这是用户在 2024-8-25 24:29 为 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/word/ 保存的双语快照页面,由 沉浸式翻译 提供双语支持。了解如何保存?

Poster Assessment
海报评估

Ethical Dilemmas: The Pull between the personal and the professional.
道德困境 个人与专业之间的拉力

Turnitin submission – PDF ONLY
Turnitin 提交 –仅 PDF

Students are NOT PERMITTED to use AI in Assessments.
学生不得在评估中使用人工智能。

Poster: A3 page size with 500 words (+/-10%)
海报:A3 页面大小,500 字(+/-10%)

The poster assessment is designed to help you explore potential conflicts (ethical dilemmas) between your personal moral values and the professional ethical codes that you will encounter in your future professional practices. The point of this exercise is to create a poster that might guide or assist others in resolving ethical dilemmas that they face in professional practice.
海报评估旨在帮助您探索您的个人道德价值观与您在未来职业实践中将遇到的职业道德准则之间的潜在冲突(道德困境)这项练习的目的是制作一张海报,可以指导帮助其他人解决他们在专业实践中面临的道德困境。

For this assignment, a few key terms
对于本次作业,有几个关键术语
:

Moral values personal judgements about what is right/wrong (good/bad) based on what we value as important. These are often driven by communal or societal norms (such as cultural influences, the social context of our lives, family, religion, etc.).
道德价值观 基于我们认为重要的事情对什么是对/错(好/坏)个人判断。这些通常是由社区或社会规范(例如文化影响、我们生活的社会背景、家庭、宗教等)驱动的。

Ethical Code – the standards of right/wrong or good/bad that assist with the assessment of what is good/bad (right/wrong) in certain community or social settings (such as in a professional context).
道德准则——对/错或好/坏的标准,有助于评估某些社区或社会环境(例如在专业环境中)的好/坏(对/错)。

Ethical Dilemma (aka moral dilemma) A conflict in decision-making as a result of conflicting moral and ethical values. In the context of the assessment, this is where there is a conflict between personal moral values (suggesting one pathway) and the standards of behaviour/outcome set by the professional ethical code (or code of conduct).
道德困境又名道德困境) 由于道德和伦理价值观冲突而导致的决策冲突。在评估的背景下,这是个人道德价值观(建议一种途径)与职业道德准则(或行为准则)设定的行为/结果标准之间存在冲突的地方

There are three parts to this assessment:
本次评估分为三个部分:

Your moral ‘mind map (should be drafted for tutorial 1) 4 marks (this part should be very graphic so 100 words should be plenty)
你的道德“思维导图 (应该为教程1起草 4(这部分应该非常形象,所以 100 个字就足够了

What is the foundation of your moral values?
你的道德价值观的基础是什么?

Use a mind map or a 'family tree' to plot out where your sense of right/wrong or good/bad comes from. Review the material under the Individual Learning Task 1 to examine your own life, experiences, and social interactions to try and establish as honestly and accurately as possible where your moral values (personal ethics) might have come from. This task will be unique to you. It is important to also identify some of the key values that you might hold because of your ‘family tree’. You should present this element as a diagram, rather than as a ‘chunk’ of text. Select a way of representing these moral influences in graphic form that best suits you. This could be as a mind map, family tree, decision tree, bubble graph, Venn diagram, meme etc.
使用思维导图或“家谱” 找出你的对/错或好/坏的感觉从何而来。查看个人学习任务 1 下的材料,检查您自己的生活、经历和社交互动,尝试尽可能诚实、准确地确定您的道德价值观(个人道德)可能来自何处。这个任务对你来说将是独一无二的。确定您可能“家谱而持有的一些关键价值观也很重要您应该将此元素呈现为图表,而不是文本的“块” 选择一种最适合您的图形形式来表示这些道德影响。这可以是思维导图、家谱、决策树、气泡图、 维恩图、模因等。

There are many resources within module 1 to inspire you. You could also discuss this with your family or friends. Another useful resource might be the various resources on the YourMorals website - https://www.yourmorals.org/
第 1 单元中有许多资源可以激发您的灵感。您也可以与家人或朋友讨论这个问题。另一个有用的资源可能是YourMorals上的各种资源 网站 - https://www.yourmorals.org/
.

