沉浸式翻译Poster Assessment
海报评估
Ethical Dilemmas: The Pull between the personal and the professional.
道德困境： 个人与专业之间的拉力。
Turnitin submission – PDF ONLY
Turnitin 提交 –仅 PDF
Students are NOT PERMITTED to use AI in Assessments.
学生不得在评估中使用人工智能。
Poster: A3 page size with 500 words (+/-10%)
海报：A3 页面大小，500 字（+/-10%）
The poster assessment is designed to help you explore potential conflicts (ethical dilemmas) between your personal moral values and the professional ethical codes that you will encounter in your future professional practices. The point of this exercise is to create a poster that might guide or assist others in resolving ethical dilemmas that they face in professional practice.
海报评估旨在帮助您探索您的个人道德价值观与您在未来职业实践中将遇到的职业道德准则之间的潜在冲突（道德困境） 。这项练习的目的是制作一张海报，可以指导或帮助其他人解决他们在专业实践中面临的道德困境。
For this assignment, a few key terms
对于本次作业，有几个关键术语:
Moral values – personal judgements about what is right/wrong (good/bad) based on what we value as important. These are often driven by communal or societal norms (such as cultural influences, the social context of our lives, family, religion, etc.).
道德价值观– 基于我们认为重要的事情对什么是对/错（好/坏）的个人判断。这些通常是由社区或社会规范（例如文化影响、我们生活的社会背景、家庭、宗教等）驱动的。
Ethical Code – the standards of right/wrong or good/bad that assist with the assessment of what is good/bad (right/wrong) in certain community or social settings (such as in a professional context).
道德准则——对/错或好/坏的标准，有助于评估某些社区或社会环境（例如在专业环境中）的好/坏（对/错）。
Ethical Dilemma (aka moral dilemma) – A conflict in decision-making as a result of conflicting moral and ethical values. In the context of the assessment, this is where there is a conflict between personal moral values (suggesting one pathway) and the standards of behaviour/outcome set by the professional ethical code (or code of conduct).
道德困境（又名道德困境） – 由于道德和伦理价值观冲突而导致的决策冲突。在评估的背景下，这是个人道德价值观（建议一种途径）与职业道德准则（或行为准则）设定的行为/结果标准之间存在冲突的地方。
There are three parts to this assessment:
本次评估分为三个部分：
Your moral ‘mind map’ (should be drafted for tutorial 1) – 4 marks (this part should be very graphic so 100 words should be plenty)
你的道德“思维导图” （应该为教程1起草） – 4分（这部分应该非常形象，所以 100 个字就足够了）
What is the foundation of your moral values?
你的道德价值观的基础是什么？
Use a mind map or a 'family tree' to plot out where your sense of right/wrong or good/bad comes from. Review the material under the Individual Learning Task 1 to examine your own life, experiences, and social interactions to try and establish as honestly and accurately as possible where your moral values (personal ethics) might have come from. This task will be unique to you. It is important to also identify some of the key values that you might hold because of your ‘family tree’. You should present this element as a diagram, rather than as a ‘chunk’ of text. Select a way of representing these moral influences in graphic form that best suits you. This could be as a mind map, family tree, decision tree, bubble graph, Venn diagram, meme etc.
使用思维导图或“家谱” 找出你的对/错或好/坏的感觉从何而来。查看个人学习任务 1 下的材料，检查您自己的生活、经历和社交互动，尝试尽可能诚实、准确地确定您的道德价值观（个人道德）可能来自何处。这个任务对你来说将是独一无二的。确定您可能因“家谱”而持有的一些关键价值观也很重要。您应该将此元素呈现为图表，而不是文本的“块” 。选择一种最适合您的图形形式来表示这些道德影响。这可以是思维导图、家谱、决策树、气泡图、 维恩图、模因等。
There are many resources within module 1 to inspire you. You could also discuss this with your family or friends. Another useful resource might be the various resources on the YourMorals website - https://www.yourmorals.org/
第 1 单元中有许多资源可以激发您的灵感。您也可以与家人或朋友讨论这个问题。另一个有用的资源可能是YourMorals上的各种资源 网站 - https://www.yourmorals.org/.
