Criteria
标准

Exceeds expectations
超出预期

Meets expectations
符合预期

Approaching expectations
接近预期

Does not meet expectations
未达到预期

Weight
重量

Total
总

Summary and source
摘要和来源

5

4

3

0-2

1

3

All main ideas and facts from the article are included. Summary is presented in objective view and referencing to the article is provided. Citation and reference follow APA format exactly.
包括文章中的所有主要思想和事实。摘要以客观的方式呈现，并提供了对文章的引用。引文和参考文献完全遵循 APA 格式。

Most of the main ideas and facts from the article are included. Summary is presented in objective view and referencing to the article is provided. Citation and reference follow APA format mostly with few minor mistakes.
文章中的大部分主要思想和事实都包括在内。摘要以客观的方式呈现，并提供了对文章的引用。引文和参考文献大多遵循 APA 格式，几乎没有小错误。

Some details from article are missing. Summary is not objective OR minimal referencing to the article is provided. Citation and reference do not follow APA format exactly.
文章中的一些细节缺失。摘要不客观或提供了对文章的最少引用。引文和参考文献不完全遵循 APA 格式。

No summary is provided OR a verbatim of the text is provided. Reference is not included.
没有提供摘要或逐字记录。不包括参考。

3

Analysis of technological aspects
技术方面分析

5

4

3

0-2

2

6

Journal demonstrates deep synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Careful attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances.
Journal 展示了对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的技术方面的深入综合和分析。仔细关注并思考技术必要性/可供性。

Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Some attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances
期刊展示了对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的技术方面的充分综合和分析。对技术必要性/可供性的一些关注和思考

Journal contains limited synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Limited attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances.
期刊包含对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的技术方面的有限综合和分析。对技术必要性/可供性的关注和思考有限。

Journal lacks synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Lack of attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances.
期刊缺乏对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的技术方面的综合和分析。缺乏对技术必要性/可供性的关注和思考。

2

Analysis of pedagogical aspects
教学方面分析

5

4

3

0-2

2

6

Journal demonstrates deep synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Careful attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse).
期刊展示了对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的教学方面的深入综合和分析。仔细关注和思考任务设计模式（建立实践、批判性辨别和建立情境话语）。

Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Some attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse).
期刊展示了对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的教学方面的充分综合和分析。对任务设计模式（建立实践、批判性辨别和建立情境话语）进行一些关注和思考。

Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Limited attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse).
期刊展示了对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的教学方面的充分综合和分析。对任务设计模式（建立实践、批判性辨别和建立情境话语）的关注和思考有限。

Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Lack of attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse).
期刊展示了对文章中描述的与本周主题相关的任务的教学方面的充分综合和分析。缺乏对任务设计模式（建立实践、批判性辨别和建立情境话语）的关注和思考。

2

Analysis and rationale for the technology-based task
基于技术的任务的分析和基本原理

5

4

3

0-2

2

6

Response provides clear and thoughtful description of the planning and development of the task with very strong justification based on the analysis of research and pedagogical articles
响应对任务的规划和开发进行了清晰而周到的描述，并根据对研究和教学文章的分析提供了非常有力的理由

Response provides adequate description of the planning and development of the task with reasonable justification related to the analysis of research and pedagogical articles.
回复 提供了对任务的规划和开发的充分描述，并提供了与研究和教学文章分析相关的合理理由。

Response provides incomplete description of the planning and development of the task with justification somewhat related to the analysis of research and pedagogical articles.
响应对任务的规划和开发提供了不完整的描述，其理由与研究和教学文章的分析有些关系。

Response lacks description of planning or development of the task. Justification is not provided or not related to the analysis of research and pedagogical articles.
响应缺少对任务的规划或开发的描述。没有提供理由或与研究和教学文章的分析无关。

2

Writing Quality
写作质量

5

4

3

0-2

1

3

Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.
使用标准英语写得很好，组织清晰，特点是强烈的写作风格元素，基本上没有语法、标点符号、用法和拼写错误。

Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
高于平均水平的写作风格，使用标准英语进行逻辑组织，在语法、标点符号、用法和拼写方面有轻微错误。

Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
平均和/或随意的写作风格，有时不清楚和/或在语法、标点符号、用法和拼写方面存在一些错误。

Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.
写作风格不佳，缺乏标准英语、清晰度、使用的语言和/或语法、标点符号、用法和拼写经常错误。需要工作。

3

TOTAL
总

Grade calculations: Total/8 = _3_ /5
成绩计算：总计/8 = _3_ /5

24/40