A useful reading here is Zigon, J. (2009). Morality and Personal Experience: The Moral Conceptions of a Muscovite Man. Ethos, 37(1), 78-101. Retrieved July 19, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/20486600 (this is a scholarly resource)
Zigon, J. (2009) 是一个有用的读物​​。道德与个人经历:莫斯科人的道德观念。精神,37(1), 78-101。 2020 年 7 月 19 日检索自 www.jstor.org/stable/20486600(这是学术资源)
.

Professional Code of Ethics (or Code of Conduct) – 3 marks (aim for 150 words – concise!!)
职业道德准则(或行为准则) ——3 分(目标是 150 个字——简洁!!)

You need to identify (and present) the Ethical Code or Code of Conduct for your professional pathway. If you are in the Bachelor of Social Science, or another degree that has more ambiguous employment pathways, then identify a profession within which you would like to work in the future.
您需要确定(并提出)您的职业道路的道德准则或行为准则。如果您正在攻读社会科学学士学位,或其他就业途径较为模糊的学位,那么请确定您未来想要工作的职业。

Often these are extensive documents, so you will need to convey the spirit of the Ethical Code, whilst meeting the limitations of space and the word count. You will need to emphasise the core/key values and summarise the ethical responsibilities of people in that profession. It would be a good idea to present this information as bulleted/numbered lists.
通常这些文件内容很广泛,因此您需要传达道德准则精神 ,同时满足空间和字数的限制。您需要强调核心/关键价值观总结该行业人员的道德责任最好将此信息显示为项目符号/编号列表。

Ethical Dilemma (we will discuss ethical dilemmas in Tutorial 2) 9 marks (aim for 250 words)
道德困境(我们将在教程 2 中讨论道德困境) 9分(目标为 250 个单词)

You need to identify an ethical dilemma (or moral dilemma) that you could face in your future professional pathway. This should be a decision that you could have to make about how to act, where you would face a conflict of your personal moral values and your professional ethical code. The conflict is likely to arise from personal/professional beliefs about how you should act/behave (towards other people or the environment), your sense of self (what makes you a good/bad person), or the outcomes/consequences of your actions. It could also result from your beliefs and judgements about other people and their actions.
您需要确定您在未来的职业道路上可能面临的道德困境(或道德困境)。这应该是您必须做出的关于如何行动的决定,因为您将面临个人道德价值观和职业道德准则的冲突。冲突可能源于关于您应该如何行动/表现(对待他人或环境)、您的自我意识(是什么让您成为好人/坏人)的个人/职业信念,或者您的行为的结果/后果。它还可能源于您对其他人及其行为的信念和判断。

You need to:
您需要:

Identify an ethical/moral dilemma.
确定伦理/道德困境。

A starting point here might be to search the library (or google) for “ethical dilemmas” AND your profession
这里的起点可能是在图书馆(或谷歌)中搜索“道德困境”和您的职业

Describe the situation that could arise
描述可能出现的情况

Explain the conflict that would exist between your personal moral values and your professional code of ethics.
解释您的个人道德价值观和职业道德准则之间可能存在的冲突。

Discuss how you might resolve this conflict: what decision would you make? Why? (at the end of the day you either act or you don’t act (not deciding is not acting), and we are interested in how/why you make this decision). Did you strictly follow one set of morals or values? Did you find compromise? What might be the consequences of the decision you made for you? For your profession? For others?
讨论你如何解决这个冲突:你会做出什么决定?为什么? (归根结底,你要么采取行动,要么不采取行动(不决定就不算采取行动),我们感兴趣的是你如何/为何做出这个决定)。您是否严格遵循一套道德或价值观?你找到妥协了吗?您所做的决定可能会给您带来什么后果?为了你的职业?为了其他人?

Reflect on the process of making this decision: How do you feel about the decision you made? What does it tell you about your commitment to either your profession (and its ethics) or your personal moral values? What reflections can you offer to others who might be faced with the same situation?
反思做出这个决定的过程:你对你所做的决定有何感受?它告诉你什么关于你对你的职业(及其道德)或你的个人道德价值观的承诺?您可以向可能面临同样情况的其他人提供哪些思考?

