality in the relationships among the actors and the events; actors create linkages among the events, and simultaneously the events create linkages among the actors. Although affiliation networks are two-mode networks, and the most comprehensive analyses would study both actors and events simultaneously, it is also possible to study the one-mode networks, of actors or of events. However, since affiliation networks are defined on subsets (not pairs) of actors and events there is loss of information and potential for misinterpretation when studying only the one-mode networks.
首先,隸屬關係網路是雙模式網路,側重於一組參與者與一組事件的隸屬關係。由於每個事件都由參與者的子集組成,並且每個參與者都隸屬於事件的子集,因此無法通過查看參與者對和/或事件對來完全研究隸屬網路數據。其次,行為者和事件之間的關係存在著重要的二元性;行動者在事件之間建立聯繫,同時事件在行動者之間建立聯繫。雖然隸屬關係網路是雙模網路,最全面的分析會同時研究行為者和事件,但也可以研究行為者或事件的單模式網路。然而,由於隸屬網路是在參與者和事件的子集(而不是成對)上定義的,因此在僅研究單模網路時,存在資訊丟失和誤解的可能性。

For the most part the analyses that we have described in this chapter assume that one has a complete affiliation network. That is, that all actors and all events constituting the network are included. If, on the other hand, the actors in % are a sample of actors from a larger popUlation, or if the events in .It are a sample from a larger popUlation of events, then one must consider issues of sampling and estimation of the relevant network quantities. McPherson (1982) discusses how to estimate key network affiliation measures (including the average size of events, and average rates of affiliation).
在大多數情況下,我們在本章中描述的分析假設一個人有一個完整的從屬網路。也就是說,構成網路的所有參與者和所有事件都包括在內。另一方面,如果 % 中的 actor 是來自較大 popUlation 的 actor 樣本,或者如果 .它是來自更大事件的樣本,那麼必須考慮相關網路數量的採樣和估計問題。McPherson(1982)討論了如何估計關鍵的網路隸屬關係指標(包括事件的平均規模和平均隸屬關係率)。

Funding
資金

And lastly, we thank Murray Aborn, Jim B1ackman, SaJIy Nerlove, and Cheryl Eavey at the National Science Foundation for financial support over the years (most recently, via NSF Grant #SBR93-10184 to the University of Illinois)
最後,我們感謝美國國家科學基金會的 Murray Aborn、Jim B1ackman、SaJIy Nerlove 和 Cheryl Eavey 多年來的財政支援(最近,通過 NSF Grant #SBR93-10184 向伊利諾伊大學提供)

We could then measure the flows of financial support flows from corporations to non-profit actors
然後,我們可以衡量從公司到非營利行為者的財政支援流量

Participants and statistics
參與者和統計數據

• r!J2: 1,4,7,8,10, 16, 18,21. These subsets show the mapping, 4>(i) = ~k> for each of the twenty-one managers. The second step in the blockmodel analysis is to describe the ties between and within positions
• R!J2:1,4,7,8,10,16,18,21。這些子集顯示了21個經理中每個經理的映射4>(i) = ~k>。塊模型分析的第二步是描述位置之間和位置內部的聯繫

Consider the ties from members of f!81 to members of f!82. Since there are six people in f!8j, and four people in. @2 there are 6 x 4 = 24 possible ties that could be present from members &I. 812 813 814 811 0.367 0.625 0.944 0.833 0.708 0.750 0.528 0.375 0.056 0.167 0.194 0.722 0.250 0.250 0.667 LOOO
考慮一下 f!81 成員與 f!82 成員的聯繫。因為 f!8j 中有六個人,而 f!8j 中有四個人。@2 有 6 x 4 = 24 個可能的紐帶可能來自成員 &I. 812 813 814 811 0.367 0.625 0.944 0.833 0.708 0.750 0.528 0.375 0.056 0.167 0.194 0.722 0.250 0.250 0.667 LOOO

Now, consider the relations of advice and friendship for Krackhardl's high-tech managers. The distances between the ego algebras for the twenty-one managers in this network are presented in Figure 12.13. We can represent these distances between ego algebras using complete link hierarchical clustering (we used the program SYSTAT; Wilkinson 1987)
現在,考慮一下 Krackhardl 的高科技經理的建議和友誼關係。圖 12.13 顯示了該網路中 21 個經理的自我代數之間的距離。我們可以使用完全連結分層聚類來表示自我代數之間的這些距離(我們使用了程式 SYSTAT;威爾金森 1987)

Figure 12.14 presents the dendrogram for the hierarchical clustering. Considering this figure, we could partition the twenty-one managers into four positions of approximately ego-algebraically equivalent positions:. • [!l(EA)l : {5, 8,10, 13, 15, 19}
圖 12.14 顯示了分層聚類的樹狀圖。考慮到這個數字,我們可以將 21 名經理分為四個職位,這些職位在自我代數上大致相等:• [!l(EA)l : {5, 8,10, 13, 15, 19}

Consider Krackhardt's high-tech managers. The twenty-one managers were asked who, among the other managers, are your "friends." The managers were also asked who they went to for advice on the job. We will contrast these two relations in this chapter
想想克拉克哈特的高科技經理。這21位經理被問及,在其他經理中,誰是你的“朋友”。經理們還被問及他們向誰尋求工作建議。在本章中,我們將對比這兩種關係

Since, M = 23, we find PH = (23 - 0)/(51 - 0) = 0.451, a fairly large value, even larger in fact than PKP' In general, we have found that the PB indices tend to be larger than the corresponding PKP values. Krackhardt's data set also contains a second relation, advice, measured for the twenty-one managers. The density of choices for this second relation is 190/420 = 0.452, and there are 45 mutual dyads
由於 M = 23,我們發現 PH = (23 - 0)/(51 - 0) = 0.451,這是一個相當大的值,實際上甚至比 PKP 還要大。Krackhardt的數據集還包含第二種關係,即建議,針對21位經理進行測量。第二種關係的選擇密度為190/420 =0.452,並且有45個相互二元組

The set of all possible digraphs with 4 nodes, Gd(.AI"), with .AI" = {n1,n2,n3,n4}, has 212 = 4096 elements. There are 4 x 3 = 12 ordered pairs of nodes. Each of these twelve pairs is such that the first actor can relate to or choose the second actor
具有 4 個節點的所有可能的二元圖的集合,Gd(.AI“),以及 .AI“ = {n1,n2,n3,n4},有 212 = 4096 個元素。有 4 x 3 = 12 對有序節點。這十二對中的每一對都是這樣,第一個演員可以與第二個演員相關或選擇

There are 4 x 3 = 12 ordered pairs of nodes. Each of these twelve pairs is such that the first actor can relate to or choose the second actor. Thus, there can be as many as 12 arcs present in the digraph
有 4 x 3 = 12 對有序節點。這十二對中的每一對都是這樣,第一個演員可以與第二個演員相關或選擇。因此,二合圖中可以存在多達12個弧

If g is sufficiently large (probably around 20, although the size needed depends on the true number of mutual dyads), then one can test a hypothesis about M by first dividing the difference between the observed M and the hypothesized M by the standard deviation (square root of the variance of M), and then assuming that this standardized statistic has an approximate normal distribution. A good, early application of this approach can be found in Maucorps' (1949) study of friendship, work preference, and praise among an elite group of thirty-five French army officers. The recent research of Snijders (1991a) demonstrates that nonparametric tests can be used to test hypotheses about M
如果 g 足夠大(可能在 20 左右,儘管所需的大小取決於互對偶的真實數量),那麼可以通過首先將觀察到的 M 和假設的 M 之間的差除以標準差(M 方差的平方根)來檢驗關於 M 的假設,然後假設這個標準化統計量具有近似正態分佈。這種方法的早期應用可以在Maucorps(1949)對35名法國軍官的精英群體的友誼,工作偏好和讚美的研究中找到。Snijders(1991a)最近的研究表明,非參數檢驗可用於檢驗關於M的假設

Holland and Leinhardt (1972, 1979) (as reviewed by Davis 1979) analyzed data from many sociometric studies. Their sociometric data bank (see Davis 1970; Leinhardt 1972; and Davis and Leinhardt 1972) contains almost 800 sociomatrices from several hundred sociometric studies. A variety of analyses of these dala have verified the presence of several important structural properties, slIch as balance, clustering, ranked clusters, and transitivity
Holland 和 Leinhardt (1972, 1979) (Davis 1979) 分析了許多社會測量學研究的數據。他們的社會計量資料庫(見Davis 1970;萊因哈特 1972;Davis and Leinhardt 1972)包含來自數百項社會計量學研究的近800個社會矩陣。對這些 dala 的各種分析已經驗證了幾個重要結構特性的存在,即 slIch 作為平衡、聚類、排序簇和傳遞性

As an example, we take a set of six actors. Specifically, we will look at the six children that we have used as a hypothetical example throughout the book. The six children are indexed by i = 1,2, ... ,6, and we measure a new relation: a directional dichotomous relation recording friendship at the beginning of the third grade, one full year after the beginning of the study
舉個例子,我們以一組六個演員為例。具體來說,我們將看看我們在整本書中用作假設例子的六個孩子。這六個孩子被 i = 1,2, ...,6 索引,我們測量了一種新的關係:一種定向二分關係,記錄了三年級開始時的友誼,即研究開始整整一年後

Specifically, we will look at the six children that we have used as a hypothetical example throughout the book. The six children are indexed by i = 1,2, ... ,6, and we measure a new relation: a directional dichotomous relation recording friendship at the beginning of the third grade, one full year after the beginning of the study. We have an arc from node i to node j in our directed graph representing this friendship relation if child i reports that child j is a m friend at the beginning of third grade
具體來說,我們將看看我們在整本書中用作假設例子的六個孩子。這六個孩子被 i = 1,2, ...,6 索引,我們測量了一種新的關係:一種定向二分關係,記錄了三年級開始時的友誼,即研究開始整整一年後。在我們的有向圖中,我們有一個從節點 i 到節點 j 的弧線,表示這種友誼關係,如果孩子 i 在三年級開始時報告孩子 j 是 m 朋友

The entire sociomatrix is not needed here, just the triad census. Using our simple example of six children, whose triad census was given earlier in this chapter, we note that the outdegrees are 3, 2, 3, 1,0, 1, and the indegrees are 1, 3,2, 1, 0, 3. These two sets of numbers are identical; thus, the variances are S;ut = sl, = 1.222, calculated directly from this set of six numbers
這裡不需要整個社會矩陣,只需要三合會人口普查。以我們六個孩子的簡單例子為例,他們的三元組人口普查在本章前面給出,我們注意到出度是 3、2、3、1、0、1,而內度是 1、3、2、1、0、3。這兩組數位是相同的;因此,方差為 S;ut = sl, = 1.222,直接從這組六個數字計算得出

Let us turn to Krackhardt's high-tech managers, and the friendship relation. The triad census for this relation, measured on the twenty-one managers, is. T/riends = (376,366,143,34,114,35,101,39, 23,0,20,25, 16,9,23, 6)'
讓我們轉向克拉克哈特的高科技經理,以及友誼關係。這種關係的三合會普查,以21名經理為衡量標準。T/riends = (376,366,143,34,114,35,101,39, 23,0,20,25, 16,9,23, 6)'

There are eight more predictive configurations, for p'airs of actors who are just "friends" rather than close friends. These eight fall into four pairs, and have the same reading rule as those for close friends; that is, they all involve exactly the same ties: ij, ji, ik,jk. Their types (the second rows of the configuration matrices - the predicted values for the ties) are: 1011 and 0111 (which are equivalent); 1000 and 0100 (which are equivalent); 1010 and 0101 (which are equivalent); and 1001 and 0110 (which are equivalent)
還有八種預測配置,適用於只是“朋友”而不是親密朋友的演員。這八對分為四對,與密友的閱讀規則相同;也就是說,它們都涉及完全相同的紐帶:IJ、JI、IK、JK。它們的類型(配置矩陣的第二行 - 領帶的預測值)為:1011 和 0111(等效);1000 和 0100(等效);1010 和 0101(等效);以及 1001 和 0110(等效)

There are two configurations relevant to the theory of transitivity. Both involve just three ordered pairs: ij, jk, and ik. The first configuration, which we will label the intransitive configuration, is ij jk ik). (1 1 0 '
有兩種與傳遞性理論相關的配置。兩者都只涉及三個有序對:ij、jk 和 ik。第一種配置,我們將它標記為不傳遞配置,是ij jk ik)。(1 1 0 '

Y1S00 = YlSOl = YISll = 0. We can build the Y that corresponds to the network describing friendship choices among these six children at the beginning of a school year. We first present these data as a sociomatrix in Table 15.1
Y1S00 = YlSOl = YISll = 0.我們可以構建與描述這六個孩子在學年開始時的友誼選擇的網路相對應的 Y。我們首先在表 15.1 中以社會矩陣的形式呈現這些數據

To illustrate, we fit the model to the fabricated network of second-grade children and study its parameters. The parameter estimates resulting from fitting model (15.2) to the y-array based on the friendship choices among the 6 children are presented in Table 15.4. Note that these parameters are on a logarithmic scale
為了說明這一點,我們將模型擬合到二年級兒童的虛構網路中,並研究其參數。表 15.4 給出了根據 6 個孩子之間的友誼選擇將模型 (15.2) 擬合到 y 陣組得出的參數估計值。請注意,這些參數採用對數刻度

In some applications, we might be interested in studying the patterns of dyadic interactions within and between subsets of persons who share similar characteristics. For example, we might be interested in understanding how a classroom of thirty children interacts. We would create Y based on a relation among the thirty actors
在某些應用中,我們可能有興趣研究具有相似特徵的人子集內部和之間的二元相互作用模式。例如,我們可能有興趣瞭解一個由三十個孩子組成的教室是如何互動的。我們將根據 30 個參與者之間的關係創建 Y

For example, we might at least suspect that in a classroom of kindergarteners, children would be most likely to nominate as friends children of their same gender. We might be less interested in modeling individual differences in the interactions of thirty children than in understanding how gender affects the childrens' interactions. Thus, we might be led by theoretical concerns to model subset differences - the interactions of these thirty children in conjunction with the attribute of gender
例如,我們至少可以懷疑,在幼稚園兒童的教室里,孩子們最有可能提名同性別的孩子作為朋友。我們可能對三十個孩子互動中的個體差異建模不那麼感興趣,而是對理解性別如何影響兒童的互動感興趣。因此,我們可能會受到理論關注的引導,對子集差異進行建模——這三十個孩子與性別屬性的相互作用

We might be less interested in modeling individual differences in the interactions of thirty children than in understanding how gender affects the childrens' interactions. Thus, we might be led by theoretical concerns to model subset differences - the interactions of these thirty children in conjunction with the attribute of gender. We would form two subsets, boys and girls, and study the between- and within-subset interactions
我們可能對三十個孩子互動中的個體差異建模不那麼感興趣,而是對理解性別如何影響兒童的互動感興趣。因此,我們可能會受到理論關注的引導,對子集差異進行建模——這三十個孩子與性別屬性的相互作用。我們將形成兩個子集,男孩和女孩,並研究子集之間和子集內的相互作用

The entries in this table do not depend on actors i and j, or on subsets s(i) and s(j). Instead, the g(g -1) = 30 ordered pairs of actors (each of the fifteen dyads is viewed from both perspectives) are classified only according to the strengths of the relational variable between the actors. The elements in this small array are the counts from the dyad census: there are 9 (18/2) null dyads, 2 (4/2) mutual dyads, and the off-diagonal entry (4) gives the number of asymmetric dyads
此表中的條目不依賴於參與者 i 和 j,也不依賴於子集 s(i) 和 s(j)。取而代之的是,g(g -1) = 30 對有序的參與者(從兩個角度查看 15 個二元組中的每一個)僅根據參與者之間關係變數的強度進行分類。這個小陣列中的元素是來自二元普查的計數:有 9 (18/2) 個零二元組,2 (4/2) 個互對偶,非對角線條目 (4) 給出了不對稱二元組的數量

Frequently, the functions arise from actor attribute variables, as we have demonstrated in Chapter 15. For example, the six second-grade children have been categorized into B = 2 positions based on their age, and stochastic blockmodels fit to these positions were discussed in the previous chapter. For other examples from the literature, Wasserman and Iacobucci (1986) analyzed the frequency of toy-offerings among a set of ninety children who were partitioned into positions based on their gender, and Galaskiewicz, Wasserman, Rauschenbach, Bielefeld, and Mullaney (1985) studied patterns of corporate board interlocking by partitioning firms into positions based on attributes of the firms such as size, number of employees, and information on the chief executive officers (such as club memberships)
通常,函數來自參與者屬性變數,正如我們在第 15 章中演示的那樣。例如,六個二年級的孩子根據他們的年齡被歸類為 B = 2 個位置,並且在上一章中討論了適合這些位置的隨機塊模型。對於文獻中的其他例子,Wasserman和Iacobucci(1986)分析了一組90名兒童的玩具供應頻率,這些兒童根據性別被劃分為職位,Galaskiewicz,Wasserman,Rauschenbach,Bielefeld和Mullaney(1985)研究了公司董事會的連鎖模式,即根據公司規模等屬性將公司劃分為職位。 員工人數和首席執行官資訊(例如俱樂部會員資格)

For example, the six second-grade children have been categorized into B = 2 positions based on their age, and stochastic blockmodels fit to these positions were discussed in the previous chapter. For other examples from the literature, Wasserman and Iacobucci (1986) analyzed the frequency of toy-offerings among a set of ninety children who were partitioned into positions based on their gender, and Galaskiewicz, Wasserman, Rauschenbach, Bielefeld, and Mullaney (1985) studied patterns of corporate board interlocking by partitioning firms into positions based on attributes of the firms such as size, number of employees, and information on the chief executive officers (such as club memberships). We note that sometimes these functions can be found directly from the relational data
例如,六個二年級的孩子根據他們的年齡被歸類為 B = 2 個位置,並且在上一章中討論了適合這些位置的隨機塊模型。對於文獻中的其他例子,Wasserman和Iacobucci(1986)分析了一組90名兒童的玩具供應頻率,這些兒童根據性別被劃分為職位,Galaskiewicz,Wasserman,Rauschenbach,Bielefeld和Mullaney(1985)研究了公司董事會的連鎖模式,即根據公司規模等屬性將公司劃分為職位。 員工人數,以及首席執行官的資訊(例如俱樂部會員資格)。我們注意到,有時這些函數可以直接從關係數據中找到

Hunter and Shotland 1974; Lundberg 1975; and especially Milgram 1967, and Travers and Milgram 1969). Doreian (1979a) examines the Davis, Gardner, and Gardner (1941) data set, which gives the social events attended by g= 18 women in the Southern United States. The 14 events are arranged as rows of an actors x events attendance matrix (see Breiger 1974) chronologically, so that one could analyze this matrix using first the first column, then the first two, then the first three columns, and so forth, in order to give these data a longitudinal perspective
Hunter 和 Shotland 1974 年;倫德伯格 1975;尤其是Milgram 1967和 Travers 和Milgram 1969)。Doreian (1979a) 研究了 Davis、Gardner 和 Gardner (1941) 數據集,該數據集給出了美國南部 g= 18 名女性參加的社交活動。這14個事件按時間順序排列為參與者 x 事件出席矩陣(參見 Breiger 1974)的行,因此可以首先使用第一列,然後是前兩列,然後是前三列,依此類推來分析該矩陣,以便為這些數據提供縱向視角

Krackhardt's High-tech Managers The three relations measured for Krackhardt's high-tech managers are advice (Table B.l), friendship (Table B.2), and reports to (Table B.3). Table B.4 lists four actor attribute variables for the 21 high-tech managers. The attributes are age (in years), tenure (length of time employed by the company, in years), level in the corporate hierarchy (coded 1,2,3), and department of the company (coded 1,2,3,4)
克拉克哈特的高科技經理人 克拉克哈特的高科技經理人所衡量的三種關係是建議(表B.l)、友誼(表B.2)和下屬(表B.3)。表B.4列出了21名高科技管理人員的4個行為者屬性變數。這些屬性包括年齡(以年為單位)、任期(公司雇用的時間長度,以年為單位)、公司層次結構中的級別(編碼為 1,2,3)和公司部門(編碼為 1,2,3,4)

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

For the Advice relation, we calculate. P = 0.452, and a 95 percent confidence interval (0.405,0.500), which just barely contains P = 1/2. 13.6 ®Conditional Uniform Distributions
對於建議關係,我們進行計算。P = 0.452,95% 置信區間 (0.405,0.500),僅勉強包含 P = 1/2。13.6 ® 條件均勻分佈

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

Ho : (etp)kl = 0 for all k and I. 1 p < 0.001 1 p < 0.001. 1 p = 0.101
Ho : (etp)kl = 0 對於所有 k 和 I. 1 p < 0.001 1 p < 0.001。1 p = 0.101

1 p < 0.001 1 p < 0.001. 1 p = 0.101. Krackhardt's high-tech managers, the advice relation and age
1 p < 0.001 1 p < 0.001。1 p = 0.101。克拉克哈特的高科技經理人,建議關係和年齡

Ho : et[,(i)) = 0 for all i and k Ho : p:(j)) = 0 for all j and k Ho : (ap)kl = 0 for all k and I. 1 p < 0.001. 1 p = 0.141
Ho : et[,(i)) = 0 對於所有 i 和 k Ho : p:(j)) = 0 對於所有 j 和 k Ho : (ap)kl = 0 對於所有 k 和 I. 1 p < 0.001.1 p = 0.141

1 p < 0.001. 1 p = 0.141. 1 Not small
1 p < 0.001。1 p = 0.141。1 不小

Ho : (rxP)kl = 0 for all k and I. 3 p < 0.001 3 p < 0.001. 1 p = 0.0214 can see that regardless of the attribute variable(s) used to classify the actors, the receipt of friendship ties is constant from subset to subset
Ho : (rxP)kl = 0 對於所有 k 和 I. 3 p < 0.001 3 p < 0.001.1 p = 0.0214 可以看出,無論用於對參與者進行分類的屬性變數如何,友誼關係的接收在子集之間都是恆定的

3 p < 0.001 3 p < 0.001. 1 p = 0.0214 can see that regardless of the attribute variable(s) used to classify the actors, the receipt of friendship ties is constant from subset to subset. But there is a difference in friendship nominations between the age groups
3 頁< 0.001 3 頁< 0.001。1 p = 0.0214 可以看出,無論用於對參與者進行分類的屬性變數如何,友誼關係的接收在子集之間都是恆定的。但是不同年齡組之間的友誼提名是有區別的

1 Not small. Not small p < 0.001. Krackhardt's high-tech managers, the friendship relation and age
1 不小。不小的 p < 0.001。克拉克哈特的高科技經理人,友誼關係和年齡

Ho : (rx/Jkl = 0 for all k and I. 1 p =0.0486. 1 Not small 1 p < 0.001
Ho : (rx/Jkl = 0 對於所有 k 和 I. 1 p =0.0486. 1 不小 1 p < 0.001

1 p =0.0486. 1 Not small 1 p < 0.001. Krackhardt's high-tech managers, the friendship relation, and age and tenure
1 p =0.0486。1 不小 1 p < 0.001。克拉克哈特的高科技經理、友誼關係、年齡和任期

Ho : rxls(J)} = 0 for all i and k 449.738 11.348 3 Ho : fJrU)1 = 0 for all j and k 438.768 0.378 3. Ho : (rx/J)kl = 0 for all k and I 451.885 13.495 1 p = 0.010. parameters
Ho : rxls(J)} = 0 對於所有 i 和 k 449.738 11.348 3 Ho : fJrU)1 = 0 對於所有 j 和 k 438.768 0.378 3.Ho : (rx/J)kl = 0 對於所有 k 和 I 451.885 13.495 1 p = 0.010。參數

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

[object Object]
[object 物件]

References
引用

Abell, P. (1970). The structural balance of the kinship system of some primitive peoples. In Lane, M. (ed.), Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
阿貝爾,P.(1970 年)。一些原始民族親屬制度的結構平衡。在 Lane, M. (ed.) 中,結構主義。紐約:基本書籍。

Abelson, RP., Aronson, E., McGuire, W.J., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J., and Tannenbaum, O.H. (eds.) (1968). Theories of Cognitive Consistency. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Abelson, RP., Aronson, E., McGuire, W.J., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J., and Tannenbaum, OH (eds.) (1968).認知一致性理論。芝加哥:蘭德·麥克納利。

Abelson, RP., and Rosenberg, M.1. (1958). Symbolic pseudo-logic: A model of attitudinaI cognition. Behavioral Science. 3, 1-13.
RP 的 Abelson 和 M.1 的 Rosenberg。(1958). 符號偽邏輯:一種態度認知模型.行為科學。3, 1-13.

Achuthan, S.B., Rao, S.B., and Rao, AR. (1982). The number of symmetric edges in a digraph with prescribed out-degrees. In Vijayan, K.S., and Singhi, N.M., eds., Proceedings of the Seminar on Combinatorics and Applications in honour of Professor S.S. Shrikhande on his 65th Birthday, pages 8-20. Calcutta: Indian Statistical Institute.
Achuthan,SB,Rao,SB和Rao,AR.(1982)。具有規定出度的二合圖中對稱邊的數量。在Vijayan, K.S.和Singhi, N.M.編輯的《組合學和應用研討會論文集》中,以紀念S.S. Shrikhande教授的65歲生日,第8-20頁。加爾各答:印度統計研究所。

Agresti, A (1984). Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Agresti,A(1984 年)。序數分類數據分析。紐約:約翰·威利父子。

Agresti, A (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Aitken, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B., and Hinde, J. (1989). Statistical Modelling in GLIM. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Agresti,A(1990 年)。分類數據分析。紐約:約翰·威利父子。艾特肯,M.,安德森,D.,弗朗西斯,B.和欣德,J.(1989)。GLIM中的統計建模。牛津:克拉倫登出版社。

Aitken, R.H. (1972). From cohomology in physics to q-connectivity in social science. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 4, 139-167.
艾特肯,RH(1972 年)。從物理學中的同調性到社會科學中的q連通性。國際人機研究雜誌。4, 139-167.

