这是用户在 2024-11-23 23:02 为 https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/issues/1328 保存的双语快照页面,由 沉浸式翻译 提供双语支持。了解如何保存?
Skip to content

OpenID Connect support #1328

Closed
niwla23 opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

OpenID Connect support #1328

niwla23 opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@niwla23

niwla23 commented Mar 15, 2021

添加 OIDC 支持将允许使用像 keycloak 这样的集中身份验证。我指的不是公共 OIDC 身份验证,而是需要在消费者和提供商上配置的机密身份验证
Adding OIDC support would allow to use central authentication like keycloak. I don't mean the public OIDC auth, but the confidential one that needs to be configured on consumer and provider

@alvaroaleman

Contributor

You can already do this today with an auth proxy like e.G. oauth2-proxy and the proxy auth method. Be aware that this currently breaks shares, xref #1316

@o1egl

Member

o1egl commented Mar 20, 2021

We not going to implement native oauth/openid support. As mentioned you can use a proxy for that. This feature might be a part of the next major release

@o1egl o1egl closed this as completed Mar 20, 2021
@guitarzero

You can already do this today with an auth proxy like e.G. oauth2-proxy and the proxy auth method. Be aware that this currently breaks shares, xref #1316

According to this xref, and since 21 march 2021, shares are no more broken (not tested) in version v2.14.1

@melaniestnls

You can already do this today with an auth proxy like e.G. oauth2-proxy and the proxy auth method. Be aware that this currently breaks shares, xref #1316

Hello, I have a question. I am trying to implement this solution, with filebrowser running as a service in a kube cluster. I am stuck on configuring proxy authentication. Is it possible to implement this authentication method using a configuration file instead of the command line?

@xiaoxuan010

Add a comment

Select a reply

Loading
Slash commands
Preview
Loading
Slash commands
Preview

An unexpected error has occurred

Remember, contributions to this repository should follow its security policy.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants