View Letter 查看信件

Manuscript number: ATE-D-24-04593
手稿编号ATE-D-24-04593
Numerical and Experimental Study on Manifold-Distributed Jet Microchannel With Micro-pin-fins
带微针鳍的漫射分布式射流微通道的数值和实验研究

Dear Professor Wei, 尊敬的魏教授

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Applied Thermal Engineering.
感谢您向《应用热能工程》投稿。

We have completed our evaluation of your manuscript and a summary of comments is appended below this message. The reviewers recommend reconsideration of your manuscript following major revision.
我们已完成对您稿件的评审，评审意见摘要附于本邮件之后。审稿人建议对您的稿件进行重大修改后重新审议。

We invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing the comments below. Please resubmit your revised manuscript by Sep 12, 2024.
我们邀请您在处理完以下意见后重新提交稿件。请在2024 年 9 月 12 日之前重新提交修改后的稿件。

When revising your manuscript, please carefully consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments, outline every change made point by point, and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed.
在修改稿件时，请仔细考虑审稿人意见中提到的所有问题，逐点概述所做的每一处修改，并对未涉及的意见提出适当的反驳。

To submit your revised manuscript, please log in as an author at https://www.editorialmanager.com/ate/ and navigate to the "Submissions Needing Revision" folder.
要提交修改后的稿件，请以作者身份登录 https://www.editorialmanager.com/ate/，并导航至 "需要修改的稿件 "文件夹。

Applied Thermal Engineering values your contribution and we look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
《应用热能工程》重视您的贡献，我们期待收到您的修订稿。

Yours sincerely, 此致敬礼
Christos Markides 克里斯托斯-马尔基迪斯
Editor-in-Chief 主编
Applied Thermal Engineering
应用热能工程

Editor and reviewer comments (if applicable):
编辑和审稿人意见（如适用）：



Editorial Comments- 编辑评论
1. Each 'Highlight' should be limited to a maximum of 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point, and should state clearly the novel outcomes of the study (and not what has been done).
1.每个 "亮点 "应限制在最多 85 个字符（包括空格），并应清楚地说明研究的新成果（而 不是已经做了什么）。
2. Avoid using abbreviations in the Title, Highlights, Abstract and Conclusions.
2.避免在标题、要点、摘要和结论中使用缩写。
3. Manuscripts submitted to ATE are expected to communicate information clearly and concisely. Consider how your manuscript can be shortened and made more focused.
3.提交给 ATE 的稿件应简明扼要地传达信息。请考虑如何缩短您的稿件并使其重点更加突出。
4. Manuscripts submitted to ATE are expected to be written in good English and proof-read carefully to ensure that research is communicated clearly. It is suggested that professional editing services should be used; see the following site:
4.提交给 ATE 的稿件应使用流利的英语撰写，并经过仔细校对，以确保研究内容表达清晰。建议使用专业编辑服务；请参阅以下网站：
http://webshop.elsevier.com/languageservices/languageediting/?gclid=CNvjjJPwv9MCFQe2wAod01AM7A
5. The Abstract should contain answers to the following questions: What problem was studied and why is it important? What methods were used? What are the important results? What conclusions can be drawn from the results? What is the novelty of the work and where does it go beyond previous efforts in the literature? Please include specific and quantitative results in your Abstract, while ensuring that it is suitable for a broad audience. References, figures, tables, equations and abbreviations should be avoided.
5.摘要应包含对以下问题的回答：研究了什么问题，为什么这个问题很重要？使用了哪些方法？有哪些重要结果？从结果中可以得出什么结论？这项工作的新颖之处是什么？请在摘要中列出具体的量化结果，同时确保摘要适合广大读者阅读。应避免使用参考文献、图、表、公式和缩写。
6. The originality of the paper needs to be stated clearly. It is of importance to have sufficient results to justify the novelty of a high-quality journal paper. The Introduction should make a compelling case for why the study is useful along with a clear statement of its novelty or originality by providing relevant information and providing answers to basic questions such as: What is already known in the open literature? What is missing (i.e., research gaps)? What needs to be done, why and how? Clear statements of the novelty of the work should also appear briefly in the Abstract and Conclusions sections.
6.需要明确说明论文的原创性。重要的是要有足够的结果来证明高质量期刊论文的新颖性。引言应通过提供相关信息和回答基本问题（如：公开文献中已经知道了什么？公开文献中已有哪些内容？还缺少什么（即研究空白）？需要做什么，为什么以及如何做？还应在摘要和结论部分简要说明工作的新颖性。
7. An updated and complete literature review should be conducted and should appear as part of the Introduction, while bearing in mind the work’s relevance to ATE and taking into account the scope and readership of the journal. In this regard, it is suggested to include relevant articles published in ATE.
7.应进行最新和完整的文献综述，并将其作为引言的一部分，同时铭记作品与 ATE 的相关性，并考虑到期刊的范围和读者群。在这方面，建议纳入 ATE 发表的相关文章。
8. The description of each symbol (e.g., after each equation) may be avoided if a Nomenclature is provided, otherwise, all symbols should be clearly defined at the first instance of appearance in the manuscript.
8.如果提供了术语表，则可避免对每个符号进行说明（如在每个方程后），否则，所有符号应在稿件中首次出现时明确定义。