Alba, R.D. (1973). A graph-theoretic definition of a sociometric clique. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 3, 113-126.
阿爾巴,RD(1973 年)。社會計量集團的圖論定義。數學社會學雜誌。3, 113-126.

Alba, RD. (1981). Taking stock of network analysis: A decade's result. In
阿爾巴,RD.(1981 年)。盤點網路分析:十年的成果。在

Alba, R.D., and Kadushin, C. (1976). The intersection of social circles: A new measure of social proximity in networks. Sociological Methods and Research. 5, 77-102.
Alba,RD和Kadushin,C.(1976)。社交圈的交集:網路中社會接近度的新度量。社會學方法與研究。5, 77-102.

Alba, R.D., and Moore, G. (1978). Elite social circles. Sociological Methods and Research. 7, 167-188.
Alba,RD和Moore,G.(1978)。精英社交圈。社會學方法與研究。7, 167-188.

Aldenderfer, M.S., and Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Alexander, C.N. (1963). A method for processing sociometric data. Sociometry. 26, 268-269.
Aldenderfer,M.S.和Blashfield,R.K.(1984)。聚類分析。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。亞歷山大,CN(1963 年)。一種處理社會計量數據的方法。社會測量學。26, 268-269.

AlIen, M.P. (1982). The identification of interlock groups in large corporate networks: Convergent validation using divergent techniques. Social Networks. 4, 349--366.
AlIen,MP(1982 年)。大型企業網路中聯鎖組的識別:使用發散技術進行收斂驗證。社交網路。4, 349--366.

Allison, P.D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review. 43, 865-880.
艾莉森,PD(1978 年)。不平等的衡量標準。美國社會學評論。43, 865-880.

Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1992). Building stochastic blockmodels. Social Networks. 14, 137-16l.
安德森,CJ,Wasserman,S.和Faust,K.(1992)。構建隨機塊模型。社交網路。14,137-16L。

Anderson, J.G., and Jay, S.J. (1985). The diffusion of medical technology: Social network analysis and policy research. The Sociological Quarterly. 26, 49-64.
安德森,JG和傑伊,SJ(1985)。醫療技術的傳播:社會網路分析與政策研究。社會學季刊。26, 49-64.

Anderson, N.H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review. 78, 171-206.
新罕布什爾州安德森(1971 年)。整合理論和態度轉變。心理評論。78, 171-206.

Anderson, N.H. (1977). Some problems in using analysis of variance in balance theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35, 140-158.
新罕布什爾州安德森(1977 年)。在平衡理論中使用方差分析的一些問題。人格與社會心理學雜誌。35, 140-158.

Andrews, D.F., and Herzberg, A.M. (1985). Data: A Collection of Problems from Many Fields for the Student and Research Worker. New York: Springer-Verlag.
安德魯斯,DF和赫茨伯格,AM(1985)。數據:來自學生和研究工作者的許多領域的問題的集合。紐約:Springer-Verlag。

Anthonisse, 1.M. (1971). The Rush in a Graph. Amsterdam: Mathematische Centrum.
安東尼斯,1.M.(1971 年)。圖表中的匆忙。阿姆斯特丹:數學中心。

Arabie, P. (1977). Clustering representations of group overlap. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 5, 113-128.
阿拉比,P.(1977 年)。組重疊的聚類表示。數學社會學雜誌。5, 113-128.

Arabie, P. (1984). Validation of sociometric structure by data on individuals' attributes. Social Networks. 6, 373-403.
阿拉比,P.(1984 年)。通過個人屬性數據驗證社會計量結構。社交網路。6, 373-403.

Arabie, P., and Boorman, S.A. (1979). Algebraic approaches to the comparison of concrete social structures represented as networks: Reply to Bonacich. American Journal of Sociology. 86, 166-174.
Arabie,P.和Boorman,SA(1979)。比較以網路表示的具體社會結構的代數方法:回復 Bonacich。美國社會學雜誌。86, 166-174.

Arabie, P., and Boorman, S.A. (1982). Blockmodels: Developments and prospects. In Hudson, H.C. (ed.), Classifying Social Data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Arabie,P.和Boorman,SA(1982)。Blockmodels:發展和前景。在Hudson, H.C.(編輯)中,對社會數據進行分類。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Arabie, P., Boorman, S.A., and Levitt, P.R. (1978). Constructing blockmodels: How and why. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 17, 21-63.
Arabie,P.,Boorman,SA和Levitt,PR(1978)。構建塊模型:如何以及為什麼。數學心理學雜誌。17, 21-63.

Arabie, P., and Carroil, 1. D. (1989). Conceptions of overlap in social structure. In Freeman, L.c., White, D.R., and Romney, A.K. (eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, pages 367-392.
Arabie, P. 和 Carroil, 1.D.(1989年)。社會結構重疊的概念。在Freeman, L.c., White, D.R., and Romney, A.K.(編輯)中,《社交網路分析研究方法》,第367-392頁。

Arabie, P., Carroll, J.D., and DeSarbo, W.S. (1987). Three-way Scaling and Clustering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Arabie,P.,Carroll,JD和DeSarbo,WS(1987)。三向擴展和聚類。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Arabie, P., and Hubert, L.J. (1992). Combinatorial data analysis. Annual Review of Psychology. 43, 169-203.
Arabie,P.和Hubert,LJ(1992)。組合數據分析。心理學年度評論。43, 169-203.

Arabie, P., Hubert, L.J., and Schleutermann, S. (1990). Blockmodels from the bond energy approach. Social Networks. 12,99-126.
Arabie,P.,Hubert,LJ和Schleutermann,S.(1990)。鍵能方法的塊模型。社交網路。12,99-126.

Arney, W.R. (1973). A refined status index for sociometric data. Sociological Methods and Research. 1,329-346.
Arney,WR(1973 年)。社會計量數據的精細狀態索引。社會學方法與研究。1,329-346.

Atkin, R.H. (1974). An algebra for patterns on a complex, 1. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 6,285-307.
阿特金,RH(1974 年)。複數 1 上模式的代數。國際人機研究雜誌。6,285-307.

Atkin, R.H. (1976). An algebra for patterns on a complex, 11. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 8, 483-488.
阿特金,RH(1976 年)。複數上模式的代數,11。國際人機研究雜誌。8, 483-488.

Atkin, R.H. (1977). Combinatorial Connectivities in Social Systems. Basel: Birkhauser.
阿特金,RH(1977 年)。社會系統中的組合連接性。巴塞爾:Birkhauser。

Auerbach, D.M., Darrow, W.W., Jaft'e, H.W., and Curtan, J.w. (1984). Cluster of cases of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. The American Journal of Medicine. 76, 487-492.
Auerbach,DM,Darrow,WW,Jaft'e,HW和Curtan,JW(1984)。獲得性免疫缺陷綜合症的病例群。美國醫學雜誌。76, 487-492.

Baker, F.B., and Hubert, L.J. (1981). The analysis of social interaction data. Sociological Methods & Research. 9, 339-361.
貝克,FB和休伯特,LJ(1981)。社會互動數據的分析。社會學方法與研究。9, 339-361.

Baker, RJ., and Nelder, J.A. (1978). The GLIM System, Release 3, Generalized
Baker,RJ.和Nelder,JA(1978)。GLIM 系統,第 3 版,廣義

Baker, w.E. (1986). Three-dimensional blockmodels. Journal of Mathematical
貝克,w.E.(1986 年)。三維塊模型。數學學報

Barnes, lA (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human
巴恩斯,洛杉磯(1954 年)。挪威島嶼教區的班級和委員會。人

Barnes, lA (1969a). Networks and political processes. In Mitchell, J.C. (ed.), Social Networks in Urban Situations, pages 51-76.
巴恩斯,lA(1969a)。網路和政治進程。在Mitchell,J.C.(編輯),城市環境中的社交網路,第51-76頁。

Barnes, J.A (1969b). Graph theory and social networks: A technical comment on connectedness and connectivity. Sociology. 3, 215-232.
巴恩斯,J.A(1969b)。圖論與社交網路:關於連通性和連通性的技術評論。社會學。3, 215-232.

Barnes, J.A. (1972). Social Networks. Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology.
巴恩斯,JA(1972 年)。社交網路。人類學中的艾迪生-衛斯理模組。

Barnes, J.A., and Harary, F. (1983). Graph theory in network analysis. Social
巴恩斯,JA和哈拉裡,F.(1983)。網路分析中的圖論。社會的

Barnett, G. (1990). Correspondence analysis: A method for the description of communication networks. Unpublished manuscript.
巴內特,G.(1990 年)。對應分析:一種描述通信網路的方法。未發表的手稿。

Barrera, M., Sandler, I.N., and Ramsay, T.B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of
巴雷拉,M.,桑德勒,I.N.和拉姆齊,TB(1981)。社會支援量表的初步發展:對大學生的研究。美國雜誌

Bartholomew, DJ. (1967). Stochastic Models for Social Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
巴塞洛繆,DJ。(1967). 社會過程的隨機模型.紐約:約翰·威利父子。

Batagelj, v., Doreian, P., and Ferligoj, A (1992). An optimizational approach to regular equivalence. Social Networks. 14, 121-135.
Batagelj,V.,Doreian,P.和Ferligoj,A(1992)。正則等價的優化方法。社交網路。14, 121-135.

Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A, and Doreian, P. (1992). Direct and indirect methods for structural equivalence. Social Networks. 14, 63-90.
Batagelj,V.,Ferligoj,A和Doreian,P.(1992)。結構等價的直接和間接方法。社交網路。14, 63-90.

Bavelas, A (1948). A mathematical model for group structure. Human
巴維拉斯,A(1948 年)。群結構的數學模型。人

Bavelas, A (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 22,271-282.
巴維拉斯,A(1950 年)。面向任務的小組中的溝通模式。美國聲學學會雜誌。22,271-282.

Baveias, A, and Barrett, D. (1951). An experimental approach to organizational communication. Personnel. 27, 366--371.
Baveias,A和Barrett,D.(1951)。一種組織溝通的實驗方法。人員。27, 366--371.

Bearden, J., and Mintz, B. (1987). The structure of class cohesion: The corporate network and its dual. In Mizruchi, M.S., and Schwartz, M. (eds.), Intercorporate Relations: The Structural AnalysiS of Business, pages
Bearden,J.和Mintz,B.(1987)。階級凝聚力的結構:企業網路及其雙重性。在 Mizruchi, M.S. 和 Schwartz, M. (eds.) 中, 公司間關係:商業的結構分析, 頁

Beauchamp, M.A. (1965). An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science.
Beauchamp,馬薩諸塞州(1965 年)。改進的中心性指數。行為科學。

Bekessy, A, Bekessy, P., and Komlos, J. (1972). Asymptotic enumeration of regular matrices. Studia Scientiarum Matematicarum Hungarica. 7, 343.
Bekessy,A,Bekessy,P.和Komlos,J.(1972)。正則矩陣的漸近枚舉。Studia Scientiarum Matematicarum Hungarica.7, 343.

Bellmore, M., and Nemhauser, G.L. (1968). The traveling salesman problem: A
Bellmore,M.和Nemhauser,GL(1968)。旅行推銷員問題:A

Berelson, B.R., Lazarsfeld, P.F., and McPhee, W.N. (1954). Voting: A Study of
Berelson,BR,Lazarsfeld,PF和McPhee,WN(1954)。投票:一項研究

Berge, C. (1973). Graphs and Hypergraphs. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Berge,C.(1973 年)。圖形和超圖形。阿姆斯特丹:北荷蘭。

Berge, C. (1989). Hypergraphs: Combinatorics of Finite Sets. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Berge,C.(1989 年)。超圖:有限集的組合學。阿姆斯特丹:北荷蘭。

Berkowitz, S.D. (1982). An Introduction to Structural Analysis: The Network
Berkowitz,S.D.(1982 年)。結構分析簡介:網路

Berkowitz, S.D. (1988). Markets and market-areas: Some preliminary formulations. In Wellman, B. and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 261-303.
Berkowitz,S.D.(1988 年)。市場和市場領域:一些初步的表述。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.D.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第261-303頁。

Bernard, H.R., Johnsen, E.e., Killworth, P.D., McCarty, C., Shelley, G.A., and Robinson, S. (1990). Comparing four different methods for measuring personal social networks. Social Networks. 12, 179-216.
伯納德,HR,約翰森,EE,基爾沃思,PD,麥卡蒂,C.,雪萊,GA和羅賓遜,S.(1990)。比較四種不同的測量個人社交網路的方法。社交網路。12, 179-216.

Bernard, H.R., Johnsen, E.C., Killworth, P.D., and Robinson, S. (1989). Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation. In Kochen, M. (ed.), The Small World, pages 159-175.
伯納德,HR,約翰森,EC,基爾沃思,PD和羅賓遜,S.(1989)。估計平均個人網路和事件子群體的大小。在Kochen,M.(編輯),《小世界》,第159-175頁。

Bernard, H.R., and Killworth, P.D. (1977). Informant accuracy in social network data n. Human Communications Research. 4, 3-18.
伯納德,HR和基爾沃思,PD(1977)。社交網路數據中的線人準確性 n. 人類傳播研究。4, 3-18.

Bernard, H.R., and Killworth, PD. (1979). Deterministic models of social networks. In Holland, P.W., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 165-186. New York: Academic Press.
伯納德,HR和基爾沃思,PD.(1979)。社交網路的確定性模型。在Holland,P.W.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),《社交網路研究的觀點》,第165-186頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, PD., Kronenfeld, D., and Sailer, L. (1985). On the validity of retrospective data: The problem of informant accuracy. Annual Review of Anthropology. 13, pages 495-517. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Bernard,HR,Killworth,PD.,Kronenfeld,D.和Sailer,L.(1985)。關於回顧性數據的有效性:資訊提供者的準確性問題。人類學年度評論。13,第495-517頁。帕洛阿爾托:斯坦福大學出版社。

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., and Sailer, L. (1980). Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Social Networks. 2, 191-218.
Bernard,HR,Killworth,PD和Sailer,L.(1980)。社交網路數據中的線人準確性IV:行為和認知網路數據中集團級結構的比較。社交網路。2, 191-218.

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., and Sailer, L. (1982). Informant accuracy in social network data V: An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Science Research. 11,30-66.
伯納德,HR,基爾沃思,PD和塞勒,L.(1982)。社交網路數據中的線人準確性 V:從召回數據中預測實際通信的實驗嘗試。社會科學研究。11,30-66.

Beum, e.O., and Brundage, E.G. (1950). A method for analyzing the sociomatrix. Sociometry. 13, 141-145.
Beum, e.O. 和 Brundage, E.G. (1950)。一種分析社會矩陣的方法。社會測量學。13, 141-145.

Beum, e.O., and Criswell, J.H. (1947). Application of machine tabulation methods to sociometric data. Sociometry. 10, 227-232.
Beum,e.O.和Criswell,J.H.(1947)。機器製表方法在社會計量數據中的應用。社會測量學。10, 227-232.

Beyer, W.U. (1968). CRC Handbook of Tables for Probability and Statistics, Second Edition. Boca Raton, FL: The CRC Press.
拜爾,WU(1968 年)。CRC概率與統計表手錶手錶手冊,第二版。佛羅里達州博卡拉頓:CRC出版社。

Biggs, N.L., L1oyd, E.K., and Wilson, R.T. (1976). Graph Theory 1736-1936.
Biggs,N.L.,L1oyd,EK和Wilson,RT(1976)。圖論 1736-1936。

Birkhoff, G. (1940). Lattice Theory. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Birkhoff,G.(1940 年)。晶格理論。羅得島州普羅維登斯:美國數學學會。

Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., and Holland, P.W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bishop,Y.M.M.,Fienberg,SE和Holland,PW(1975)。離散多元分析:理論與實踐。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:麻省理工學院出版社。

Blau, P.M. (1977). Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
布勞,PM(1977 年)。不平等和異質性。紐約:自由新聞。

Bloemena, A.R. (1964). Sampling from a Graph. Amsterdam: Mathematische
布洛梅納,A.R.(1964 年)。從圖形中採樣。阿姆斯特丹:數學

Blumen, I., Kogan, M., and McCarthy, PJ. (1955). The Industrial Mobility of
Blumen, I.、Kogan, M. 和 McCarthy, PJ。(1955). 工業流動性

Bock, R.D., and Husain, S.Z. (1950). An adaptation of Holzinger's B-coefficients for the analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry. 13, 146-153.
博克,RD和海珊,SZ(1950)。Holzinger 的 B 係數用於分析社會計量數據的改編。社會測量學。13, 146-153.

Bock, R.D., and Husain, S.Z. (1952). Factors of the tele: A preliminary report.
博克,RD和海珊,SZ(1952)。電視因素:初步報告。

Boissevain, 1. (1968). The place of non-groups in the social sciences. Man. 3, 542-556.
Boissevain,1。(1968). 非群體在社會科學中的地位.人 3, 542-556.

Boissevain, 1. (1973). An exploration of two first-order zones. In Boissevain, J., and Mitchell, J.C. (eds.), Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague: Mouton.
Boissevain,1。(1973). 對兩個一級區域的探索.在 Boissevain, J. 和 Mitchell, J.C. (eds.) 中,網路分析:人類交互研究。海牙:木桐。

Boissevain, J., and Mitchell, J.C. (eds.) (1973). Network Analysis Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague: Mouton.
Boissevain,J.和Mitchell,J.C.(編輯)(1973)。人機交互中的網路分析研究。海牙:木桐。

Bolland, I.M. (1985). Perceived leadership stability and the structure of urban agenda-setting networks. Social Networks. 7, 153-172.
博蘭德,IM(1985 年)。感知到的領導層穩定性和城市議程設置網路的結構。社交網路。7, 153-172.

Bolland, J.M. (1988). Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks. Social Networks. 10, 233-253.
Bolland,JM(1988 年)。整理中心性:分析四種中心性模型在真實和模擬網路中的性能。社交網路。10, 233-253.

Bollobas, B. (1985). Random Graphs. London: Academic Press.
Bollobas,B.(1985 年)。隨機圖。倫敦:學術出版社。

Bonacich, P. (1972a). Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. In
Bonacich,P.(1972a)。用於分析重疊成員資格的技術。在

Costner, a (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1972, pages 176-185. San
科斯特納,(編輯),社會學方法論,1972年,第176-185頁。三

Francisco: 1ossey-Bass. Bonacich, P. (1972b). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique indentification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 2, 113-120.
弗朗西斯科:1ossey-Bass。Bonacich,P.(1972b)。地位評分和集團識別的分解和加權方法。數學社會學雜誌。2, 113-120.

Bonacich, P. (1978). Using Boolean algebra to analyze overlapping memberships. In Schuessler, K.F. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1978. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bonacich, P. (1979). The 'common structure semigroup,' a replacement for the Boorman and White 'joint reduction.' American Journal of Sociology. 86, 159-166.
Bonacich,P.(1978 年)。使用布爾代數分析重疊隸屬關係。在Schuessler,K.F.(編輯),社會學方法論,1978年。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Bonacich,P.(1979 年)。“共同結構半群”,是布爾曼和懷特“聯合還原”的替代品。美國社會學雜誌。86, 159-166.

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology. 92, 1170-1182.
Bonacich,P.(1987 年)。權力和中心性:一系列措施。美國社會學雜誌。92, 1170-1182.

Bonacich, P. (1989). What is a homomorphism? In Freeman, L.e., White, D.R., and Romney, AK. (OOs.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
Bonacich,P.(1989 年)。什麼是同態?在弗裡曼,L.E.,懷特,D.R.和羅姆尼,AK。(OOs.),社會網路分析的研究方法。佛吉尼亞州費爾法克斯:喬治梅森大學出版社。

Bonacich, P., and McConaghy, M.J. (1979). The algebra of blockmodelling. In Schuessler, K.F. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1980, pages 489-532. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bondy, JA, and Murty, U.S.R. (1976). Graph Theory with Applications. New York: North-Holland.
Bonacich,P.和McConaghy,MJ(1979)。塊建模的代數。在Schuessler,K.F.(編輯),社會學方法論1980年,第489-532頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Bondy, JA和Murty, U.S.R. (1976)。圖論與應用。紐約:北荷蘭。

Boorrnan, S.A, and Levitt, P.R. (1983a). Big brother and blockmodelling. The New York Times, November 20, 1983, page F3. Boorrnan, SA, and Levitt, P.R. (1983b). Blockmodels and self-defense. The New York Times, November 27, 1983, page F3. Boorrnan, S.A., and Oliver, D.e. (1973). Metrics on spaces of finite trees. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 10,26-59.
Boorrnan, S.A. 和 Levitt, P.R. (1983a)。老大哥和塊建模。《紐約時報》,1983 年 11 月 20 日,第 F3 頁。Boorrnan, SA 和 Levitt, P.R. (1983b)。方塊模型和自衛。《紐約時報》,1983 年 11 月 27 日,第 F3 頁。Boorrnan, S.A. 和 Oliver, D.e. (1973)。有限樹空間的度量。數學心理學雜誌。10,26-59.

Boorrnan, S.A, and White, H.C. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks 11. Role structures. American Journal of Sociology. 81, 1384-1446.
Boorrnan, SA 和 White, HC (1976)。來自多重網路的社會結構 11.角色結構。美國社會學雜誌。81, 1384-1446.

Borgatti, S.P. (1988). A comment on Doreian's regular equivalence in symmetric structures. Social Networks. 10,265-271.
Borgatti, S.P.(1988年)。對 Doreian 在對稱結構中的正則等價性的評論。社交網路。10,265-271.

Borgatti, S.P. (1989). Regular Equivalence in Graphs, Hypergraphs, and Matrices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Borgatti, S.P.(1989年)。圖、超圖和矩陣中的正則等價。未發表的博士論文,加州大學歐文分校。

Borgatti, S.p, Boyd, l.P. and Everett, M. (1989). Iterated roles: Mathematics and application. Social Networks. 11, 159-172.
Borgatti,SP,Boyd,LP和Everett,M.(1989)。反覆運算角色:數學和應用。社交網路。11, 159-172.

Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. (1989). The class of regular equivalences: Algebraic structure and computation. Social Networks. 11, 65-88.
Borgatti,SP和Everett,MG(1989)。正則等價類:代數結構和計算。社交網路。11, 65-88.

Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. (1992a). The notion of position in social network analysis. In Marsden, P. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1992. London: Basil Blackwell.
Borgatti, S.P. 和 Everett, MG (1992a)。社交網路分析中的位置概念。在Marsden,P.(編輯),社會學方法論,1992年。倫敦:巴茲爾·布萊克威爾。

Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. (1992b). Regular blockmodels of mulitway, multimode matrices. Social Networks. 14,91-120.
Borgatti, S.P. 和 Everett, MG (1992b)。多路、多模矩陣的常規塊模型。社交網路。14,91-120.

Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.O., and Freeman, L.C. (1991). UCINET. Version IV. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technology.
Borgatti, S.P. 和 Everett, M.O. 和 Freeman, L.C. (1991)。UCINET的。第四版。南卡羅來納州哥倫比亞:分析技術。

Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Shirey, P.R. (1990). LS sets, lambda sets, and other cohesive subsets. Social Networks. 12,337-358.
Borgatti,SP,Everett,MG和Shirey,PR(1990)。LS 集、lambda 集和其他內聚子集。社交網路。12,337-358.

Bott, E. (1957). Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock.
博特,E.(1957 年)。家庭和社交網路。倫敦:塔維斯托克。

Box, G.E.P., Hunter, w.G., and Hunter, J.S. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters.
Box,GEP,Hunter,WG和Hunter,JS(1978)。實驗者的統計數據。

New York: John Wiley and Sons. Boyd, J.P. (1969). The algebra of group kinship. Journal of Mathematical
紐約:約翰·威利父子。博伊德,JP(1969 年)。群體親屬關係的代數。數學學報

Boyd, lP. (1983). Structural similarity, semigroups and idempotents. Social
博伊德,lP。(1983). 結構相似性、半群和冪等.社會的

Boyd, J.P. (1990). Social Semigroups: A Unified Theory of Scaling and
博伊德,JP(1990 年)。社會半群:尺度和

Blockmodelling as Applied to Social Networks. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press. Boyd, lP., and Everett, M.G. (1988). Block structures of automorphism groups of social relations. Social Networks. 10, 137-155.
應用於社交網路的塊建模。佛吉尼亞州費爾法克斯:喬治梅森大學出版社。 博伊德,lP.和埃弗雷特,MG(1988)。社會關係的自同構組的塊結構。社交網路。10, 137-155.

Bradley, RA, and Terry, M.E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, 1. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika. 39, 324-345.
布蘭得利,RA和特裡,ME(1952)。不完整砌塊設計的等級分析,1.配對比較的方法。生物計量。39, 324-345.

Breedlove, W.L., and Nolan, P.D. (1988). International stratification and inequality, 1960-1980. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology. 25, 105-123.
Breedlove,WL和Nolan,PD(1988)。1960-1980年國際分層和不平等。國際當代社會學雜誌。25, 105-123.

Breiger, R.L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces. 53, 181-190.
Breiger,RL(1974 年)。個人和群體的二元性。社會力量。53, 181-190.

Breiger, R.L. (1976). Career attributes and network structure: A blockmodel study of a biomedical research specialty. American Sociological Review. 41, 117-135.
Breiger,RL(1976 年)。職業屬性和網路結構:生物醫學研究專業的塊模型研究。美國社會學評論。41, 117-135.

Breiger, R.L. (1979). Toward an operational theory of community elite structures. Quality and Quantity. 13, 21-57.
Breiger,RL(1979 年)。邁向社區精英結構的操作理論。質量和數量。13, 21-57.

Breiger, R.L. (1981a). Structures of economic interdependence among nations. In Blau, P.M., and Merton, R.K. (eds.), Continuities in Structural Inquiry, pages 353-380. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Breiger,R.L.(1981a)。國家間經濟相互依存的結構。在 Blau, P.M. 和 Merton, R.K. (eds.), Continuities in Structural Inquiry, 第 353-380 頁。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Breiger, R.L. (1981b). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt, 'An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs.' Journal of the American Statistical Association. 76, 51-53.
Breiger, R.L.(1981年b)。評論 Holland 和 Leinhardt,“有向圖的概率分布指數族”。美國統計協會雜誌。76, 51-53.