A useful reading here is Zigon, J. (2009). Morality and Personal Experience: The Moral Conceptions of a Muscovite Man. Ethos, 37(1), 78-101. Retrieved July 19, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/20486600 (this is a scholarly resource)
Zigon, J. (2009) 是一个有用的读物。道德与个人经历：莫斯科人的道德观念。精神，37(1), 78-101。 2020 年 7 月 19 日检索自 www.jstor.org/stable/20486600（这是学术资源）.
Professional Code of Ethics (or Code of Conduct) – 3 marks (aim for 150 words – concise!!)
职业道德准则（或行为准则） ——3 分（目标是 150 个字——简洁！！）
You need to identify (and present) the Ethical Code or Code of Conduct for your professional pathway. If you are in the Bachelor of Social Science, or another degree that has more ambiguous employment pathways, then identify a profession within which you would like to work in the future.
您需要确定（并提出）您的职业道路的道德准则或行为准则。如果您正在攻读社会科学学士学位，或其他就业途径较为模糊的学位，那么请确定您未来想要工作的职业。
Often these are extensive documents, so you will need to convey the ‘spirit’ of the Ethical Code, whilst meeting the limitations of space and the word count. You will need to emphasise the core/key values and summarise the ethical responsibilities of people in that profession. It would be a good idea to present this information as bulleted/numbered lists.
通常这些文件内容很广泛，因此您需要传达道德准则的“精神” ，同时满足空间和字数的限制。您需要强调核心/关键价值观并总结该行业人员的道德责任。最好将此信息显示为项目符号/编号列表。
Ethical Dilemma (we will discuss ethical dilemmas in Tutorial 2) – 9 marks (aim for 250 words)
道德困境（我们将在教程 2 中讨论道德困境） – 9分（目标为 250 个单词）
You need to identify an ethical dilemma (or moral dilemma) that you could face in your future professional pathway. This should be a decision that you could have to make about how to act, where you would face a conflict of your personal moral values and your professional ethical code. The conflict is likely to arise from personal/professional beliefs about how you should act/behave (towards other people or the environment), your sense of self (what makes you a good/bad person), or the outcomes/consequences of your actions. It could also result from your beliefs and judgements about other people and their actions.
您需要确定您在未来的职业道路上可能面临的道德困境（或道德困境）。这应该是您必须做出的关于如何行动的决定，因为您将面临个人道德价值观和职业道德准则的冲突。冲突可能源于关于您应该如何行动/表现（对待他人或环境）、您的自我意识（是什么让您成为好人/坏人）的个人/职业信念，或者您的行为的结果/后果。它还可能源于您对其他人及其行为的信念和判断。
You need to:
您需要：
Identify an ethical/moral dilemma.
确定伦理/道德困境。
A starting point here might be to search the library (or google) for “ethical dilemmas” AND your profession
这里的起点可能是在图书馆（或谷歌）中搜索“道德困境”和您的职业
Describe the situation that could arise
描述可能出现的情况
Explain the conflict that would exist between your personal moral values and your professional code of ethics.
解释您的个人道德价值观和职业道德准则之间可能存在的冲突。
Discuss how you might resolve this conflict: what decision would you make? Why? (at the end of the day you either act or you don’t act (not deciding is not acting), and we are interested in how/why you make this decision). Did you strictly follow one set of morals or values? Did you find compromise? What might be the consequences of the decision you made for you? For your profession? For others?
讨论你如何解决这个冲突：你会做出什么决定？为什么？ （归根结底，你要么采取行动，要么不采取行动（不决定就不算采取行动），我们感兴趣的是你如何/为何做出这个决定）。您是否严格遵循一套道德或价值观？你找到妥协了吗？您所做的决定可能会给您带来什么后果？为了你的职业？为了其他人？
Reflect on the process of making this decision: How do you feel about the decision you made? What does it tell you about your commitment to either your profession (and its ethics) or your personal moral values? What reflections can you offer to others who might be faced with the same situation?
反思做出这个决定的过程：你对你所做的决定有何感受？它告诉你什么关于你对你的职业（及其道德）或你的个人道德价值观的承诺？您可以向可能面临同样情况的其他人提供哪些思考？
This section should be written using concise paragraphs (think about how easy it is for the reader to engage with your work). It must utilise formal English and make use of scholarly references to support your discussion.