This section should be written using concise paragraphs (think about how easy it is for the reader to engage with your work). It must utilise formal English and make use of scholarly references to support your discussion.
本节应使用简洁的段落来编写(想想读者是否容易参与您的工作)。它必须使用正式英语并利用学术参考文献来支持您的讨论。

Presentation – ONE A3 page submitted in PDF format only – 2 marks
演示文稿– 仅以 PDF 格式提交一页 A3 页– 2 分

This assessment is a poster. This enables you to innovate with the presentation when it comes to the moral Mind Map (and your professional code of ethics). Your poster will need to be a concise presentation of the three sections: enough detail to cover the content, but edited text that is not verbose
本评价为海报。这使您能够在道德思维导图(以及您的职业道德准则)方面的演示中进行创新。您的海报需要简明地呈现三个部分:有足够的细节来涵盖内容,但经过编辑的文本不冗长
.

Your poster should be presented in an interesting and visually appealing manner, utilising no more than 1 A3 page (including all headings and references).
您的海报应以有趣且具有视觉吸引力的方式呈现,使用不超过 1 个 A3 页(包括所有标题和参考文献)。

Academic referencing and in-text citations should be done correctly. If you use images or figures, these should be referred to in your text (i.e. see figure 1) and should be appropriately captioned and referenced (not included in the word count).
学术参考和文内引用应正确进行。如果您使用图像或图形,则应在文本中引用这些图像或图形(即参见图 1 ),并应添加适当的标题和引用(不包含在字数统计中)。

References (not included in word count) – 2 marks
参考文献(不计入字数) ——2分

You are expected to use a minimum FIVE unique resources to support and justify your decision marking.
您应该使用至少五种独特的资源来支持和证明您的决策标记的合理性。

At least THREE of these should be scholarly resources, and ONE should be the Professional Ethical Code (or Professional Code of Conduct).
其中至少三项应该是学术资源,其中一项应该是职业道德准则(或职业行为准则)。

They should be distributed throughout the task
它们应该分布在整个任务中

Professional Codes of Ethics or Codes of Conduct need to be properly referenced (but you don’t need to cite each piece of text in PART 2 in this instance).
需要正确引用职业道德准则或行为准则(但在这种情况下,您不需要引用第 2 部分中的每一段文字)。

These are NOT scholarly resources.
这些不是学术资源。

The preferred reference styles are Harvard or APA Style. In-text citations are required.
首选参考样式是Harvard 或APA 样式需要在文本中引用。

All published works (academic and lay readings, textbooks, websites, newspapers, videos, etc .) need to be referenced in the reference list. The reference list needs to be included at the bottom of your slide. This can be in very small font.
所有发表的作品(学术和非专业读物、教科书、网站、报纸、视频都需要在参考文献列表中引用。参考列表需要包含在幻灯片的底部。这可以是非常小的字体。

A good assessment will not depend on unpublished works from vUWS (slides, online modules, research wall videos), or on YouTube videos. These are a starting point only and should never be the final resource in assessment.
良好的评估不依赖于vUWS发表的作品(幻灯片、在线模块、研究墙视频)YouTube视频。这些只是一个起点,绝不应该成为评估的最终资源。

Deductions:
扣除额:

Anything that is included beyond ONE A3 page will NOT be marked.
超出一张 A3 页的任何内容都不会被标记。

Qualitative Rubric (i.e. this is about the quality of your response)
定性评分标准(即这与您的回答质量有关)

Criteria
标准

No attempt (NA)
没有尝试(NA)

Unsatisfactory
不满意

Satisfactory
满意

Good
好的

Very Good
非常好

Excellent
出色的

PART 1
第 1 部分

Moral ‘Family Tree’ / Mind Map
道德“家谱” / 思维导图

4 marks
4分

NA

Minimal attempt, revealing little detail about core moral values and/or where they come from. Mind Map feels incomplete
最小的尝试,透露有关核心道德价值观和/或它们来自何处的很少细节。思维导图 感觉不完整

Mind Map feels complete: identifies some key core moral values. Simplistic or generalised identification of the sources of those values. Little use of other resources to develop section.
思维导图感觉很完整:确定了一些关键的核心道德价值观。对这些值的来源进行简单或概括的识别。很少使用其他资源来开发部分。

Mind Map identifies core moral values and some insight in identifying the source of those values. Demonstrates some use of readings or resources to develop ideas.
思维导图 确定核心道德价值观以及确定这些价值观来源的一些见解。展示如何使用阅读材料或资源来发展想法。

