The Breakpoint  断点

The Latest  最新

Five of the most interesting recent dev tool (or dev tool-adjacent) launches on the site. 
网站上有五款最近发布的最有趣的开发工具（或与开发工具相关的）新动态。

OpenAI's Responses API and Agents SDK give developers a new set of tools to build AI agents that can actually do things. The Responses API lets AI pull in outside info like web searches and file retrievals, while the Agents SDK helps manage workflows between multiple AI-powered agents.
OpenAI 的响应 API 和代理 SDK 为开发者提供了一套构建能够真正做事的 AI 代理的新工具。响应 API 允许 AI 获取外部信息，如网络搜索和文件检索，而代理 SDK 有助于管理多个 AI 代理之间的工作流程。

Taska is a Mac app designed to bring GitHub and GitLab issue tracking into a dedicated, native workspace. Instead of flipping between browser tabs, Taska keeps everything in one place, letting developers create, edit, and organize tasks more efficiently.
Taska 是一款 Mac 应用程序，旨在将 GitHub 和 GitLab 的问题跟踪功能引入一个专门的本地工作空间。无需在浏览器标签页之间切换，Taska 将所有内容集中在一个地方，让开发者能够更高效地创建、编辑和组织任务。

octal.email makes email testing painless by letting developers, marketers, and QA teams spin up temporary inboxes instantly. No more cluttering your actual email with test signups, password resets, or endless notifications—just quick, disposable addresses.
八进制电子邮件通过让开发者、营销人员和 QA 团队即时创建临时邮箱，使电子邮件测试变得轻松。不再用测试注册、密码重置或无尽的提醒来打扰你的实际邮箱——只需快速、可丢弃的地址。

BashBuddy is a command-line tool that translates plain English into bash or PowerShell commands, making terminal work easier for beginners and pros alike. It runs offline for privacy, but if you want faster processing, there is a $2 cloud option.
BashBuddy 是一款命令行工具，可以将普通英语翻译成 bash 或 PowerShell 命令，使终端工作对初学者和专业人士都更加容易。它离线运行以保护隐私，但如果您想要更快的处理速度，还有一个 2 美元的云端选项。

Aider is an AI pair programmer that works directly in your terminal, letting you edit code inside your local git repository without bouncing between tools. It supports multiple large language models, including Claude 3.5 Sonnet, DeepSeek R1, and GPT-4o.
Aider 是一款直接在您的终端中工作的 AI 代码伴侣，让您无需在工具之间切换即可在本地 git 仓库中编辑代码。它支持多个大型语言模型，包括 Claude 3.5 Sonnet、DeepSeek R1 和 GPT-4o。

Windsurf or Cursor?   风帆板还是光标？

Two AI-powered IDE’s are dominating the space right now, but what’s the difference?
目前有两款 AI 驱动的集成开发环境（IDE）在市场上占据主导地位，但它们之间有什么区别呢？

Developers used to rely on autocomplete, linters, and Copilot for small boosts, but AI-powered IDEs like Windsurf and Cursor are taking that a step further. Instead of just assisting, they’re actively shaping how code gets written.
开发者们过去依赖自动补全、代码检查器和 Copilot 来获得小幅度提升，但像 Windsurf 和 Cursor 这样的 AI 驱动 IDE 正在将这一步更进一步。它们不仅仅是协助，还在积极塑造代码的编写方式。

Both tools are built on top of VS Code and powered by Claude 3.5 Sonnet, but their approach is different. Windsurf automates more of the process, analyzing entire codebases and generating suggestions without much input. Cursor, on the other hand, gives developers more control, requiring manual context selection for AI assistance. One is streamlined, the other more customizable.
两款工具都基于 VS Code 构建，并由 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 驱动，但它们的处理方式不同。Windsurf 自动化更多流程，分析整个代码库并生成建议，无需太多输入。另一方面，Cursor 为开发者提供了更多控制，需要手动选择上下文以获取 AI 辅助。一个是流程化，另一个更可定制。

Some developers love Windsurf’s hands-off approach, where AI figures out what’s needed and just does it. Others prefer Cursor’s precision, even if it means a bit more setup. Pricing is similar, but the experience is not—Windsurf leans into automation, while Cursor caters to those who want AI as an assistant, not a replacement.
一些开发者喜欢 Windsurf 的无干预方法，其中 AI 会找出需要什么并直接完成。其他人更喜欢 Cursor 的精确度，即使这意味着需要更多设置。价格相似，但体验却不同——Windsurf 倾向于自动化，而 Cursor 迎合那些希望 AI 作为助手而非替代品的人。

The bigger question is how much control developers are willing to give up. If AI can handle the structure, refactoring, and even the debugging, does the role of a developer shift toward managing AI instead of writing code? And if so, which tool is better for that future?
更大的问题是开发者愿意放弃多少控制。如果 AI 可以处理结构、重构甚至调试，那么开发者的角色是否会转向管理 AI 而不是编写代码？如果是这样，那么哪个工具更适合那个未来？

Here’s what’s trending for developers 🔥 
开发者当前的热门趋势🔥

AI and no-code tools mean anyone can build something in minutes, so Alex, founder of Questflow, kicked off a debate: Does software still hold value, or is the real challenge everything that comes after?
人工智能和无代码工具意味着任何人都能在几分钟内构建出一些东西，因此 Questflow 创始人 Alex 开启了一场辩论：软件是否仍然具有价值，还是真正的挑战在于所有随之而来的事物？

Some takes from the discussion:
一些讨论摘录：

💬 Nika: If an app takes ten minutes to build instead of months, of course, it’s worth less. But now the real cost is in marketing, customer support, and actually getting people to use it.
💬 Nika：如果一个应用只需要十分钟而不是几个月来构建，当然，它的价值就降低了。但现在真正的成本在于市场营销、客户支持和实际上让人们使用它。

💬 Alan Rivera: No-code tools are great, but they’re not free. You’re swapping dev costs for a bunch of SaaS subscriptions that add up fast. Cheap at first, but not as cheap as it looks.
💬 阿兰·里维拉：无代码工具很棒，但它们不是免费的。你是在用开发成本换取一大堆快速累积的 SaaS 订阅，一开始看起来很便宜，但实际上并不便宜。

💬 Hussein: “SaaS tools feel like magic at first, then you check your billing statement and realize you’re basically funding their Series A.”
💬 胡森：“一开始觉得 SaaS 工具就像魔法一样，然后你查看你的账单，才发现你基本上是在为他们提供 A 轮融资。”

So, is software turning into a commodity, or is building just the easy part now?
所以，软件正在变成一种商品，还是现在构建只是容易的部分？