本节应使用简洁的段落来编写（想想读者是否容易参与您的工作）。它必须使用正式英语并利用学术参考文献来支持您的讨论。
Presentation – ONE A3 page submitted in PDF format only – 2 marks
演示文稿– 仅以 PDF 格式提交一页 A3 页– 2 分
This assessment is a poster. This enables you to innovate with the presentation when it comes to the moral Mind Map (and your professional code of ethics). Your poster will need to be a concise presentation of the three sections: enough detail to cover the content, but edited text that is not verbose
本评价为海报。这使您能够在道德思维导图（以及您的职业道德准则）方面的演示中进行创新。您的海报需要简明地呈现三个部分：有足够的细节来涵盖内容，但经过编辑的文本不冗长.
Your poster should be presented in an interesting and visually appealing manner, utilising no more than 1 A3 page (including all headings and references).
您的海报应以有趣且具有视觉吸引力的方式呈现，使用不超过 1 个 A3 页（包括所有标题和参考文献）。
Academic referencing and in-text citations should be done correctly. If you use images or figures, these should be referred to in your text (i.e. see figure 1) and should be appropriately captioned and referenced (not included in the word count).
学术参考和文内引用应正确进行。如果您使用图像或图形，则应在文本中引用这些图像或图形（即参见图 1 ），并应添加适当的标题和引用（不包含在字数统计中）。
References (not included in word count) – 2 marks
参考文献（不计入字数） ——2分
You are expected to use a minimum FIVE unique resources to support and justify your decision marking.
您应该使用至少五种独特的资源来支持和证明您的决策标记的合理性。
At least THREE of these should be scholarly resources, and ONE should be the Professional Ethical Code (or Professional Code of Conduct).
其中至少三项应该是学术资源，其中一项应该是职业道德准则（或职业行为准则）。
They should be distributed throughout the task
它们应该分布在整个任务中
Professional Codes of Ethics or Codes of Conduct need to be properly referenced (but you don’t need to cite each piece of text in PART 2 in this instance).
需要正确引用职业道德准则或行为准则（但在这种情况下，您不需要引用第 2 部分中的每一段文字）。
These are NOT scholarly resources.
这些不是学术资源。
The preferred reference styles are Harvard or APA Style. In-text citations are required.
首选参考样式是Harvard 或APA 样式。需要在文本中引用。
All published works (academic and lay readings, textbooks, websites, newspapers, videos, etc .) need to be referenced in the reference list. The reference list needs to be included at the bottom of your slide. This can be in very small font.
所有发表的作品（学术和非专业读物、教科书、网站、报纸、视频等）都需要在参考文献列表中引用。参考列表需要包含在幻灯片的底部。这可以是非常小的字体。
A good assessment will not depend on unpublished works from vUWS (slides, online modules, research wall videos), or on YouTube videos. These are a starting point only and should never be the final resource in assessment.
良好的评估不依赖于vUWS未发表的作品（幻灯片、在线模块、研究墙视频）或YouTube视频。这些只是一个起点，绝不应该成为评估的最终资源。
Deductions:
扣除额：
Anything that is included beyond ONE A3 page will NOT be marked.