Breiger, R.L. (1981c). The social class structure of occupational mobility. American Journal of SOCiology. 87, 578-611.
Breiger,R.L.(1981c)。職業流動的社會階層結構。美國 SOCiology 雜誌。87, 578-611.

Breiger, R.L. (1986). How to use ROLE. Unpublished manuscript.
Breiger,RL(1986 年)。如何使用 ROLE.未發表的手稿。

Breiger, R.L. (ed.) (1990a). Social Mobility and Social Structure. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Breiger. R.L. (1990b). Social control and social networks: A model from Georg
Breiger, R.L. (ed.) (1990a)。社會流動性和社會結構。英國劍橋:劍橋大學出版社。R.L.(1990年b)。社會控制與社交網路:Georg 的模型

Simmel. In Calhoun, c., Meyer. M.W. and ScoU, W.R. (eds.), Structures of
西梅爾。在卡爾霍恩,c.,邁耶。M.W. 和 ScoU, W.R. (eds.), 結構

Breiger, R.L. (1991). Explorations in Structural Analysis: Dual and Multiple Networks of Social Structure. New York: Garland Press.
Breiger,RL(1991 年)。結構分析探索:社會結構的雙重和多重網路。紐約:加蘭出版社。

Breiger, R.L., Boorman, S.A., and Arabie, P. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 12, 328-383.
Breiger,RL,Boorman,SA和Arabie,P.(1975)。一種對關係數據進行聚類的演算法,適用於社交網路分析和多維縮放比較。數學心理學雜誌。12, 328-383.

Breiger, R.L., and Ennis, J.G. (1979). Personae and social roles: The network structure of personality types in small groups. Social Psychology Quarterly.
Breiger,RL和Ennis,JG(1979)。人格和社會角色:小群體中人格類型的網路結構。社會心理學季刊。

Breiger, R.L., and Pattison, P.E. (1978). The joint role structure of two communities' elites. Sociological Methods and Research. 7, 213-226.
Breiger,RL和Pattison,PE(1978)。兩個社區精英的聯合角色結構。社會學方法與研究。7, 213-226.

Breiger, R.L., and Pattison, P.E. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks. 8,215-256.
Breiger,RL和Pattison,PE(1986)。累積的社會角色:人的二元性及其代數。社交網路。8,215-256.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1943). A constant frame of reference for sociometric research. Sociometry. 6, 363-397.
布朗芬布倫納,美國(1943 年)。社會計量學研究的恆定參考框架。社會測量學。6, 363-397.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1944). A constant frame of reference for sociometric research: Part 11. Experiment and inference. Sociometry. 7,40-75.
美國布朗芬布倫納(1944 年)。社會計量學研究的恆定參考框架:第 11 部分。實驗和推理。社會測量學。7,40-75.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1945). The Measurement of Sociometric Status, Structure, and Development. Sociometric Monographs, No. 6. Beacon House, NY.
美國布朗芬布倫納(1945年)。社會計量地位、結構和發展的測量。社會計量學專著,第 6 號。紐約州燈塔之家。

Brown, D.J.J. (1979). The structuring of Polopa feasting and warfare. Man. 14, 712-733.
布朗,DJJ(1979 年)。波羅帕盛宴和戰爭的結構。人14,712-733。

Budescu, D.V. (1984). Tests of lagged dominance in sequential dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin. 96,402-414.
布德斯庫,DV(1984 年)。順序二元相互作用中滯後顯性測試。心理公報。96,402-414.

Burgess, R.L. (1968). Communication networks in research and training. Human
伯吉斯,RL(1968 年)。研究和培訓中的通信網路。人

Burt, R.S. (1975). Corporate society: A time series analysis of network structure.
伯特,R.S.(1975 年)。企業社會:網路結構的時間序列分析。

Burt, R.S. (1976). Positions in networks. Social Forces. 55, 93-122.
伯特,R.S.(1976 年)。網路中的位置。社會力量。55, 93-122.

Burt, R.S. (1978a). Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups. Sociological Methods and Research. 7, 189-212.
伯特,R.S.(1978a)。內聚力與結構等效性作為網路子組的基礎。社會學方法與研究。7, 189-212.

Burt, R.S. (1978b). Applied network analysis: An overview. Sociological Methods & Research. 7, 123-212.
伯特,R.S.(1978b)。應用網路分析:概述。社會學方法與研究。7, 123-212.

Burt, R.S. (1978/79a). Stratification and prestige among elite experts in methodological and mathematical sociology circa 1975. Social Networks. 1, 105-158.
伯特,R.S.(1978/79a)。大約1975年方法論和數學社會學精英專家的分層和聲望。社交網路。1, 105-158.

Burt, R.S. (1978/79b). A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates. Social Networks. 1,415-435.
伯特,R.S.(1978/79b)。聯鎖公司董事會的結構理論。社交網路。1,415-435.

Burt, R.S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology. 6, pages 79-141. [Also Chapter 2 in Burt, R.S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press.] Burt, R.S. (1982). Towards a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perceptions, and Action. New York: Academic Press.
伯特,R.S.(1980 年)。網路結構模型。社會學年度評論。6,第79-141頁。[另見Burt, R.S. (1982)第2章。走向結構性作用理論。紐約:學術出版社。伯特,R.S.(1982 年)。邁向行動的結構理論:社會結構、感知和行動的網路模型。紐約:學術出版社。

Burt, R.S. (1983). Network data from archival records. In Burt, R.S., and Minor, M.J. (eds.), Applied Network Analysis, pages 158-174. Beverly Hills: Sage. Burt, R.S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks. 6,293-340.
伯特,R.S.(1983 年)。來自存檔記錄的網路數據。在 Burt, R.S. 和 Minor, M.J.(編輯)中,應用網路分析,第 158-174 頁。比佛利山莊:鼠尾草。伯特,R.S.(1984 年)。網路專案和一般社會調查。社交網路。6,293-340.

Burt, R.S. (1985). General social survey network items. Connections. 8, 119-122.
伯特,R.S.(1985 年)。一般社會調查網路專案。連接。8, 119-122.

Burt, R.S. (1986). A cautionary note. Social Networks. 8, 205-211.
伯特,R.S.(1986 年)。注意事項。社交網路。8, 205-211.

BUrt, R.S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versuS structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology. 92, 1287-1335.
BUrt,R.S.(1987 年)。社會傳染與創新:凝聚力與結構對等性。美國社會學雜誌。92, 1287-1335.

Burt, R.S. (1988a). Some properties of structural equivalence measures derived from sociometric choice data. Social Networks. 10, 1-28.
伯特,R.S.(1988a)。從社會計量選擇數據中得出的結構等價度量的一些屬性。社交網路。10, 1-28.

BUrt, R.S. (1988b). The stability of American markets. American Journal of Sociology. 94, 356--395.
BUrt, R.S. (1988b)。美國市場的穩定性。美國社會學雜誌。94, 356--395.

Burt, R.S. (1989). STRUCTURE, Version 4.0. Research Program in Structural Analysis, Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University.
伯特,R.S.(1989 年)。STRUCTURE,版本 4.0。哥倫比亞大學社會科學中心結構分析研究專案。

Burt, R.S. (1990). Detecting role equivalence. Social Networks. 12, 83-97.
伯特,R.S.(1990 年)。檢測角色等效性。社交網路。12, 83-97.

Burt, R.S. (1991). STRUCTURE, Version 4.2. Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University.
伯特,R.S.(1991 年)。STRUCTURE,版本 4.2。哥倫比亞大學社會科學中心。

Burt, R.S., and Bittner, W.M. (1981). A note on inferences regarding network subgroups. Social Networks. 3, 71-88.
Burt,R.S.和Bittner,WM(1981)。關於網路子組的推論的說明。社交網路。3, 71-88.

Burt, R.S., and Lin, N. (1977). Network time series from archival records. In
Burt,R.S.和Lin,N.(1977)。來自存檔記錄的網路時間序列。在

Heise, D.R. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1977, pages 224-254. San
Heise, D.R. (ed.),《社會學方法論》,1977年,第224-254頁。三

Burt, R.S., Marsden, p.v., and Rossi, P.H. (1985). A Research Agenda for Survey
Burt,R.S.,Marsden,p.v.和Rossi,PH(1985)。調查研究議程

Burt, R.S., and Minor, M. (1983). Applied Network Analysis, A Methodological
Burt,R.S.和Minor,M.(1983)。應用網路分析,方法論

Bush, R.R., and Mosteller, F. (1955). Stochastic Modelsfor Learning. New York: Caldeira, G.A. (1988). Legal precedent: Structures of communication between state supreme courts. Social Networks. 10, 29-55.
布希,R.R.和莫斯特勒,F.(1955)。隨機模型學習。紐約:喬治亞州卡爾代拉(1988 年)。法律先例:州最高法院之間的溝通結構。社交網路。10, 29-55.

Campbell, K.E., Marsden, P.V., and Hurlbert, 1. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks. 8, 97-117.
坎貝爾,KE,馬斯登,PV和赫爾伯特,1。(1986). 社會資源和社會經濟地位.社交網路。8, 97-117.

Caplow, TA (1956). A theory of coalitions in the triad. American SOCiological
塔卡普洛(1956 年)。三合會中的聯盟理論。美國SOCiological

Capobianco, M. (1970). Statistical inference in finite populations having structure. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science. 32, 401-413.
Capobianco,M.(1970 年)。具有結構的有限總體中的統計推斷。紐約科學院院刊。32, 401-413.

Capobianco, M., and Frank, O. (1982). Comparison of statistical graph-size estimators. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 6, 87-97.
Capobianco,M.和Frank,O.(1982)。統計圖大小估計器的比較。統計規劃與推理雜誌。6, 87-97.

Cappell, c.L., and Guterbock, T.M. (1992) The social and conceptual structure of sociology specialties. American Sociological Review. 57,266-273.
Cappell, c.L. 和 Guterbock, T.M. (1992) 社會學專業的社會和概念結構。美國社會學評論。57,266-273.

Carley, K. (1986). An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12, 137-189.
卡利,K.(1986 年)。一種將社會結構與認知結構聯繫起來的方法。數學社會學雜誌。12, 137-189.

Carley, K., and Hummon, N. (1993). Scientific influence among social networkers. Social Networks. 15,71-108.
Carley,K.和Hummon,N.(1993)。社交網路使用者中的科學影響。社交網路。15,71-108.

Carley, K., and Wendt, K. (1988). Electronic mail and the diffusion of scientific information. The study of SOAR and its dominant users. Unpublished manuscript.
Carley,K.和Wendt,K.(1988)。電子郵件和科學信息的傳播。對SOAR及其主要使用者的研究。未發表的手稿。

Carrington, P.l., and Heil, G.H. (1981). COBLOC: A hierarchical method for blocking network data. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 8, 103-131.
Carrington,PL和Heil,GH(1981)。COBLOC:一種用於阻止網路數據的分層方法。數學社會學雜誌。8, 103-131.

Carrington, PJ., Heil, G.H., and Berkowitz, S~D. (1979/80). A goodness~of-fit index for blockmodels. Social Networks. 2,219-234.
Carrington, PJ., Heil, G.H., 和 Berkowitz, S~D. (1979/80)。塊模型的優度~擬合指數。社交網路。2,219-234.

Carroll, I.D., and Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional Scaling. In Rosenzweig, M.R., and Porter, L.w. (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
卡羅爾,ID和阿拉比,P.(1980)。多維縮放。在Rosenzweig,M.R.和Porter,L.w.(編輯)中,心理學年度評論。加利福尼亞州帕洛阿爾托:年度審查。

Carroll, I.D., Green, P.E., and Schaffer, C.M. (1986). Interpoint distance comparisons in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. 23, 271-280.
卡羅爾,ID,格林,PE和Schaffer,CM(1986)。對應分析中的點間距離比較。行銷研究雜誌。23, 271-280.

Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1959). Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
卡特賴特,D.(編輯)(1959 年)。社會權力研究。密歇根州安娜堡:社會研究所。

Cartwright, D., and Gleason, T.e. (1966). The number of paths and cycles in a digraph. Psychometrika. 31, 179-199.
卡特賴特,D.和格裡森,T.e.(1966)。二合圖中的路徑數和循環數。心理測量。31, 179-199.

Cartwright, D., and Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of
卡特賴特,D.和哈拉裡,F.(1956)。結構平衡:概括

Cartwright, D., and Harary, F. (1968). On the coloring of signed graphs.
卡特賴特,D.和哈拉裡,F.(1968)。關於簽名圖的著色。

Cartwright, D., and Harary, F. (1970). Ambivalence and indifference in generalizations of structural balance. Behavioral Science. 15,497-513.
卡特賴特,D.和哈拉裡,F.(1970)。結構平衡概括中的矛盾和冷漠。行為科學。15,497-513.

Cartwright, D., and Harary, F. (1977). A graph-theoretic approach to the investigation of system-environment relationships. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 5,87-111.
卡特賴特,D.和哈拉裡,F.(1977)。一種研究系統-環境關係的圖論方法。數學社會學雜誌。5,87-111.

Cartwright, D., and Harary, F. (1979). Balance and clusterability: An overview. In Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 25-50. New York: Academic Press.
卡特賴特,D.和哈拉裡,F.(1979)。平衡和可聚類性:概述。在Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, 第25-50頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Chabot, 1. (1950). A simplified example of the use of matrix multiplication for the analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry. 13, 131-140.
查博特,1。(1950). 使用矩陣乘法分析社會計量數據的簡化示例.社會測量學。13, 131-140.

Chase, I.D. (1982). Behavioral sequences during dominance hierarchy formation in chickens. Science. 216, 439--440.
蔡斯,I.D.(1982 年)。雞優勢等級形成過程中的行為序列。科學。216, 439--440.

Clark, lA., and McQuitty, L.L. (1970). Some problems and elaborations of iterative, intercolumnar correlational analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30, 773-784.
克拉克,洛杉磯和麥奎蒂,LL(1970)。反覆運算、柱間相關分析的一些問題和闡述。教育和心理測量。30, 773-784.

Cochran, W.G., and Cox, G.M. (1957). Experimental Design. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
科克倫,WG和考克斯,GM(1957)。試驗設計。再版。紐約:約翰·威利父子。

Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., and Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In Sarason, I.G., and Sarason, B.G. (eds.), Social Support: Theory, Research, and Applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Cohen,S.,Mermelstein,R.,Kamarck,T.和Hoberman,H.(1985)。衡量社會支援的功能組成部分。在Sarason,I.G.和Sarason,B.G.(編輯)中,社會支持:理論,研究和應用。荷蘭多德雷赫特:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。

Cohen, S., and Syme, S.L. (1985). Social Support and Health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Cohen,S.和Syme,SL(1985)。社會支援和健康。佛羅里達州奧蘭多:學術出版社。

Cohn, B.S., and Marriott, M. (1958). Networks and centres of integration in Indian civilization. Journal of Social Research. 1, 1-9.
Cohn,BS和Marriott,M.(1958)。印度文明的整合網路和中心。社會研究雜誌。1, 1-9.

Coleman, J.S. (1957). Community Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Coleman, 1.S. (1964). Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free
科爾曼,JS(1957 年)。社區衝突。伊利諾伊州葛籣科:自由出版社。 科爾曼,1.S.(1964 年)。數學社會學導論。紐約:免費

Press. Coleman, 1.S. (1973). The Mathematics of Collective Action. Chicago: Aldine. Coleman, 1.S. (1981). Longitudinal Data Analysis. New York: Basic Books.
科爾曼出版社,1.S.(1973 年)。集體行動的數學。 芝加哥:阿爾丁。科爾曼,1.S.(1981 年)。縱向數據分析。紐約:基本書籍。

Coleman, J.S., Katz, E., and Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry. 20, 253-270.
Coleman,JS,Katz,E.和Menzel,H.(1957)。創新在醫生中的傳播。社會測量學。20, 253-270.

Coleman, 1.S., Katz, E., and Menzel, H. (1966). Medical Innovation: A Diffusion
Coleman,1.S.,Katz,E.和Menzel,H.(1966)。醫療創新:擴散

Study. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Coleman, 1.S., and MacRae, D. (1960). Electronic processing of sociometric data for groups up to 1000 in size. American Sociological Review. 25, 722-727.
研究。印第安納波利斯:Bobbs-Merrill。Coleman,1.S.和MacRae,D.(1960)。對規模不超過 1000 人的群體的社會測量數據進行電子處理。美國社會學評論。25, 722-727.

Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical SOCiology. New York: Harcourt Brace lovanovich. Conrath, DW., Higgins, c.A., and McClean, R.l. (1983). A comparison of the reliability of questionnaire versus diary data. Social Networks. 5, 315-322.
柯林斯,R.(1988 年)。理論SOCiology。紐約:哈考特·佈雷斯·洛瓦諾維奇。康拉斯,DW.,希金斯,CA和麥克萊恩,RL(1983)。問卷與日記數據可靠性的比較。社交網路。5, 315-322.

Cook, K.S. (ed.) (1987) Social Exchange Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cook, K.S., and Emerson, R.M. (1978). Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review. 43, 721-739.
Cook, K.S. (ed.) (1987) 社會交換理論。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。庫克,KS和愛默生,RM(1978)。交換網路中的權力、公平和承諾。美國社會學評論。43, 721-739.

Cook, K.S., Emerson, R.M., Gillmore, M.R., and Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology. 89, 275-305.
庫克,KS,艾默生,RM,吉爾莫爾,MR和山岸,T.(1983)。交換網路中的權力分佈:理論和實驗結果。美國社會學雜誌。89, 275-305.

Coombs, C.H. (1951). Mathematical models in psychological scaling. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 46, 480-489.
庫姆斯,CH(1951 年)。心理縮放中的數學模型。美國統計協會雜誌。46, 480-489.

Cox, D.R., and Snell, EJ. (1989). Analysis of Binary Data, Second Edition. London: Chapman-Hall. Coxon, A.P.M. (1982). The User's Guide to Multidimensional Scaling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
考克斯,DR 和斯內爾,EJ。(1989). 二進位數據分析, 第二版.倫敦:查普曼大廳。考克森,APM(1982 年)。多維縮放使用者指南。新罕布希爾州埃克塞特:海涅曼。

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
克蘭,D.(1972 年)。看不見的大學:科學界的知識傳播。芝加哥:芝加哥大學出版社。

Crano, W.D., and Cooper, R.E. (1973). Examination of Newcomb's extension of structural balance theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 27, 344-353.
Crano,WD和Cooper,RE(1973)。研究紐科姆對結構平衡理論的擴展。人格與社會心理學雜誌。27, 344-353.

Criswell, J.H. (1939). A sociometric study of race cleavage in the classroom. Archives of Psychology. 33, 1-82.
克里斯韋爾,J.H.(1939 年)。課堂上種族分裂的社會測量學研究。心理學檔案。33, 1-82.

Criswell, J.H. (1943). Sociometric methods of measuring group preferences. Sociometry. 6, 398--408.
克里斯韋爾,J.H.(1943 年)。測量群體偏好的社會計量方法。社會測量學。6, 398--408.

Criswell, lH. (1946a). Foundations of sociometric measurement. Sociometry. 9, 7-13.
克裡斯韋爾,lH。(1946a). 社會測量的基礎.社會測量學。9, 7-13.

Criswell, lH. (1946b). Measurement of reciprocation under multiple criteria of choice. Sociometry. 9, 126--127.
克裡斯韋爾,lH。(1946b). 在多種選擇標準下測量往複。社會測量學。9, 126--127.

Criswell, J.H. (1947). Measurement of group integration. Sociometry. 10, 259-267.
克里斯韋爾,J.H.(1947 年)。群體整合的測量。社會測量學。10, 259-267.

Criswell, lH. (1950). Notes on the constant frame of reference problem. Sociometry. 13,93-107.
克裡斯韋爾,lH。(1950). 關於常數參考系問題的註釋.社會測量學。13,93-107.

Cronbach, LJ., and Gleser, G.C. (1953). Assessing similarity between porfiles. Psychological Bulletin. 50, 456--473.
Cronbach,LJ.和Gleser,G.C.(1953)。評估 porfiles 之間的相似性。心理公報。50, 456--473.

Cubbitt, T. (1973). Network density among urban families. In Boissevain, J., and Mitchell, I.C. (eds.), Network AnalysiS: Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague: Mouton Press.
Cubbitt,T.(1973 年)。城市家庭網路密度。在 Boissevain, J. 和 Mitchell, I.C. (eds.) 中,網路分析:人類交互研究。海牙:木桐出版社。

Cuthbert, K.R. (1989). Social relations in Luzon, Philippines, using the reverse small world problem. In Kochen, M. (ed.), The Small World, pages 211-226.
卡斯伯特,KR(1989 年)。菲律賓呂宋島的社會關係,使用反向小世界問題。在Kochen,M.(編輯),《小世界》,第211-226頁。

Czepie!, lA (1974). Word of mouth processes in the diffusion of a major technological innovation. Journal of Marketing Research. 11, 172-180.
Czepie!, lA (1974).口碑傳播過程中的一項重大技術創新。行銷研究雜誌。11, 172-180.

Darroch, IN., and RatcIiff, D. (1972). Generalized iterative scaling of loglinear models. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 43, 1470-1480.
印第安那州達羅克和RatcIiff,D.(1972)。對數線性模型的廣義反覆運算縮放。數理統計年鑒。43, 1470-1480.

David, H. A. (1988). The Method of Paired Comparisons. Second Edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
大衛,HA(1988 年)。配對比較的方法。再版。牛津和紐約:牛津大學出版社。

Davis, A, Gardner, 8., and Gardner, M.R. (1941). Deep South. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
大衛斯,A,加德納,8.和加德納,MR(1941)。南方深處。芝加哥:芝加哥大學出版社。

Davis, J.A (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry. 22, 280-296.
大衛斯,JA(1959年)。對相對剝奪理論的正式解釋。社會測量學。22, 280-296.

Davis, J.A (1963). Structural balance, mechanical solidarity, and interpersonal relations. American Journal of Sociology. 68, 444--462.
大衛斯,JA(1963年)。結構平衡、機械團結和人際關係。美國社會學雜誌。68, 444--462.

Davis, l.A (1967). Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations. 20, 181-187.
洛杉磯大衛斯(1967年)。圖中的聚類和結構平衡。人際關係。20, 181-187.

Davis, lA (1968a). Statistical analysis of pair relationships: Symmetry, subjective consistency, and reciprocity. Sociometry. 31, 102-119.
大衛斯,lA(1968a)。配對關係的統計分析:對稱性、主觀一致性和互惠性。社會測量學。31, 102-119.

Davis, lA (1968b). Social structures and cognitive structures. In Abelson, R.P., Aronson, E., McGuire, WJ., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.l, and Tannenbaum, O.H. (eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency. Chicago: Rand McNally.
大衛斯,lA(1968b)。社會結構和認知結構。在 Abelson, R.P., Aronson, E., McGuire, WJ., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.l, and Tannenbaum, OH (eds.), 認知一致性理論.芝加哥:蘭德·麥克納利。

Davis, lA (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two theoretical models on 742 sociograms. American Sociological Review. 35, 843-852.
大衛斯,洛杉磯(1970 年)。人際關係中的聚類和等級:在742個社會圖上測試兩個理論模型。美國社會學評論。35, 843-852.

Davis, lA (1977). Sociometric triads as multi-variate systems. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 5, 41-60.
大衛斯,洛杉磯(1977 年)。社會計量三元組作為多變數系統。數學社會學雜誌。5, 41-60.

Davis, 1.A. (1979). The Davis/Holland/Leinhardt studies: An overview. In Holland, P.W., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 51-62. New York: Academic Press.
大衛斯,1.A.(1979 年)。大衛斯/霍蘭德/萊因哈特研究:概述。在Holland,P.W.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),《社交網路研究的觀點》,第51-62頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Davis, lA., Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S. (1971). Comments on Professor Mazur's hypothesis about interpersonal sentiments. American Sociological Review. 36,309-311.
Davis,la,Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.(1971)。對馬祖爾教授關於人際情感的假設的評論。美國社會學評論。36,309-311.

Davis, J.A., and Leinhardt, S. (1968). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. Paper presented at the 1968 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston, Massachusetts, August 1968.
Davis,JA和Leinhardt,S.(1968)。小團體中積極的人際關係結構。1968年8月在馬薩諸塞州波士頓舉行的美國社會學協會1968年年會上發表的論文。

Davis, lA., and Leinhardt, S. (1972). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In Berger, 1 (ed.), Sociological Theories in Progress. Volume 2, pages 218-251. Boston: Houghton MifHin.
Davis,la.和Leinhardt,S.(1972)。小團體中積極的人際關係結構。在Berger,1(編輯),社會學理論進行中。第 2 卷,第 218-251 頁。波士頓:Houghton MifHin。

Davis, lH. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review. 80,97-125.
大衛斯,lH。(1973). 群體決策與社會互動:社會決策方案理論.心理評論。80,97-125.

Davis, R.L. (1953). The number of structures of finite relations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 4, 486-495.
大衛斯,RL(1953 年)。有限關係的結構數。美國數學學會會刊。4, 486-495.

Davis, R.L. (1954). Structures of dominance relations. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 16, 131-140.
大衛斯,RL(1954 年)。支配關係的結構。數學生物物理學通報。16, 131-140.

Delany, J. (1978). Network dynamics for the weak-tie problem. Unpublished manuscript.
德拉尼,J.(1978 年)。弱關係問題的網路動力學。未發表的手稿。

Delany, 1 (1980). The efficiency of sparse personal contact networks for donative transfer of resources: The case of job vacancy information. Unpublished manuscript.
德拉尼,1(1980)。稀疏的個人聯繫網路在捐贈資源轉移中的效率:職位空缺資訊的案例。未發表的手稿。

Delany, 1 (1988). Social networks and efficient resource allocation: Computer models of job vacancy allocation through contacts. In Wellman, 8., and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 430-451.
德拉尼,1(1988 年)。社交網路和有效的資源分配:通過聯繫人分配職位空缺的計算機模型。在Wellman,8.和Berkowitz,S.D.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第430-451頁。

de Sola Pool, I., and Kochen, M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social Networks. 1, 5-51.
de Sola Pool,I.和Kochen,M.(1978)。聯繫和影響。社交網路。1, 5-51.