Note: Authors may use their discretion to cite only those references (that some reviewers have suggested) that may improve quality and impact of their paper.
注：作者可自行决定只引用（某些审稿人建议的）可提高论文质量和影响力的参考文献。



Reviewer #1: The paper and the study are very well conducted and I only have a few suggestions/comments as listed below
审稿人 1：这篇论文和研究进行得非常好，我只有以下几点建议/意见

Reduce the size of highlights to 125 characters each including spaces
将重点内容的大小减至 125 个字符（包括空格）。
Abstract reads as introduction, shorten it and be to the point. What you have done, how you have done and what are the key findings.
摘要就像导言一样，缩短它，直奔主题。你做了什么，如何做的，主要发现是什么。
In Fig 11, the Nu number remains the same for different diameters however, the PEC changes drastically, can the authors explain why?
在图 11 中，不同直径的 Nu 数保持不变，但 PEC 却发生了巨大变化，作者能否解释其中的原因？
Fig 12, can the authors superimpose contour lines on the colour maps so that it is easier to see the recirculation regions for different diameter cases
图 12，作者能否在彩色图上叠加等高线，以便更容易看到不同直径情况下的再循环区域？
Fig 13, PS 300-0.6 shows the best Nu number, why did the authors not try to increase the height to see if additional increase in Nu will take place or not
图 13，PS 300-0.6 显示了最佳 Nu 值，为什么作者不尝试增加高度，看看 Nu 值是否会有额外的增加？
Conclusions need to be shortened.
结论需要缩短。



Reviewer #2: Review of "Numerical and Experimental Study on Manifold-Distributed Jet Microchannel With Micro-pin-fins"
审稿人 #2："带微针鳍的漫射分布式射流微通道的数值和实验研究 "综述
The manuscript is well-structured and presents a significant advancement in the field of thermal management for high-power chips. The combination of manifold microchannels, distributed jets, and micro-pin-fins is innovative and shows promise for improving heat transfer performance. The study is thorough and scientifically rigorous, with detailed methodologies and comprehensive data analysis. The findings have potential implications for the design of more efficient heat sinks in the future.
该手稿结构合理，在大功率芯片热管理领域取得了重大进展。将多歧管微通道、分布式喷流和微型插针鳍片结合在一起是一种创新，有望提高热传导性能。这项研究深入透彻、科学严谨，采用了详细的方法和全面的数据分析。研究结果对未来设计更高效的散热器具有潜在影响。
The experimental and numerical methodologies are detailed and well-organized. The parameters for simulations and experiments are clearly listed, and the experimental setup is well-documented. The experimental setup is well-designed, with appropriate control measures to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results. The comparison between numerical and experimental results shows good agreement, validating the simulation model.
实验和数值方法详细且条理清晰。清楚地列出了模拟和实验的参数，并详细记录了实验装置。实验装置设计合理，有适当的控制措施来确保结果的准确性和可靠性。数值结果和实验结果的对比显示出良好的一致性，验证了模拟模型。