Detailed mind Map - identifies core moral values, and clear insight in identifying the source of those values. Perhaps demonstrating potential conflicts between the different sources of values. Good use of readings or resources to develop and support ideas.
详细思维导图 - 识别核心道德价值观,并清晰地洞察这些价值观的来源。也许展示了不同价值观来源之间的潜在冲突。充分利用阅读材料或资源来发展和支持想法。

Very detailed Mind Map (though with concise presentation). Excellent identification of core moral values and strong insight in identifying the source of those value. Reflection on the potential conflicts between the different sources of values. Good use of readings or resources to develop and support ideas.
非常详细的思维导图 (尽管有简洁的介绍)。对核心道德价值观的出色识别和识别这些价值观来源的深刻洞察力。反思不同价值观来源之间的潜在冲突。充分利用阅读材料或资源来发展和支持想法。

PART 2
第二部分

Professional Ethical Code
职业道德守则

3 marks
3分

NA

Ethical Code identified, but not summarised
道德准则已确定,但未总结

Ethical Code identified. Basic Summary that is perhaps focused on only one of core values and/or responsibilities
确定了道德准则。基本摘要可能仅关注其中一项核心价值观和/或责任

Ethical Code identified. Good Summary of core values and/or responsibilities (perhaps one is weaker than the other)
确定了道德准则。核心价值观和/或责任的良好总结(也许其中一个比另一个弱)

Clear and concise articulation of core values and responsibilities. Perhaps makes use of additional resources to critique summary.
清晰简洁地阐述核心价值观和责任。也许利用额外的资源来批评总结。

Strong and concise explanation of core values and responsibilities, perhaps reflecting on the philosophical source of these ideas. Perhaps makes use of additional resources.
对核心价值观和责任的有力而简洁的解释,也许反映了这些想法的哲学根源。也许利用额外的资源。

Part 3
第三部分

Ethical Dilemma
道德困境

Explanation of ethical dilemma
道德困境的解释

3 marks
3分

NA

Weak or incorrect identification of dilemma or situation in which it would arise
对可能出现的困境或情况的识别能力薄弱或不正确

Identifies ethical dilemma. Some description of situation that would arise. Vague details as to the personal vs professional conflict
识别道德困境。对可能出现的情况的一些描述。关于个人与职业冲突的模糊细节

Clearly outlines ethical dilemma, identifying situation in which it would arise, and clearly articulating the conflict between personal moral values and professional ethical code. Clear evidence of use of other resources to develop understanding
清楚地概述道德困境,确定出现这种困境的情况,并清楚地阐明个人道德价值观与职业道德准则之间的冲突。使用其他资源来增进理解的明确证据

Clear and concise articulation of ethical dilemma. Strong understanding of the nature of the conflict between personal moral values and professional ethical code. Good use of other resources to support discussion
清晰简洁地阐述了道德困境。对个人道德价值观与职业道德准则之间冲突的本质有深刻的理解。充分利用其他资源来支持讨论

Excellent articulation of ethical dilemma. Very strong understanding of the nature of the conflict between personal moral values and professional ethical code. Excellent use of other resources to support discussion and to demonstrate critical thinking about the situation
道德困境的完美阐述。对个人道德价值观与职业道德准则之间冲突的本质有非常深刻的理解。充分利用其他资源来支持讨论并展示对情况的批判性思维

Part 3
第三部分

Ethical Dilemma
道德困境

Resolution
解决

3 marks
3分

NA

Weak identification of possible resolution. Perhaps remains sitting on the fence, with no indication of why the decision was made
对可能解决方案的识别能力较弱。也许仍然持观望态度,没有任何迹象表明为什么做出这个决定

Identifies a possible resolution, offers some explanation for the decision made. Lacks links to readings/resources and/or theoretical content with regards to the decision made.
确定可能的解决方案,并对所做的决定提供一些解释。缺乏与所做决策相关的阅读材料/资源和/或理论内容的链接。

Good discussion of resolution of ethical dilemma. Offers an explanation and justification for the decision made. Uses resources/readings to support decision making. Demonstrates insight about the consequences of the decision made, predominantly focused on self
对解决道德困境的良好讨论。为所做出的决定提供解释和理由。使用资源/阅读材料来支持决策。表现出对所做决定的后果的洞察力,主要关注自我