Dodd, S.C. (1940). The interrelation matrix. Sociometry. 3,91-101.
南卡羅來納州多德(1940 年)。相互關係矩陣。社會測量學。3,91-101.

Domhoff, GW. (1975). A network study of ruling-class cohesiveness. The
多姆霍夫,GW。(1975). 統治階級凝聚力的網路研究.這

Donninger, C. (1986). The distribution of centrality in social networks. Social
唐寧格,C.(1986 年)。社交網路中中心性的分佈。社會的

Doreian, P. (1969). A note on the detection of cliques in valued graphs.
Doreian,P.(1969 年)。關於在值圖中檢測集團的說明。

Doreian, P. (1974). On the connectivity of social networks. Journal of
Doreian,P.(1974 年)。關於社交網路的連通性。期刊

Doreian, P. (1979a). On the evolution of group and network structure. Social
Doreian,P.(1979a)。關於群體和網路結構的演變。社會的

Doreian, P. (1979b). Structural control models of group structure. In Holland, P.W., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research. New York: Academic Press.
Doreian,P.(1979b)。群體結構的結構控制模型。在Holland,P.W.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),社會網路研究的觀點。紐約:學術出版社。

Doreian, P. (1980). On the evolution of group and network structure. Social Networks. 2, 235-252.
Doreian,P.(1980 年)。關於群體和網路結構的演變。社交網路。2, 235-252.

Doreian, P. (1981). Estimating linear models with spatially distributed data. In Leinhardt, S. (00.), Sociological Methodology 1981, pages 359-388. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Doreian, P. (1986). Measuring relative strength in small groups and bounded networks. Social Psychological Quarterly. 49, 247-259.
Doreian,P.(1981 年)。使用空間分佈數據估計線性模型。在Leinhardt,S.(00.),社會學方法論1981年,第359-388頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Doreian,P.(1986 年)。測量小組和有界網路的相對強度。社會心理學季刊。49, 247-259.

Doreian, P. (1987). Measuring regular equivalence in symmetric structures. Social Networks. 9, 89-107.
Doreian,P.(1987 年)。測量對稱結構中的規則等價性。社交網路。9, 89-107.

Doreian, P. (1988a). Equivalence in a social network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 13, 243-282.
Doreian,P.(1988a)。社交網路中的等價性。數學社會學雜誌。13, 243-282.

Doreian, P. (1988b). Borgatti toppings on Doreian splits: Reflections on regular equivalence. Social Networks. 10, 273-285.
Doreian,P.(1988b)。多雷分裂的 Borgatti 澆頭:對規則等價的反思。社交網路。10, 273-285.

Doreian, P. (1988c). Using multiple network analytic tools for a single social network. Social Networks. 10, 287-312.
Doreian,P.(1988c)。對單個社交網路使用多個網路分析工具。社交網路。10, 287-312.

Doreian, P. (1990). Mapping networks through time. In Weesie, J., and Flap, H. (eds.), Social Networks Through Time, pages 245-264.
Doreian,P.(1990 年)。映射網路穿越時空。在 Weesie, J. 和 Flap, H. (eds.) 中,Social Networks Through Time,第 245-264 頁。

Doreian, P., and Albert, L.H. (1989). Partitioning political actor networks: Some quantitative tools for analyzing qualitative networks. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology. 1, 279-291.
Doreian,P.和Albert,L.H.(1989)。劃分政治行為者網路:一些用於分析定性網路的定量工具。定量人類學雜誌。1, 279-291.

Doreian, P., and Fararo, T.J. (1985). Structural equivalence in a journal network. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36, 28-37.
Doreian,P.和Fararo,TJ(1985)。期刊網路中的結構等價性。美國資訊科學學會雜誌。36, 28-37.

Doreian, P., and Woodard, K.L. (1990). Interorganizational tie formalization as a dynamic process. Unpublished manuscript.
Doreian,P.和Woodard,KL(1990)。組織間關係形式化是一個動態過程。未發表的手稿。

Dunbar, R., and Dunbar, P. (1975). Social Dynamics of Gelada Baboons. Contributions to Primatology, Volume 6.
鄧巴,R.和鄧巴,P.(1975)。吉拉達狒狒的社會動態。對靈長類動物學的貢獻,第 6 卷。

Duquenne, V. (1991). On the core of finite lattices. Discrete Mathematics. 88, 133-147.
Duquenne,V.(1991 年)。在有限晶格的核心上。離散數學。88, 133-147.

Durkheirn, E. (1947). The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by George Sirnpson. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Durkheirn,E.(1947 年)。社會分工。由喬治·西恩普森(George Sirnpson)翻譯。伊利諾伊州葛籣科:自由新聞。

Eder, T., and Hallinan, M.T. (1978). Sex differences in children's friendships. American Sociological Review. 43, 237-250.
Eder,T.和Hallinan,MT(1978)。兒童友誼中的性別差異。美國社會學評論。43, 237-250.

Edmonds, 1., and Johnson, E. L. (1973). Matching, Euler tours, and the Chinese postman. Mathematical Programming. 5, 88-124.
埃德蒙茲,1.和詹森,EL(1973)。匹配,歐拉之旅和中國郵遞員。數學規劃。5, 88-124.

Edwards, D.S. (1948). The constant frame of reference problem in sociometry. Sociometry. 11,372-379.
愛德華茲,DS(1948 年)。社會測量學中的恆定參考系問題。社會測量學。11,372-379.

Elsas, D.A (1990). The Scheiblechner model: A loglinear analysis of social interaction data. Social Networks. 12, 57-82.
艾爾薩斯,DA(1990 年)。Scheiblechner模型:社交互動數據的對數線性分析。社交網路。12, 57-82.

Emotions mapped by new geography. (1933, April 3). The New York Times, page 17.
由新地理映射的情感。(1933 年 4 月 3 日)。《紐約時報》,第17頁。

Ennis, J.G. (1982). Blockmodels and spatial representations of group structure: Some comparisons. In Hudson, H.C. (ed.), Classifying Social Data, pages 199-214. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
恩尼斯,JG(1982 年)。組結構的塊模型和空間表示:一些比較。在Hudson, H.C.(編輯)中,對社會數據進行分類,第199-214頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Ennis, lG. (1992). Modeling the intersection of sociological specialties. American Sociological Review. 57, 259-265.
恩尼斯,lG。(1992). 對社會學專業的交叉點進行建模.美國社會學評論。57, 259-265.

Erbring, L., and Young, AA (1979). Individuals and social structure: Contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods & Research. 7, 396-430.
Erbring,L.和Young,AA(1979)。個人與社會結構:作為內生反饋的情境效應。社會學方法與研究。7, 396-430.

Erdos, P., and Renyi, A (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. 5, 17-61.
Erdòs,P.和Renyi,A(1960)。關於隨機圖的演變。匈牙利科學院數學研究所的出版物。5, 17-61.

Erickson, B. (1978). Some problems of inference from chain data. In Schuessler, K.F. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1979, pages 276-302. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
埃裡克森,B.(1978 年)。從鏈數據推理的一些問題。在Schuessler,K.F.(編輯),社會學方法論,1979年,第276-302頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Erickson, B. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 99-121.
埃裡克森,B.(1988 年)。態度的關係基礎。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.D.(編輯)中,社會結構:網路方法,第99-121頁。

Erickson, B., and Kringas, P.R. (1975). The small world of politics. Canadian Journal of Sociology and Anthropology. 12,585-593.
埃裡克森,B.和克林加斯,PR(1975)。政治的小世界。加拿大社會學和人類學雜誌。12,585-593.

Erickson, B., and Nosanchuk, T.A. (1983). Applied network sampling. Social Networks. 5, 367-382.
埃裡克森,B.和Nosanchuk,TA(1983)。應用網路採樣。社交網路。5, 367-382.

Erickson, B., Nosanchuk, T.A., and Lee, E. (1981). Network sampling in practice: Some second steps. Social Networks. 3, 127-136.
埃裡克森,B.,Nosanchuk,TA和Lee,E.(1981)。實踐中的網路採樣:一些第二步。社交網路。3, 127-136.

Europa Publications (1984). Europa Year Book. London: Europa Publications.
歐羅巴出版社(1984年)。歐羅巴年鑒。倫敦:歐羅巴出版社。

Evans-Pritchard, E.E. (1929). The study of kinship in primitive societies. Man.
埃文斯-普里查德,EE(1929 年)。原始社會的親屬關係研究。男人。

Everett, M.G. (1982). A graph theoretic blocking procedure for social networks.
埃弗雷特,MG(1982 年)。社交網路的圖論阻塞過程。

Everett, M.G. (1985). Role similarity and complexity in social networks. Social
埃弗雷特,MG(1985 年)。社交網路中的角色相似性和複雜性。社會的

Everett, M.G., and Borgatti, S.P. (1988). Calculating role similarities: An algorithm that helps determine the orbits of a graph. Social Networks. 10, 77-91.
Everett,MG和Borgatti,SP(1988)。計算角色相似性:一種有助於確定圖形軌道的演算法。社交網路。10, 77-91.

Everett, M.G., and Borgatti, S.P. (1990). A testing example for positional analysis techniques. Social Networks. 12,253-260.
Everett,MG和Borgatti,SP(1990)。位置分析技術的測試範例。社交網路。12,253-260.

Everett, M.G., Boyd, I.P., and Borgatti, S.P. (1990). Ego-centered and local roles: A graph theoretic approach. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 15, 163-172.
Everett,MG,Boyd,I.P.和Borgatti,SP(1990)。以自我為中心和局部角色:一種圖論方法。數學社會學雜誌。15, 163-172.

Fararo, T.I. (1973). Mathematical SOciology. New York: Wiley lnterscience.
法拉羅,TI(1973 年)。數學社會學。紐約:Wiley lnterscience。

Fararo, T.I. (1981). Biased networks and social structure theorems. Part I: Social Networks. 3, 137-159.
法拉羅,TI(1981 年)。有偏見的網路和社會結構定理。第一部分:社交網路。3, 137-159.

Fararo, T.I. (1983). Biased networks and the strength of weak ties. Social Networks. 5, 1-11.
法拉羅,TI(1983 年)。有偏見的網路和弱關係的強度。社交網路。5, 1-11.

Fararo, T.J., and Doreian, P. (1984). Tripartite structural analysis: Generalizing the Breiger-Wilson formalism. Social Networks. 6,141-176.
Fararo,TJ和Doreian,P.(1984)。三方結構分析:推廣Breiger-Wilson形式主義。社交網路。6,141-176.

Fararo, T.J., and Skvoretz, J. (1984). Biased networks and social structure theorems. Part 11. Social Networks. 6, 223-258.
Fararo,TJ和Skvoretz,J.(1984)。有偏見的網路和社會結構定理。第 11 部分。社交網路。6, 223-258.

Fararo, T.J., and Skvoretz, 1. (1987). Unification research programs: Integrating two structural theories. American Journal of Sociology. 92, 1183-1209.
Fararo, T.J. 和 Skvoretz, 1.(1987). 統一研究計劃:整合兩種結構理論.美國社會學雜誌。92, 1183-1209.

Fararo, T.J., and Sunshine, M.H. (1964). A Study of a Biased Friendship Net. Syracuse, NY: Youth Development Center. Faucheux, C, and Moscovici, S. (1960). Etudes sur la creativite des groups taches, structures des communications, et reussite. Bulletin du C.E.R.P. 9, 11-22.
Fararo,TJ和Sunshine,MH(1964)。對有偏見的友誼網的研究。紐約州錫拉丘茲:青年發展中心。Faucheux,C和Moscovici,S.(1960)。Etudes sur la creativite des groups taches, structures des communications, et reussite.C.E.R.P. 公報 9, 11-22.

Faust, K. (1985). A Comparative Evaluation of Methods for Positional Analysis of Social Networks. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
浮士德,K.(1985 年)。社交網路位置分析方法的比較評估。未發表的博士論文。加州大學歐文分校社會科學學院。

Faust, K. (1988). Comparison of methods for positional analysis: Structural and general equivalences. Social Networks. 10,313-341.
浮士德,K.(1988 年)。位置分析方法的比較:結構和一般等價。社交網路。10,313-341.

Faust, K., and Romney, AK. (1985a). Does STRUCTURE find structure?: A critique of Burt's use of distance as a measure of structural equivalence. Social Networks. 7,77-103.
浮士德,K.和羅姆尼,AK。(1985a). 結構找到結構嗎?:對伯特使用距離作為結構等價度量的批判。社交網路。7,77-103.

Faust, K., and Romney, AK. (1985b). The effect of skewed distributions OD matrix permutation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistica( Psychology. 38, 152-160.
浮士德,K.和羅姆尼,AK。(1985b). 偏態分佈的影響 OD 矩陣排列檢驗.英國數理與統計雜誌(心理學38,152-160。

Faust, K., and Romney, AK. (1986). Comment on 'A cautionary note.' Social Networks. 8,213.
浮士德,K.和羅姆尼,AK。(1986). 評論“警告說明”。社交網路。8,213.

Faust, K., and Wasserman, S. (1992). Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology. 4, 23-78.
Faust,K.和Wasserman,S.(1992)。中心性和聲望:回顧和綜合。定量人類學雜誌。4, 23-78.

Faust, K., and Wasserman, S. (1993). Correlation and association models for studying measurements on ordinal relations. In Marsden, P.V. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1993, pages 177-216.
Faust,K.和Wasserman,S.(1993)。用於研究序數關係測量的相關和關聯模型。在Marsden,P.V.(編輯),社會學方法論,1993年,第177-216頁。

Feger, H., and Bien, W. (1982). Network unfolding. Social Networks. 4, 257-283.
Feger,H.和Bien,W.(1982)。網路展開。社交網路。4, 257-283.

Feger, H., HummeU. H.l, Pappi, E, Sodeur, W., and Ziegler, R. (1978).
費格,H.,胡梅U。H.l,Pappi,E,Sodeur,W.和Ziegler,R.(1978)。

Feld, S.L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology. 86, 1015-1035.
費爾德,SL(1981 年)。社會關係的重點組織。美國社會學雜誌。86, 1015-1035.

Feld, S.L., and Elmore, R. (1982a). Patterns of sociometric choices: Transitivity reconsidered. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45, 77-85.
Feld, SL 和 Elmore, R. (1982a)。社會計量選擇的模式:重新考慮傳遞性。社會心理學季刊。45, 77-85.

Feld, S.L., and EImore, R. (1982b). Processes underlying patterns of sociometric choice: Response to Hallinan. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45,9(}-92.
Feld, S.L. 和 EImore, R. (1982b)。社會測量選擇模式的基本過程:對哈裡南的反應。社會心理學季刊。45,9(}-92.

Fennema, M., and Schijf, H. (1978/79). Analysing interlocking directorates: Theory and methods. Social Networks. 1,297-332.
Fennema,M.和Schijf,H.(1978/79)。分析聯鎖理事會:理論和方法。社交網路。1,297-332.

Fershtman, M. (1985). Transitivity and the path census in sociometry. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 11, 159-189.
Fershtman,M.(1985 年)。社會計量學中的傳遞性和路徑普查。數學社會學雜誌, 11, 159-189.

Festinger, L. (1949). The analysis of sociograms using matrix algebra. Human Relations. 2, 153-158.
費斯廷格,L.(1949 年)。使用矩陣代數分析社會圖。人際關係。2, 153-158.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 7,117-140.
費斯廷格,L.(1954 年)。社會比較過程理論。人際關係。7,117-140.

Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co. Fiedler, F.E. (1958). Attitudes and Group Effectiveness. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
費斯廷格,L.(1957 年)。認知失調理論。伊利諾伊州埃文斯頓:Row,Peterson&Co.Fiedler,FE(1958)。態度和團隊效能。厄巴納:伊利諾伊大學出版社。

Fienberg, S.E. (1980). The Analysis of Cross-Classified, Categorical Data. Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
費恩伯格,SE(1980 年)。對交叉分類的分類數據的分析。再版。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:麻省理工學院出版社。

Fienberg, S.E. (1985). Multivariate directed graphs in statistics. In Kotz, S.L., Johnson, N.L., and Read, CB. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical SCiences, Volume 6, pages 40-43. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
費恩伯格,SE(1985 年)。統計學中的多元有向圖。在 Kotz, S.L.、Johnson, N.L. 和 Read, CB.(編輯),統計科學百科全書,第 6 卷,第 40-43 頁。紐約:約翰·威利父子。

Fienberg, S.E., Meyer, M.M., and Wasserman, S. (1981). Analyzing data from multivariate directed graphs: An application to social networks. In Barnett, V. (ed.), Interpreting Multivariate Data, pages 289-306. London: John Wiley and Sons.
Fienberg,SE,Meyer,MM和Wasserman,S.(1981)。分析來自多元有向圖的數據:社交網路的應用。在Barnett,V.(編輯),解釋多變數數據,第289-306頁。倫敦:約翰·威利父子。

Fienberg, S.E., Meyer, M.M., and WaSserman, S. (1985). Statistical analysis of multiple sociometric relations. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 80, 51-67.
Fienberg,SE,Meyer,MM和WaSserman,S.(1985)。多重社會計量關係的統計分析。美國統計協會雜誌。80, 51-67.

Fienberg, S.E., and Wasserman, S. (1980). Methods for the analysis of data from multivariate directed graphs. In Proceedings of the Conference on Recent Developments in Statistical Methods and Applications, pages 137-161.
Fienberg,SE和Wasserman,S.(1980)。分析來自多元有向圖的數據的方法。《統計方法和應用最新發展會議論文集》,第137-161頁。

Fienberg, S.E., and Wasserman, S. (1981a). Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. In Leinhardt, S. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1981, pages 156-192. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fienberg, SE 和 Wasserman, S. (1981a)。單一社會計量關係的分類數據分析。在Leinhardt,S.(編輯),社會學方法論1981年,第156-192頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Fienberg, S.E., and Wasserman, S. (1981b). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt, 'An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs.' Journal of the American Statistical Association. 76, 54-57.
Fienberg,SE和Wasserman,S.(1981b)。評論 Holland 和 Leinhardt,“有向圖的概率分布指數族”。美國統計協會雜誌。76, 54-57.

Fischer, C.s. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and
Fischer,C.s.(1982 年)。住在朋友中間:城裡的個人網路和

Flament, C. (1963). Applications of Graph Theory to Group Structure. Englewood
弗拉門特,C.(1963 年)。圖論在群結構中的應用.恩格爾伍德

Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Ford, L.R., and Fulkerson, D.R. (1962). Flows in Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
新澤西州克利夫斯:Prentice-Hall。福特,LR和富爾克森,DR(1962)。網路中的流。新澤西州普林斯頓:普林斯頓大學出版社。

Forsyth, E., and Katz, L. (1946). A matrix approach to the analysis of sociometric data: Preliminary report. Sociometry. 9, 340-347.
Forsyth,E.和Katz,L.(1946)。分析社會計量數據的矩陣方法:初步報告。社會測量學。9, 340-347.

Foster, B.L. (1978/79). Formal network studies and the anthropological perspective. Social Networks. 1,241-255.
福斯特,BL(1978/79)。正式的網路研究和人類學視角。社交網路。1,241-255.

Foster, B.L., and Seidman, S.B. (1982). Urban structures derived from collections of overlapping subsets. Urban Anthropology. 11,177-192.
福斯特,BL和塞德曼,SB(1982)。從重疊子集的集合派生的城市結構。城市人類學。11,177-192.

Foster, B.L., and Seidman, S.B. (1983). A strategy for the dissection and analysis of social structures. Journal of Social and Biological Structures. 6, 49-64.
福斯特,BL和塞德曼,SB(1983)。社會結構剖析和分析的策略。社會和生物結構雜誌。6, 49-64.

Foster, B.L., and Seidman, S.B. (1984). Overlap structure of ceremonial events in two Thai villages. Thai Journal of Development Administration. 24, 143-157.
福斯特,BL和塞德曼,SB(1984)。兩個泰國村莊的儀式活動重疊結構。泰國發展管理雜誌。24, 143-157.

Fox, J. (1982). Selective aspects of measuring resemblance for taxonomy. In
福克斯,J.(1982 年)。測量分類相似性的選擇性方面。在

Hudson, H.C. (ed.), Classifying Social Data. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Frank, O. (1971). Statistical Inference in Graphs. Stockholm; FOA Repro.
Hudson, H.C. (ed.),對社會數據進行分類。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。弗蘭克,O.(1971 年)。圖表中的統計推斷。斯德哥爾摩;FOA 複製。

Frank, O. (1977a). Survey sampling in graphs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 1, 235-264.
弗蘭克,O.(1977a)。圖表中的調查抽樣。統計規劃與推理雜誌。1, 235-264.

Frank, O. (1977b). A note on Bernoulli sampling in graphs and
弗蘭克,O.(1977b)。關於圖中伯努利抽樣的說明和

Horvitz-Thompson estimation. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 4, 178-180.
Horvitz-Thompson估計。斯堪的納維亞統計雜誌。4, 178-180.

Frank, O. (1977c). Estimation of graph totals. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 4,81-89.
弗蘭克,O.(1977c)。圖形總數的估計。斯堪的納維亞統計雜誌。4,81-89.

Frank, O. (1978a). Inferences concerning cluster structure. In Corsten, L.CA., and Hennans, J. (eds.), Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Vienna: Physica-Verlag.
弗蘭克,O.(1978a)。關於簇結構的推論。在 Corsten, L.CA. 和 Hennans, J. (eds.) 中,計算統計論文集。維也納:Physica-Verlag。

Frank, O. (1978b). Sampling and estimation in large social networks. Social Networks. 1,91-101.
弗蘭克,O.(1978b)。大型社交網路中的採樣和估計。社交網路。1,91-101.

Frank, O. (1979a). Estimating a graph from triad counts. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 9, 31-46.
弗蘭克,O.(1979a)。從三元組計數中估計圖形。統計計算與模擬學報.9, 31-46.

Frank, O. (1979b). Estimation of population totals by use of snowball samples. In Holland, P.w., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 319-348. New York: Academic Press.
弗蘭克,O.(1979b)。使用滾雪球樣本估計種群總數。在Holland,P.w.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),《社交網路研究的觀點》,第319-348頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Frank, O. (1980). Sampling and inference in a population graph. International Statistical Review. 48, 33-41.
弗蘭克,O.(1980 年)。總體圖中的採樣和推理。《國際統計評論》。48, 33-41.

Frank, O. (1981). A survey of statistical methods for graph analysis. In Leinhardt, S. (ed.), Sociological Methodology. 1981, pages 110-155. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Frank, O. (1985). Random sets and random graphs. In Lanke, 1, and Lindgren, G. (eds.), Contributions in Probability and Statistics in Honour of Bunnar Blom, pages 113-120.
弗蘭克,O.(1981 年)。圖分析的統計方法綜述。在Leinhardt,S.(編輯)中,社會學方法論。1981年,第110-155頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。弗蘭克,O.(1985 年)。隨機集和隨機圖。在Lanke, 1, and Lindgren, G. (eds.), Contributions in Probability and Statistics in Honour of Bunnar Blom, pages 113-120.

Frank, O. (1988). Random sampling and social networks: A survey of various approaches. Mathematiques. Informatique. et Sciences Humaines. 26, 19-33.
弗蘭克,O.(1988 年)。隨機抽樣和社交網路:對各種方法的調查。數學。資訊。等人文科學。26, 19-33.

Frank, O. (1989). Random graph mixtures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 576, Graph Theol'y alld Its Applications: East and West, 192-199.
弗蘭克,O.(1989 年)。隨機圖混合物。紐約科學院年鑒。576, Graph Theol'y alld Its Applications: East and West, 192-199.

Frank, 0., Hallinan, M., and Nowicki, K. (1985). Clustering of dyad distributions as a tool in network modeling. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 11,47-64.
弗蘭克,0.,哈裡南,M.和諾維奇,K.(1985)。二元分佈聚類作為網路建模中的一種工具。數學社會學雜誌。11,47-64.

Frank, 0., and Harary, F. (1979). Maximum triad counts in graphs and digraphs. Journal of Combinatorics Information and System Sciences. 4, 286-294.
弗蘭克,0.和哈拉裡,F.(1979)。圖形和二元圖中的最大三元組計數。組合學資訊與系統科學雜誌.4, 286-294.

Frank, 0., and Harary, F. (1980). Balance in stochastic signed graphs. Social Networks. 2, 155-163.
弗蘭克,0.和哈拉裡,F.(1980)。隨機有符號圖中的餘額。社交網路。2, 155-163.

Frank, 0., and Harary, F. (1982). Cluster inference by using transitivity indices in empirical graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 77, 835-840.
弗蘭克,0.和哈拉裡,F.(1982)。通過在經驗圖中使用傳遞性指數進行聚類推理。美國統計協會雜誌。77, 835-840.

Frank, 0., Komanska, H., and Widaman, K.F. (1985). Cluster analysis of dyad distributions in networks. Journal of Classification. 2,219-238.
弗蘭克,0.,科曼斯卡,H.和Widaman,K.F.(1985)。網路中二元分佈的聚類分析。分類雜誌。2,219-238.

Frank, 0., Lundquist, S., Wellman, B., and Wilson, e. (1986). Analysis of composition and structure of social networks. Unpublished manuscript. Frank, 0., and Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 81, 832-842.
弗蘭克,0.,倫德奎斯特,S.,威爾曼,B.和威爾遜,e.(1986)。分析社交網路的組成和結構。未發表的手稿。弗蘭克,0.和施特勞斯,D.(1986)。瑪律可夫圖。美國統計協會雜誌。81, 832-842.

Freeman, L.e. (1976). Bibliography on Social Networks. Monticello, IL: Council of Planning Librarians.
弗里曼,L.E.(1976 年)。社交網路上的參考書目。伊利諾伊州蒙蒂塞洛:規劃圖書館員委員會。

Freeman, L.e. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweeness. Sociometry. 40, 35-41.
弗里曼,L.E.(1977 年)。一組基於中間性的中心性度量。社會測量學。40, 35-41.