1. How sensitive are the results to changes in the geometric parameters of the micro-pin-fins and jet holes? Have you explored a wide enough range of these parameters to ensure the robustness of your findings?
1.结果对微针鳍和喷射孔几何参数变化的敏感度如何？您是否对这些参数进行了足够广泛的研究，以确保研究结果的稳健性？
2. How scalable is the proposed heat sink design for different chip sizes and power levels? Have you conducted any preliminary studies on larger or smaller chips?
2.针对不同芯片尺寸和功率水平，建议的散热器设计的可扩展性如何？你们是否对更大或更小的芯片进行过初步研究？
3. What challenges do you foresee in the practical implementation of the proposed heat sink design in commercial applications? Are there any manufacturing constraints that need to be addressed?
3.您预计在商业应用中实际实施拟议的散热器设计会遇到哪些挑战？是否存在需要解决的制造限制？
4. How does the performance of the proposed heat sink compare with other advanced cooling technologies currently available? Can you provide a quantitative comparison in terms of key performance metrics like thermal resistance and pressure drop?
4.拟议散热器的性能与现有的其他先进冷却技术相比如何？能否提供热阻和压降等关键性能指标的量化比较？




Reviewer #3: 3 号审查员：
I have outlined my feedback below. Please consider these comments to enhance the quality and impact of your manuscript.
我的反馈意见概述如下。请考虑这些意见，以提高稿件的质量和影响力。
1. The originality of the paper needs to be further clarified in the Abstract.
1.论文的原创性需要在摘要中进一步说明。
2. The necessity and innovation of the article should be presented to the introduction.
2.文章的必要性和创新性应在引言中提出。
3. How were the range of parameters selected in the current study?
3.当前研究中的参数范围是如何选定的？
4. All Equations require a valid reference.
4.所有方程都需要一个有效的参照。
5. How did you choose the boundary conditions?
5.你是如何选择边界条件的？
6. What are the limitations of this study? I recommend the authors to highlight this topic.
6.这项研究有哪些局限性？我建议作者突出这一主题。
7. The quality of all the figures should be improved.
7.应提高所有数字的质量。
8. I have not found the very important part on the experimental side, which is uncertainty. Please do that and add it to the manuscript.
8.我还没有找到实验方面非常重要的部分，即不确定性。请将其添加到手稿中。
9. Why is there no comparison with previous studies? The comparison with previous studies provide more confident, so I suggested to conduct compared the results of the current study with previous studies (at least one study).
9.为什么没有与以前的研究进行比较？与以前的研究进行比较更有把握，因此我建议将本次研究的结果与以前的研究（至少一项研究）进行比较。
10. The results interpretation is not fully clear, and the obtained results should be explained appropriately.
10.结果解释不完全清楚，应适当解释所获得的结果。
11. It is suggested to add a nomenclature (including alphabetic letters, Greek letters, subscripts, and superscripts).
11.建议增加术语表（包括字母、希腊字母、下标和上标）。
12. How did you develop the correlation equations? What are the limitations of these equations?
12.你是如何建立相关方程的？这些方程有哪些局限性？
13. To assess the effectiveness of developed correlation equations in the current study, statistical tests and acceptance criteria for developed equations such as F-value, t-test, Chi-square, and P-value must be conducted.
13.为了评估本研究中已开发相关方程的有效性，必须对已开发方程进行统计检验和验收标准，如 F 值、t 检验、Chi-square 和 P 值。
14. The conclusion section is written in an unconventional way. It is recommended to add some suggestions for future works in this area to improve the conclusion.
14.结论部分的写法不合常规。建议为这一领域的未来工作添加一些建议，以完善结论。