超出一张 A3 页的任何内容都不会被标记。
Qualitative Rubric (i.e. this is about the quality of your response)
定性评分标准（即这与您的回答质量有关）
Criteria | No attempt (NA) | Unsatisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | Excellent |
PART 1 Moral ‘Family Tree’ / Mind Map 4 marks | NA | Minimal attempt, revealing little detail about core moral values and/or where they come from. Mind Map feels incomplete | Mind Map feels complete: identifies some key core moral values. Simplistic or generalised identification of the sources of those values. Little use of other resources to develop section. | Mind Map identifies core moral values and some insight in identifying the source of those values. Demonstrates some use of readings or resources to develop ideas. | Detailed mind Map - identifies core moral values, and clear insight in identifying the source of those values. Perhaps demonstrating potential conflicts between the different sources of values. Good use of readings or resources to develop and support ideas. | Very detailed Mind Map (though with concise presentation). Excellent identification of core moral values and strong insight in identifying the source of those value. Reflection on the potential conflicts between the different sources of values. Good use of readings or resources to develop and support ideas. |
PART 2 Professional Ethical Code 3 marks | NA | Ethical Code identified, but not summarised | Ethical Code identified. Basic Summary that is perhaps focused on only one of core values and/or responsibilities | Ethical Code identified. Good Summary of core values and/or responsibilities (perhaps one is weaker than the other) | Clear and concise articulation of core values and responsibilities. Perhaps makes use of additional resources to critique summary. | Strong and concise explanation of core values and responsibilities, perhaps reflecting on the philosophical source of these ideas. Perhaps makes use of additional resources. |
Part 3 Ethical Dilemma Explanation of ethical dilemma 3 marks | NA | Weak or incorrect identification of dilemma or situation in which it would arise | Identifies ethical dilemma. Some description of situation that would arise. Vague details as to the personal vs professional conflict | Clearly outlines ethical dilemma, identifying situation in which it would arise, and clearly articulating the conflict between personal moral values and professional ethical code. Clear evidence of use of other resources to develop understanding | Clear and concise articulation of ethical dilemma. Strong understanding of the nature of the conflict between personal moral values and professional ethical code. Good use of other resources to support discussion | Excellent articulation of ethical dilemma. Very strong understanding of the nature of the conflict between personal moral values and professional ethical code. Excellent use of other resources to support discussion and to demonstrate critical thinking about the situation |
Part 3 Ethical Dilemma Resolution 3 marks | NA | Weak identification of possible resolution. Perhaps remains sitting on the fence, with no indication of why the decision was made | Identifies a possible resolution, offers some explanation for the decision made. Lacks links to readings/resources and/or theoretical content with regards to the decision made. | Good discussion of resolution of ethical dilemma. Offers an explanation and justification for the decision made. Uses resources/readings to support decision making. Demonstrates insight about the consequences of the decision made, predominantly focused on self | Very good discussion of resolution of ethical dilemma. Offers a strong explanation and justification for the decision made. Uses resources/readings to support decision making. Demonstrates good insight about the consequences of the decision made for self, profession and/or others. | Excellent discussion of resolution of ethical dilemma: critical thinking evident and concise presentation of a strong and insightful discussion. Offers a strong explanation and justification for the decision made. Strong awareness of the thinking behind the decision made, and that this is grounded/supported with academic literature. Strong insight into the consequences of the decision made for self, profession and/or others. |
Part 3 Ethical Dilemma Reflections 3 marks | NA | Little reflection on the process of ethical decision making. | Demonstrates some insight into the process of ethical decision making | Demonstrates good insight into the process of ethical decision making. Makes use of at least one resource to demonstrate idea development | Demonstrates good insight into the process and experience of ethical decision making, Clearly articulates a sense of how this exercise might help them (or others) in the future. Evidence of reading and engagement with resources to develop and support discussion. | Excellent insight into, and critical thinking about, the process and experience of ethical decision making, Strong articulation of how this exercise might help them and others in the future. Evidence of reading and engagement with resources to develop and support discussion. |
Presentation 2 marks | Not a poster, and no awareness of audience | Overall poster design is confused and clumsily designed. There is no logical layout. Limited use of graphical elements | Acceptable evidence of care in terms of design and layout, but little evidence of planning or editing. Minimal effort to connect with audience. Uses low-quality images or graphics. | Poster should be presented in an interesting and visually appealing manner. Information is presented in a logical sequence with some attempt at design. Graphical elements used to enhance and clarify the content. | A well-structured effort that makes an attempt to engage with an audience. Graphical elements used to bring topic to life | Outstanding creativity and flair used to stimulate audience engagement. High quality graphical elements used to enhance the posters visual appeal and readability. |
Referencing 2 marks | NA No reference list OR NO in-text citations | Attempted but many error in either reference list or in-text citations | Correct referencing style. Meets minimum reference requirements | Correct referencing style, with minimal use of in-text citations Meets minimum reference requirements. | Extensive use of readings throughout the text. No problems with consistency of referencing style | Extensive list of readings. Strong presence of scholarly resources. Used effectively throughout the assessment, with consistency of style (no obvious problems). |