Very good discussion of resolution of ethical dilemma. Offers a strong explanation and justification for the decision made. Uses resources/readings to support decision making. Demonstrates good insight about the consequences of the decision made for self, profession and/or others.
关于解决道德困境的很好的讨论。为所做的决定提供强有力的解释和理由。使用资源/阅读材料来支持决策。对自己、职业和/或他人所做的决定的后果表现出良好的洞察力。

Excellent discussion of resolution of ethical dilemma: critical thinking evident and concise presentation of a strong and insightful discussion. Offers a strong explanation and justification for the decision made. Strong awareness of the thinking behind the decision made, and that this is grounded/supported with academic literature. Strong insight into the consequences of the decision made for self, profession and/or others.
关于解决道德困境的精彩讨论:批判性思维明显且简洁地呈现出强有力且富有洞察力的讨论。为所做的决定提供强有力的解释和理由。对决策背后的思考有强烈的认识,并且这是有学术文献基础/支持的。对自己、职业和/或他人所做的决定的后果有深刻的洞察力。

Part 3
第三部分

Ethical Dilemma
道德困境

Reflections
反思

3 marks
3分

NA

Little reflection on the process of ethical decision making.
对道德决策过程的反思很少。

Demonstrates some insight into the process of ethical decision making
展示对道德决策过程的一些见解

Demonstrates good insight into the process of ethical decision making. Makes use of at least one resource to demonstrate idea development
对道德决策过程表现出良好的洞察力。利用至少一种资源来展示想法的发展

Demonstrates good insight into the process and experience of ethical decision making, Clearly articulates a sense of how this exercise might help them (or others) in the future. Evidence of reading and engagement with resources to develop and support discussion.
展示出对道德决策过程和经验的良好洞察力,清楚地阐明了这项练习在未来如何帮助他们(或其他人)。阅读和参与资源以发展和支持讨论的证据。

Excellent insight into, and critical thinking about, the process and experience of ethical decision making, Strong articulation of how this exercise might help them and others in the future. Evidence of reading and engagement with resources to develop and support discussion.
对道德决策的过程和经验有出色的洞察力和批判性思考,有力地阐明了这项练习如何在未来帮助他们和其他人。阅读和参与资源以发展和支持讨论的证据。

Presentation
推介会

2 marks
2分

Not a poster, and no awareness of audience
不是海报,也没有观众的意识

Overall poster design is confused and clumsily designed. There is no logical layout. Limited use of graphical elements
整体海报设计混乱且笨拙。没有逻辑布局。图形元素的有限使用

Acceptable evidence of care in terms of design and layout, but little evidence of planning or editing. Minimal effort to connect with audience. Uses low-quality images or graphics.
在设计和布局方面的精心设计的证据是可接受的,但规划或编辑的证据很少。与观众建立联系的努力最少。使用低质量的图像或图形。

Poster should be presented in an interesting and visually appealing manner. Information is presented in a logical sequence with some attempt at design. Graphical elements used to enhance and clarify the content.
海报应以有趣且具有视觉吸引力的方式呈现。信息以逻辑顺序呈现,并经过一些设计尝试。用于增强和阐明内容的图形元素。

A well-structured effort that makes an attempt to engage with an audience. Graphical elements used to bring topic to life
一种结构良好的努力,试图与观众互动。用于使主题栩栩如生的图形元素

Outstanding creativity and flair used to stimulate audience engagement. High quality graphical elements used to enhance the posters visual appeal and readability.
出色的创造力和才华用来激发观众的参与度。高品质的图形元素用于增强海报的视觉吸引力和可读性。

Referencing
参考文献

2 marks
2分

NA
不适用

No reference list OR NO in-text citations
没有参考列表或没有文本引用

Attempted but many error in either reference list or in-text citations
尝试过,但参考文献列表或文本引用中存在许多错误

Correct referencing style.
正确的引用风格。

Meets minimum reference requirements
满足最低参考要求

Correct referencing style, with minimal use of in-text citations
正确的引用风格,尽量减少文本内引用

Meets minimum reference requirements.
满足最低参考要求。

Extensive use of readings throughout the text. No problems with consistency of referencing style
全文广泛使用阅读材料。引用风格的一致性没有问题

Extensive list of readings. Strong presence of scholarly resources. Used effectively throughout the assessment, with consistency of style (no obvious problems).
广泛的阅读清单。学术资源雄厚。在整个评估过程中有效使用,风格一致(没有明显问题)。