Reviewer #4: This manuscript presents an experimental and numerical study to investigate the thermohydraulic performance of manifold microchannel heat sink that couples a manifold inlet and outlet structure, distributed jet impingement, and micro-pin-fins. The scientific soundness of the work is good. Some comments are as follows:
审稿人 4：本手稿通过实验和数值研究，探讨了将多歧管入口和出口结构、分布式射流撞击和微针鳍片结合在一起的多歧管微通道散热器的热流体力学性能。这项工作的科学性良好。以下是一些评论意见：

1- The abstract is overly long. I suggest the authors condense it to enhance clarity and conciseness while maintaining its comprehensiveness.
1- 摘要过长。我建议作者在保持全面性的同时，对摘要进行压缩，使其更加简洁明了。
2- There is a typo in Table 1 for the chip area unit.
2- 表 1 中的芯片面积单位有一个错字。
3- Can you specify the types of sensors used and the accuracy of each one?
3- 能否说明所用传感器的类型以及每个传感器的精度？
4- Would it be good to perform and present uncertainty analysis to convince the reliability of experimental measurement?
4- 能否进行不确定性分析并提交分析结果，以证明实验测量的可靠性？
5- Make sure the numbering of each section is correct.
5- 确保每个部分的编号正确无误。
6- To enhance the validation section, please consider adding the experimental and numerical pressure drop values.
6- 为加强验证部分，请考虑添加实验和数值压降值。




More information and support
更多信息和支持
FAQ: How do I revise my submission in Editorial Manager?
常见问题：如何在编辑管理器中修改我的投稿？
https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/28463/supporthub/publishing
FAQ: How can I reset a forgotten password?
常见问题：如何重置遗忘的密码？
https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/28452/supporthub/publishing/
For further assistance, please visit our customer service site: https://service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/publishing/
如需更多帮助，请访问我们的客户服务网站： https://service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/publishing/
Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions, and learn more about Editorial Manager via interactive tutorials. You can also talk 24/7 to our customer support team by phone and 24/7 by live chat and email
在这里，您可以搜索各种主题的解决方案，找到常见问题的答案，并通过互动教程了解更多有关编辑管理器的信息。您还可以通过电话、即时聊天和电子邮件与我们的客户支持团队进行全天候交流。



At Elsevier, we want to help all our authors to stay safe when publishing. Please be aware of fraudulent messages requesting money in return for the publication of your paper. If you are publishing open access with Elsevier, bear in mind that we will never request payment before the paper has been accepted. We have prepared some guidelines (https://www.elsevier.com/connect/authors-update/seven-top-tips-on-stopping-apc-scams ) that you may find helpful, including a short video on Identifying fake acceptance letters (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5l8thD9XtE ). Please remember that you can contact Elsevier s Researcher Support team (https://service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/publishing/) at any time if you have questions about your manuscript, and you can log into Editorial Manager to check the status of your manuscript (https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/29155/c/10530/supporthub/publishing/kw/status/).
在爱思唯尔，我们希望帮助所有作者在发表论文时保持安全。请注意那些以发表论文为由索要报酬的欺诈性信息。如果您在爱思唯尔发表开放存取论文，请记住我们绝不会在论文被接受之前要求付款。我们准备了一些指南 (https://www.elsevier.com/connect/authors-update/seven-top-tips-on-stopping-apc-scams )，其中包括一个关于识别虚假录用信的视频短片 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5l8thD9XtE )，您可能会发现对您有所帮助。请记住，如果您对稿件有任何疑问，可以随时联系爱思唯尔研究人员支持团队 (https://service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/publishing/)，也可以登录编辑管理器查看稿件状态 (https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/29155/c/10530/supporthub/publishing/kw/status/)。