Freeman, L.e. (1979). Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks. 1,215-239.
弗里曼,L.E.(1979 年)。社交網路的中心性:I.概念澄清。社交網路。1,215-239.

Freeman, L.C. (1980a). The gatekeeper, pair-dependency, and structural centrality. Quality and Quantity. 14,585-592.
Freeman, L.C.(1980年a)。看門人、對依賴性和結構中心性。質量和數量。14,585-592.

Freeman, L.e. (1980b). Q-analysis and the structure of friendship networks. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 12, 367-378.
Freeman, L.e.(1980年b)。Q分析與友情網路結構。國際人機研究雜誌。12, 367-378.

Freeman, L.e. (1984). Turning a profit from mathematics: The case of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 10, 343-360.
弗里曼,L.E.(1984 年)。從數學中獲利:社交網路的案例。數學社會學雜誌。10, 343-360.

Freeman, L.e. (1986). The impact of computer based communication on the social structure of an emerging scientific speciality. Social Networks. 6, 201-221.
弗里曼,L.e.(1986 年)。基於計算機的通信對新興科學專業的社會結構的影響。社交網路。6, 201-221.

Freeman, L.e. (1988). Alliances: A new formalism for primary groups and its relationships to cliques and to structural equivalences. Unpublished manuscript.
弗里曼,L.E.(1988 年)。聯盟:初級群體及其與集團和結構等價物的關係的新形式主義。未發表的手稿。

Freeman, L.e. (1989). Social networks and the structure experiment. In Freeman, L.C., White, D.R., and Romney, AK. (eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, pages 11-40.
弗里曼,L.E.(1989 年)。社交網路和結構實驗。在弗裡曼,L.C.,懷特,D.R.和羅姆尼,AK。(編輯),《社交網路分析研究方法》,第11-40頁。

Freeman, L.C. (1992a). The sociological concept of "group": An empirical test of two models. American Journal of Sociology. 98, 152-166.
Freeman, L.C.(1992年a)。“群體”的社會學概念:兩種模型的實證檢驗。美國社會學雜誌。98, 152-166.

Freeman, L.e. (1992b). La resurrection des cliques: Application du trellis de Galois. Bulletin de Metodologie Sociologique. 37, 3-24.
Freeman, L.e. (1992b)。集團的復活:伽羅瓦格子的應用。社會學方法學通報。37, 3-24.

Freeman, L.e., Borgatti, S.P., and White D.R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks. 13:141-154.
Freeman,L.e.,Borgatti,S.P.和White DR(1991)。值圖中的中心性:基於網路流的仲介度量。社交網路。13:141-154.

Freeman, L.C., and Freeman, S.C. (1980). A semi-visible college: Structural effects of seven months of EIES participation by a social networks community. In Henderson, M.M., and MacNaughton, M.l (eds.), Electronic Communication: Technology and Impacts, pages 77-85. AAAS Symposium 52.
Freeman, L.C. 和 Freeman, S.C. (1980)。半可見的大學:社交網路社區參與 EIES 七個月的結構性影響。在Henderson, M.M.和MacNaughton, M.l(編輯)中,電子通信:技術和影響,第77-85頁。AAAS 專題討論會 52.

Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
華盛頓特區:美國科學促進會。

Freeman, L.e., Freeman, S.e., and Michaelson, AG. (1988). On human social intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures. 11, 415-425.
Freeman, L.E.、Freeman, S.e. 和 Michaelson, AG。(1988). 論人類社會智慧.社會和生物結構雜誌。11, 415-425.

Freeman, L.C., Freeman, S.C., and Michaelson. AG. (1989). How humans sce social groups: A test of the Sailer-Gaulin models. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology. 1,229-238.
弗里曼,L.C.,弗里曼,南卡羅來納州和邁克爾森。銀。(1989). 人類如何劃分社會群體:對塞勒-高盧模型的測試.定量人類學雜誌。1,229-238.

Freeman, L.C., Roeder, D., and Mulholland, R.R. (1980). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social Networks. 2, 119-141.
Freeman,L.C.,Roeder,D.和Mulholland,R.R.(1980)。社交網路的中心性:II.實驗結果。社交網路。2, 119-141.

Freeman, L.e., and Romney, A.K (1987). Words, deeds and social structure: A preliminary study of the reliability of informants. Human Organization. 46, 330-334.
Freeman,L.E.和Romney,AK(1987)。言行與社會結構:線人可靠性的初步研究。人類組織。46, 330-334.

Freeman, L.e., Romney, A.K., and Freeman, S.e. (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist. 89, 310-325.
Freeman, L.E., Romney, A.K., and Freeman, S.E. (1987)。認知結構和線人準確性。美國人類學家。89, 310-325.

Freeman, L.C, and Thompson, CR. (1989). Estimating acquaintanceship volume. In Kochen, M. (ed.), The Small World, pages 147-158.
Freeman, L.C. 和 Thompson, CR. (1989)。估計熟人數量。在Kochen,M.(編輯),《小世界》,第147-158頁。

Freeman, L.C, and White, D.R. (1993). Using Galois lattices to represent network data. In Marsden, PV. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1993, pages 127-146.
Freeman, L.C. 和 White, DR (1993)。使用伽羅瓦格子表示網路數據。在馬斯登,PV。(編),《社會學方法論》,1993年,第127-146頁。

Freeman, L.C, White, D.R., and Romney, A.K. (eds.) (1989). Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
Freeman, L.C, White, D.R., and Romney, A.K. (eds.) (1989)。社會網路分析的研究方法。佛吉尼亞州費爾法克斯:喬治梅森大學出版社。

Freeman, S.C., and Freeman, L.C (1979). The networkers network: A study of the impact of a new communications medium on sociometric structure. Social Science Research Reports No. 46.
弗里曼,南卡羅來納州和弗里曼,L.C(1979)。網路人網路:研究一種新的通信媒介對社會計量結構的影響。社會科學研究報告第46號。

Frey, S.L. (1989). Network Analysis as Applied to a Group of AIDS Patients Linked by Sexual Contact. Unpublished Undergraduate Honors Thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana.
弗雷,SL(1989 年)。應用於一組通過性接觸聯繫在一起的愛滋病患者的網路分析。未發表的本科榮譽論文。伊利諾伊大學厄巴納分校心理學系。

Friedell, M.F. (1967). Organizations as semilattices. American Sociological Review. 32, 46-54.
弗里德爾,MF(1967 年)。組織作為半格子。美國社會學評論。32, 46-54.

Friedkin, N.E. (1981). The development of structure in random networks: An analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure. Social Networks. 3,41-52.
弗里德金,NE(1981 年)。隨機網路結構的發展:網路密度增加對結構五種度量的影響分析.社交網路。3,41-52.

Friedkin, N.E. (1984). Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods and Research. 12, 235-261.
弗里德金,NE(1984 年)。社會同質性的結構凝聚力和等價性解釋。社會學方法與研究。12, 235-261.

Friedkin, N.E. (1986). A formal theory of social power. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12, 103-126.
弗里德金,NE(1986 年)。一種正式的社會權力理論。數學社會學雜誌。12, 103-126.

Friedkin, N.E. (1989). SNAPS (Social Network Analysis Procedures) for GAUSS. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
弗里德金,NE(1989 年)。高斯的 SNAPS(社交網路分析程式)。未發表的手稿,加州大學聖塔芭芭拉分校。

Friedkin, N.E. (1990). A Guttman scale for the strength of an interpersonal tie. Social Networks. 12,217-238.
弗里德金,NE(1990 年)。衡量人際關係強度的古特曼量表。社交網路。12,217-238.

Friedkin, N.E. (1991). Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology. 96, 1478-1504.
弗里德金,NE(1991 年)。中心性度量的理論基礎。美國社會學雜誌。96, 1478-1504.

Friedkin, N.E., and Cook, KS. (1990). Peer group influence. Sociological Methods & Research. 19, 122-143.
弗里德金,N.E.和庫克,堪薩斯州。(1990). 同伴群體影響.社會學方法與研究。19, 122-143.

Friedkin, N.E., and Johnsen, E.e. (1990). Social influence and opinions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 15, 193-206.
Friedkin,NE和Johnsen,EE(1990)。社會影響和意見。數學社會學雜誌。15, 193-206.

Friedmann, H. (1988). Form and substance in the analysis of the world economy. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 304-325. New York: Cambridge University Press.
弗裡德曼,H.(1988 年)。世界經濟分析的形式和實質。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第304-325頁。紐約:劍橋大學出版社。

Fulkerson, D.R. (1960). Zero-one matrices with zero trace. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 10,831-836.
富爾克森,DR(1960 年)。跡線為零的零一矩陣。太平洋數學雜誌。10,831-836.

Gabriel, KR. (1982). Biplot. In Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L., and Reed, CB. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Volume 1, pages 263-271. New York: John WiJey and Sons.
加布里埃爾,KR.(1982 年)。雙圖。在 Kotz, S.、Johnson, N.L. 和 Reed, CB。(編輯),統計科學百科全書,第 1 卷,第 263-271 頁。紐約:John WiJey and Sons。

Gabriel, K.R., and Zamir, S. (1979). Lower rank approximation of matrices by least squares with any choice of weight. Technometrics. 21,489--498.
Gabriel,KR和Zamir,S.(1979)。矩陣的低秩近似,以最小二乘法進行任何權重選擇。技術指標。21,489--498.

Galaskiewicz, J. (1979). Exchange Networks and Community Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
加拉斯基維奇,J.(1979 年)。交流網路和社區政治。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy. New York: Academic Press.
加拉斯基維奇,J.(1985 年)。城市贈款經濟的社會組織。紐約:學術出版社。

Galaskiewicz. 1., and Krohn, K.R. (1984). Positions, roles, and dependencies in a community interorganizational system. The Sociological Quarterly. 25, 527-550.
加拉斯基維奇。1.和Krohn,K.R.(1984)。社區組織間系統中的職位、角色和依賴關係。社會學季刊。25, 527-550.

Galaskiewicz, 1., and Marsden, P.V. (1978). Interorganizational resource networks: Formal patterns of overlap. Social Science Research. 7, 89-107.
Galaskiewicz,1.和Marsden,P.V.(1978)。組織間資源網路:正式的重疊模式。社會科學研究。7, 89-107.

Galaskiewicz, J., and Wasserman, S. (1981). A dynamic study of change in a regional corporate network. American Sociological Review. 46, 475--484.
Galaskiewicz,J.和Wasserman,S.(1981)。對區域企業網路變化的動態研究。美國社會學評論。46, 475--484.

Galaskiewicz, J., and Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic and normative processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly. 34, 454--480.
Galaskiewicz,J.和Wasserman,S.(1989)。組織間領域的擬態和規範過程:實證檢驗。行政科學季刊。34, 454--480.

Galaskiewicz, J., and Wasserman, S. (1990). Social action models for the study of change in organizational fields. In Weesie, J., and Flap, H. (eds.), Social Networks Through Time, pages 1-30.
Galaskiewicz,J.和Wasserman,S.(1990)。用於研究組織領域變革的社會行動模型。在 Weesie, J. 和 Flap, H. (eds.) 中,Social Networks Through Time,第 1-30 頁。

Galaskiewicz, 1., Wasserman, S., Rauschenbach, B., Bielefeld, W., and Mullaney, P. (1985). The influence of corporate power, social status, and market position on corporate interlocks in a regional network. Social Forces. 64, 403--431.
Galaskiewicz,1.,Wasserman,S.,Rauschenbach,B.,Bielefeld,W.和Mullaney,P.(1985)。企業權力、社會地位和市場地位對區域網路中企業互鎖的影響。社會力量。64, 403--431.

Gale, D. (1957). A theorem on flows in networks. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 7, 1073-1082.
蓋爾,D.(1957 年)。關於網路中流動的定理。太平洋數學雜誌。7, 1073-1082.

Gamson, WA. (1964). Experimental studies of coalition formation. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume I, pages 81-110. New York: Academic Press.
華盛頓州甘森。(1964). 聯盟形成的實驗研究.在Berkowitz,L.(編輯),實驗社會心理學進展,第一卷,第81-110頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Garrison, WL. (1960). Connectivity of the interstate highway system. Papers and Proceedings o/the Regional Science Association. 6, 121-137.
加裡森,WL。(1960). 州際公路系統的連通性.論文和論文集 o/區域科學協會。6, 121-137.

GAUSS (1988). The GAUSS System Version 2.0. Kent, WA: Aptech Systems.
高斯(1988)。高斯系統版本 2.0。華盛頓州肯特:Aptech Systems。

Gerard, H.B., and Fleischer, L. (1967). Recall and pleasantness of balanced and unbalanced cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 7, 332-337.
Gerard,HB和Fleischer,L.(1967)。平衡和不平衡認知結構的回憶和愉悅。人格與社會心理學雜誌。7, 332-337.

Glanzer, M., and Glaser, R. (1959). Techniques for the study of group structure and behavior: I. Analysis of structure. Psychological Bulletin. 56, 317-331.
Glanzer,M.和Glaser,R.(1959)。群體結構和行為研究技術:I.結構分析。心理公報。56, 317-331.

Glazer, A. (1981). A solution to the constant frame of reference problem. Social Networks. 3, 117-126.
格雷澤,A.(1981 年)。恆定參考系問題的解決方案。社交網路。3, 117-126.

Gokhale, D.V., and Kullback, S. (1978). The Information in Contingency Tables. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Gokhale,DV和Kullback,S.(1978)。列聯表中的資訊。紐約:馬塞爾·德克爾(Marcel Dekker)。

Goodenough, WH. (1969). Rethinking "status" and "role": Toward a general model of the cultural organization of social relationships. In Tyler, S.A. (ed.), Cognitive Anthropology, pages 311-330. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
古迪納夫,WH.(1969 年)。重新思考“地位”和“角色”:邁向社會關係文化組織的一般模型。在Tyler, S.A.(編輯)中,認知人類學,第311-330頁。紐約:霍爾特、萊因哈特和溫斯頓。

Goodman, L.A. (1949). On the estimation of the number of classes in a population. Annals 0/ Mathematical Statistics. 20, 572-579.
洛杉磯古德曼(1949年)。關於總體中類數的估計。年鑒 0/ 數理統計.20, 572-579.

Goodman, L.A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 32. 148-170.
洛杉磯古德曼(1961年)。雪球採樣。數理統計年鑒。32. 148-170.

Goodman, L.A. (1978). Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
洛杉磯古德曼(1978 年)。分析定性/分類數據。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:Abt Books。

Goodman, L. A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74, 537-552.
洛杉磯古德曼(1979年)。用於分析具有有序類別的交叉分類中的關聯的簡單模型。美國統計協會雜誌。74, 537-552.

Goodman, L.A. (1981). Criteria for determining whether certain categories in a cross-classification table should be combined, with special reference to occupational categories in an occupational mobility table. American Journal of Sociology. 87, 612-652.
洛杉磯古德曼(1981 年)。確定是否應合併交叉敘類表中某些職類的標準,特別提及職業流動表中的職業職類。美國社會學雜誌。87, 612-652.

Goodman, L.A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries. Annals of Statistics. 13, 10-69.
洛杉磯古德曼(1985年)。分析具有排序類別的交叉分類數據:關聯模型、關聯模型和不對稱模型,用於有或沒有缺失條目的列聯表。統計年鑒。13, 10-69.

Goodman, L.A. (1986). Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual log-linear models approach in the analysis of contingency tables. International Statistical Review. 54, 243-309.
洛杉磯古德曼(1986 年)。在列聯表分析中,通常的對應分析方法和通常的對數線性模型方法的一些有用擴展。《國際統計評論》。54, 243-309.

Gottlieb, B.H. (1981). Preventive interventions involving social networks and social support. In Gottlieb, B.H. (ed.), Social Networks and Social Support, pages 201-232. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
戈特利布,BH(1981 年)。涉及社交網路和社會支援的預防性干預措施。在Gottlieb,B.H.(編輯),社交網路和社會支援,第201-232頁。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Gottman, J.M. (1979a). Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations. New York: Academic Press.
戈特曼,JM(1979a)。婚姻互動:實驗調查。紐約:學術出版社。

Gottman, J.M. (1979b). Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. Psychological Bulletin. 86, 338-348.
戈特曼,JM(1979b)。檢測社交互動中的週期性。心理公報。86, 338-348.

Gottman, J.M., and Ringland, J.T. (1981). The analysis of dominance and bi-directionality in social development. Child Development. 52, 393-412.
Gottman,JM和Ringland,J.T.(1981)。分析社會發展中的主導地位和雙向性。兒童發育。52, 393-412.

Gould, P., and Gatrell, A. (1979). A structural analysis of a game: The Liverpool v. Manchester United Cup final of 1977. Social Networks. 2, 253-273.
Gould,P.和Gatrell,A.(1979)。一場比賽的結構分析:1977年利物浦對陣曼聯杯決賽。社交網路。2, 253-273.

Gould, R.v. (1987). Measures of betweeness in non-symmetric networks. Social Networks. 9, 277-282.
古爾德,R.v.(1987 年)。非對稱網路仲介的度量。社交網路。9, 277-282.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 81, 1287-1303.
格蘭諾維特,M.(1973 年)。弱關係的力量。美國社會學雜誌。81, 1287-1303.

Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
格蘭諾維特,M.(1974 年)。找工作:人脈和職業研究。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:哈佛大學出版社。

Granovetter, M. (1977a). Network sampling. Some first steps. American Journal of Sociology. 81, 1287-1303.
格蘭諾維特,M.(1977a)。網路採樣。一些第一步。美國社會學雜誌。81, 1287-1303.

Granovetter, M. (1977b). Reply to Morgan and Rytina. American Journal of Sociology. 83, 727-729.
格蘭諾維特,M.(1977b)。回復 Morgan 和 Rytina。美國社會學雜誌。83, 727-729.

Granovetter, M. (1979). The theory-gap in social network analysis. In Holland, P.W., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 501-518. New York: Academic Press.
格蘭諾維特,M.(1979 年)。社會網路分析中的理論差距。在Holland,P.W.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),《社交網路研究的觀點》,第501-518頁。紐約:學術出版社。

GranoveUer, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Marsden, P.V., and Lin, N. (eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis, page 105-130. BeverIy Hills, CA: Sage.
GranoveUer,M.(1982 年)。弱關係的力量:重新審視網路理論。在Marsden,P.V.和Lin,N.(編輯),社會結構和網路分析,第105-130頁。加利福尼亞州比弗伊山:鼠尾草。

Greenacre, MJ. (1984). Theory and Application of Correspondence Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
格林納克,MJ。(1984). 對應分析的理論與應用.紐約:學術出版社。

Greenacre, M.J. (1986). SIMCA: A program to perform simple correspondence analysis. Psychometrika. 51:172-173.
格林納克,MJ(1986 年)。SIMCA:執行簡單對應分析的程式。心理測量。51:172-173.

Gupta, M. (1985). Interpersonal tension: A two-factor approach to the POX situation. Small Group Behavior. 16,303-323.
古普塔,M.(1985 年)。人際關係緊張:POX 情況的雙因素方法。小組行為。16,303-323.

Gurevich, M. (1961). The Social Structure of Acquaintanceship Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
古列維奇,M.(1961 年)。熟人網路的社會結構。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:麻省理工學院出版社。

Guttman, L. (1977). A definition of dimensionality and distance for graphs. In Lingoes, J.c. (ed.), Geometric Representation of Relational Data. Ann
Guttman,L.(1977 年)。圖形的維度和距離的定義。In Lingoes, J.c. (ed.), Geometric Representation of Relational Data(關係數據的幾何表示)。安

Haberman, S.1. (1978). The Analysis of Qualitative Data. Volume 1. New York: Academic Press.
哈伯曼,S.1。(1978). 定性數據分析.第 1 卷。紐約:學術出版社。

Haberman, S.l. (1979). The Analysis of Qualitative Data. Volume 2. New York: Academic Press.
哈伯曼,SL(1979 年)。定性數據分析。第 2 卷。紐約:學術出版社。

Haberman, S.l. (1981). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt, 'An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs'. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 76, 60-62.
哈伯曼,SL(1981 年)。評論 Holland 和 Leinhardt,“有向圖的概率分布指數族”。美國統計協會雜誌。76, 60-62.

Hage, P. (1973). A graph theoretic approach to the analysis of alliance structure and local grouping in Highland New Guinea. Anthropological Forum. 3, 280-294.
哈格,P.(1973 年)。分析新幾內亞高地聯盟結構和地方分組的圖論方法。人類學論壇。3, 280-294.

Hage, P. (1976a). Structural balance and clustering in Bushmen kinship relations. Behavioral Science. 21, 36-37.
Hage,P.(1976a)。布須曼人親屬關係中的結構平衡和聚類。行為科學。21, 36-37.

Hage, P. (1976b). The atom of kinship as a directed graph. Man (n.s.). 11, 558-568.
Hage,P.(1976b)。作為有向圖的親屬關係原子。男人 (n.s.)。11, 558-568.

Hage, P. (1979). Graph theory as a structural model in cultural anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 8, 115-136.
哈格,P.(1979 年)。圖論作為文化人類學中的結構模型。人類學年度評論。8, 115-136.

Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1983). Structural Models in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hage,P.和Harary,F.(1983)。人類學中的結構模型。劍橋:劍橋大學出版社。

Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1991). Exchange in Oceania: A Graph Theoretic Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hage,P.和Harary,F.(1991)。大洋洲的交流:圖論分析。牛津:克拉倫登出版社。

Hakimi, S.L. (1965). Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Operations Research. 12, 450-459.
Hakimi,SL(1965 年)。交換中心的最佳位置以及圖形的絕對中心和中位數。運籌學。12, 450-459.

Hall, A., and Wellman, B. (1985). Social networks and social support. In Cohen, S., and Syme, S.L. (eds.), Social Support and Health. New York: Academic Press.
Hall,A.和Wellman,B.(1985)。社交網路和社會支援。在 Cohen, S. 和 Syme, S.L.(編輯)中,社會支援與健康。紐約:學術出版社。

Hallinan, M.T. (1972). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt. American Journal of Sociology. 77, 1201-1205.
哈裡南,MT(1972 年)。評論霍蘭德和萊因哈特。美國社會學雜誌。77, 1201-1205.

HaIlinan, M.T. (1974a). The Structure of Positive Sentiment. New York: Elsevier.
HaIlinan, M.T. (1974a)。積極情緒的結構。紐約:愛思唯爾。

Hallinan, M.T. (1974b). A structural model of sentiment relations. American Journal of Sociology. 80, 364-378.
哈裡南,M.T.(1974b)。情感關係的結構模型。美國社會學雜誌。80, 364-378.

Hallinan, M.T. (1978). The process of friendship formation. Social Networks. 1, 193-210.
哈裡南,MT(1978 年)。友誼形成的過程。社交網路。1, 193-210.

Hallinan, M.T. (1982). Cognitive balance and differential popularity in social networks. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45, 86-90.
哈裡南,MT(1982 年)。社交網路中的認知平衡和差異流行度。社會心理學季刊。45, 86-90.

Hallinan, M.T., and Hutchins, E.E. (1980). Structural effects on dyadic change. Social Forces. 59, 229-245.
Hallinan,M.T.和Hutchins,EE(1980)。對二元變化的結構效應。社會力量。59, 229-245.

Hallinan, M.T., and Kubitschek, W.N. (1988). The effects of individual and structural characteristics on intransitivity in social networks. Social Psychology Quarterly. 51, 81-92.
Hallinan,M.T.和Kubitschek,W.N.(1988)。個體和結構特徵對社交網路中不可傳遞性的影響。社會心理學季刊。51, 81-92.

Hallinan, M.T., and Kubitschek, W.N. (1990). Sex and race effects on the response to intransitive sentiment relations. Social Psychology Quarterly. 53, 252-263.
Hallinan,M.T.和Kubitschek,W.N.(1990)。性別和種族對不及物情感關係反應的影響。社會心理學季刊。53, 252-263.

Hallinan, M.T., and McFarland, D.D. (1975). Higher order stability conditions in mathematical models of sociometric or cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 4, 131-148.
Hallinan,M.T.和McFarland,D.D.(1975)。社會計量學或認知結構的數學模型中的高階穩定性條件。數學社會學雜誌。4, 131-148.

Hallinan, M.T., and Smith, S.S. (1985). The effects of classroom racial composition on students' interracial friendliness. Social Psychological Quarterly. 48,3-16.
Hallinan,M.T.和Smith,SS(1985)。課堂種族構成對學生跨種族友好度的影響。社會心理學季刊。48,3-16.

Hallinan, M.T., and Williams, R.A. (1987). The stability of students' interracial friendships. American Sociological Review. 52, 653-664.
Hallinan,M.T.和Williams,RA(1987)。學生跨種族友誼的穩定性。美國社會學評論。52, 653-664.

Hallinan, M.T., and Williams, RA. (1989). Interracial friendship choices in secondary schools. American Sociological Review. 54,67-78.
哈裡南,M.T.和威廉姆斯,RA。(1989). 中學的跨種族友誼選擇.美國社會學評論。54,67-78.

Hammer, M. (1980). Reply to Killworth and Bernard. Connections. 3, 14-15.
哈默,M.(1980 年)。回復 Killworth 和 Bernard。連接。3, 14-15.

Hammer, M. (1983). 'Core' and 'extended' social networks in relation to health and illness. Social Science and Medicine. 7, 405-411.
哈默,M.(1983 年)。與健康和疾病相關的“核心”和“擴展”社交網路。社會科學與醫學。7, 405-411.

Hammer, M. (1985). Implications of behavioral and cognitive reciprocity in social network data. Social Networks. 7, 189-201.
哈默,M.(1985 年)。社交網路數據中行為和認知互惠的影響。社交網路。7, 189-201.

Hammer, M., Polgar, S., and Salzinger, K. (1969). Speech predictability and social contact patterns in an informal group. Human Organization. 28, 235-242.
Hammer,M.,Polgar,S.和Salzinger,K.(1969)。非正式群體中的言語可預測性和社交接觸模式。人類組織。28, 235-242.

