这是用户在 2025-4-14 15:58 为 https://www.wsj.com/economy/us-manufacturing-decline-service-economy-ee97a1e2?mod=hp_lead_pos4 保存的双语快照页面,由 沉浸式翻译 提供双语支持。了解如何保存?
  • Conversation
  • What To Read Next

How the U.S. Lost Its Place as the World’s Manufacturing Powerhouse

Trump says his tariff plan will restore American manufacturing might but economists are skeptical

A person viewing a Diego Rivera mural depicting industrial workers.
A Diego Rivera mural in Detroit depicts industrial workers in the American automaking capital. Photo: Andrew Burton/Getty Images

April 13, 2025 8:00 pm ET

In the 1950s, around 35% of private-sector jobs in the U.S. were in manufacturing. Today, there are 12.8 million manufacturing jobs in the U.S., an amount equal to 9.4% of those private-sector jobs.

President Trump says his sweeping tariff regime is aimed at bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. Economists are skeptical that tariffs could make that a reality, and worry that the damage they create will outweigh any benefits.

To understand whether restoring manufacturing to the U.S. is possible, it helps to first understand how the U.S. lost its place as the world’s manufacturing powerhouse.

The rise of U.S. manufacturing

America’s rise to becoming a global manufacturing juggernaut was driven by a confluence of factors.

In the early 1900s, the U.S. pioneered the use of interchangeable parts and organizing factors for mass production. World War II prompted a massive increase in manufacturing capacity, while also devastating competitors, points out Case Western Reserve University economist Susan Helper.

In the postwar years, more Americans joined the middle class, driving jumps in spending on long-lasting durable goods, like the cars and appliances for their newly purchased homes. America was America’s best customer for manufactured goods.

Advertisement

Many of these goods were high tech for the time, such as dishwashers, televisions and jets, often brought about by the host of innovations developed during the war. Making them in America, as opposed to some other country, made sense because staying on the leading edge required research and development teams working closely with the factory floor.

It helped, too, that thanks to the high-school education movement that began in the early 20th century, the U.S. had the most educated workforce in the world.

Services take the wheel

After the 1950s, manufacturing’s role in the U.S. economy began to slip. Some of this came about merely because Americans were becoming more affluent, and devoting more of their spending to services, such as travel, restaurants and medical care.

“You get richer, you can only buy so many cars, and you start buying services,” explained Helper.

The jobs followed the spending, with more people going to work for service-sector employers such as hotels, banks, law firms and hospitals. There were ups and downs with recessions and recoveries, but from the mid-1960s through the early 1980s, manufacturing employment essentially leveled off, as services jobs grew and grew.

A North Carolina textile mill in 1960.
A North Carolina textile mill in 1960, when U.S. manufacturing was still dominant. Photo: Billy E. Barnes/FPG/Getty Images

Under the hood, there were also shifts in where many of the nondurable goods Americans bought, such as clothing, were made. A lot of production shifted to states in the South, where labor costs were lower.

Advertisement

Around this time, less developed parts of the world, where labor costs were much lower, began dialing up manufacturing of nondurable goods in Latin America and Asia. The U.S. started importing more and more of those items. Over time, the same thing happened with light durable items, such as blenders.

China shock

In the 1980s, things began to change. American manufacturers of nondurable goods had an increasingly difficult time competing with countries where labor costs were lower. That intensified in the 1990s, in part as a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement lowering duties on Mexican goods.

There were also job losses at steel producers after developing countries such as South Korea built up their steel industries and left the world awash in excess capacity, points out Susan Houseman, an economist at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

But what happened in the 1980s and 1990s pales in comparison to what happened after China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, opening its country to foreign investment and gaining access to global markets. 

Advertisement

“All of a sudden we have substantial production capacity in a low-wage country, and that was a major shift,” said Harvard University economist Gordon Hanson.

The U.S. had faced import competition from other countries before, but never one that dwarfed its population. And it came on the scene much faster than places like Japan had. In 1999, the value of Chinese goods exports came to only about a tenth of U.S.’s—less than Sweden’s. In 2008, it would surpass the U.S. as the world’s top exporter of goods.

Manufacturers of low-tech items such as furniture and small household appliances, in particular, suffered. Hanson, with David Autor and David Dorn, documented how the influx of inexpensive Chinese goods afflicted manufacturing communities in the South and Midwest, hurting workers. They called it the China Shock, and the name has stuck.

Where we are now

As China produced more and more stuff, America became even more adept at producing services.

Many of these can’t be traded globally: Somebody in London can’t easily go to a dentist in San Diego. But some, like software and other intellectual property items, can. In 2023, the U.S. exported $24 billion in advertising services, for example. 

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Should the U.S. strive to become a manufacturing powerhouse again? Join the conversation below.

The U.S. now exports in excess of $1 trillion-worth of services—far more than any other country. Moreover, America’s services exports are undercounted as a result of companies moving overseas the rights to intellectual property developed in the U.S.—like patents and trademarks—for tax purposes. (Ireland, a prime destination for those rights, is counted as the world’s fourth-largest services exporter.)

In new research, Hanson and Enrico Moretti find that in 1980 manufacturing accounted for 39% of the U.S. jobs where workers earned high wages (after adjusting for factors such as education). By 2021 that had dropped to 20%. Over the same period, the share of high-paying jobs in the finance, professional and legal industries jumped from 8% to 26%.

Can manufacturing come back?

As a group, economists have been arguing against the wide use of tariffs for hundreds of years, and that is not about to change. As they see it, the higher prices that consumers and businesses pay will end up cutting into spending on other goods and services—including ones made in the U.S. This would more than swallow up any benefits from increased domestic production and government revenues, so while some manufacturers might benefit, most Americans would be worse off. 

Even a 30% increase in manufacturing jobs would only bring manufacturing’s share of private employment up to about 12%, notes Hanson—far lower than it once was.

Advertisement

Upjohn’s Houseman points out that manufacturing jobs generate other jobs in ways that others don’t. And she is part of a growing number of economists who argue that the U.S. should invest in making more of some things here, even though there are costs to doing that—but in a more targeted way than through the broad application of tariffs. 

Increasing domestic production of high-tech goods such as semiconductors is an example, not just for the jobs that might create, she said, but for economic and military security reasons. That argument doesn’t hold for many low-cost goods.

“Do we want to start producing our own T-shirts again?” Houseman said. “How important is that?”

Write to Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com

Advertisement

Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Appeared in the April 14, 2025, print edition as 'How the U.S. Slipped From Top Manufacturing Perch'.