Online Journal Rubric
在线期刊评分量规
Criteria | Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Approaching expectations | Does not meet expectations | Weight | Total | |||
Summary and source | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0-2 | 1 | 3 | |||
All main ideas and facts from the article are included. Summary is presented in objective view and referencing to the article is provided. Citation and reference follow APA format exactly. | Most of the main ideas and facts from the article are included. Summary is presented in objective view and referencing to the article is provided. Citation and reference follow APA format mostly with few minor mistakes. | Some details from article are missing. Summary is not objective OR minimal referencing to the article is provided. Citation and reference do not follow APA format exactly. | No summary is provided OR a verbatim of the text is provided. Reference is not included. | 3 | |||||
Analysis of technological aspects | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0-2 | 2 | 6 | |||
Journal demonstrates deep synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Careful attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances. | Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Some attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances | Journal contains limited synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Limited attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances. | Journal lacks synthesis and analysis of the technological aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Lack of attention and thinking about technological essentiality/affordances. | 2 | |||||
Analysis of pedagogical aspects | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0-2 | 2 | 6 | |||
Journal demonstrates deep synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Careful attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse). | Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Some attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse). | Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Limited attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse). | Journal demonstrates adequate synthesis and analysis of the pedagogical aspects of the tasks described in the article in relation to the week’s topic. Lack of attention and thinking about task design modes (establishing practices, critical discernment, and establishing situated discourse). | 2 | |||||
Analysis and rationale for the technology-based task | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0-2 | 2 | 6 | |||
Response provides clear and thoughtful description of the planning and development of the task with very strong justification based on the analysis of research and pedagogical articles | Response provides adequate description of the planning and development of the task with reasonable justification related to the analysis of research and pedagogical articles. | Response provides incomplete description of the planning and development of the task with justification somewhat related to the analysis of research and pedagogical articles. | Response lacks description of planning or development of the task. Justification is not provided or not related to the analysis of research and pedagogical articles. | 2 | |||||
Writing Quality | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0-2 | 1 | 3 | |||
Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. | Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. | Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. | Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. | 3 | |||||
TOTAL Grade calculations: Total/8 = _3_ /5 | 24/40 |
Focus more on specific strategies to help teachers in rural areas effectively integrate technology. Discussing potential barriers and offering solutions would provide a more comprehensive analysis.
更多地关注帮助农村地区教师有效整合技术的具体策略。讨论潜在障碍并提供解决方案将提供更全面的分析。