Hansell, S. (1984). Cooperative groups, weak ties, and the integration of peer friendships. Social Psychology Quarterly. 47, 316-328.
漢塞爾,S.(1984 年)。合作團體,弱關係,以及同伴友誼的整合。社會心理學季刊。47, 316-328.

Harary, F. (1953). On the notion of balance of a signed graph. Michigan Mathematical Journal. 2, 143-146.
哈拉裡,F.(1953 年)。關於有符號圖的平衡概念。密歇根數學雜誌。2, 143-146.

Harary, F. (1955a). The number of linear, directed, rooted, and connected graphs. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 78, 445-463.
哈拉裡,F.(1955a)。線性圖、有向圖、根圖和連通圖的數量。美國數學會匯刊。78, 445-463.

Harary, F. (1955b). On local balance and N-balance in signed graphs. Michigan Mathematical Journal. 3, 37-4l. Harary, F. (1957). Structural duality. Behavioral Science. 2, 255-265.
哈拉裡,F.(1955b)。在有符號圖中的局部平衡和 N 平衡上。密歇根數學雜誌。3、37-4升。哈拉裡,F.(1957 年)。結構二元性。行為科學。2, 255-265.

Harary, F. (1959a). On the measurement of structural balance. Behavioral Science. 4, 316-323.
哈拉裡,F.(1959a)。關於結構平衡的測量。行為科學。4, 316-323.

Harary, F. (1959b). Graph theoretic methods in the management sciences. Management Science. 5, 387-403.
哈拉裡,F.(1959b)。管理科學中的圖論方法。管理科學。5, 387-403.

Harary, F. (1959c). Status and contrastatus. Sociometry. 22, 23-43.
哈拉裡,F.(1959c)。狀態和禁忌狀態。社會測量學。22, 23-43.

Harary, F. (1960). A matrix criterion for structural balance. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 7, 195-199.
哈拉裡,F.(1960 年)。結構平衡的矩陣準則。海軍研究後勤季刊。7, 195-199.

Harary, F. (1969). Graph Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
哈拉裡,F.(1969 年)。圖論。馬薩諸塞州雷丁:艾迪生-衛斯理。

Harary, F., and Norman, RZ. (1953). Graph Theory as a Mathematical Model in Social Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
哈拉裡,F.和諾曼,RZ。(1953). 圖論作為社會科學中的數學模型.安娜堡:密歇根大學出版社。

Harary, F., Norman, R.Z., and Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. New York: John WHey and Sons. Harary, E, and Palmer, E. (1966). Enumeration of locally restricted digraphs. Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 18,853-860.
Harary,F.,Norman,R.Z.和Cartwright,D.(1965)。結構模型:有向圖理論簡介。紐約:John WHey and Sons。Harary,E和Palmer,E.(1966)。枚舉本地限制的二元對立文字。加拿大數學雜誌。18,853-860.

Harary, E, and Ross, I.C. (1957). A procedure for clique detection using the group matrix. Sociometry. 20,205-215.
Harary, E, 和 Ross, I.C. (1957)。使用群矩陣進行群檢測的過程。社會測量學。20,205-215.

Hartigan, J.A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Hastie, R, Penrod, S., and Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
哈蒂根,JA(1975 年)。聚類演算法。紐約:約翰·威利父子。Hastie,R,Penrod,S.和Pennington,N.(1983)。陪審團內部。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:哈佛大學出版社。

Hayashi, C. (1958). Note on sampling from a sociometric pattern. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 9, 49-52.
Hayashi,C.(1958 年)。關於從社會計量模式中抽樣的注意事項。統計數學研究所年鑒。9, 49-52.

Heider, E (1944). Social perception and phenomenal organization. Psychological Review. 51,358-374.
海德,E(1944 年)。社會感知和非凡的組織。心理評論。51,358-374.

Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology. 21, 107-112.
海德,F.(1946 年)。態度和認知組織。心理學雜誌。21, 107-112.

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Heider, E (1979). On balance and attribution. In Holland, p.w., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 11-23. New York: Academic Press.
海德,F.(1958 年)。人際關係心理學。紐約:約翰·威利父子。海德,E(1979 年)。關於平衡和歸因。在Holland, p.w., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, 第11-23頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Heil, G.H., and White, H.C. (1976). An algorithm for finding simultaneous homomorphic correspondences between graphs and their image graphs. Behavioral Science. 21,26-35.
Heil,G.H.和White,HC(1976)。一種用於查找圖形與其圖像圖形之間同時同態對應關係的演算法。行為科學。21,26-35.

Held, M., and Karp, R. M. (1970). The traveling salesman problem and minimum spanning trees. Operations Research, 18, 1138-1162.
Held, M. 和 Karp, RM (1970)。旅行推銷員問題和最小生成樹。運籌學, 18, 1138-1162.

Hempel, e.G. (1952). Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. In Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 2, Number 7. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hempel,例如(1952)。實證科學概念形成的基礎。在統一科學百科全書中,第 2 卷,第 7 期。芝加哥:芝加哥大學出版社。

Henley, N.M., Horsfall, R.B., and De Soto, C.B. (1969). Goodness of figure and social structure. Psychological Review. 76, 194-204.
Henley,N.M.,Horsfall,RB和De Soto,CB(1969)。身材和社會結構的善良。心理評論。76, 194-204.

Higgins, CA., McClean, R.J., and Conrath, D.W. (1985). The accuracy and biases of diary communication data. Social Networks. 7, 173-187.
加利福尼亞州希金斯,麥克萊恩,RJ 和康拉斯,DW(1985 年)。日記通信數據的準確性和偏差。社交網路。7, 173-187.

Hill, M.O. (1974). Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics. 23, 340-345.
希爾,M.O.(1974 年)。對應分析:一種被忽視的多變數方法。應用統計學。23, 340-345.

Hill, M.O. (1982). Correspondence analysis. In Kotz, S., and Johnson, N.L. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, pages 204-210. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
希爾,M.O.(1982 年)。對應分析。在Kotz,S.和Johnson,N.L.(編輯),統計科學百科全書,第204-210頁。紐約:約翰·威利父子。

Hiramatsu, H. (ed.) (1990). Shakai Nettowaku. Tokyo: Fukumura.
平松,H.(編輯)(1990 年)。沙凱·內托瓦庫(Shakai Nettowaku)。東京:福村。

Hoaglin, D.e., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J.W. (eds.) (1985). Exploring Data
Hoaglin,D.e.,Mosteller,F.和Tukey,JW(編輯)(1985)。探索數據

Mouton, J.S., Blake, R.R., and Fruchter, B. (1955b). The validity of sociometric responses. SOciometry. 18, 181-206.
Mouton,JS,Blake,RR和Fruchter,B.(1955b)。社會測量反應的有效性。SOciometric(測光法)。18, 181-206.

Moxley, R.L., and Moxley, N.F. (1974). Determining point-centrality in uncontrived social networks. Sociometry. 37, 122-130.
莫克斯利,RL和莫克斯利,NF(1974)。確定非人為社交網路中的點中心性。社會測量學。37, 122-130.

Mullins, N.C. (1973). Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
北卡羅來納州穆林斯(1973 年)。當代美國社會學中的理論和理論組。紐約:Harper & Row。

Mullins, N.C., Hargens, L.L., Hecht, P.K., and Kick, E.L. (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review. 42, 552-562.
北卡羅來納州穆林斯,哈根斯,LL,赫克特,PK和Kick,EL(1977)。共引簇的組結構:比較研究。美國社會學評論。42, 552-562.

Nadel, S.F. (1957). The Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press. Nahinsky, 1.0. (1969). A group interaction stochastic model based on balance theoretical considerations. Behavioral Science. 14, 289-302.
納德爾,SF(1957 年)。社會結構理論。紐約:自由新聞。 Nahinsky,1.0。(1969). 基於平衡理論考慮的群相互作用隨機模型.行為科學。14, 289-302.

Nehnevajsa, J. (1955a). Chance expectancy and intergroup choice. Sociometry.
Nehnevajsa,J.(1955a)。機會期望和組間選擇。社會測量學。

Nehnevajsa, J. (1955b). Probability in sociometric analysis. Sociometry. 18, 678-688.
Nehnevajsa,J.(1955b)。社會計量分析中的概率。社會測量學。18, 678-688.

Nelder, J.A., and Wedderburn, R.w. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. 135, 370-384.
Nelder,JA和Wedderburn,R.w.(1972)。廣義線性模型。《皇家統計學會雜誌》,A輯135,370-384。

Nemeth, RJ., and Smith, D.A. (1985). International trade and world-system structure, A multiple network analysis. Review. 8, 517-560.
Nemeth,RJ.和Smith,DA(1985)。國際貿易與世界體系結構, 多元網路分析.回顧。8, 517-560.

Newcomb, T.M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts.
紐科姆,TM(1953 年)。一種研究交際行為的方法。

Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
紐科姆,TM(1961年)。相識過程。紐約:霍爾特、萊因哈特和溫斯頓。

Newcomb, T.M. (1965). Role Relationships. In Newcomb, T.M., Turner, R.H., and Converse, P.E. (eds.), Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
紐科姆,TM(1965年)。角色關係。在Newcomb,T.M.,Turner,R.H.和Converse,P.E.(編輯),社會心理學。紐約:霍爾特、萊因哈特和溫斯頓。

Newcomb, T.M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In Abelson, R.P., Aronson, E., McGuire, WJ., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, MJ., and Tannenbaum, O.H. (eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency. Chicago: Rand McNally.
紐科姆,TM(1968 年)。人際平衡。在 Abelson, R.P., Aronson, E., McGuire, WJ., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, MJ., and Tannenbaum, OH (eds.), 認知一致性理論.芝加哥:蘭德·麥克納利。

Newcomb, T.M. (1981). Heiderian balance as a group phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 40, 862-867.
紐科姆,TM(1981 年)。海德平衡作為一種群體現象。人格與社會心理學雜誌。40, 862-867.

Nieminen, J. (1973). On the centrality in a directed graph. Social Science Research. 2,371-378.
Nieminen,J.(1973 年)。關於有向圖的中心性。社會科學研究。2,371-378.

Nieminen, J. (1974). On centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 15, 322-336.
Nieminen,J.(1974 年)。關於圖中的中心性。斯堪的納維亞心理學雜誌。15, 322-336.

Niesmoller, K., and Schijf, B. (1980). Applied network analysis. Quality and Quantity. 14, 101-116.
Niesmoller,K.和Schijf,B.(1980)。應用網路分析。質量和數量。14, 101-116.

Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
西裡,S.(1980 年)。分類數據分析:雙重縮放及其應用.多倫多:多倫多大學出版社。

Nolan, P.D. (1983). Status in the world economy and national structure and development. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 24, 109-120.
諾蘭,PD(1983 年)。在世界經濟和國家結構和發展中的地位。國際比較社會學雜誌。24, 109-120.

Nolan, P.D. (1987). World system status, income inequality, and economic growth: A criticism of recent criticism. International Journal of Comparative SOCiology. 28, 69-76.
諾蘭,PD(1987 年)。世界體系地位、收入不平等和經濟增長:對近期批評的批評。國際比較SOCiology雜誌。28, 69-76.

NoIan, P.D. (1988). World system status, techno-economic heritage, and fertility. SOciological Focus. 21, 9-33.
諾伊恩,PD(1988 年)。世界體系地位、技術經濟遺產和生育率。社會學重點。21, 9-33.

Noma, E. (1982a). Untangling citation networks. Information Processing & Management. 18,43-53.
Noma,E.(1982a)。解開引文網路。信息處理與管理。18,43-53.

Noma, E. (1982b). The simultaneous scaling of cited and citing articles in a common space. Scientometrics. 4,205-231.
Noma,E.(1982b)。在公共空間中同時縮放被引用和引用的文章。科學計量學。4,205-231.

Noma, E., and Smith, D.R (1978). SHED: A FORTRAN IV program for the analysis of small group sociometric structure. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation. 10, 60-62.
Noma,E.和Smith,DR(1978)。SHED:用於分析小群體社會計量結構的 FORTRAN IV 程式。行為研究方法和儀器。10, 60-62.

Noma, E., and Smith, D.R (1985a). Benchmark for the blocking of sociometric data. Psychological Bulletin. 97, 583-591.
Noma, E. 和 Smith, DR (1985a)。阻止社會計量數據的基準。心理公報。97, 583-591.

Nordlie, P. (1958). A longitudinal study of interpersonal attraction in a natural group setting. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
諾德利,P.(1958 年)。自然群體環境中人際吸引力的縱向研究。未發表的博士論文,密歇根大學心理學系。

Norman, R.Z., and Roberts, ES. (1972a). A derivation of a measure of relative balance for social structures and a characterization of extensive ratio systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 9, 66-91.
諾曼,R.Z.和羅伯茨,ES。(1972a). 社會結構相對平衡度量的推導和粗放比率系統的特徵.數學心理學雜誌。9, 66-91.

Norman, R.Z., and Roberts, ES. (1972b). A measure of relative balance for social structures. In Berger, 1., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress. n, pages 358-391. New York: Houghton
諾曼,R.Z.和羅伯茨,ES。(1972b). 社會結構相對平衡的量度.在 Berger, 1., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (eds.) 中,社會學理論正在進行中。n,第358-391頁。紐約:霍頓

Northway, M.L. (1940). A method for depicting social relationships obtained by sociometric testing. Sociometry. 3, 144-150.
諾斯韋,ML(1940 年)。一種描述通過社會測量測試獲得的社會關係的方法。社會測量學。3, 144-150.

Northway, M.L. (1951). A note on the use of target sociograms. Sociometry. 14, 235-236.
諾斯韋,ML(1951 年)。關於使用目標社會圖的說明。社會測量學。14, 235-236.

Northway, M.L. (1952). A Primer of Sociometry. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.
諾斯韋,ML(1952 年)。社會測量學入門。多倫多:多倫多大學出版社。

Norusis, M.1. (1985). SPSSx: Advanced Statistics Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
諾魯西斯,M.1。(1985). SPSSx:高級統計指南.伊利諾伊州芝加哥:SPSS。

Nosanchuk, T.A. (1963). A comparison of several sociometric partitioning techniques. Sociometry. 26, 112-124.
Nosanchuk,TA(1963 年)。幾種社會計量學分區技術的比較。社會測量學。26, 112-124.

Osgood, C.E., and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review. 62, 42-55.
奧斯古德,CE和Tannenbaum,PH(1955)。預測態度變化的一致性原則。心理評論。62, 42-55.

Padgett, IF. (1987). Social mobility in hieratic control systems. Unpublished manuscript. PadgeU, 1.F. (1990). Mobility as control: Congressmen through committees. In
帕吉特,IF。(1987). 分層控制系統中的社會流動性.未發表的手稿。PadgeU,1.F.(1990年)。流動性作為控制:國會議員通過委員會。在

PadgeU, I.E, and Ansell, C.K. (1989). From faction to party in Renaissance Florence: The emergence of the Medici patronage party. Unpublished manuscript.
PadgeU, I.E, 和 Ansell, C.K. (1989)。文藝復興時期佛羅倫薩從派系到政黨:美第奇贊助黨的出現。未發表的手稿。

Padgett, IF., and Ansell, C.K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology. 98, 1259-1319.
Padgett,IF和Ansell,C.K.(1993)。強有力的行動和美第奇家族的崛起,1400-1434 年。美國社會學雜誌。98, 1259-1319.

Pagel, M.D., Erdly, WW., and Becker, 1. (1987). Social networks: We get by with (and in spite of) a little help from our friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53, 793-804.
Pagel, M.D., Erdly, WW., 和 Becker, 1.(1987). 社交網路:我們靠朋友的一點説明過日子。人格與社會心理學雜誌。53, 793-804.

Palmer. E. (1985). Graphical Evolution. New York: Wiley.
帕爾默。E.(1985年)。圖形演變。紐約:威利。

Panning, W.H. (1982a). Fitting blockmodels to data Social Networks. 4,81-101.
潘寧,W.H.(1982a)。將塊模型擬合到數據社交網路。4,81-101.

Panning, W.H. (1982b). Blockmodels: From relations to configurations. American Journal of Political Science. 26, 585-608.
潘寧,W.H.(1982b)。塊模型:從關係到配置。美國政治學雜誌。26, 585-608.

Parker, G.R, and Parker, S.L. (1979). Factions in committees: The U.s. House of Representatives. The American Political Science Review. 73, 85-102.
Parker, GR 和 Parker, SL (1979)。委員會中的派系:美國眾議院。美國政治學評論。73, 85-102.

Pattison, P.E. (1981). A reply to McConaghy. Sociological Methods and Research. 9, 286-302.
帕蒂森,PE(1981 年)。對麥康納希的回復。社會學方法與研究。9, 286-302.

Pattison, P.E. (1982). The analysis of semigroups of multirelational systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 25,87-118.
帕蒂森,PE(1982 年)。多重關係系統的半群分析。數學心理學雜誌 25,87-118。

Pattison, P.E. (1988). Network models: Some comments on papers in this special issue. Social Networks. 10, 383--411.
帕蒂森,PE(1988 年)。網路模型:對本期特刊論文的一些評論。社交網路。10, 383--411.

Pattison, P.E. (1993). Algebraic Models for Social Netwoks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
帕蒂森,PE(1993 年)。社會網路的代數模型。英國劍橋:劍橋大學出版社。

Pattison, P.E., and Bartlett, w.K. (1982). A factorization procedure for finite algebras. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 25,51-81.
帕蒂森,PE和巴特利特,WK(1982)。有限代數的因式分解過程。數學心理學雜誌。25,51-81.

Pattison, P.E., and Wasserman, S. (1993). Algebraic models for local social networks based on statistical methods. Unpublisbed manuscript.
Pattison,PE和Wasserman,S.(1993)。基於統計方法的局部社交網路代數模型。未出版的手稿。

Payne, C.D. (1985). The GLIM System Release 3.77: Generalized Linear Interactive Modelling Manual. Oxford: The Numerical Algorithms Group.
佩恩,CD(1985 年)。GLIM 系統 3.77 版:廣義線互建模手冊。牛津:數值演算法組。

Peay, E.R. (1974). Hierarcbical clique structures. Sociometry. 37, 54-65.
皮伊,ER(1974 年)。等級集團結構。社會測量學。37, 54-65.

Peay, E.R. (1975a). Nonmetric grouping: clusters and cliques. Psychometrika. 40, 297-313.
Peay, E.R.(1975年a)。非度量分組:集群和集團。心理測量。40, 297-313.

Peay, E.R. (1975b). Grouping by cliques for directed relationships.
Peay, E.R.(1975年b)。按集團分組以獲得定向關係。

Peay, E.R (1980). Connectedness in a general model for valued networks. Social
皮伊,ER(1980 年)。有價值網路的通用模型中的連通性。社會的

PhiIlips, D.P., and Conviser, RH. (1972). Measuring the structure and boundary properties of groups: Some uses of information tbeory. Sociometry. 35, 235-254.
PhiIlips, D.P. 和 Conviser, RH.(1972). 測量群的結構和邊界特性:資訊的一些用途.社會測量學。35, 235-254.

Pitts, ER (1965). A graph theoretic approach to historical geography. The Professional Geographer. 17, 15-20.
皮茨,急診室(1965年)。歷史地理學的圖論方法。專業地理學家。17, 15-20.

Pitts, ER (1979). The medieval river trade network of Russia revisited. Social Networks. 1, 285-292.
皮茨,急診室(1979年)。重新審視了俄羅斯的中世紀河流貿易網路。社交網路。1, 285-292.

Popping, R., Snijders, T.A.B., and Stokman, EN. (1988). Triad counts. In Stokman, EN., and Van Veen, FJ. (eds.), GRADAP User's Manual, Volume Ill. Amsterdam: The University of Amsterdam.
Popping, R.、Snijders、TAB 和 Stokman, EN。(1988). 三合會計數.在 Stokman, EN. 和 Van Veen, FJ.(編輯),GRADAP 用戶手冊,第 Ill 卷。 阿姆斯特丹:阿姆斯特丹大學。

Price, K.O., Harburg, E., and Newcomb, T.M. (1966). Psychological balance in situations of negative interpersonal attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 3, 255-270.
Price,K.O.,Harburg,E.和Newcomb,TM(1966)。消極人際態度情況下的心理平衡。人格與社會心理學雜誌。3, 255-270.

Proctor, C.H. (1967). The variance of an estimate of linkage density from a simple random sample of graph nodes. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 1967, pages 342-343.
普羅克特,CH(1967 年)。從圖節點的簡單隨機樣本中估計連鎖密度的方差。《社會統計科會議記錄》,美國統計協會,1967年,第342-343頁。

Proctor, C.H. (1969). Analyzing prior data and point data on social relationships, attitudes, and background characteristics of Costa Rican Census Bureau employees. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 1969, pages 457--465.
普羅克特,CH(1969 年)。分析哥斯大黎加人口普查局員工的社會關係、態度和背景特徵的先前數據和點數據。《社會統計科會議記錄》,美國統計協會,1969年,第457--465頁。

Proctor, C.H. (1979). Graph sampling compared to conventional sampling. In Holland, PW., and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, pages 301-318. New York: Academic Press.
普羅克特,CH(1979 年)。圖形採樣與傳統採樣的比較。在Holland,PW.和Leinhardt,S.(編輯),《社交網路研究的觀點》,第301-318頁。紐約:學術出版社。

Proctor, C.H., and Loomis, C.P. (1951). Analysis of sociometric data. In Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M" and Cook, S.w. (eds.), Research Methods in Social Relations, pages 561-586. New York: Dryden Press.
Proctor, C.H. 和 Loomis, CP (1951)。社會測量數據分析。在Jahoda,M.,Deutsch,M“和Cook,S.w.(編輯),社會關係研究方法,第561-586頁。紐約:德萊頓出版社。

Radcliffe-Brown, A.R (1940). On social structure. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 70, 1-12.
拉德克利夫-布朗,AR(1940 年)。關於社會結構。大不列顛及愛爾蘭皇家人類學學會雜誌。70, 1-12.

Rainio, K. (1966). A study on sociometric group structure: An application of a stochastic theory of social interaction. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and
雷尼奧,K.(1966 年)。社會計量群體結構研究:社會互動隨機理論的應用。在 Berger, J.、Zelditch, M. 和

Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Volume 1. Boston: Houghton MifHin. Rao, A.R, and Bandyopadhyay, S. (1987). Measures of reciprocity in a social network. Sankhyii, Series A. 49, 141-188.
Anderson, B.(編輯),《社會學理論進展中》,第 1 卷。波士頓:Houghton MifHin。Rao,A.R和Bandyopadhyay,S.(1987)。社交網路中的互惠措施。Sankhyii,A輯49,141-188。

Rao, A.R, and Rao, S.B. (1988). Measuring reciprocity in weighted social networks. Unpublished manuscript.
Rao,AR和Rao,SB(1988)。衡量加權社交網路中的互惠性。未發表的手稿。

Rapoport, A. (l949a). Outline of a probabilistic approach to animal sociology. I. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 11, 183-196.
拉波波特,A.(l949a)。動物社會學概率方法的概述。I. 數學生物物理學通報。11, 183-196.

11. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 11, 273-281.
11. 數學生物物理學通報.11, 273-281.

Rapoport, A. (1950). Outline of a probabilistic approach to animal sociology. Ill. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 12,7-17.
Rapoport,A.(1950 年)。動物社會學概率方法的概述。數學生物物理學通報。12,7-17.

Rapoport, A. (1953). Spread of information through a population with sociostructural bias: I. Assumption of transitivity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 15, 523-533.
Rapoport,A.(1953 年)。在具有社會結構偏見的人群中傳播資訊:I.傳遞性的假設。數學生物物理學通報。15, 523-533.

Rapoport, A. (1957). A contribution to the theory of random and biased nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 19,257-271.
Rapoport,A.(1957 年)。對隨機和偏置網路理論的貢獻。數學生物物理學通報。19,257-271.

Rapoport, A. (1963). Mathematical models of social interaction. In Luce, RD., Bush, RR., and Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume I, pages 493-579. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Rapoport, A. (1979). A probabilistic approach to networks. Social Networks. 2, 1-18.
Rapoport,A.(1963 年)。社會互動的數學模型。在 Luce, RD.、Bush, RR. 和 Galanter, E.(編輯)中,數學心理學手冊,第一卷,第 493-579 頁。紐約:約翰·威利父子。Rapoport,A.(1979 年)。網路的概率方法。社交網路。2, 1-18.

Rapoport, A., and Horvath, w.J. (1961). A study of a large sociogram. Behavioral Science. 6, 279-291.
Rapoport,A.和Horvath,w.J.(1961)。對大型社會圖的研究。行為科學。6, 279-291.

Reis, H.T., Wheeler, L., Kernix, M.H., Spiegel, N., and NezJek, 1. (1985). On specificity in the impact of social participation on physical and psychological health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 456-471.
Reis, HT, Wheeler, L., Kernix, MH, Spiegel, N., 和 NezJek, 1.(1985). 關於社會參與對身心健康影響的特殊性.人格與社會心理學雜誌,48,456-471。

Reitz, K.P. (1982). Using log linear analysis with network data: Another look at Sampson's monastery. Social Networks. 4, 243...,.256. Reitz. K.P. (1988). Social groups in a monastery. Social Networks. 10, 343-358.
Reitz,K.P.(1982 年)。對網路數據使用對數線性分析:桑普森修道院的再一視角。社交網路。4, 243...,.256.雷茨。K.P.(1988年)。修道院中的社會團體。社交網路。10, 343-358.

Reitz, K.P., and Dow, M. (1989). Network interdependence of sample units in contingency tables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 14, 85-96.
Reitz,K.P.和Dow,M.(1989)。列聯表中樣本單元的網路相互依賴性。數學社會學雜誌。14, 85-96.

Rice, R.E., and Richards, W.D. (1985). An overview of network analysis methods and programs. In Dervin, B., and Voigt, M.J. (eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, Volume 6, pages 105-165.
賴斯,RE和理查茲,WD(1985)。網路分析方法和程式概述。在 Dervin, B. 和 Voigt, M.J. (eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, Volume 6, pages 105-165.

Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co. Richards, W.D. (1989a). The NEGOPY AnalYSis Program. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, Simon Fraser University.
新澤西州諾伍德:Ablex Publishing Co. Richards, W.D. (1989a)。NEGOPY AnalYSis計劃。未發表的手稿,西蒙弗雷澤大學傳播系。

Richards, W.D. (1989b). FATCAT - for Thick Data. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, Simon Fraser University. Roberts, ES. (1976). Discrete Mathematical Models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Roberts, F.S. (1978). Graph Theory and Its Applications to Problems of Society. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
理查茲,W.D.(1989b)。FATCAT - 用於厚數據。未發表的手稿,西蒙弗雷澤大學傳播系。羅伯茨,ES。(1976). 離散數學模型.新澤西州恩格爾伍德懸崖:Prentice-Hall。羅伯茨,FS(1978 年)。圖論及其在社會問題中的應用。費城:工業與應用數學學會。

Rodrigues, A. (1967). Effects of balance, positivity, and agreement in triadic social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 5, 472-475.
羅德裡格斯,A.(1967 年)。平衡、積極性和一致性在三元社會關係中的影響。人格與社會心理學雜誌。5, 472-475.

Rodrigues, A. (1981). Conditions favoring the effects of balance, agreement, and attraction in P - 0 - X triads. Inderdisciplinaria. 2, 59-68.
羅德裡格斯,A.(1981 年)。有利於 P - 0 - X 三聯征中平衡、一致和吸引力影響的條件。Inderdisciplinaria。2, 59-68.

Rodrigues, A., and Dela Coleta, 1.A. (1983). The prediction of preferences for triadic interpersonal relations. The Journal of Social Psychology. 121, 73-80.
羅德裡格斯,A.和德拉科萊塔,1.A.(1983)。對三元人際關係偏好的預測。社會心理學雜誌。121, 73-80.

Rodrigues, A, and Ziviani, C.R (1974). A theoretical explanation for the intermediate level of tension found in nonbalanced P ~ 0 - X triads. Journal of Psychology. 88, 47-56.
羅德裡格斯(A)和齊維亞尼(CR)(1974)。對非平衡 P ~ 0 - X 三元組中發現的中等張力水平的理論解釋。心理學雜誌。88, 47-56.

Roethlisberger, El. and Dickson, WJ. (1961). Management and the Worker. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Roethlisberger, El. 和 Dickson, WJ.(1961). 管理與工人.劍橋。MA:哈佛大學出版社。

Rogers, D.L. (1974). Sociometric analysis of interorganizational relations: Application of theory and measurement. Rural Sociology. 39, 487-503.
羅傑斯,DL(1974 年)。組織間關係的社會計量分析:理論和測量的應用。農村社會學。39, 487-503.

Rogers, E.M. (1979). Network analysis of the diffusion of innovations. In
羅傑斯,EM(1979 年)。創新擴散的網路分析。在

Holland, P.w.. and Leinhardt. S. (eds.). Perspectives on Social Network
荷蘭,P.w.。和萊因哈特。S.(編輯)。對社交網路的看法

Rogers, E.M., and Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1976). Communication networks in organizations. Communication in Organizations, pages 108-148. New York: Free Press.
羅傑斯,EM和Agarwala-Rogers,R.(1976)。組織中的通信網路。《組織中的溝通》,第108-148頁。紐約:自由新聞。

Rogers, E.M.• and Kincaid. D.L. (1981). Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: Macmillan. Rohlf, EJ., and Sokal, RR. (1965). Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy. The University of Kansas Science Bulletin. 45, 3-27.
羅傑斯,EM•和金凱德。DL(1981年)。通信網路:邁向研究的新範式。紐約:麥克米倫。羅爾夫,EJ. 和 索卡爾,RR。(1965). 數值分類學中的相關係數和距離係數.堪薩斯大學科學公報。45, 3-27.

Roistacher, R.C. (1974). A review of mathematical methods in sociometry. Sociological Methods and Research. 3, 123-171.
Roistacher,R.C.(1974 年)。社會測量學中的數學方法綜述。社會學方法與研究。3, 123-171.

Romney, AK. (1993). Visualizing Social Networks. Keynote address. 13th Annual International Sunbelt Social Network Conference. Tampa, Florida. Romney, AK., and Faust, K. (1982). Predicting the structure of a communications network from recalled data. Social Networks 4, 285-304.
羅姆尼,AK。(1993). 可視化社交網路.演講。第 13 屆年度國際 Sunbelt 社交網路會議。佛羅里達州坦帕市。羅姆尼,AK.和浮士德,K.(1982)。根據召回的數據預測通信網路的結構。社交網路4,285-304。

Romney, AK., and Weller, S.C. (1984). Predicting informant accuracy from patterns of recall among individuals. Social Networks 4, 59-77.
羅姆尼,AK和韋勒,南卡羅來納州(1984)。根據個人的回憶模式預測線人的準確性。社交網路 4, 59-77.

Rosenberg, M.J.• and Abelson, RP. (1960). An analysis of cognitive balancing. In Rosenberg, M.J., et al. (eds.), Attitude Organization and Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Rosenthal. N., Fingrutd. M., Ethier, M., Karant, R., and McDonald, D. (1985). Social movements and network analysis: A case study of nineteenth-century women's reform in New York state. American Journal of Sociology. 90. 1022-1054.
羅森伯格,MJ• 和阿貝爾森,RP。(1960). 認知平衡分析.在Rosenberg,M.J.等人(編輯)中,態度組織與變革。康涅狄格州紐黑文:耶魯大學出版社。 羅森塔爾。N.,芬格魯特。M.,Ethier,M.,Karant,R.和McDonald,D.(1985)。社會運動和網路分析:紐約州19世紀婦女改革的案例研究。美國社會學雜誌。90. 1022-1054.

Rosner, B. (1989). Multivariate methods for clustered binary data with more than one level of nesting. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 84, 373-380.
羅斯納,B.(1989 年)。具有多個嵌套級別的聚類二進位數據的多變數方法。美國統計協會雜誌。84, 373-380.

Runger, G., and Wasserman, S. (1979). Longitudinal analysis of friendship networks. Social Networks. 2, 143-154.
Runger,G.和Wasserman,S.(1979)。友誼網路的縱向分析。社交網路。2, 143-154.

Ryser, H.J. (1957). Combinatorial properties of matrices of zeros and ones. Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 9,371-377.
Ryser,HJ(1957 年)。0 和 1 矩陣的組合性質。加拿大數學雜誌。9,371-377.

Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika. 31, 581-603.
Sabidussi,G.(1966 年)。圖形的中心性索引。心理測量。31, 581-603.

Sade, D.S. (1965). Some aspects of parent-offspring and sibling relations in a group of rhesus monkeys, with a discussion of grooming. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 23, 1-18.
薩德,DS(1965 年)。一群恆河猴的父母-後代和兄弟姐妹關係的某些方面,並討論了梳理。美國體質人類學雜誌。23, 1-18.

Sailer, L.D. (1978). Structural equivalence: Meaning and definition, computation and application. Social Networks. 1, 73-90.
塞勒,L.D.(1978 年)。結構等價:含義和定義,計算和應用。社交網路。1, 73-90.

Sailer, L.D., and Gaulin, S.lC. (1984). Proximity, sociality, and observation: The definition of social groups. American Anthropologist. 86,91-98. St. John, R.e., and Draper, N.R (1975). D-optimality for regression designs: A review. Technometrics. 17, 15-24.
Sailer,L.D.和Gaulin,S.lC.(1984)。接近性、社會性和觀察性:社會群體的定義。美國人類學家。86,91-98. 聖約翰,R.e.和德雷珀,N.R(1975)。回歸設計的 D 最優性:綜述。技術指標。17, 15-24.

Sampson, S.E (1968). A Novitiate in a Period of Change: An Experimental and
Sampson,SE(1968 年)。變革時期的新生:實驗和

Sarason, B.R., Shearin, E.N., Pierce, G.R, and Sarason, I.G. (1987). Interrelations of social support measures: Theoretical and practical implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52, 813-832.
Sarason,BR,Shearin,EN,Pierce,GR和Sarason,IG(1987)。社會支援措施的相互關係:理論和實踐意義。人格與社會心理學雜誌。52, 813-832.

Sarason, I.G., Levine, H.M., Basham, RB., and Sarason, B.R (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 48, 1162-1172.
Sarason,IG,Levine,HM,Basham,RB和Sarason,BR(1983)。評估社會支援:社會支援問卷。人格與社會心理學雜誌。48, 1162-1172.

Scheiblechner, H. (1971). The separation of individual- and system-influences on behavior in social contexts. Acta Psychologica. 35, 442-460.
Scheiblechner,H.(1971 年)。個人和系統對社會環境中行為的影響的分離。心理學報。35, 442-460.

Scheiblechner, H. (1972). Personality and system influences on behavior in groups: Frequency models. Acta Psychologica. 36, 322-336.
Scheiblechner,H.(1972 年)。人格和系統對群體行為的影響:頻率模型。心理學報。36, 322-336.

Scheiblechner, H. (1977). The social structure of large groups. In Kempf, W.F, and Rep, B.H. (eds.), Mathematical Models for Social Psychology, pages 170-182. Chichester: John WHey and Sons. Schendel, U. (1989). Sparse Matrices: Numerical Aspects with Applications for Scientists and Engineers. London: ElIis-Horwood.
Scheiblechner,H.(1977 年)。大群體的社會結構。在Kempf,W.F和Rep,B.H.(編輯),社會心理學的數學模型,第170-182頁。奇切斯特:約翰·惠父子。Schendel,U.(1989 年)。稀疏矩陣:科學家和工程師的數值方面應用。倫敦:ElIis-Horwood。

Schiffman, S.S., Reynolds, M.L., and Young, FW. (1981). Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Academic Press.
Schiffman, SS、Reynolds, ML 和 Young, FW。(1981). 多維縮放導論:理論、方法和應用.紐約:學術出版社。

Schott, T. (1986). Models of dyadic and individual components of a social relation: Applications to international trade. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12, 225-249.
肖特,T.(1986 年)。社會關係的二元和個體組成部分模型:在國際貿易中的應用。數學社會學雜誌。12, 225-249.

Schott, T. (1988). International influence in science: Beyond center and periphery. Social Science Research. 17, 219-238.
肖特,T.(1988 年)。科學的國際影響力:超越中心和邊緣。社會科學研究。17, 219-238.

SchuItz, J.v., and Hubert, L.J. (1976). A nonparametric test for the correspondence between two proximities matrices. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1, 59-67.
SchuItz,J.v.和Hubert,L.J.(1976)。兩個鄰近矩陣之間對應關係的非參數檢驗。教育統計雜誌。1, 59-67.

Schwartz, lE. (1977). An examination of CONCOR and related methods for blocking sociometric data. In Heise, n.R (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1977, pages 255-282. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. Schweizer, T. (1990). The power struggle in a Chinese community, 1950-1980: A social network analysis of the duality of actors and events. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology. 3, 19-44.
施瓦茨,lE。(1977). 對 CONCOR 和阻止社會測量數據的相關方法的檢查.Heise, n.R (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1977, pages 255-282.三藩市,Jossey-Bass。Schweizer,T.(1990 年)。1950-1980年華人社區的權力鬥爭:對行動者和事件二元性的社交網路分析。定量人類學雜誌。3, 19-44.

Scott, 1 (1988). Trend report: Social network analysis. Sociology. 22, 109-127.
斯科特,1(1988)。趨勢報告:社交網路分析。社會學。22, 109-127.

Scott, 1 (1992). Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Seed, P. (1990). Introducing Network Analysis in Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
斯科特,1(1992 年)。社交網路分析。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。種子,P.(1990 年)。在社會工作中引入網路分析。倫敦:潔西嘉·金斯利出版社。

Seeley, J.R. (1949). The net of reciprocal influence: A problem in treating sociometric data. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 3, 234--240.
Seeley,J.R.(1949年)。相互影響的網路:處理社會計量數據的問題。加拿大心理學雜誌。3, 234--240.

Seeman, M. (1946). A situational approach to intra-group Negro attitudes. Sociometry. 9, 199-206.
西曼,M.(1946 年)。群體內黑人態度的情境方法。社會測量學。9, 199-206.

Seidman, S.B. (1981a). Structures induced by collections of subsets: A hypergraph approach. Mathematical Social Sciences. 1,381-396.
Seidman, S.B.(1981年a)。由子集集合誘導的結構:超圖方法。數學社會科學。1,381-396.

Seidman, S.B. (1981b). LS sets as cohesive subsets of graphs and hypergraphs. Paper presented at the SIAM Conference On the Applications of Discrete Mathematics. Troy, NY, 1981.
塞德曼,S.B.(1981b)。LS 設置為圖和超圖的內聚子集。在SIAM離散數學應用會議上發表的論文。紐約州特洛伊,1981 年。

Seidman, S.B. (1983a). Internal Cohesion of LS Sets in Graphs. Social Networks. 5, 97-107.
塞德曼,SB(1983a)。圖中LS集的內部內聚力。社交網路。5, 97-107.

Seidman, S.B. (1983b). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks. 5,269-287.
塞德曼,SB(1983b)。網路結構和最低程度。社交網路。5,269-287.

Seidman, S.B., and Foster, B.L. (1978a). A graph-theoretic generalization of the clique concept. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 6, 139-154.
Seidman, S.B. 和 Foster, B.L. (1978a)。集團概念的圖論推廣。數學社會學雜誌。6, 139-154.

Seidman, S.B., and Foster, RL. (1978b). A note on the potential for genuine cross-fertilization between anthropology and mathematics. Social Networks. 1, 65-72.
塞德曼,SB 和福斯特,RL。(1978b). 關於人類學和數學之間真正交叉融合的潛力的說明.社交網路。1, 65-72.

Seidman, S.B., and Foster, B.L. (1978c). SONET-I: Social network analysis and modeling system. Social Networks. 2, 85~90.
Seidman, S.B. 和 Foster, BL (1978c)。SONET-I:社交網路分析和建模系統。社交網路。2、85~90。

Shannon, C.E., and Weaver, w.w. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of
香農,CE 和 Weaver,w.w.(1949 年)。的數學理論

Shaw, M.E. (1954). Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. Journal of Psychology. 38, 139~149.
肖,M.E.(1954 年)。群體結構和小群體中個體的行為。心理學雜誌。38、139~149.

Sheardon, A.W. (1970). Sampling Directed Graphs. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
A.W.希爾登(1970)。採樣有向圖。北卡羅來納州立大學統計系。未發表的博士論文。

Shimbel, A. (1953). Structural parameters of communication networks. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 15, 501~507.
Shimbel,A.(1953 年)。通信網路的結構參數。數學生物物理學通報。15、501~507.

Shotland, R.L. (1976). University Communication Networks: The Small World
肖特蘭,RL(1976 年)。大學通信網路:小世界

Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Silvey, S.D. (1981). Optimal Design. London: Chapman-Hall. Sim, F.M., and Schwartz, M.R. (1979). Does CONCOR find positions?
方法。紐約:約翰·威利父子。西爾維,S.D.(1981 年)。優化設計。倫敦:查普曼大廳。Sim,FM和Schwartz,MR(1979)。CONCOR能找到職位嗎?

Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel, ed. by Wolff, K.H. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
西梅爾,G.(1950 年)。喬治·西梅爾(Georg Simmel)的社會學,由沃爾夫(Wolff)編輯,KH Glencoe,伊利諾伊州:自由出版社。

Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free
西梅爾,G.(1955 年)。衝突和群體隸屬關係網路。伊利諾伊州葛籣科:免費

Singer, B., and Spilerman, S. (1974). Social mobility models for heterogeneous populations. In Costner, H. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1973~1974, pages 356-401. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Singer, B., and Spilerman, S. (1976). The representation of social processes by Markov models. American Journal of SOciology. 82, 1-54.
Singer,B.和Spilerman,S.(1974)。異質人口的社會流動模型。科斯特納主編,《社會學方法論》,1973~1974年,第356-401頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Singer,B.和Spilerman,S.(1976)。瑪律可夫模型對社會過程的表示。美國社會學雜誌。82, 1-54.

Singer, B., and Spilerman, S. (1977). Trace inequalities for Markov chains. Advances in Applied Probability. 9, 747-764.
Singer,B.和Spilerman,S.(1977)。跟蹤瑪律可夫鏈的不等式。應用概率論進展。9, 747-764.

Singer, B., and SpiIerman, S. (1978). Clustering on the main diagonal in mobility matrices. In Schuessler, K. (ed.), Sociological Methodology. 1979, pages 172~208. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Skvoretz, 1. (1983). Salience, heterogeneity, and consolidation of parameters: Civilizing Blau's primitive theory. American Sociological Review. 48, 360-375.
Singer,B.和SpiIerman,S.(1978)。在遷移矩陣中的主對角線上聚類。在Schuessler,K.(編輯)中,社會學方法論。1979年,第172~208頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。斯克沃雷茨,1。(1983). 參數的顯著性、異質性和整合性:文明布勞的原始理論.美國社會學評論。48, 360-375.

Skvoretz, J. (1985). Random and biased networks: SimuIations and approximations. Social Networks. 7, 255-261. Skvoretz,1. (1990). Biased net theory: Approximations, simulations, and observations. Social Networks. 12, 217~238.
Skvoretz,J.(1985 年)。隨機和偏置網路:類比和近似。社交網路。7, 255-261.斯克沃雷茨,1.(1990). 偏置網路理論:近似、類比和觀測.社交網路。12、217~238.

Smith, D., and White, D. (1988). Structure and dynamics of the global economy: Network analysis of international trade 1965-1980. Unpublished manuscript.
史密斯,D.和懷特,D.(1988)。全球經濟的結構和動態:1965-1980年國際貿易網路分析。未發表的手稿。

Smith, S.L. (1950). Communication Pattern and the Adaptability of Task-oriented Groups: An Experimental StUdy. Cambridge, MA: Group Networks Laboratory, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
史密斯,SL(1950 年)。面向任務的群體的溝通模式和適應性:實驗性研究。馬薩諸塞州劍橋:麻省理工學院電子研究實驗室集團網路實驗室。

Sneath, P.H.A., and Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: Freeman.
Sneath,PHA和Sokal,R.R.(1973)。數值分類法:數值分類的原理和實踐。三藩市:弗里曼。

Snijders, T.AB. (1981a). The degree variance: An index of graph heterogeneity. Social Networks. 3, 163-174.
Snijders, T.AB.(1981年a)。度方差:圖異質性的指數。社交網路。3, 163-174.

Snijders, T.AB. (1981b). Maximum value and null moments of the degree variance. TW-report 229. Department of Mathematics, University of Groningen.
Snijders, T.AB.(1981b)。度差的最大值和零矩。TW-報告 229.格羅寧根大學數學系。

Snijders, T.AB. (1987). Means and (co-)variances of triad counts in network analysis of subgroups. Unpublished paper # HB-87-848-EX in Heymans
Snijders,T.AB(1987 年)。亞組網路分析中三元組計數的均值和(協)方差。Heymans 中未發表的論文 # HB-87-848-EX

Bulletin, Psychological Institute, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
荷蘭格羅寧根大學心理研究所公報。

Snijders, T.AB. (1991a). Enumeration and simulation methods for 0-1 matrices with given marginals. Psychometrika. 56,397--417.
Snijders, T.AB.(1991年a)。具有給定邊際的 0-1 矩陣的枚舉和模擬方法。心理測量。56,397--417.

Snijders, T.A.B. (1991b). Recent research on the UIM,{Xi+},{Xj+} distribution.
Snijders, T.A.B. (1991b)。UIM,{習+},{Xj+}分佈的最新研究.

Snijders, T.AB., and Stokman, EN. (1987). Extensions of triad counts to networks with different subsets of points and testing underlying random graph distributions. Social Networks. 9, 249-275.
Snijders, T.AB. 和 Stokman, EN.(1987). 將三元組計數擴展到具有不同點子集的網路並測試潛在的隨機圖分佈.社交網路。9, 249-275.

Snyder, D., and Kick, E. (1979). Structural position in the world system and economic growth 1955-70: A multiple network analysis oftransnational interactions. American Journal of Sociology. 84, 1096--1126.
Snyder,D.和Kick,E.(1979)。1955-70年世界體系中的結構性地位和經濟增長:跨國互動的多元網路分析。美國社會學雜誌。84, 1096--1126.

Sokal, R.R., and Sneath, P.H.A (1963). Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.
Sokal, R.R. 和 Sneath, PHA (1963)。數值分類學原理。三藩市:弗里曼。

Sonquist, J., and Koenig, T. (1975). Interlocking directorates in the top U.S. corporations: A graph theory approach. Insurgent Sociologist. 5, 196--229.
Sonquist,J.和Koenig,T.(1975)。美國頂級公司的聯鎖董事會:圖論方法。叛亂社會學家。5, 196--229.

Sl'lrensen, AB., and Hallinan, M.T. (1976). A stochastic model for change in social structure. Social Science Research. 5,43-61.
Sl'lrensen,AB.和Hallinan,MT(1976)。社會結構變化的隨機模型。社會科學研究。5,43-61.

Sprenger, C.J.A., and Stokman, EN. (1989). GRADAP: Graph Definition and Analysis Package. Groningen, The Netherlands: iee ProGAMMA
Sprenger, C.J.A. 和 Stokman, EN.(1989). GRADAP:圖定義和分析包.荷蘭格羅寧根:iee ProGAMMA

Stephenson, K. (1989). Social centrality: A study of group dynamics using geJada baboons. Unpublished manuscript.
斯蒂芬森,K.(1989 年)。社會中心性:使用 geJada 狒狒的群體動力學研究。未發表的手稿。

Stephenson, K., and ZeJen, M. (1989). Rethinking centrality: Methods and applications. Social Networks. 11, 1-37.
Stephenson,K.和ZeJen,M.(1989)。重新思考中心性:方法和應用。社交網路。11, 1-37.

StogdiIl, R.M. (1951). The organization of working relationships: Twenty sociometric indices. Sociometry. 14, 366--374.
StogdiIl,RM(1951 年)。工作關係的組織:20個社會測量指標。社會測量學。14, 366--374.

Stouifer, S.E., Suchman, E.A, DeVinney, L.C., Star, S.A., and Williams, R.M. (1949). The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stouifer,SE,Suchman,EA,DeVinney,LC,Star,SA和Williams,RM(1949)。美國士兵:軍隊生活中的調整。新澤西州普林斯頓:普林斯頓大學出版社。

Strauss, D., and Freeman, L.e. (1989). Stochastic modeling and the analysis of structural data. In Freeman, L.C., White, D.R., and Romney, AK. (eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, pages 135--183.
施特勞斯,D.和弗里曼,LE(1989)。隨機建模和結構數據分析。在弗裡曼,L.C.,懷特,D.R.和羅姆尼,AK。(編輯),《社交網路分析研究方法》,第135--183頁。

Strauss, D., and Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. Journal of the American Statistical ASSOCiation. 85,204-212.
施特勞斯,D.和池田,M.(1990)。社交網路的偽似然估計。美國統計協會雜誌。85,204-212.

Sukhatme, P.V. (1938). On bipartitional functions. Philosophical Transactions. 237A, 375--409.
Sukhatme,P.V.(1938 年)。關於二分函數。哲學交易。237A,375--409。

Suppes, P., and Zinnes, J.L. (1963). Basic measurement theory. In Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., and Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 11. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Suppes,P.和Zinnes,J.L.(1963)。基本測量理論。在 Luce, R.D.、Bush, R.R. 和 Galanter, E.(編輯)中,數學心理學手冊,第 11 卷。紐約:約翰·威利父子。

Sylvester, J.1. (1882). On the geometrical forms called trees. Johns Hopkins University Circle. 1, 202-203.
西爾維斯特,J.1。(1882). 關於稱為樹的幾何形式.約翰霍普金斯大學圈。1, 202-203.

Taba, H. (1955). With Perspective on Human Relations: A Study of Peer Group Dynamics in an Eighth Grade. Washington, DC: American Council of Education.
塔巴,H.(1955 年)。從人際關係的角度:八年級的同伴群體動態研究。華盛頓特區:美國教育委員會。

Tagiuri, R. (1952). Relational analysis: An extension of sociometric method with emphasis upon social perception. Sociometry. 15, 91-104.
Tagiuri,R.(1952 年)。關係分析:社會計量方法的延伸,強調社會感知。社會測量學。15, 91-104.

Tagiuri, R., Blake, R.R., and Bruner, 1.S. (1953). Some determinants of the perception of positive and negative feelings in others. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 48, 585-592.
Tagiuri,R.,Blake,RR和Bruner,1.S.(1953)。對他人積極和消極情緒的看法的一些決定因素。異常與社會心理學雜誌。48, 585-592.

Tagiuri, R., Bruner, 1.S., and Kogan, N. (1955). Estimating the chance ex.pectancies of positive and negative feelings in others. Psychological Bulletin. 52, 122-131.
Tagiuri,R.,Bruner,1.S.和Kogan,N.(1955)。估計他人積極和消極情緒的幾率。心理公報。52, 122-131.

Tarn, T. (1989). Demarcating the boundaries between self and the social: The anatomy of centrality in social networks. Social Networks. 11, 387-401.
塔恩,T.(1989 年)。劃定自我與社會之間的界限:社會網路中心性的剖析。社交網路。11, 387-401.

Tashakkori, A, and Insko, CA (1979). Interpersonal attraction and the polarity of similar attitudes: A test of three balance models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37, 2262-2277.
Tashakkori,A和Insko,CA(1979)。人際吸引力和相似態度的兩極性:三種平衡模型的檢驗。人格與社會心理學雜誌。37, 2262-2277.

Taylor, H.E (1970). Balance in Small Groups. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
泰勒,HE(1970 年)。小組平衡。紐約:Van Nostrand Reinhold。

Taylor, M. (1969). Influence structures. Sociometry. 32, 490-502.
泰勒,M.(1969 年)。影響結構。社會測量學。32, 490-502.

Theil, H. (1967). Economics and Information Theory. Chicago: Rand McNally. Thibaut, lW., and Kelley, H.H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New
泰爾,H.(1967 年)。經濟學與資訊論。芝加哥:蘭德·麥克納利。Thibaut,lW.和Kelley,HH(1959)。群體的社會心理學。新增功能

York: John WHey and Sons. Thurrnan, B. (1980). In the office: Networks and coalitions. Social Networks. 2, 47-63.
約克:約翰·惠父子。瑟南,B.(1980 年)。在辦公室:網路和聯盟。社交網路。2, 47-63.

Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review.
瑟斯通,L.L.(1927 年)。比較判斷法則。心理評論。

Tracy, E.M., Catalano, R.E, Whittaker, J.K., and Fine, D. (1990). Reliability of social network data. Social Work Research and Abstracts. 26, 33-35.
Tracy,EM,Catalano,RE,Whittaker,JK和Fine,D.(1990)。社交網路數據的可靠性。社會工作研究和摘要。26, 33-35.

Travers, J., and Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry. 32,425-443.
Travers,J.和Milgram,S.(1969)。小世界問題的實驗研究。社會測量學。32,425-443.

Tucker, L.R. (1963). Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change. In Harris, C.W. (ed.), Problems in Measuring Change, pages 122-137.
塔克,LR(1963 年)。三因素矩陣因數分析對變化測量的影響。在Harris, C.W. (ed.), Problems in Measuring Change, 第122-137頁。

Tucker, L.R. (1964). The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In Gullikson, H., and Frederiksen, N. (eds.), Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, pages 110-119. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
塔克,LR(1964 年)。因數分析擴展到三維矩陣。在 Gullikson, H. 和 Frederiksen, N. (eds.) 中,對數學心理學的貢獻,第 110-119 頁。紐約:霍爾特、萊因哈特和溫斯頓。

Tucker, L.R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika. 31, 279-311.
塔克,LR(1966 年)。關於三模因數分析的一些數學筆記。心理測量。31, 279-311.

Tukey, lW. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
圖基,lW。(1977). 探索性數據分析.馬薩諸塞州雷丁:艾迪生-衛斯理。

Tuma, N.B., and Hallinan, M.T. (1979). The effects of sex, race, and achievement on schoolchildren's friendships. Social Forces. 58, 126-146.
Tuma, N.B. 和 Hallinan, M.T. (1979)。性別、種族和成就對學童友誼的影響。社會力量。58, 126-146.

Tutte, W.T. (1971). Introduction to Matroid Theory. New York: Elsevier. Tutzauer, E (1985). Toward a theory of disintegration in communication networks. Social Networks. 7, 263-285.
圖特,WT(1971 年)。Matroid 理論導論。紐約:愛思唯爾。Tutzauer,E(1985 年)。走向通信網路解體理論。社交網路。7, 263-285.

Uhlenbeck, G.E., and Ford, G.W. (1962). Theory of Linear Graphs. Amsterdam: North-Holland. United Nations (1984). Statistical Papers: Commodity Trade Statistics. Series D. 34, Numbers 1-1 through 1-24.
Uhlenbeck,GE和Ford,GW(1962)。線性圖理論。阿姆斯特丹:北荷蘭。聯合國(1984年)。統計論文:商品貿易統計。D輯 34,編號 1-1 至 1-24。

Useem, M. (1973). Conscription, Protest, and Social Conflict. New York: 10hn Wiley and Sons. Vaux, A (1988). Measurement of social support. In Vaux, A. (ed.), Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. New York: Praeger.
尤瑟姆,M.(1973 年)。徵兵、抗議和社會衝突。紐約:10hn Wiley and Sons。沃克斯,A(1988 年)。社會支援的衡量。在 Vaux, A. (ed.) 中,社會支援:理論、研究和干預。紐約:Praeger。

Velleman, P.P., and Hoaglin, D.C. (1981). Applications, Basics, and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis. Boston: Duxbury Press.
Velleman,PP和Hoaglin,D.C.(1981)。探索性數據分析的應用、基礎和計算。波士頓:達克斯伯里出版社。

Verbeek, A., and Kroonenberg, P.M. (1985). A survey of algorithms for exact distributions of test statistics in r by c contingency tables with fixed margins. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 3, 159-185.
Verbeek,A.和Kroonenberg,PM(1985)。對具有固定邊距的 r by c 列聯表中檢驗統計量精確分佈的演算法的調查。計算統計與數據分析。3, 159-185.

Verbrugge, L. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces. 56, 576-597.
Verbrugge,L.(1977 年)。成人友誼選擇的結構。社會力量。56, 576-597.

Vinacke, W.E., and ArkotT, A. (1957). An experimental study of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review. 22,406-414.
Vinacke,W.E.和ArkotT,A.(1957)。三合會聯盟的實驗研究。美國社會學評論。22,406-414.

Vogt, F., and Bliegener, J. (1990). DIAGRAM. Technische Hochschule, Darmstadt. Fachhochschule Dannstadt.
Vogt,F.和Bliegener,J.(1990)。圖。達姆施塔特技術大學。丹施塔特應用科學大學。

Walker, M.E. (1991). Statistical models for social support networks. Unpublished manuscript.
沃克,ME(1991 年)。社會支援網路的統計模型。未發表的手稿。

Walker, M.E., and Wassennan, S. (1987). TRIADS: A Computer Program for Triadic Analyses. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Walker,ME和Wassennan,S.(1987)。TRIADS:用於三元分析的計算機程式。伊利諾伊州厄巴納:伊利諾伊大學。

Wampold, B.E. (1984). Tests of dominance in sequential categorical data. Psychological Bulletin. 96, 424-429.
Wampold,B.E.(1984 年)。順序分類數據中的優勢性測試。心理公報。96, 424-429.

Wang, YJ., and Wong, G.Y. (1987). Stochastic blockmodels for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 82, 8-19.
Wang,YJ和Wong,G.Y.(1987)。有向圖的隨機塊模型。美國統計協會雜誌。82, 8-19.

Wasserman, S. (1977). Random directed graph distributions and the triad census in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 5, 61-86.
Wasserman,S.(1977 年)。社交網路中的隨機有向圖分佈和三元普查。數學社會學雜誌。5, 61-86.

Wassennan, S. (1978). Models for binary directed graphs and their applications. Advances in Applied Probability. 10,803-818.
Wassennan,S.(1978 年)。二進位有向圖模型及其應用。應用概率論進展。10,803-818.

Wasserman, S. (1979). A stochastic model for directed graphs with transition rates determined by reciprocity. In Schuessler, K.P. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1980, pages 392-412. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wasserman,S.(1979 年)。有向圖的隨機模型,其轉移率由互易性決定。在Schuessler,K.P.(編輯),社會學方法論1980年,第392-412頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Wassennan, S. (1980). Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 75, 280--294.
Wassennan,S.(1980 年)。將社交網路分析為隨機過程。美國統計協會雜誌。75, 280--294.

Wassennan, S. (1987). Conformity of two sociometric relations. Psychometrika. 52,3-18.
Wassennan,S.(1987 年)。兩種社會計量關係的一致性。心理測量。52,3-18.

Wasserman, S., and Anderson, C. (1987). Stochastic a posteriori blockmodels: Construction and assessment. Social Networks. 9, 1-36.
Wasserman,S.和Anderson,C.(1987)。隨機后驗塊模型:構建和評估。社交網路。9, 1-36.

Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1989). Canonical analysis of the composition and structure of social networks. In Clogg, C.C. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1989, pages 1-42.
Wasserman,S.和Faust,K.(1989)。對社交網路的組成和結構進行規範分析。在Clogg,C.C.(編輯),社會學方法論,1989年,第1-42頁。

Wasserman, S., Faust, K., and Galaskiewicz, J. (1990). Correspondence and canonical analysis of relational data. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 15, 11-64.
Wasserman,S.,Faust,K.和Galaskiewicz,J.(1990)。關係數據的對應和規範分析。數學社會學雜誌。15, 11-64.

Wasserman, S., and Galaskiewicz, J. (1984). Some generalizations of PI: External constraints, interactions, and non-binary relations. Social Networks. 6, 177-192.
Wasserman,S.和Galaskiewicz,J.(1984)。PI的一些概括:外部約束、交互作用和非二元關係。社交網路。6, 177-192.

Wassennan, S., and Galaskiewicz, J. (eds.) (1994). Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research from the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Wassennan,S.和Galaskiewicz,J.(編輯)(1994)。社交網路分析進展:社會和行為科學研究。加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Wasserman, S., and Iacobucci, D. (1986). Statistical analysis of discrete relational data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 39,41-64.
Wasserman,S.和Iacobucci,D.(1986)。離散關係數據的統計分析。英國數學與統計心理學雜誌。39,41-64.

Wasserman, S., and Iacobucci, D. (1988). Sequential social network data. Psychometrika. 53, 261-282.
Wasserman,S.和Iacobucci,D.(1988)。順序社交網路數據。心理測量。53, 261-282.

Wasserman, S., and Iacobucci, D. (1989). GSQUARE: A FORTRAN program for computing G2• Unpublished manuscript.
Wasserman,S.和Iacobucci,D.(1989)。GSQUARE: A FORTRAN PROGRAM FOR COMPUTING G2• 未發表的手稿。

Wasserman, S., and Iacobucci, D. (1990). Statistical modeling of one-mode and two-mode networks: Simultaneous analysis of graphs and bipartite graphs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 44, 13-44.
Wasserman,S.和Iacobucci,D.(1990)。單模和雙模網路的統計建模:同時分析圖和二分圖。英國數學與統計心理學雜誌。44, 13-44.

Wasserman, S., and Weaver, S.O. (1985). Statistical analysis of binary relational data: Parameter estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 29, 406-427.
Wasserman,S.和Weaver,S.O.(1985)。二元關係數據的統計分析:參數估計。數學心理學雜誌。29, 406-427.

Weaver, S.O., and Wasserman, S. (1986). RELTWO-Interactive loglinear model fitting for pairs of sociometric relations. Communications: Bulletin of the International Network for Social Network Analysis. 9, 38-46.
Weaver,SO和Wasserman,S.(1986)。RELTWO-互動式對數線性模型擬合社會計量關係。通訊:國際社交網路分析網路公報。9, 38-46.

Weesie, J., and Flap, H. (eds.) (1990). Social Networks Through Time. Utrecht, The Netherlands: ISORjUniversity of Utrecht.
Weesie,J.和Flap,H.(編輯)(1990)。隨著時間的流逝,社交網路。荷蘭烏得勒支:ISORj烏得勒支大學。

Weick, K.E., and Penner, D.D. (1966). Triads: A laboratory analogue. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1, 191-211.
Weick,KE和Penner,DD(1966)。三聯征:實驗室類似物。組織行為與人類績效。1, 191-211.

Weinberg, S., and Goldberg, K. (1990). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Weinberg,S.和Goldberg,K.(1990)。行為科學統計學。英國劍橋:劍橋大學出版社。

Wellens, AR., and Thistlethwaite, D.L. (1971a). An analysis of two quantitative theories of cognitive balance. Psychological Review. 78, 141-150.
Wellens, AR. 和 Thistlethwaite, D.L. (1971a)。對認知平衡的兩種定量理論的分析。心理評論。78, 141-150.

Wellens, AR., and Thistlethwaite, D.L. (1971b). An analysis of three quantitative theories of cognitive balance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 20, 82-92.
Wellens, AR. 和 Thistlethwaite, D.L. (1971b)。對認知平衡的三種定量理論的分析。人格與社會心理學雜誌。20, 82-92.

Weller, S.C., and Romney, AK. (1990). Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
南卡羅來納州韋勒和阿肯色州羅姆尼。(1990). 指標縮放:對應分析.加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。

Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology. 84, 1201-1231.
威爾曼,B.(1979 年)。社區問題:東約克人的親密網路。美國社會學雜誌。84, 1201-1231.

Wellman, B. (1983). Network analysis: Some basic principles. In Collins, R. (ed.), Sociological Theory, 1983, pages 155-199. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
威爾曼,B.(1983 年)。網路分析:一些基本原理。柯林斯,R.(編輯),社會學理論,1983年,第155-199頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。

Wellman, B. (1988a). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 19-61.
威爾曼,B.(1988a)。結構分析:從方法和隱喻到理論和實質。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.D.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第19-61頁。

Wellman, B. (1988b). The community question re-evaluated. In Smith, M.P. (ed.), Power, Community, and the City, pages 81-107. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
威爾曼,B.(1988b)。重新評估了社群問題。在史密斯,M.P.(編輯),權力,社區和城市,第81-107頁。新澤西州新不倫瑞克省:交易帳簿。

Wellman, B. (1992b). Which types of ties and networks give what kinds of social support? In Lawler, E., Markovsky, B., Ridgeway, C., and Walker, H. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Volume 9, pages 207-235.
威爾曼,B.(1992b)。哪些類型的關係和網路提供什麼樣的社會支援?在 Lawler, E.、Markovsky, B.、Ridgeway, C. 和 Walker, H.(編輯)中,Advances in Group Processes,第 9 卷,第 207-235 頁。

Wellman, B. (1993). An egocentric network tale. Social Networks. 15,423-436.
威爾曼,B.(1993 年)。一個以自我為中心的網路故事。社交網路。15,423-436.

Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S.D. (1988). Introduction: Studying social structures. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, SD. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 1-14.
Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.D.(1988)。簡介:研究社會結構。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,SD.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第1-14頁。

Wellman, B., Carrington, P.l, and Hall, A. (1988). Networks as personal communities. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 130-184.
Wellman,B.,Carrington,PL和Hall,A.(1988)。網路作為個人社區。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.D.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第130-184頁。

Wellman, B., Frank, 0., Espinoza, v., Lundquist, S., and Wilson, C. (1991).
Wellman,B.,Frank,0.,Espinoza,V.,Lundquist,S.和Wilson,C.(1991)。

Wellman, B., Mosher, C., Rottenberg, C., and Espinoza, V. (1987). The sum of the ties does not equal a network: The Case of social support. Unpublished manuscript.
Wellman,B.,Mosher,C.,Rottenberg,C.和Espinoza,V.(1987)。紐帶的總和不等於一個網路:社會支援的案例。未發表的手稿。

Wellman, B., and Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology. 96, 558-588.
Wellman,B.和Wortley,S.(1990)。來自不同人的不同筆觸:社區關係和社會支援。美國社會學雜誌。96, 558-588.

Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur lehre von der gestalt, 11. Psychologische Forschung. 4, 301-350.
韋特海默,M.(1923 年)。Untersuchungen zur lehre von der gestalt, 11. Psychologische Forschung.4, 301-350.

White, C.J. Mower (1977). A limitation of balance theory: The effects of indentification with a member of the triad. European Journal of Social Psychology. 7, 111-116.
懷特,CJ Mower(1977 年)。平衡理論的局限性:與三合會成員的認同效應。歐洲社會心理學雜誌。7, 111-116.

White, C.J. Mower (1979). Factors affecting balance, agreement, and positivity biases in POQ and P OX triads. European Journal of Social Psychology. 9, 129-148.
懷特,CJ Mower(1979 年)。影響 POQ 和 P OX 三聯征中平衡、一致性和積極性偏差的因素。歐洲社會心理學雜誌。9, 129-148.

White, D.R., and McCann, H.G. (1988). Cites and fights: Material entailment analysis of the eighteenth-century chemical revolution. In Wellman, B., and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social, Structures: A Network Approach, pages
懷特,DR和麥肯,HG(1988)。引用與鬥爭:十八世紀化學革命的物質蘊涵分析。在 Wellman, B. 和 Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.) 中,社會、結構:一種網路方法,頁面

White, D.R., and Reitz, K.P. (1983). Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on networks of relations. Social Networks. 5, 193-234.
White, DR 和 Reitz, K.P. (1983)。關係網路上的圖和半群同態。社交網路。5, 193-234.

White, D.R., and Reitz, K.P. (1985). Measuring role distance: Structural, regular and relational equivalence. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Irvine.
White, DR 和 Reitz, K.P. (1985)。測量角色距離:結構、規則和關係等價。未發表的手稿,加州大學歐文分校。

White, D.R., and Reitz, K.P. (1989). Re-thinking the role concept: Homomorphisms on social networks. In Freeman, L.C., White, D.R., and Romney, AK. (eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, pages 429-488.
White, DR 和 Reitz, KP (1989)。重新思考角色概念:社交網路上的同態性。在弗裡曼,L.C.,懷特,D.R.和羅姆尼,AK。(編輯),《社交網路分析研究方法》,第429-488頁。

White, H.C. (1961). Management conflict and sociometric structure. American Journal of Sociology. 67, 185-187.
懷特,HC(1961 年)。管理衝突和社會計量結構。美國社會學雜誌。67, 185-187.

White, H.C. (1963). An Anatomy of Kinship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. White, H.C. (1970). Search parameters for the small world problem. Social Forces. 49, 259-264.
懷特,HC(1963 年)。親屬關係剖析。新澤西州恩格爾伍德懸崖:Prentice-Hall。懷特,HC(1970 年)。搜索小世界問題的參數。社會力量。49, 259-264.

White, H.C. (1977). Probabilities of homomorphic mappings from multiple graphs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 16, 121-134.
懷特,HC(1977 年)。來自多個圖的同態映射的概率。數學心理學雜誌。16, 121-134.

White, H.C. (1981). Where do markets come from? American Journal of Sociology. 87, 517-47.
懷特,HC(1981 年)。市場從何而來?美國社會學雜誌。87, 517-47.

White, H.C. (1988). Varieties of markets. In Wellman, B. and Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pages 226-260. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
懷特,HC(1988 年)。各種市場。在Wellman,B.和Berkowitz,S.D.(編輯),社會結構:網路方法,第226-260頁。英國劍橋:劍橋大學出版社。

White, H.C., Boorman, S.A, and Breiger, R.L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology. 81, 730-779.
White,HC,Boorman,SA和Breiger,RL(1976)。來自多個網路的社會結構。一、角色和職位的塊模型。美國社會學雜誌。81, 730-779.

White, H.C., and Breiger, R.L. (1975). Pattern across networks. Society. 12, 68-73.
懷特,HC和Breiger,RL(1975)。跨網路模式。社會。12, 68-73.

Whiting, P.D., and Hillier, J.A. (1960). A method for finding the shortest route through a road network. Operations Research Quarterly. 11, 37-40.
Whiting,PD和Hillier,JA(1960)。一種在道路網路中查找最短路徑的方法。運籌學季刊。11, 37-40.

Whitney, R.E. (1971). Agreement and positivity in pleasantness ratings of balanced and unbalanced social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 17, 11-14.
惠特尼,RE(1971 年)。平衡和不平衡社會情境的愉快度評級的一致性和積極性。人格與社會心理學雜誌。17, 11-14.

Whitten, N.E., and Wolfe, AW. (1973). Network analysis. In Honigmann, J.
內華達州惠頓和AW沃爾夫。(1973). 網络分析.在霍尼格曼,J.

(ed.), Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, pages 717-746. Chicago: Rand McNaIly. Wickens, T.D. (1989). Multiway Contingency Tables Analysis for the Social Sciences. HiIlsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(編),《社會和文化人類學手冊》,第717-746頁。芝加哥:蘭德·麥克納伊利。威肯斯,TD(1989 年)。社會科學的多路列聯表分析。新澤西州希爾斯代爾:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。

Wilkinson, L. (1987). SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.
威爾金森,L.(1987 年)。SYSTAT:統計系統。伊利諾伊州埃文斯頓:SYSTAT。

Wille, R. (1984). Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems. International Classification. 11, 77-86.
Wille,R.(1984 年)。分層概念系統的線圖。國際分類。11, 77-86.

Wille, R (1990). Concept Lattices and Conceptual Knowledge Systems. Unpublished manuscript. Fachbereich Mathematik, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt.
Wille,R(1990 年)。概念格子和概念知識系統。未發表的手稿。Fachbereich Mathematik, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt.

Willis, R.H., and Burgess, T.D.G. (1974). Cognitive and affective balance in sociometric dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 29, 145-152.
威利斯,RH和伯吉斯,TDG(1974)。社會計量二元組中的認知和情感平衡。人格與社會心理學雜誌。29, 145-152.

Wilson, T.p. (1982). Relational networks. An extension of sociometric concepts. Social Networks. 4, 105-116.
威爾遜,TP(1982 年)。關係網路。社會計量學概念的延伸。社交網路。4, 105-116.

Winship, C. (1974). Thoughts about roles and relations. Part I: Theoretical considerations. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
Winship,C.(1974 年)。關於角色和關係的思考。第一部分:理論思考。未發表的手稿,哈佛大學。

Winship, C. (1977). A distance model for sociometric structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 5,21-39.
Winship,C.(1977 年)。社會計量結構的距離模型。數學社會學雜誌。5,21-39.

Winship, C. (1988). Thoughts about roles and relations: An old document revisited. Social Networks. 10, 209-231.
Winship,C.(1988 年)。關於角色和關係的思考:重新審視舊檔。社交網路。10, 209-231.

Winship, c., and Mandel, M. (1983). Roles and positions: A critique and extension of the blockmodeling approach. In Leinhardt, S. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1983-1984, pages 314-344. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Woelfel, J., Fink, E.L., Serota, G.A., Barnett, G.A., Holmes, R, Cody, M., Saltiel, J"> Marlier, M., and Gillham, J.R. (1977). GALILEO: A Program/or Metric Multidimensional Scaling. Honolulu: East-West Communication Institute.
Winship,c.和Mandel,M.(1983)。角色和立場:對塊建模方法的批判和擴展。Leinhardt, S. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1983-1984, 第314-344頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Woelfel,J.,Fink,EL,Serota,GA,Barnett,GA,Holmes,R,Cody,M.,Saltiel,J“>Marlier,M.和Gillham,J.R.(1977)。伽利略:程式/或度量多維縮放。檀香山:東西方傳播學院。

Wolfe, A.w. (1978). The rise of network thinking in anthropology. Social Networks. 1,53-64.
沃爾夫,AW(1978 年)。網路思維在人類學中的興起。社交網路。1,53-64.

Wolman, S. (1937). Sociometric planning of a new community. Sociometry. 1, 220--254.
沃爾曼,S.(1937 年)。新社區的社會計量規劃。社會測量學。1, 220--254.

Wong, G.Y. (1982). Round robin analysis of variance via maximum likelihood. Journal o/the American Statistical Association. 77,714-724.
Wong,G.Y.(1982 年)。通過最大似然度進行方差的迴圈分析。美國統計協會雜誌。77,714-724.

Wong, G.Y. (1987). Bayesian models for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 82, 140--148.
Wong,G.Y.(1987 年)。有向圖的貝葉斯模型。美國統計協會雜誌。82, 140--148.

Wong, G.Y., and Yu, Q.-Q. (1989). Computation and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimates of exponential parameters of the Pt model. Unpublished manuscript.
Wong, G.Y. 和 Yu, Q.-Q.(1989). Pt模型指數參數最大似然估計的計算和漸近正態性.未發表的手稿。

Woodard, K.L., and Doreian, P. (1990). Centralization: From action sets to structured interorganizational networks. Unpublished manuscript. World Bank (1983). World Bank World Tables. Volumes I and H. Baltimore: The lohns Hopkins University Press.
Woodard,KL和Doreian,P.(1990)。集中化:從行動集到結構化的組織間網路。未發表的手稿。世界銀行(1983年)。世界銀行世界表。第一卷和 H. 巴爾的摩:羅恩斯霍普金斯大學出版社。

Wright, B., and Evitts, M.S. (1961). Direct factor analysis in sociometry. Sociometry. 24, 82-98.
Wright,B.和Evitts,MS(1961)。社會測量學中的直接因數分析。社會測量學。24, 82-98.

Wu, L. (1983). Local blockmodel a1gebras for analyzing social networks. In Tuma, N.B. (cd.), Sociological Methodology 1983-84, pages 272-313. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Yamagishi, T. (1987). An exchange theoretical approach to defining positions in network structures. In Cook, K. (ed.), Social Exchange Theory, pages
吳,L.(1983 年)。用於分析社交網路的局部塊模型 a1gebras。In Tuma, N.B. (cd.), Sociological Methodology 1983-84, 第272-313頁。三藩市:Jossey-Bass。Yamagishi,T.(1987 年)。一種在網路結構中定義位置的交換理論方法。在庫克,K.(編輯),社會交換理論,頁面

149-169. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Yamaguchi, K. (1990). Homophily and social distance in the choice of multiple friends. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 85, 204-212.
149-169.加利福尼亞州紐伯里公園:鼠尾草。山口,K.(1990 年)。在選擇多個朋友時的同性戀和社交距離。美國統計協會雜誌。85, 204-212.

Young, M.w. (1971). Fighting with Food. Cambridge: Cambridge University
楊,MW(1971 年)。與食物戰鬥。劍橋:劍橋大學

Zachary, w.w. (1977). An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research. 13, 452-473.
扎卡里,w.w.(1977 年)。小群體衝突和裂變的資訊流模型。人類學研究雜誌。13, 452-473.

Zachary, w.w. (1984). Modeling social network processes using constrained flow representations. Social Networks 6, 259-292.
扎卡里,w.w.(1984 年)。使用約束流表示對社交網路過程進行建模。社交網路6,259-292。

Zajonc, R. (1960). Balance, congruity, and dissonance. Public Opinion Quarterly.
Zajonc,R.(1960 年)。平衡、協調和不和諧。輿論季刊。

Zajonc, R. (1968). Cognitive theories in social psychology. In Lindzey, G., and
Zajonc,R.(1968 年)。社會心理學中的認知理論。在 Lindzey, G. 和

Aronson, E. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Volume 4, pages 319-411.
Aronson,E.(編輯),社會心理學手冊。第 4 卷,第 319-411 頁。

Zegers, F., and ten Berge, J. (1985). A family of association coefficients for metric scales. Psychometrika. 50, 17-24.
Zegers,F.和ten Berge,J.(1985)。公制刻度的關聯繫數系列。心理測量。50, 17-24.

Zeleny, L.D. (1940a). Measurement of social status. American Journal of
澤萊尼,L.D.(1940a)。社會地位的衡量。美國雜誌

Zeleny, L.D. (1941). Measurement of sociation. American Sociological Review. 6, 173-188.
澤萊尼,L.D.(1941 年)。社會的測量。美國社會學評論。6, 173-188.

Zeleny, L.D. (1960). Status: Its measurement and control in education. In
澤萊尼,L.D.(1960 年)。現狀:它在教育中的測量和控制。在